The Ukrainian–Russian conflict of 2013–2017 is characterized as ‘hybrid’ warfare, with a crucial role of informational component. Using ideological discourse analytic tools, this article demonstrates how two prominent Russian TV channels shaped the persuasive message, creating strong unity and mobilizing a high level of support among the national audience. Based on legitimation and de-legitimation patterns, Channel One and Russia-1 built ideologically polarized opposition between ‘Our’ and ‘Their’ sides of the conflict. The wide range of editorializing tools, socio-cultural and historical Soviet-time constructs, and references to gay culture served to promote one group and to debase the opposition. Close institutional ties between government and media in Russia sustain multiplicity and intertextuality of ‘general line’, thus eliminating discordant interpretations. The article shows strong evidence that the analyzed TV news programs present a typical illustration of ideological discourse, exploited by the Russian government in order to achieve its political goals.
BakhtinMM ([1965] 1984) Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaia kul’tura srednevekov’ia i Renessansa. Rabelais and his world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
2.
BarghoornFC [Баргхорн ФК] (2008) Советский образ Соединенных Штатов: Преднамеренное искажение [The Soviet image of the United States: A Study of Distortion]. Политическая лингвистика [Political Linguistics] 1(24): 149–56.
3.
BerkowitzDA (2009) Reporters and their sources. In: Wahl-JorgensenKHanitzschT (eds) The Handbook of Journalism Studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 102–115.
4.
CatenaccioPCotterCDe SmedtMet al. (2011) Towards a linguistics of news production. Journal of Pragmatics43(7): 1843–1852.
5.
ChekinovSBogdanovS (2013) The nature and content of a new-generation war. Voyennaya mysl’/Military Thought4: 13–24.
6.
ChiltonP (2004) Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
7.
ChouliarakiL (2000) Political discourse in the news: Democratizing responsibility or aestheticizing politics?Discourse & Society11(3): 293–314.
8.
CotterC (2001) Discourse and media. In: TannenDSchiffrinDHamiltonH (eds) Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford; Cambridge, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 416–436.
9.
DarczewskaJ (2014) The anatomy of Russian information warfare: The Crimean operation, a case study. Point of View42: 1–37.
10.
EfremovaTF [Ефремова ТФ] (2000) Новый словарь русского языка. Толково-словообразовательный [A new Russian dictionary. Explanatory and word-building]. Москва: Русский язык.
11.
EntmanRM (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication43(4): 51–58.
12.
EntmanRM (2003) Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
HabermasJ (1974) Introduction: Some difficulties in the attempt to link theory and praxis. In: HabermasJ (ed.) Theory and Practice. London: Heinemann, pp. 1–40.
14.
HallS ([1973] 1980) Encoding/decoding. In: Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (ed.) Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies. London: Hutchinson, pp. 128–138.
15.
HanitzschTMelladoC (2011) What shapes the news around the world? How journalists in eighteen countries perceive influences on their work. The International Journal of Press/Politics16(3): 404–426.
16.
HodgesA (2015) War discourse. In: TracyK (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1–6.
17.
HorbykR (2015) Little Patriotic War: Nationalist narratives in the Russian media coverage of the Ukraine-Russia crisis. Asian Politics & Policy7(3): 505–511.
18.
JayM (2002) Cultural relativism and the visual turn. Journal of Visual Culture1(3): 267–278.
19.
KampfZ (2013) Mediated performatives. In: ÖstmanJOVerschuerenJ (eds) Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–24.
20.
KampfZLiebesT (2013) Transforming Media Coverage of Violent Conflicts: The New Face of War. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
LaruelleM (2015) The ‘Russian World’: Russia’s Soft Power and Geopolitical Imagination. Washington, DC: The Center on Global Interests.
LiebesT (1997) Reporting the Arab-Israeli Conflict: How Hegemony Works. London: Routledge, pp. 20–48.
24.
LiebesTKampfZ (2009a) Black and white and shades of gray. The International Journal of Press/Politics14(4): 434–453.
25.
LiebesTKampfZ (2009b) The changing relationships among media, government, and public: The case of war. The Communication Review12(3): 195–198.
26.
LipmanM (2014) Russia’s nongovernmental media under assault. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization22(2): 179–190.
27.
LivingstonSBennettWL (2003) Gatekeeping, indexing, and live-event news: Is technology altering the construction of news?Political Communication20(4): 363–380.
28.
MatveevOV [Матвеев ОВ] (2014) Трагедия украинского кризиса: История и политика [The tragedy of Ukrainian crisis: History and politics]. Историческая и социально-образовательная мысль [Historical and Socio-Educational Thought] 3(25): 17–29.
29.
NyeJ (2004) Soft power and American foreign policy. Political Science Quarterly119(2): 255–270.
30.
OddoJ (2011) War legitimation discourse: Representing ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in four US presidential addresses. Discourse & Society22(3): 287–314.
31.
PanZKosickiG (2001) Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation. In: ReeseSGandyOGrantA (eds) Framing Public Life. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 35–65.
32.
PerryB (2015) Non-linear warfare in Ukraine: The critical role of information operations and special operations. Small Wars Journal, 14August, pp. 1–30.
PotterD (2003) An unhealthy mix: Editorializing is good, but not as part of the newscast. American Journalism Review25: 80.
35.
PrestonP (2009) Making the News: Journalism and News Cultures in Europe. London: Routledge.
36.
Pyung-KyunW (2015) The Russian hybrid war in the Ukraine crisis: Some characteristics and implications. The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis27(3): 383–400.
37.
RoheINirR (1990) Speech presentation in the Israel radio news: Ideological constraints and rhetorical strategies. Text: Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse10(3): 225–244.
38.
SheaferTShenhavS (2009) Mediated public diplomacy in a new era of warfare. The Communication Review12(34): 272–283.
39.
ShenhavS (2015) Analyzing Social Narratives. New York: Routledge.
40.
Tenenboim-WeinblattKBadenC (2016) Journalistic transformation: How source texts are turned into news stories. Journalism1(1): 1–19.
41.
TumberHPalmerJ (2004) Media at War: The Iraq Crisis. London: SAGE.
42.
Van DijkTA (1998) Ideology. London: SAGE.
43.
Van LeeuwenT (2007) Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication1(1): 91–112.
44.
VartanovaE (2012) The Russian media model in the context of post-Soviet dynamics. In: HallinDManciniP (eds) Comparing Media Systems beyond the Western World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 119–142.
45.
VerschuerenJ (2015) Ideology in discourse. In: TracyK (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 1–10.
WodakR (2006) Blaming and denying: Pragmatics. In: BrownK (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 59–64.
49.
WolfsfeldG (2011) Making Sense of Media and Politics: Five Principles in Political Communication. New York: Routledge.
50.
ZandbergENeigerM (2005) Between the nation and the profession: Journalists as members of contradicting communities. Media, Culture & Society27(1): 131–134.
