Research has shown that suicide rate in Australia is on the rise and that most people who die by suicide are not in contact with mental health services. They most likely communicate their suicidal thoughts to family members or close friends, whose responses may sound unhelpful and/or dismissive, thus reinforcing suicidal ideation. This national emergency has been tackled via a social media campaign, #YouCan Talk, launched by a government-supported digital platform, BeyondBlue. This article adopts a multimodal discourse analysis approach to investigate how peer support is encouraged and articulated in the context of mental health discourse for suicide prevention. The two case studies selected for analysis from the BeyondBlue platform are (1) the #YouCanTalk social media campaign, designed to teach carers to identify severe depression and effectively respond to suicide warning signs and (2) a sample of posts from a thread for peer support in a monitored online forum devoted to help carers who seek peer advice. Unlike previous research, the article focuses on how pronouns and verbs index interpersonal relations in a systemic-functional perspective as well as other multimodal resources, such as visuals, layout and hyperlinking, to understand how identities are entextualised by both professional health providers and peer carers in digital platforms that address mental health issues.
AndroutsopoulosJ (2014) Moments of sharing: Entextualization and linguistic repertoires in social networking. In: Bou-FranchPBlitvitchPG (eds) The Pragmatics of Textual Participation in the Social Media (Special Issue of Journal of Pragmatics), vol. 73. pp. 4–18.
2.
BaldryAThibaultP (2006) Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis. London: Equinox.
3.
BaldryAThibaultP (2008) Applications of multimodal concordances. Hermes41: 11–41.
4.
BarakA (2007) Emotional support and suicide prevention through the Internet: A field project report. Computers in Human Behavior23: 971–984.
5.
BarakAMironO (2005) Writing characteristics of suicidal people on the Internet: A psychological investigation of emerging social environments. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behaviour35: 507–524.
6.
BathjeGPryorJ (2011) The relationships of public and self-stigma to seeking mental health services. Journal of Mental Health Counseling33(2): 161–176.
7.
BernsteinB (1981) Codes, modalities and the process of cultural reproduction: A model. Language and Society10: 327–363.
8.
BondiMCacchianiSMazziA (eds) (2015) Discourse in and through the Media: Recontextualizing and Reconceptualizing Expert Discourse. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
9.
CalsamigliaHvan DijkTA (2004) Popularization discourse and knowledge about the genome. Discourse & Society15(4): 369–389.
10.
ChafeW (1982) Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In: TannenD (ed.) Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 35–53.
11.
ChurchKde OliveriaR (2013) What’s up with WhatsApp? Comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services (MobileHCI‘13), Munich, 27–30August, pp. 352–361. New York: ACM.
12.
CottonSGuptaS (2004) Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them. Social Science and Medicine59(9): 1795–1806.
13.
CulverJDGerrFFrumkinH (1997) Medical information on the Internet: A study of an electronic bulletin board. Journal of General Internal Medicine12: 466–470.
14.
DonelleLBoothR (2012) Health tweets: An exploration of health promotion on Twitter. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing17(3): 4.
15.
Fingeld-ConnettD (2015) Twitter and health science research. West Journal of Nursing Research37(10): 1269–1283.
16.
GeeJPHayesER (2011) Language and Learning in the Digital Age. London and New York: Routledge.
17.
GeorgakopoulouAGoutsosD (2004) Discourse Analysis, 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
18.
GeulayovGCaseyDMcDonaldKC (2018) Incidence of suicide, hospital-presenting non-fatal self-harm, and community-occurring non-fatal self-harm in adolescents in England (the iceberg model of self-harm): A retrospective study. The Lancet Psychiatry5: 167–174.
19.
GoatlyAHiradharP (2016) Critical Reading and Writing in the Digital Age. London and New York: Routledge.
20.
GottiM (2014) Reformulation and recontextualization in popularization discourse. Ibérica27: 15–34.
21.
GuidryJCarlyleKMessnerM, et al. (2015) On pins and needles: How vaccines are portrayed on Pinterest. Vaccine33(39): 5051–5056.
22.
HallET (1966) The Hidden Dimension, 1st edn. New York: Doubleday.
23.
HallidayMAK (1978) Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold.
24.
HallidayMAKMatthiessenC (2013) An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edn. London: Arnold.
25.
HarrisIBRobertsLM (2013) Exploring the use and effects of deliberate self-harm websites: An Internet-based study. Journal of Medical Internet Research15(12): e285.
26.
HarveyKJ (2010) Electronic health discourse. In: CummingsL (ed.) The Routledge Pragmatics Encyclopedia. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 141–143.
27.
HarveyKJBrownBCrawfordP, et al. (2007) ‘Am I normal?’ Teenagers, sexual health and the internet. Social Science and Medicine65(4): 771–781.
28.
HerringSC (ed) (1996) Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-cultural Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
29.
HillKDallosR (2011) Young people’s stories of self–harm: A narrative study. Clinical Child and Psychology and Psychiatry17(3): 459–471.
30.
