Invoking the stereotype content model (SCM), two studies examined how television portrayals of gay men are arrayed in terms of warmth and competence. Participants were exposed to a sitcom and asked about their perceptions of two leading gay male characters. Results suggest that effeminate portrayals are more stereotypical, warmer, and less competent than masculine gay characters, yet these characterizations did not differ in terms of perceived valence. This novel application of the SCM helps to more explicitly define stereotypicality in the context of televised portrayals of gay men and demonstrates the utility of the model in advancing media studies of stereotypes.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
Atwell SeateA.MastroD. (2015). Exposure to immigration in the news: The impact of group-level emotions on intergroup behavior. Communication Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0093650215570654
3.
BoysenG. A. (2016). Exploring the relation between masculinity and mental illness stigma using the stereotype content model and BIAS map. The Journal of Social Psychology, 69, 1464-1479.
4.
ClausellE.FiskeS. T. (2005). When do subgroup parts add up to the stereotypic whole? Mixed stereotype content for gay male subgroups explains overall ratings. Social Cognition, 23, 161-181.
5.
CollangeJ.FiskeS. T.SanitiosoR. (2009). Maintaining a positive self-image by stereotyping others: Self-threat and the stereotype content model. Social Cognition, 27, 138-149.
6.
CuddyA. J.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631-648.
7.
CuddyA. J.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61-149.
8.
CuddyA. J.FiskeS. T.KwanV. S. Y.GlickP.DemoulinS.LeyensJ.-P. . . . ZieglerR. (2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1-33.
9.
CuddyA. J.WolfE. B.GlickP.CrottyS.ChongJ.NortonM. I. (2015). Men as cultural ideals: Cultural values moderate gender stereotype content. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 622-635.
FingerhutA. W.PeplauL. A. (2006). The impact of social roles on stereotypes of gay men. Sex Roles, 55, 273-278.
12.
FisherD. A.HillD. L.GrubeJ. W.GruberE. L. (2007). Gay, lesbian, and bisexual content on television: A quantitative analysis across two seasons. Journal of Homosexuality, 52, 167-188.
13.
FiskeS. (2012). Warmth and competence: Stereotype content issues for clinicians and researchers. Canadian Psychology, 53, 14-20.
14.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 77-83.
15.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
16.
GilmanS. L. (1985). Difference and pathology: Stereotypes of sexuality, race, and madness. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
GlickP.GanglC.GibbS.KlumpnerS.WeinbergE. (2007). Defensive reactions to masculinity threat: More negative affect toward effeminate (but not masculine) gay men. Sex Roles, 57, 55-59.
19.
GrossL. (1984). The cultivation of intolerance: Television, blacks, and gays. In MelischekG.RosengrenK.StappersJ. (Eds.), Cultural indicators: An international symposium (pp. 345-363). Vienna: Verlag der Osterreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften [Austrian Academy of Sciences].
20.
HalkiasG.DavvetasV.DiamantopoulosA. (2016). The interplay between country stereotypes and perceived brand globalness/localness as drivers of brand preference. Journal of Business Research, 69, 3621-3628.
21.
HarwoodJ.RoyA. (2005). Social identity theory and mass communication research. In HarwoodJ.GilesH. (Eds.), Intergroup communication (pp. 189-211). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
22.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23.
HerekG. M. (1995). Psychological heterosexism in the United States. In D’AugelliA. R.PattersonC. J. (Eds.), Lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities over the lifespan: Psychological perspectives (pp. 321-346). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24.
HerekG. M. (2000). The psychology of sexual prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 19-22.
25.
HerekG. M. (2009). Hate crimes and stigma-related experiences among sexual minority adults in the United States: Prevalence estimates from a national probability sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 54-74.
26.
HicksG. R.LeeT. T. (2006). Public attitudes toward gays and lesbians: Trends and predictors. Journal of Homosexuality, 51, 57-77.
27.
KielwasserA. P.WolfM. A. (1992). Mainstream television, adolescent homosexuality, and significant silence. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 9, 350-373.
28.
MadonS. (1997). What do people believe about gay males? A study of stereotype content and strength. Sex Roles, 37, 663-685.
29.
MastroD. M. (2009). Racial/ethnic stereotyping and the media. In NabiR. L.OliverM. B. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 377-382). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30.
MontoyaA. K.HayesA. F. (2016). Two-condition within-participant statistical mediation analysis: A path-analytic framework. Psychological Methods, 22, 6-27.
31.
PageS.YeeM. (1985). Conception of male and female homosexual stereotypes among university undergraduates. Journal of Homosexuality, 12, 109-118.
32.
PajaresF.PrestinA.ChenJ.NabiR. L. (2009). Social cognitive theory and media effects. In NabiR. L.OliverM. B. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 283-297). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
33.
ParkS. Y. (2012). Mediated intergroup contact: Concept explication, synthesis, and application. Mass Communication and Society, 15, 136-159.
34.
RaleyA. B.LucasJ. L. (2006). Stereotype or success? Prime-time television’s portrayals of gay male, lesbian, and bisexual characters. Journal of Homosexuality, 51, 19-38.
35.
ReillyK. H.NeaigusA.JennessS. M.WendelT.MarshallD. M.HaganH. (2015). Experiences of discrimination and HIV risk among men who have sex with men in New York City. American Journal of Men’s Health, 10, 505-514.
36.
RudmanL.AshmoreR. (2007). Discrimination and the Implicit Association Test. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 359-372.
SalvatiM.IovernoS.GiacomantonioM.BaioccoR. (2016). Attitude toward gay men in an Italian sample: Masculinity and sexual orientation make a difference. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 13, 109-118.
39.
SeiterE. (1986). Stereotypes and the media: A re-evaluation. Journal of Communication, 36, 14-26.
40.
ShanahanJ.MorganM. (1999). Television and its viewers: Cultivation theory and research. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
SteinerL.FejesF.PetrichK. (1993). Invisibility, homophobia and heterosexism: Lesbians, gays and the media. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 10, 395-422.
46.
SzaszT. S. (1970). The manufacture of madness. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
47.
WaltersS. D. (2001). All the rage: The story of gay visibility in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
