This article explores the experiences of female significant others (N = 27) in the lives of young men (N = 14) subject to repeat cycles of incarceration in South Australia since 2003. It focuses on how these women conceive of their roles during and following the incarceration of their intimate and addresses in detail some of the personal, situational and structural factors that characterize their lives. A major conclusion of the article is that (ex)prisoners’ female significant others are an important but highly marginalized and often traumatized group within the correctional and post-release landscape. Additional institutional and public support for these women is needed in order to maximize their potential impact on (ex)prisoner well-being.
AdamsDFischerJ (1976) The effects of prison residents’ community contacts on recidivism rates. Corrective and Social Psychiatry22: 21–27.
2.
AndersonE (1999) Code of the Street. New York: Norton.
3.
AunglesA (1993) Prisons’ penal policies: The hidden contracts. In: EastealPMcKillopS (eds) Women and the Law: Proceedings of a Conference Held 24–26 September 1991. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
4.
CarlenP (1988) Women, Crime and Poverty. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
5.
CarlsonBCerveraN (1992) Inmates and Their Wives: Incarceration and Family Life. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
6.
ChristianJ (2005) Riding the bus: Barriers to prison visitation and family management strategies. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice21(1): 31–48.
7.
ChristianJMellowJThomasS (2006) Social and economic implications of family connections to prisoners. Journal of Criminal Justice34: 443–452.
8.
CoddH (2000) Age, role changes and gender power in family relationships: The experiences of older female partners of male prisoners. Women and Criminal Justice12(2–3): 63–93.
9.
CoddH (2002) ‘The ties that bind’: Feminist perspectives on self-help groups for prisoners’ partners. Howard Journal41(4): 334–347.
10.
CoddH (2007) Prisoners’ families and resettlement: A critical analysis. Howard Journal46(3): 255–263.
11.
CoddH (2008) In the Shadow of Prison: Families, Imprisonment and Criminal Justice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
12.
ComfortM (2003) In the tube at San Quentin: The ‘secondary prisonization’ of women visiting inmates. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography32(1): 77–107.
13.
ComfortM (2007) Punishment beyond the legal offender. Annual Review of Law and Social Science3: 271–296.
14.
CondryR (2006) Stigmatised women: Relatives of serious offenders and the broader impact of crime. In: HeidensohnF (ed.) Gender and Justice: New Concepts and Approaches. Cullompton: Willan, pp. 96–120.
15.
DeyI (2007) Ground theory. In: SearleCGoboGGubriumJSilvermanD (eds) Qualitative Research Practice. London: SAGE, pp. 80–94.
16.
EdwardsS (1981) Female Sexuality and the Law. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
17.
EdwardsS (1984) Women on Trial. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
18.
FishmanL (1988) Prisoners and their wives: Marital and domestic effects of telephone contacts and home visits. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology32: 55–66.
19.
FishmanL (1990) Women and the Wall: A Study of Prisoner’s Wives Doing Time on the Outside. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
20.
FosterHHaganJ (2009) The mass incarceration of parents in America: Issues of race/ethnicity, collateral damage to children, and prisoner re-entry. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science623: 179–194.
21.
GavazziSYarcheckMRhineEPartridgeC (2003) Building bridges between the parole officer and the families of serious juvenile offenders: A preliminary report on a family based parole program. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology47(3): 291–308.
LowensteinA (1984) Coping with stress: The case of prisoners’ wives. Journal of Marriage and Family46(3): 699–708.
31.
MartinezD (2009) Family connections and prisoner re-entry. Paper presented at Prisoner Reentry: A Twenty-First Century Imperative Symposium, School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, 3April2009. Available at: http://ccj.asu.edu/downloads/paper-martinez (accessed 4 September 2013).
32.
MarunaS (2001) Making Good: How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33.
MarunaSLeBelTMitchellNNaplesM (2004) Pygmalion in the reintegration process: Desistance from crime through the looking glass. Psychology, Crime & Law10(3): 271–281.
34.
McIvorGTrotterCSheehanR (2009) Women, resettlement and desistance. Probation Journal56(4): 347–361.
35.
MillsA (2004) ‘Great expectations?’: A review of the role of prisoners’ families in England and Wales, selected papers from the British Criminology Conference,Portsmouth, Volume 7, July. Available at: http://www.britsoccrim.org/volume7/001.pdf (accessed 4 September 2013).
36.
NaserRVisherC (2006) Family members’ experiences with incarceration and reentry. Western Criminology Review7(2): 20–31.
37.
O’KeefeL (2000) The Partners of Prisoners: Their Reality, How They Contribute to the Criminal Justice System and Prisoner Rehabilitation, and How We Can Assist, paper presented at Women in Corrections: Staff and Clients Conference, convened by the Australian Institute of Criminology in conjunction with the Department for Correctional Services, SA, Adelaide, 31 Oct – 1 Nov. Available at: http://www.aic.gov.au/media_library/conferences/womencorrections/okeefe.pdf (accessed 26 February 2014).
38.
PeeloMStewartJPriorA (1991) Women partners of prisoners. Howard Journal30(4): 311–327.
39.
SchwartzMWeintraubJ (1974) The prisoner’s wife: A study in crisis. Federal Probation38: 20–26.
40.
SmartC (1976) Women, Crime and Criminology: A Feminist Critique. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
41.
SmartC (1989) Feminism and the Power of Law. London: Routledge.
42.
TravisJWaulM (eds) (2003) Prisoners Once Removed: The Impact of Incarceration and Reentry on Children, Families and Communities. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
43.
VisherCLa VigneNTravisJ (2004) Returning home: Understanding the challenges of prisoner reentry. Maryland pilot study: Findings from Baltimore Urban Institute. Available at: http://www.urban.org/uploadedPDF/410974_ReturningHome_MD.pdf (accessed 9 June 2011).
44.
Young Offenders Act 1993 (SA) s. 3b (Version 4.3.2013).
