A critique of a research article on preoperative skin antisepsis was undertaken using a recognised framework. This critique drew out issues which may be of use for clinicians in making a judgement regarding implementing change into their clinical practice.
Association for Perioperative Practice2010Landmark NEJM study - SSIs cut by 41% Available from: www.afpp.org.uk/news/landmarkNEJMstudy [Accessed September 2010]
2.
AltmanDG, SchulzKF, MoherD, EggerM, DavidoffF, ElbourneD2001. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaborationAnnals of Internal Medicine134663–694
3.
BerryA, WattB, GoldacreM, ThomsonJ, McNairT (1982) A comparison of the use of povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine in the prophylaxis of postoperative wound infectionJournal of Hospital Infection3(1) 55–63
4.
Centre for Evidence Based Medicine2005RCT Critical Appraisal Sheet. 2010 Available from: www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1157 [Accessed September 2010]
5.
DarouicheR, WallM, ItaniK, OttersonM, WebbA, CarrickM2010Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical-site antisepsisNew England Journal of Medicine362(1) 18–26
6.
EdwardsP, LippA, HolmesA (2004) Preoperative skin antiseptics for preventing surgical wound infections after clean surgery Issue 3Cochrane Library Review.Oxford, Update Software
7.
EggerM, SmithGD, AltmanD (eds) 2001Systematic Reviews in Health CareLondon, BMJ Publishing Group
8.
LippA, EdwardsP2002Disposable surgical face masks to prevent surgical wound infection in clean surgeryOxford, Update Software
9.
MangramAJ, HoranTC, PearsonML, SilverLC, JarvisWR, The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee 1999Guideline for prevention of surgical site infectionInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology20(4) 247–278
10.
MouleP, GoodmanM2009Nursing Research: An introductionLondon, Sage Publications Ltd
11.
SivathasanN, SivathasanN, VijayarajanL2010Chlorhexidine's complications.Journal of Perioperative Practice20(8) 300–301
