There is a current interest in implementing education programmes to reduce prejudice towards gay individuals. This study investigates how adolescents recognise gay stereotypes in characters and how video-on-demand series could be utilised to reduce bias in Spain and Mexico. Six focus groups (Spain: (1) gay, (2) heterosexual, (3) LBTQ+; Mexico: (4) gay, (5) heterosexual, (6) LBTQ+) are used to explore the main stereotypes, to analyse how they are perceived in serialised fiction and to investigate their potential use in education programmes. The thematic analysis reveals that the primary stereotypes identified by young Mexicans and Spaniards are associated with femininity and perversion, as well as the belief that the main factors that encourage these stereotypes are religion and politics. LBTQ+ participants are also more critical of the depictions than heterosexuals. Education programmes should not only target young people but also engage the individuals and institutions that are close to them.
AdlerKSalanteräSZumstein-ShahaM (2019) Focus group interviews in child, youth, and parent research: An integrative literature review. International Journal of Qualitative Methods18: 1–15.
2.
AguirreAMolinerLFranciscoA (2021) “Can anybody help me?” High school teachers’ Experiences on LGBTphobia perception, teaching intervention and training on affective and sexual diversity. Journal of Homosexuality68(14): 2430–2450.
3.
AndersonE (2011) The rise and fall of western homohisteria. Journal of Feminist Scholarship1(1): 80–94.
4.
AyoubPMGarretsonJ (2017) Getting the message out: Media context and global changes in attitudes toward homosexuality. Comparative Political Studies50(8): 1055–1085.
5.
BaamsLDubasJSVan AkenMAG (2017) Comprehensive sexuality education as a longitudinal predictor of LGBTQ name-calling and perceived willingness to intervene in school. Journal of Youth and Adolescence46(5): 931–942.
6.
BagnoliAClarkA (2010) Focus groups with young people: A participatory approach to re-search planning. Journal of Youth Studies13(1): 101–119.
7.
BárcenasK (2019) Religión, sexualidad y democracia en México: Un balance ante la visibilidad de nuevos actores conservadores. In: CareagaG (ed) Sexualidad, Religión y Democracia en América Latina. Mexico: Fundación Arcoíris por el Respeto a la Diversidad Sexual, A.C., 95–118.
8.
BlackWWFedewaALGonzalezKA (2012) Effects of “Safe School” programs and policies on the social climate for sexual-minority youth: A review of the literature. Journal of LGBT Youth9(4): 321–339.
9.
BondBJMillerBAubreyJS (2019) Sexual references and consequences for heterosexual, lesbian, gay, and bisexual characters on television: A comparison content analysis. Mass Communication and Society22(1): 72–95.
10.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
11.
ChenMDongYWangJ (2023) A meta-analysis examining the role of character-recipient similarity in narrative persuasion. Communication Research51(1): 56–82.
12.
CsardiGNepuszT (2006) The igraph software package for complex network research. International Journal, Complex Systems5: 1–9. Available at: https://igraph.org
13.
DayJKIovernoSRussellST (2019) Safe and supportive schools for LGBT youth: Addressing educational inequities through inclusive policies and practices. Journal of School Psychology74: 29–43.
14.
EaglyAHKoenigAM (2021) The vicious cycle linking stereotypes and social roles. Current Directions in Psychological Science30(4): 343–350.
15.
EdwardsF (2020) From misrepresentation to milestones: An investigation of LGBTQ character development in two primetime situation comedies. Journalism and Mass Communication8(1): 25–36.
16.
Elite (2018) Netflix, 5 October.
17.
FongkaewKKhruataengAUnsathitS, et al. (2019) “Gay guys are shit-lovers” and “Lesbians are obsessed with fingers”: The (mis)representation of LGBTIQ People in Thai news media. Journal of Homosexuality66(2): 260–273.
18.
FranciscoAGonzález-de-GarayBMolinerL (2022) Between invisibility and homonormativity: LGBT+ referents for Spanish adolescents. Journal of LGBT Youth19(4): 448–468.
19.
GaldiSGuizzoFFasoliF (2023) Media representation matters: The effects of exposure to counter-stereotypical gay male characters on heterosexual men’s expressions of discrimination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations26(6): 1329–1350.
20.
GegenfurtnerAGebhardtM (2017) Sexuality education including lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) issues in schools. Educational Research Review22: 215–222.
21.
GontaGHansenSFaginC, et al. (2017) Changing media and changing minds: Media exposure and viewer attitudes toward homosexuality. Pepperdine Journal of Communication Research5(1): 22–34.
22.
González-de-GarayBMarcos-RamosMAngulo-BrunetA (2023) LGBT+ characters in original Spanish video-on-demand series. Sexuality & Culture27(3): 786–804.
23.
Gossip Girl (2007) The CW, 19 September.
24.
GulesciSLombardiMRamosA (2024) Telenovelas and attitudes toward the LGBTQ+ community in Latin America. Labour Economics87: 102488.
25.
Heartstopper (2022) Netflix, 22 April.
26.
HollowaySLValentineG (2000) Spatiality and the new social studies of childhood. Sociology34(4): 763–783.
27.
HopeMAHallJJ (2018) ‘This feels like a whole new thing’: A case study of a new LGBTQ-affirming school and its role in developing ‘inclusions’. International Journal of Inclusive Education22(12): 1320–1332.
