What influences media effects on public perception? A cross-national study of comparative agenda setting

Abstract

Using a big data approach, this study explores the media agenda setting effects in 16 countries on five continents. Agenda setting effects were found to vary across the nations. Our findings provide empirical evidence that individual factors such as Age, Education, Living area, and Political ideologyand national macro variables, including Economic developmentand Media freedom, are associated with the strength of such effects. Results suggest that assessing agenda setting effects needs to be conducted in relation to the economic, political, and media context of a country. This study also proposes an alternative way to measure salience on the public agenda using Issue distance, which arguably allows for capturing the possible interaction between issue relevance to individual audiences and media cueing effects.

Keywords

Agenda setting big data approach comparative media issue distance Lexicoder national context

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albaugh Q, Sevenans J, Soroka S, et al. (2013) The automated coding of policy agendas: A dictionary-based approach. In: Paper presented at the 6th annual comparative agendas conference, 27–29 June 2013, Atnwerp, Belgium.

Altschull

(1990) From Milton to McLuhan: The ideas behind American journalism. Journal of Communication41: 216–217.

Arceneaux

Johnson

Murphy

(2012) Polarized political communication, oppositional media hostility, and selective exposure. The Journal of Politics74(1): 174–186.

Behrendt M (2010) Hier streiten Berlins Rockerbanden um die Macht. Berliner Morgenpost, 28 May. Available at: www.morgenpost.de/berlin/article104192148/Hier-streiten-Berlins-Rockerbanden-um-die-Macht.html(accessed on 20 April 2018).

Brandenburg

(2006) Party strategy and media bias: A quantitative analysis of the 2005 UK election campaign. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties16(2): 157–178.

Brosius

Weimann

(1996) Who sets the agenda: Agenda-setting as a two-step flow. Communication Research23(5): 561–580.

Bulkow

Urban

Schweiger

(2013) The duality of agenda-setting: The role of information processing. International Journal of Public Opinion Research25(1): 43–63.

Cheng

Chan

(2015) The third level of agenda setting in contemporary China: Tracking descriptions of moral and national education (MNE) in media coverage and people's minds. International Journal of Communication9: 1090–1107.

Cushion

Kilby

Thomas

, et al.(2016) Newspapers, impartiality and television news: Intermedia agenda-setting during the 2015 UK general election campaign. Journalism Studies19(2): 162–181.

10.

Deutsche Welle (2010) Germany pushes for tougher laws to protect police, May 28. Available at: www.dw.com/en/germany-pushes-for-tougher-laws-to-protect-police/a-5625366(accessed 20 April 2018).

11.

Pfetsch B and Esser F (2004) Comparing political communication: Orientations in a changing world. In F. Esser and B. Pfetsch (eds) Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–24.

12.

Farnsworth SJ, Soroka S and Young L (2007) Canadian TV news on Bush and Iraq: No more hostile than top US network. Policy. Available at: http://policyoptions.irpp.org/fr/magazines/canadas-economic-challenges/canadian-tv-news-on-bush-and-iraq-no-more-hostile-than-top-us-network/(accessed 7 December 2018).

13.

Freedom House (2010) Freedom of the press 2010: Table of global press freedom rankings. Available at: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FOTP%202010%20Global%20%26%20Regional%20Tables.pdf(accessed 16 March 2017).

14.

Gibb J (2010) New law criticised, labelled ‘racist.’ Otago Daily Times, 18 August 2010. Available at: www.odt.co.nz/news/dunedin/new-law-criticised-labelled-racist(accessed 15 July 2017).

15.

Greenslade R (2010) New Zealand police to restrict reporting of crime news. The Guardian. Available at: www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2010/aug/02/press-freedom-newzealand(accessed 2 August 2010).

16.

Guo

Chen

YNK

, et al.(2015) Coverage of the Iraq War in the United States, Mainland China, Taiwan and Poland: A transnational network agenda-setting study. Journalism Studies16(3): 343–362.

