This article presents the results of an analysis of the large-scale processed texts of Arabic newspapers in the King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) Arabic Corpus Project. I adopted methods modified from the Biber Connor Upton Approach to retrieve the expanded concordances of the lexical units almarᵓa (woman) and alnisāᵓ (women) from the corpus. The extracted text reveals the discursive patterns regarding a number of topics which are discussed in Arabic newspapers, namely, socio-culture (social practices) and eco-politics. The results of the study show how and why topics related to Arab women are discursively constructed, revealing negative patterns with regard to the topics discrimination, the veil, sports, male guardianship, driving, pro-divorce settlements and municipal elections, and positive patterns concerning the topics marital status, violence, education, travel, sexual harassment, the removal of male guardianship, employment, ministerial election and political participation. The specific case of the topic (un)veil is subsequently analysed in more detail and the results reveal that the topic is associated with negative patterns within a wider socio-cultural discourse.
Al-MujaiwelS (2016) Free/Open KACSTAC and its processing tools: Lexical resources for Arabic lexicogrammatical microstructures based on collocational indicators. In: Alonso AlmeidaFOrtegaIQuintanaEet al. (eds) Input a Word, Analyze the World: Selected Approaches to Corpus Linguistics. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 153–170.
2.
AlmujaiwelSAl-ThubaityA (2016) Arabic corpus processing tools for corpus linguistics and language teaching. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Globalization of Second Language Acquisition and Teacher Education (G-SLATE), Fukuoka, Japan, 4–6 August. Gifu City, Japan: INTESDA, pp. 103–108.
3.
Al-ThubaityA (2015) A 700M + Arabic corpus: KACST Arabic corpus design and construction. Language Resources and Evaluation49(3): 721–751.
4.
Al-ThubaityAKhanMAl-MazruaMet al. (2014) KACST Arabic corpora processing tool ‘Khawas’ (computer software). Available at: https://sourceforge.net/projects/ghawwasv4/ (accessed 2 July 2016).
5.
BakerP (2006) Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
6.
BakerPMcEneryT (2005) A corpus-based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper texts. In: BallingtonJKaramA (eds) Journal of Language and Politics, pp. 197–226.
7.
BakerPGabrielatosCKhosravinikMet al. (2008) A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society19(3): 273–306.
8.
BiberDConnorUUptonT (2007) Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
9.
BourdieuP (1991) Language and Symbolic Power (trans. G Raymond and M Adamson). Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
10.
BurrV (1995) An Introduction to Social Constructionism. London: Routledge.
11.
CharleboisJM (2010) The discursive construction of hegemonic and pariah femininities in the spoken accounts of a group of Japanese women. PhD Thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster.
12.
ConnellRW (1987) Gender and Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
ConnellRW (1995) Masculinities. Oxford: Polity.
14.
EdleyN (2001) Analysing masculinity: Interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In: WetherellMTaylorMYatesSJ (eds) Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. London: SAGE, pp. 189–228.
15.
FaircloughN (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.
16.
FaircloughN (1996) Technologisation of discourse. In: Caldas-CoulthardCRCoulthardM (eds) Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 71–83.
17.
FaircloughN (2009) Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In: WodakRMeyerM (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE, pp. 122–138.
18.
FaircloughNWodakR (1997) Critical discourse analysis. In: Van DijkTA (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction. London: SAGE, pp. 258–284.
Hardt-MautnerG (1995) Only connect: Critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics. UCREL technical paper no. 6. Lancaster: Lancaster University. Available at: http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/papers/techpaper/vol6.pdf (accessed 14 July 2016).
21.
HoeyM (1997) From concordance to text structure: New uses for computer corpora. In: LewandowskaBMeliaP (eds) Proceedings of the Practical Applications of Language Corpora Conference. Łódź: Łódź University Press, pp. 2–23.
22.
HolmesJMarraM (eds) (2010) Femininity, Feminism and Gendered Discourse: A Selected and Edited Collection of Papers From the Fifth International Gender and Language Association conference (IGALA5). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
LombardoL (2009) Introduction: Establishing guidelines for the use of corpora as resources for learners (and their teachers). In: LombardoL (ed.) Using Corpora to Learn about Language and Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 7–38.
25.
