In recent years, the concept of resilience has emerged as a flagship ideal in European Union policy discourse, especially in the context of environmental and social sustainability. Drawing on Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis (MCDA), this article examines how resilience is constructed in the National Recovery and Resilience Plans (NRRPs) of EU member states (2021, 2023). We argue that resilience appears as highly positive term, yet has shifting meanings enablining it to both unify disparate policy objectives and at the same time conceal structural tensions between economic growth, climate action, and social equity. Through a dual-layered analysis—of both the technologization of language and its semiotic framing—we show how resilience is discursively shaped through standardized bullet lists, color-coded graphics, and abstract noun phrases that depoliticize and decontextualize environmental governance. This study foregrounds how EU policy discourse enacts and legitimizes neoliberal forms of sustainability governance.
AdgerN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: Are they related?Progress in Human Geography24(3): 347–364.
2.
AfzaalM (2023). A Corpus-Based Analysis of Discourses on the Belt and Road Initiative: Corpora and the Belt and Road Initiative (Vol. 10). Springer Nature.
3.
ArenaMAzzoneG (2009) Identifying organizational drivers of internal audit effectiveness. International Journal of Auditing13(1): 43–60.
4.
BOARDE (1992) United Nations conference on environment and development. Agenda, Rio de Janeiro, 21(4).
5.
BolisIMoriokaSNSznelwarLI (2017) Are we making decisions in a sustainable way? A comprehensive literature review about rationalities for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production145: 310–322.
6.
CameronD (2000) Good to Talk? Living and Working in a Communication Culture. Sage.
7.
CarvalhoA (2007) Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science16(2): 223–243.
8.
ChandlerD (2012). Resilience and human security: The post-interventionist paradigm. Security Dialogue43(3): 213–229.
9.
ChandlerD (2014) Resilience: The Governance of Complexity. Routledge.
10.
ClanchyT (2013) From Memory to Written Record, England 1066–1307. Wiley-Blackwell.
11.
CoaffeeJ (2013) Rescaling and responsibilising the politics of urban resilience: From national security to local place-making. Politics33(4): 240–252.
12.
CornwallA (2007) Buzzwords and fuzzwords: Deconstructing development discourse. Development in Practice17(4–5): 471–484.
13.
De AngelisM (2003) Neoliberal governance, reproduction and accumulation. The Commoner, 7(Spring/Summer): 1–28.
14.
Díaz-MartínezEGibbonsED (2014) The questionable power of the Millennium Development Goal to reduce child mortality. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities15(2–3): 203–217.
15.
European Commission (2019) Regulation (EU) 2021/241 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 February 2021 establishing the Recovery and Resilience Facility. Available at: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/241/oj (accessed 05 February 2025).
16.
FaircloughN (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.
17.
FaircloughN (2000) Discourse, social theory, and social research: The discourse of welfare reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics4(2): 163–195.
18.
FoucaultM (1979) The Archaeology of Knowledge. Routledge.
19.
Fukuda-ParrSMcNeillD (2019) Knowledge and politics in setting and measuring the SDG S: Introduction to special issue. Global Policy10(S1): 16–27.
20.
GoodyJ (1977) The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge University Press.
21.
HansenAMachinD (2008) Visually branding the environment: Climate change as a marketing opportunity. Discourse Studies10(6): 777–794.
22.
JosephJ (2013) Resilience as embedded neoliberalism: A governmentality approach. Resilience1(1): 38–52.
23.
JosephJJuncosAE (2019) Resilience as an emergent European Project? The EU’s place in the resilience turn. Journal of Common Market Studies57(5): 995–1011.
24.
KoteykoN (2010) Mining the internet for linguistic and social data: An analysis of ‘carbon compounds’ in web feeds. Discourse and Society21(6): 655–674.
LedinPMachinD (2015) How lists, bullet points and tables recontextualize social practice: A multimodal study of management language in Swedish universities. Critical Discourse Studies12(4): 463–481.
28.
LedinPMachinD (2020) Introduction to Multimodal Analysis. Bloomsbury Publishing.
29.
LindseyTC (2011) Sustainable principles: Common values for achieving sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production19(5): 561–565.
30.
MachinDLiuY (2024) How tick list sustainability distracts from actual sustainable action: The UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Critical Discourse Studies21(2): 164–181.
31.
MachinDLedinPZhouW (2025) How the nature of social media platforms supports faulty knowledge production by influencers: The case of nutrition guidance for mothers on Chinese social media, Discourse, Context & Media64: 100866.
32.
MavelliL (2019) Resilience beyond neoliberalism? Mystique of complexity, financial crises, and the reproduction of neoliberal life. Resilience7(3): 224–239.
33.
MayrAMachinD (2023) How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. Sage.
34.
MediavillaJGarcia-AriasJ (2019) Philanthrocapitalism as a neoliberal (development agenda) artefact: Philanthropic discourse and hegemony in (financing for) international development. Globalizations16(6): 857–875.
35.
MerrySE (2011) Measuring the world: Indicators, human rights, and global governance. Current Anthropology52(S3): S83–S95.
36.
MerrySE (2019) The sustainable development goals confront the infrastructure of measurement. Global Policy10(S1): 146–148.
37.
Molek-KozakowskaK (2023) The hybrid discourse of the ‘European Green Deal’: Road-mapping economic transition to environmental sustainability (almost) seamlessly. Critical Discourse Studies21(2):182–199.
38.
PowerM (2009) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford University Press.
39.
ReidJ (2013). Interrogating the neoliberal biopolitics of the sustainable development-resilience nexus. International Political Sociology, 7(4): 353–367.
40.
Risku-NorjaHMuukkaE (2013) Food and sustainability: Local and organic food in Finnish food policy and in institutional kitchens. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B—Soil and Plant Science 63(Suppl.1): 8–18.
41.
SchunzS (2022) The ‘European Green Deal’—A paradigm shift? Transformations in the European Union’s sustainability meta-discourse. Political Research Exchange4(1): 2085121.
42.
ShawKMaythorneL (2013) Managing for local resilience: Towards a strategic approach. Public Policy and Administration28(1): 43–65.
43.
Stafford-SmithMGriggsDGaffneyO, et al. (2017) Integration: The key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability Science12: 911–919.
44.
TelleriaJGarcia-AriasJ (2022) The fantasmatic narrative of ‘sustainable development’. A political analysis of the 2030 global development agenda. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space40(1): 241–259.
45.
Van DijkTA (1998) Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Sage.
46.
Van LeeuwenT (2008) Discourse and Practice. Routledge.
47.
WagnerWAnholtR (2016) Resilience as the EU Global Strategy’s new leitmotif: Pragmatic, problematic or promising?Contemporary Security Policy37(3): 414–430.
48.
WalkerJCooperM (2011) Genealogies of resilience: From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security Dialogue42(2): 143–160.
49.
WelshM (2014) Resilience and responsibility: Governing uncertainty in a complex world. The Geographical Journal, 180(1), 15–26.
50.
WhiteMA (2013) Sustainability: I know it when I see it. Ecological Economics, 86, 213–217.
51.
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Special working session. Our Common Future17(1): 1–91.
52.
ZebrowskiC (2013) The nature of resilience. Resilience, 1(3), 159–173.
53.
ZhouJDellmuthLMAdamsKM, et al. (2020) The Geopolitics of Food Security: Barriers to the Sustainable Development Goal of Zero Hunger. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).