17.

Guo

McCombs

(2012) An expanded perspective on agenda-setting effects: Exploring the third level of agenda setting. Revista de Comunicación11: 51–68.

18.

Guo

Chris

Zixuan

, et al.(2016) Big social data analytics in journalism and mass communication: Comparing dictionary-based text analysis and unsupervised topic modeling. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly93(2): 332–359.

19.

Hachten WA and Scotton JF (2007) The world news prism: Global information in a satellite age, 7th ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

20.

Hanitzsch

(2007) Deconstructing journalism culture: Toward a universal theory. Communication Theory17(4): 367–385.

21.

Holton

Chyi

(2012) News and the overloaded consumer: Factors influencing information overload among news consumers. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking15(11): 619–624.

22.

Huang

(2016) Alternatives to multilevel modeling for the analysis of clustered data. The Journal of Experimental Education84(1): 175–196.

23.

Hwang

Pan

Sun

(2008) Influence of hostile media perception on willingness to engage in discursive activities: An examination of mediating role of media indignation. Media Psychology11(1): 76–97.

24.

Inglehart

Abramson

(1994) Economic security and value change. American Political Science Review88(2): 336–354.

25.

Inglehart

Flanagan

(1987) Value change in industrial societies. American Political Science Review81(04): 1289–1319.

26.

Jones

(2004) Why Americans don't trust the media: A preliminary analysis. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics9(2): 60–75.

27.

Lee

(2010) Who let priming out? Analysis of first-and second-level agenda setting effects on priming. International Communication Gazette72(8): 759–776.

28.

Lee

(2005) The liberal media myth revisited: An examination of factors influencing perceptions of media bias. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media49(1): 43–64.

29.

Luo

(2014) The Internet and agenda setting in China: The influence of online public opinion on media coverage and government policy. International Journal of Communication8: 24–36.

30.

Mancini

(2000) Political complexity and alternative models of journalism. In: Curran

Park

(eds) De-westernizing media studies, London: Routledge, pp. 265–278.

31.

Matthes

(2008) Need for orientation as a predictor of agenda-setting effects: Causal evidence from a two-wave panel study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research20(4): 440–453.

32.

McCombs

(2014) Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

33.

McCombs ME and Shaw DL (1972) The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly36(2): 176–187.

34.

McCombs

Stroud

(2014) Psychology of agenda-setting effects: Mapping the paths of information processing. Review of Communication Research2: 68–93.

35.

McCombs

Llamas

Lopez-Escobar

, et al.(1997) Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second-level agenda-setting effects. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly74(4): 703–717.

36.

McLeod

Scheufele

Moy

(1999) Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication16(3): 315–336.

37.

McQuail

(2010) McQuail's mass communication theory, Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

38.

Moy

Torres

Tanaka

, et al.(2005) Knowledge or trust? Investigating linkages between media reliance and participation. Communication Research32(1): 59–86.

39.

Muddiman

Stroud

McCombs ME (2014) Media fragmentation, attribute agenda setting, and political opinions about Iraq. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media58(2): 215–233.

40.

Murty KS, Fields MM, Herd-Clark DJ, et al. (2013) Congressional progressive caucus agenda: Challenges and opportunities for 2012 elections. Race, Gender and Class20(1-2): 56–77.

41.

Mutz

(1994) Contextualizing personal experience: The role of mass media. Journal of Politics56(3): 689–714.

42.

Neuman

Chemudugunta

Smyth

, et al.(2006) Analyzing entities and topics in news articles using statistical topic models. In: Mehrotra

Zeng

Chen

(eds) Intelligence and security informatics, Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 93–104.

43.

Newport F (2012) The Gallup poll: Public opinion 2011. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

44.

O’Connor G (2010) The criminals are already armed – It’s time for police to catch up. The Voice of PoliceAugust 2010.

45.

Peter

(2003) Country characteristics as contingent conditions of agenda setting: The moderating influence of polarized elite opinion. Communication Research30(6): 683–712.