HuntNMcHaleS (2007) A practical guide to the e-mail interview. Qualitative Health Research17: 1415–1421.
31.
JoinsonAN (2001a) Knowing me, knowing you: Reciprocal self-disclosure in Internet-based surveys. Cyberpsychology and Behavior4: 587–591.
32.
JoinsonAN (2001b) Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology31: 177–192.
33.
JonesR (2013) Health and Risk Communication: An Applied Linguistics Approach. London and New York: Routledge.
34.
KiyimbaNLesterJNO’ReillyM (2019a) Reviewing empirical examples of health research using naturally occurring data. In: KiyimbaNLesterJNO’ReillyM (eds) Using Naturally Occurring Data in Qualitative Health Research. pp. 279–306Cham: Springer.
35.
KiyimbaNLesterJNO’ReillyM (2019b) Utilising Computer-Mediated Communication and the Internet in health research. In: KiyimbaNLesterJNO’Reilly (eds) Using Naturally Occurring Data in Qualitative Health Research. Cham: pp. 179–203Springer.
36.
KressGvan LeeuwenT (2006) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 2nd edn. London and New York: Routledge.
LocherMA (2006) Advice Online: Advice-Giving in an American Internet Health Column. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
39.
MichelmoreLHindleyP (2012) Help-seeking for suicidal thoughts and selfharm in young people: A systematic review. Suicide and Life-threatening Behavior42(5): 507–524.
40.
MillerTEDerseAR (2002) Between strangers: The practice of medicine online. Health Affairs21(4): 168–179.
41.
MorrowPR (2006) Telling about problems and giving advice in an Internet discussion forum: Some discourse features. Discourse Studies8(4): 531–548.
O’HalloranKL (ed.) (2004) Multimodal Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Continuum.
44.
RecordRAStraubKStumpN (2019) #Selfharm on #Instagram: Examining user awareness and use of Instagram’s self-harm reporting tool. Health Communication. Epub ahead of print 8 April. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2019.1598738.
45.
ReevesABowlRWheelerS, et al. (2004) The hardest words: Exploring the dialogue of suicide in the counselling process – A discourse analysis. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research4(1): 62–71.
46.
RichardsonD (2004) Internet Discourse and Health Debates. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
47.
ScourfieldJColomboGBurnapP, et al. (2018) The number and characteristics of newspaper and Twitter reports on suicides and road traffic deaths in young people. Archives of Suicide Research23: 507–522.
48.
SealeCZieblandSCharteris-BlackJ (2006) Gender, cancer experience and internet use: A comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups. Social Science and Medicine62(10): 2577–2590.
49.
SindoniMG (2013) Spoken and Written Discourse in Online Interactions: A Multimodal Approach. London and New York: Routledge.
50.
SindoniMG (2019) Towards multimodal deixis? Some examples from health discourse and communication. Paper presented at Clavier 2019, “Knowledge Dissemination and Multimodal Literacy”, University of Pisa, November 28–29, 2019.
51.
SisaskMVarnikA (2012) Media roles in suicide prevention: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health9(1): 123–138.
52.
SmithsonJ (2015) Using discourse analysis to study online forums for young people who self-harm. In: O’ReillyMLesterJN (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Child Mental Health. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 384–401.
53.
SmithsonJSharkeySHewisE, et al. (2011) Problem presentation and responses on an online forum for young people who self-harm. Discourse Studies13(4): 487–501.
54.
StommelWPJKooleT (2010) The online support group as a community: A micro-analysis of the interaction with a new member. Discourse Studies12(3): 357–378.
55.
SulerJ (2004) The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology and Behavior7(3): 321–326.
56.
SuzukiLKCalzoJP (2004) The search for peer advice in cyberspace: An examination of online teen bulletin boards about health and sexuality. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology: An International Lifespan Journal25(6): 685–698.
57.
ThurlowCMroczekK (eds) (2011) Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. New York and London: Oxford University Press.
58.
Van LeeuwenT (2004) Ten reasons why linguists should pay attention to visual communication. In: LeVinePScollonR (eds) Discourse and Technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 7–20.
59.
WhitlockJPowersJEckenrodeJ (2006) The virtual cutting edge: The Internet and adolescent self-injury. Developmental Psychology42(3): 407–417.
60.
WilliamsAJNielsenECoulsonNS (2018) ‘They aren’t all like that’: Perceptions of clinical services, as told by self-harm online communities. Journal of Health Psychology. Epub ahead of print 19 July. DOI: 10.1177/1359105318788403.
61.
WrightKB (2000) Perceptions of on-line support providers: An examination of perceived homophily, source credibility, communication and social support within on-line support groups. Communication Quarterly48(1): 44–59.
62.
WrightKBBellSB (2003) Health-related support groups on the Internet: Linking empirical findings to social support and computer-mediated communication theory. Journal of Health Psychology8(1): 39–54.
63.
YbarraMLAlexanderCMitchellKJ (2005) Depressive symptomatology, youth Internet use, and online interactions: A national survey. Journal of Adolescent Health36(1): 9–18.
