A multimodal discourse analysis of glocalization and cultural identity in three Indian TV commercials

Abstract

Improvising selected tools from Kress and Van Leeuwen’s inter-semiosis framework, this study explores how, between global and local, TV commercials in India often reframe a cultural third space producing new discursive forms and identities. Three commercials from the food and beverage category are selected on the basis of the country of origin of the endorsing company and the patterns of glocalization. Multimodal discourse analysis reveals that the commercials construct the glocal identity in several ways. In the Knorr Soups commercial, the melody of the title song is contemporary pop, whereas the delivery style and crooning are distinctively Western. The language is predominantly Hindi with deft use of selected English words. The Funda Mint commercial casts a rebel voice-support executive who rejects the pseudo-glocal identity and asserts his true identity. In the Cadbury Bournvita Folk commercial, the two boys represent the global and the local in the realm of creativity. The study advances the knowledge of product positioning and brand identity involving the intersemiosis of discursive elements from different cultural spaces within the contemporary Indian consumerist culture.

Keywords

Cultural identity food and beverage glocalization Indian TV commercials multimodal discourse analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baldry

(ed.) (2000) Multimodality and Multimediality in the Distance Learning Age. Campobasso: Palladino Editore.

Baldry

(2004) Phase and transition type and instance: Patterns in media texts as seen through a multimodal concordancer. In: O’Halloran

(ed.) Multimodal Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Continuum, pp. 83–108.

Baldry

Thibault

(2006a) Multimodal Transcription and Text. London: Equinox.

Baldry

Thibault

(2006b) Multimodal corpus linguistics. In: Thompson

Hunston

(eds) System and Corpus Exploring Connections. London and New York: Equinox, pp. 164–183.

Bateman

(2008) Multimodality and Genre: A Foundation for the Systematic Analysis of Multimodal Documents. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bateman

(2007) Towards a grande paradigmatique of film: Christian Metz reloaded. Semiotica 167: 13–64.

Bateman

Schmidt

(2011) Multimodal Film Analysis: How Films Mean. London: Routledge.

Batra

(1997) Marketing issues and challenges in transitional economies. Journal of International Marketing 5(4): 95–114.

Bauman

(2001) On glocalization: Or globalization for some, localization for some others. In: Beilharz

(ed.) The Bauman Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 298–311.

10.

Bordwell

Carroll

(1996) Post-theory: Reconstructing Film Studies. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

11.

Bucholtz

Hall

(2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7(4–5): 585–614.

12.

Burn

(2013) The kineikonic mode: Towards a multimodal approach to moving image media. NCRM Working Paper (unpublished), NCRM, University of London, London. Available at: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/3085/

13.

Burn

Parker

(2003) Analysing Media Texts. London: Continuum.

14.

Butcher

(2003) Transnational Television, Cultural Identity and Change: When STAR Came to India. New Delhi: SAGE.

15.

Eriksen

(2001) Small Places, Large Issues: An Introduction to Social and Cultural Anthropology, 2nd edn. London: Pluto Press.

16.

Foglio

Stanevicius

(2007) Scenario of global marketing and glocal marketing as an answer to the globalization and localization: Action on global market and marketing strategy. Vadyba Management 3(4): 16–17.

17.

Giulianotti

Robertson

(2006) Glocalization, globalization and migration: The case of Scottish football supporters in North America. International Sociology 21(2): 171–198.

18.

Halliday

MAK

(1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Arnold.

19.

Harish

(2007). Bournvita: Do you have Bournvita confidence. Web log post, 12 November. Available at: http://marketingpractice.blogspot.com/2007/11/bournvita-do-you-have-bournvita.html

20.

Hodge

Kress

(1988) Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

21.

Iedema

(2001) Resemioticization. Semiotica 137(1/4): 23–39.

22.

Iedema

(2003) Multimodality, resemioticization: Extending the analysis of discourse as a multisemiotic practice. Visual Communication 2(1): 29–57.

23.

Indiantelevision.com (2009) Godfrey Phillips’ Funda-mint gets ‘dil se desi’. Web log post, 11 February. Available at: http://www.indiantelevision.com/old-html/mam/headlines/y2k9/feb/febmam37.php

24.

Kress

(2003) Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge.

25.

Kress

Van Leeuwen

(1990) Reading Images. Geelong, VIC, Australia: Deakin University Press.

26.

Kress

Van Leeuwen

(1996) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.

27.

Kress

Van Leeuwen

(2001) Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication Discourse. London: Arnold.

28.

Kress

Van Leeuwen

(2006) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.

29.

Lemke

(1998) Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In: Martin

Veel

(eds) Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science. London: Routledge, pp. 87–113.