28.
KhamisSLambertA (2016) Effeminacy and expertise, excess and equality: Gay best friends as consumers and commodities in contemporary television. In: HulmeA (ed) Consumerism on TV: Popular Media from the 1950s to the Present. London: Routledge, 109–126.
29.
MadžarevićGSoto-SanfielMT (2018) Positive representation of gay characters in movies for reducing homophobia. Sexuality & Culture22: 909–930.
30.
MayoC (2022) LGBTQ Youth and Education: Policies and Practices. New York: Teachers College Press.
31.
McGlashanHFitzpatrickK (2017) LGBTQ youth activism and school: Challenging sexuality and gender norms. Health Education117(5): 485–497.
32.
McLaughlinBRodríguezNS (2017) Identifying with a stereotype: The divergent effects of exposure to homosexual television characters. Journal of Homosexuality64(9): 1196–1213.
33.
MiddaughE (2019) Media and adolescent identity development. In: HobbsRMihailidisP (eds) The International Encyclopedia of Media Literacy. Wiley, 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0004
34.
MitchellJ (2019) Prejudice in the classroom: A longitudinal analysis of anti-immigrant attitudes. Ethnic and Racial Studies42(9): 1514–1533.
35.
MohammedSHKinyoL (2020) The role of constructivism in the enhancement of social studies education. Journal of Critical Reviews7(7): 249–256.
36.
MorrisTH (2019) Experiential learning – A systematic review and revision of Kolb’s Model. Interactive Learning Environments28(8): 1064–1077.
37.
Moyer-GuséEDaleKROrtizM (2018) Reducing prejudice through narratives. Journal of Media Psychology31(4): 185–195.
38.
NaserSCClonan-RoyKFullerKA, et al. (2022) Exploring the experiences and responses of LGBTQ+ adolescents to school-based sexuality education. Psychology in the Schools59(1): 34–50.
39.
O'ShaughnessyMStadlerJCaseyS (2016) Media and Society. London: Oxford University Press.
40.
Parrot Analytics (2023) The evolution of Mexico's TV & streaming landscape: Key audience trends and consumer insights for major platforms. Available at: https://www.parrotanalytics.com/insights/mexico/ (accessed 23 February).
41.
ParsemainAL (2019) Looking Back: The evolution of queer TV. In: ParsemainAL (ed) The Pedagogy of Queer TV. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 25–35.
42.
PhillippiSThomasCLGastanaduyM, et al. (2021) Inclusive policy development in a community-based alternative education program serving LGBT youth. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth65(2): 155–162.
PlateroLRSan RománBMontenegroM, et al. (2023) Discourses on trans children: Adult-centric narratives and youth fluid identities. In: LangaritaJASantosACMontenegroM, etal (eds) Child-friendly Perspectives on Gender and Sexual Diversity: Beyond Adultcentrism. London: Routledge, 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003294719-3.
45.
Pose (2018) FX, 3 June.
46.
RaabeTBeelmannA (2011) Development of ethnic, racial, and national prejudice in childhood and adolescence: A multinational meta-analysis of age differences. Child Development82(6): 1715–1737.
47.
Sánchez-SorianoJJ (2023) La Representación LGTB en las Series Españolas de Ficción. El Espejo En Que Nos Miramos. Salamanca: Comunicación Social.
48.
Sánchez-SorianoJJGarcía-JiménezLRodrigo-AlsinaM (2023) “También podemos tener finales felices”: Recepción e interpretación de personajes LGTBIQ+ en series de televisión. Cuadernos.Info55: 22–45.
49.
Sánchez-SorianoJJGarcía-JiménezLG (2020) The media construction of LGBT+ characters in hollywood blockbuster movies. The use of pinkwashing and queerbaiting. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social77: 95–116.
50.
ScandurraCPicarielloSValerioP, et al. (2017) Sexism, homophobia and transphobia in a sample of Italian pre-service teachers: The role of socio-demographic features. Journal of Education for Teaching43(2): 245–261.
51.
Sense8 (2015) Netflix, 5 June.
52.
SinkAMastroDDragojevicM (2018) Competent or warm? A stereotype content model approach to understanding perceptions of masculine and effeminate gay television characters. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly95(3): 588–606.
53.
SnappSDHoenigJMFieldsA, et al. (2015) Messy, butch, and queer: LGBTQ youth and the school-to-prison pipeline. Journal of Adolescent Research30(1): 57–82.
54.
SouleKE (2017) Creating inclusive youth programs for LGBTQ+ communities. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension5(2): 103–125.
55.
The Office (2005) NBC, 24 March.
56.
VanleeF (2019) Acknowledging/denying LGBT+ difference: Understanding homonormativity and LGBT+ homogeneity in Flemish TV fiction through production research. European Journal of Communication34(5): 520–534.
57.
van MeerMMPollmannMMH (2022) Media representations of lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals on Dutch television and people’s stereotypes and attitudes about LGBs. Sexuality & Culture26(2): 640–664.
58.
Vicente-CruzESubiranaP (2023) Percepciones de adolescentes LGBT+ sobre el acoso en contextos sociales más igualitarios. Educação & Sociedade44: 1–17.
59.
Vicente da CruzE, (2019)Representaciones sociales del bullying homofóbico en adolescentes de Brasil. PhD Thesis. Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, España.