LouwWE (2010) Collocation as instrumentation for meaning: A scientific fact. In: Van PeerWZyngierSVianaV (eds) Literary Education and Digital Learning: Methods and Technologies. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 79–101.
26.
McEneryTHardieA (2012) Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
McRobbieA (2009) The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: SAGE.
28.
MagalhaesCM (2006) A critical discourse analysis approach to news discourses and social practices on race in Brazil. DELTA22(2): 275–301.
29.
MautnerG (2007) Mining large corpora for social information: The case of elderly. Language in Society36(1): 51–72.
30.
OffenhauerP (2005) Women in Islamic societies: A selected review of social scientific literature. A report prepared by the Federal Research Division in the Library of Congress under an interagency agreement with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence/National Intelligence Council (ODNI/ADDNIA/NIC) and Central Intelligence Agency/Directorate of Science and Technology. Available at: https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/pdf-files/Women_Islamic_Societies.pdf (accessed 14 July 2016).
31.
O’HalloranKCoffinC (2004) Checking overinterpretation and underinterpretation: Help from corpora in critical linguistics. In: CoffinCHewingsAO’HalloranK (eds) Applying English Grammar: Corpus and Functional Approaches. London: Arnold, pp. 275–297.
32.
OrpinD (2005) Corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis: Examining the ideology of sleaze. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics10(1): 37–61.
33.
OttawayM (2004) Women’s Rights and Democracy in the Arab World. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
34.
ReadJBartkowskiJ (2000) To veil or not to veil? A case study of identity negotiation among Muslim women in Austin, Texas. Gender & Society14(3): 395–417.
35.
SabbaghA (2005) The Arab states: Enhancing women’s political participation. In: Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, rev. edn. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA), pp. 52–71.
36.
SinclairJ (2004) Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.
37.
SkalliLH (2011) Constructing Arab female leadership lessons from the Moroccan media. Gender & Society26(3): 382–405.
38.
StubbsM (1983) Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39.
StubbsM (1996) Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
40.
StubbsM (1997) Review of T. McEnery and A. Wilson (1996) Corpus Linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics2(2): 296–302.
41.
StubbsM (2007) On texts, corpora and models of language. In: HoeyMMahlbergMStubbsMet al. (eds) Text, Discourse and Corpora: Theory and Analysis. London: Continuum, pp. 127–162.
42.
TeubertW (2004) Language and corpus linguistics. In: HallidayMTeubertWYallopCet al. (eds) Lexicology and Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction. London: Continuum, pp. 73–112.
43.
TeubertW (2005) My version of corpus linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics10(1): 1–13.
44.
TeubertW (2007) Parole-linguistics and the diachronic dimension of the discourse. In: HoeyMMahlbergMStubbsMet al. (eds) Text, Discourse and Corpora: Theory and Analysis. London: Continuum, pp. 57–88.
45.
The World Bank (2009) The Status and Progress of Women in the Middle East and North Africa. Washington, DC: The Social and Economic Development Group and the Office of the Chief Economist of the Middle East and North Africa. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTMENA/Resources/MENA_Gender_Compendium-2009-1.pdf (accessed 14 July 2016).
46.
TitscherSMeyerMWodakRet al. (2000) Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE.
47.
Tohmé-TabetA (2001) Women, intangible heritage and development in the Arab world. In: International Editorial Meeting and Future Activities in the Domain Iran-National Commission for UNESCO, Tehran, Iran, June. Available at: http://www.unesco.org/culture/ich/doc/src/00161-EN.pdf (accessed 14 July 2016).
48.
UptonTACohenMA (2009) An approach to corpus-based discourse analysis: The move analysis as example. Discourse Studies11(5): 585–605.
49.
Van DijkTA (1993) Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society4(2): 249–283.
50.
Van DijkTA (1998) Ideology. London: SAGE.
51.
Van DijkTA (2008) Discourse Reader. London: SAGE.
52.
Van LeeuwenT (1996) The representation of social actors. In: Caldas-CoulthardCRCoulthardM (eds) Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 32–70.
53.
WeissGWodakR (eds) (2003) Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
54.
WodakR (2006) Review article: Boundaries in discourse analysis. Language in Society35(4): 595–611.
55.
WodakRDe CilliaRReisiglMet al. (1999) The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