30.

Lemke

(2002) Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication 1(3): 299–325.

31.

Lim

(2004) Developing an integrative multisemiotic model. In: O’Halloran

(ed.) Multimodal Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Continuum, pp. 220–246.

32.

Lim

O’Halloran

(2012) The ideal teacher: An analysis of a teacher-recruitment advertisement. Semiotica 189(1/4): 229–253.

33.

Martin

(1992) English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

34.

Martin

(2002) Fair trade: Negotiating meaning in multimodal texts. In: Coppock

(ed.) The Semiotics of Writing: Transdisciplinary Perspectives on the Technology of Writing. Amsterdam: Brepols and Indiana University Press, pp. 311–338.

35.

Martinec

(2005) A system for image–text relations in new (and old) media. Visual Communication 4(3): 337–371.

36.

Metz

(1974). Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema. New York: Oxford University Press.

37.

Meyer

(1956) Emotion and Meaning in Music. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

38.

O’Halloran

(ed.) (2004a) Multimodal Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Continuum.

39.

O’Halloran

(2004b) Visual semiosis in film. In: O’Halloran

(ed.) Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives. Continuum: London, pp. 109–130.

40.

O’Halloran

(2005) Mathematical Discourse: Language, Symbolism, and Visual Images. London and New York: Continuum.

41.

O’Halloran

(2008) Systemic functional-multimodal discourse analysis (SF-MDA): Constructing ideational meaning using language and visual imagery. Visual Communication 7(4): 443–475.

42.

O’Halloran

Lim

(2009) Sequential visual discourse frames. In: Ventola

Guijarro

AJM

(eds) The World Told and the World Shown: Multisemiotic Issues. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 139–156.

43.

O’Toole

(1994) The Language of Displayed Art. London: Leicester University Press.

44.

Parasecoli

(2011) Savoring semiotics: Food in intercultural communication. Social Semiotics 21(5): 645–663.

45.

Pollifroni

(2006) Globalization and glocalization: An epistemological analysis from Business Economics. In: ABH Conference on Globalization and Business History. Queen Mary University of London, 16–17 June, pp. 109–124. Available at: http://riviste.paviauniversitypress.it/index.php/ea/article/view/1291/1415

46.

Prahalad

Lieberthal

(1998) The end of corporate imperialism. Harvard Business Review 76(4): 68–79.

47.

Ransome

(2005) Work, Consumption and Culture: Affluence and Social Change in the Twenty-first Century. London: SAGE.

48.

Robertson

(1992) Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

49.

Robertson

(1995) Glocalization: Time–space and homogeneity–heterogeneity. In Featherstone

Lash

Robertson

(eds) Global Modernities. London: SAGE, pp. 25–44.

50.

Royce

(1998) Synergy on the page: Exploring intersemiotic complementarity in page-based multimodal text. JASFL Occasional Papers 1(1): 25–49.

51.

Royce

Bowcher

(eds) (2007) New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

52.

Tan

(2009) A systemic functional framework for the analysis of corporate television advertisements. In: Ventola

Guijarro

AJM

(eds) The World Told and the World Shown: Multisemiotic Issues. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 157–182.

53.

Thibault

(2000) The multimodal transcription of a television advertisement: Theory and practice. In: Baldry

(ed.) Multimodality and Multimediality in the Distance Learning Age. Lampo: Campo Basso, pp. 311–384.

54.

Toor

(2000) Indo-chic: The cultural politics of consumption in post-liberalization India. SOAS Literary Review 2: 1–33. Available at: http://www.soas.ac.uk/soaslit/issue2/TOOR.PDF (accessed 27 January 2011).

55.

Tseng

(2009) Cohesion in film and the construction of filmic thematic configuration: A functional perspective. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Linguistics and Literary Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen.

56.

Unsworth

(2001) Teaching Multiliteracies across the Curriculum: Changing Contexts of Text and Image in Classroom Practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.

57.

Unsworth

(2006) Towards a metalanguage for multiliteracies education: Describing the meaning-making resources of language–image interaction. English Teaching 5(1): 55–76.

58.

Van Leeuwen

(1984) Impartial speech: Observations on the intonation of news readers. Australian Journal Cultural Studies 2(1): 84–98.

59.

Van Leeuwen

(1999) Speech, Sound, Music. London: Macmillan.

60.

Van Leeuwen

(2005) Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.

61.

Ventola

Charles

Kaltenbacher

(eds) (2004) Perspectives on Multimodality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

62.

(2008) Between global and local: Hybridized appeals in China web auto ads. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 13(1): 68–79.