46.

Peter

de Vreese

(2003) Agenda-rich, agenda-poor: A cross-national comparative investigation of nominal and thematic public agenda diversity. International Journal of Public Opinion Research15: 44–64.

47.

Police National Headquarters (2010) New Zealand crime statistics 2009/2010: A summary of recorded and resolved offence statistics. Available at: www.police.govt.nz/sites/default/files/publications/crime-stats-national-asoc-20100630.pdf(accessed on 12 April 2018).

48.

Potter

Van Belle

(2004) News media coverage influence on Japan's foreign aid allocations. Japanese Journal of Political Science5(1): 113–135.

49.

Pralle

(2006) Timing and sequence in agenda-setting and policy change: A comparative study of lawn care pesticide politics in Canada and the US. Journal of European Public Policy13(7): 987–1005.

50.

Reich

Hanitzsch

(2013) Determinants of journalists' professional autonomy: Individual and national level factors matter more than organizational ones. Mass Communication and Society16(1): 133–156.

51.

Rosen

Waitzberg

Merkur

(2015) Israel: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition17(6): 1–212.

52.

Sartori

(1970) Concept misformation in comparative politics. The American Political Science Review64(4): 1033–1053.

53.

Sato

(2003) Agenda setting for smoking control in Japan, 1945-1990: Influence of the mass media on national health policy making. Journal of Health Communication8(1): 23–40.

54.

Schoenbach

Semetko

(1992) Agenda-setting, agenda-reinforcing or agenda-deflating? A study of the 1990 German national election. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly69(4): 837–846.

55.

Semetko HA and Mandelli A (1997) Setting the agenda for cross-national research: Bringing values into the concept. In: McCombs ME, Shaw DL and Weaver DI (eds) Communication and democracy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 195–207.

56.

Shoemaker PJ and Reese SD (1996) Mediating the message. Theories of influences on mass media content, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Longman.

57.

Simon S, Fu-chang W, Wong J, et al. (2004) Domestic and international considerations of Taiwan’s 2004 presidential election: An interdisciplinary roundtable. Pacific Affairs77(4): 683–713.

58.

Stroud

(2010) Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Ccommunication60(3): 556–576.

59.

Süddeutsche Zeitung (2010) Der Trend zur Gewalt ist ungebrochen, 17 May 2010. Available at: www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/steigende-kriminalitaet-in-deutschland-der-trend-zur-gewalt-ist-ungebrochen-1.432054(accessed on 20 April 2018).

60.

The International Social Survey Programme (2017) About ISSP. Available at: www.issp.org/data-download/by-topic/(accessed 15 April 2016).

61.

Tran

Mahmood

, et al.(2011) Linking global press freedom to development and culture: Implications from a comparative analysis. International Journal of Communication5: 22–37.

62.

Valenzuela

(2011) Materialism, postmaterialism and agenda-setting effects: The values–issues consistency hypothesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research23(4): 437–463.

63.

Van

(2007) The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication57(1): 60–78.

64.

Walgrave

Soroka

Nuytemans

(2007) The mass media's political agenda-setting power: A longitudinal analysis of media, parliament, and government in Belgium (1993 to 2000). Comparative Political Studies41(6): 814–836.

65.

Wanta

Ghanem

(2006) Effects of agenda setting. In: Bryant

Carveth

(eds) Meta-analyses of media effects, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 37–52.

66.

Weaver

(1980) Audience need for orientation and media effects. Communication Research7(3): 361–373.

67.

Weil

Gabi

Martin

(2013) Recent physician strike in Israel: A health system under stress?. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research2: 33.

68.

World Bank (2017) GDP per capita (constant 2010 US$). Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.KD?end=2010&start=1960(accessed 15 November 2016).

69.

Wu HD and Guo L (2017) Beyond salience transmission: Linking agenda networks between media and voters. Communication Research. Epub ahead of print 13 March 2017. DOI.org/10.1177/0093650217697765.