Disability is an underexplored topic in discourse analysis. A stronger emphasis on disability issues would be in keeping with the academic principles and political priorities of critical discourse analysis. Simultaneously, a discourse analysis perspective is needed in disability studies. Although that field has produced a considerable amount of discourse-oriented research, it is structured around theoretical models that appear adversarial and incompatible. In practice, many of the incompatibilities dissolve into divisions between different areas of discourse production. A greater awareness of discourse analysis will aid disability studies, both in terms of theoretical development and in furthering its goals of social change.
Antonetta S. ( 2005) A Mind Apart: Travels in a Neurodiverse World. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/ Penguin.
2.
Barne- og likestillingsdepartementet (2008 ) Om lov om forbud mot diskriminering på grunn av nedsatt funksjonsevne (diskriminerings- og tilgjengelighetsloven). B.-o. likestillingsdepartementet (ed.). Oslo: Barne- og likestillingsdepartementet.
3.
Barnes C., Mercer G. and Shakespeare T. ( 1999) Exploring Disability: A Sociological Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4.
Breivik J-K. ( 2007) Døv identitet i endring: lokale liv - globale bevegelser . Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
5.
Colker R. ( 2005) The Disability Pendulum: The First Decade of the Americans with Disabilities Act. New York: New York University Press.
6.
Corker M. and French S. ( 1999) Disability Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.
7.
Davis LJ ( 2002) Bending Over Backwards: Disability, Dismodernism, and Other Difficult Positions. New York: New York University Press.
8.
Davis LJ ( 2006) The Disability Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.
Garland-Thomson R. ( 1996) Freakery: Cultural Spectacles of the Extraordinary Body . New York: New York University Press.
11.
Garland-Thomson R. ( 2009) Staring: How We Look. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
Gleeson B. ( 1999) Recovering a ‘subjugated history’: Disability and the institution in the industrial city. Australian Geographical Studies37: 114-129.
13.
Gleeson B. ( 2001a) Disability and the open city. Urban Studies38: 251-265.
14.
Gleeson B. ( 2001b) Domestic space and disability in nineteenth-century Melbourne, Australia. Journal of Historical Geography27: 223-240.
15.
Goffman E. ( 1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
16.
Grue J. ( 2009) Critical discourse analysis, topoi and mystification: Disability policy documents from a Norwegian NGO. Discourse Studies11: 285-308.
17.
Houck DW and Kiewe A. ( 2003) FDR’s Body Politics: The Rhetoric of Disability . College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.
18.
Imrie R. ( 1996) Disability and the City: International Perspectives. New York: St Martin’s Press.
19.
Imrie R. ( 2001) Barriered and bounded places and the spatialities of disability . Urban Studies38: 231-237.
20.
Imrie R. and Kumar M. ( 1998) Focusing on disability and access in the built environment . Disability and Society13: 357-374.
21.
Kleege G. ( 2006) Blind Rage: Letters to Helen Keller. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
22.
Kohrman M. ( 2005) Bodies of Difference: Experiences of Disability and Institutional Advocacy in the Making of Modern China. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
23.
Krieger LH ( 2003) Backlash Against the ADA: Reinterpreting Disability Rights . Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
24.
Kristiansen K., Vehmas S. and Shakespeare T. ( 2009) Arguing about Disability: Philosophical Perspectives. London and New York: Routledge .
25.
Livingston J. ( 2005) Debility and the Moral Imagination in Botswana. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
26.
Lombardo PA ( 2008) Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
Longmore PK ( 2003) Why I Burned my Book and Other Essays on Disability. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
28.
Oliver M. ( 1990) The Politics of Disablement, Critical Texts in Social Work and the Welfare State. London: Macmillan Press.
29.
Oliver M. ( 1992) Changing the social relations of research production. Disability, Handicap and Society7: 101-114.
30.
Oliver M. ( 1996a) Defining impairment and disability: Issues at stake. In: Barnes C and Mercer G (eds) Exploring the Divide. Leeds: The Disability Press, 29-54.
31.
Oliver M. ( 1996b) A sociology of disability or a disablist sociology? In: Barton L (ed.) Disability and Society: Emerging Issues and Insights. London: Longman , 18-42.
32.
Oliver M. ( 1996c) Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. New York: St Martins Press.
33.
Petryna A. ( 2002) Life Exposed: Biological Citizens after Chernobyl. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
Samaha AM ( 2007) What good is the social model of disability? University of Chicago Law Review74: 1251-1308.
35.
Schweik SM ( 2009) The American Ugly Laws. New York: New York University Press.
36.
Shakespeare T. ( 2006) Disability Rights and Wrongs. London : Routledge.
37.
Shakespeare T., Davies D. and Gillespie-Sells K. ( 1996) The Sexual Politics of Disability: Untold Desires. London: Cassell.
38.
Sheldon A., Traustadóttir R., Beresford P., Boxall K. and Oliver M. ( 2007) Disability rights and wrongs? Disability and Society22: 209-234.
39.
Siebers T. ( 2008) Disability Theory. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
40.
Siebers T. ( 2010) Disability Aesthetics. Ann Arbor, MI : University of Michigan Press.
41.
Snyder SL and Mitchell DT ( 2000) Narrative Prosthesis: Disability and the Dependencies of Discourse. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
42.
Snyder SL and Mitchell DT ( 2006) Cultural Locations of Disability. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43.
Stiker H.-J (1999[1982]) A History of Disability. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
44.
Stone DA ( 1984) The Disabled State. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
45.
Thomas C. ( 1999) Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability . Buckingham: Open University Press .
46.
Tremain S. ( 2005) Foucault and the Government of Disability. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
47.
Tøssebro J. ( 2004) Understanding disability. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research6: 3-7.
48.
Union of the Physically Impaired against Segregation (UPIAS) (1976) The Fundamental Principles of Disability . U.t.o.P.I.A. Segregation (ed.). London: UPIAS.
49.
Van Dijk T. ( 2007) Discourse Studies. Los Angeles, CA : SAGE.
50.
Wendell S. ( 1996) The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability. New York: Routledge .
51.
Wodak R. and Meyer M. ( 2001) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE.
52.
Zola I. ( 1972) Medicine as an institution of social control. The Sociological Review20: 487-504.
