The war in Eastern Ukraine is happening on the battlefield as well as in the informational realm. The two sides of this military conflict, Russia and Ukraine, are trying to shape public opinion in their own countries as well as abroad. Depending on the leaning of a media outlet, its audiences see very different pictures of this crisis. This study examined a year’s worth of coverage dealing with the Eastern Ukraine military conflict in major Russian, Ukrainian, and American newscasts. The analysis revealed significant differences in the choice of on-camera sources, reporting of civilian and military fatalities, and framing of the different sides of this conflict in these media.
AdayS (2010) Chasing the bad news: An analysis of 2005 Iraq and Afghanistan war coverage on NBC and Fox News channel. Journal of Communication60(1): 144–164.
BayulgenOArbatliE (2013) Cold War redux in US–Russia relations? The effects of US media framing and public opinion of the 2008 Russia–Georgia war. Communist and Post-Communist Studies46(4): 513–527.
BennettWL (1990) Toward a theory of press–state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication40(2): 103–127.
7.
BennettWLLawrenceRGLivingstonS (2006) None dare call it torture: Indexing and the limits of press independence in the Abu Ghraib scandal. Journal of Communication56(3): 467–485.
8.
Center for Strategic and International Studies (n.d.) The Ukrainian crisis timeline. Available at: http://ukraine.csis.org/mh17.htm#11 (accessed 29 June 2016).
9.
D’AngeloP (2002) News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication52(4): 870–888.
DimitrovaDVKaidLLWilliamsAP (2005) War on the web: The immediate news framing of Gulf War II. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics10(1): 22–44.
12.
DimitrovaDVStrömbäckJ (2005) Mission accomplished? Framing of the Iraq war in the Elite newspapers in Sweden and the United States. International Communication Gazette (Formerly Gazette)67(5): 399–417.
EntmanRM (1991) Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrast in narratives of the KAL and Iran air incidents. Journal of Communication41(4): 6–27.
15.
Entman RM (2002) Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. In: McQuail D (ed.) McQuail's Reader in Mass Communication Theory. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, pp. 390–397.
16.
Entman RM, Matthes J and Pellicano L (2009) Nature, sources, and effects of news framing. In: Wahl-Jorgensen K and Hanitzsh T (eds) The handbook of Journalism Studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 175–190.
FahmySKimD (2008) Picturing the Iraq War: Constructing the image of war in the British and US press. International Communication Gazette70(6): 443–462.
Livingston S and Bennett WL (2003) Gatekeeping, indexing, and live-event news: Is technology altering the construction of News?. Political Communication 20(4): 363–380.
34.
MagdaE (2015) Hybrid War: To Survive and Win, Kharkov, Ukraine: Vivat.
NATO (2014, August 29) NATO Secretary General statement after the extraordinary meeting of the NATO-Ukraine Commission. Available at: http://www.nato.int/cps/bu/natohq/news_112210.htm (accessed 29 June 2016).
TankardJW (2001) The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In: ReeseSDGandyOHGrantAE (eds) Framing Public Life, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 95–106.
57.
Tankard J, Hendrickson L, Silberman J, et al. (1991, August) Media frames: Approaches to conceptualization and measurement. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Boston, MA.
58.
Telekritika (2014, July 26) Terrorists, militia, gunmen: How different media organizations call those who Ukrainians are fighting in Donbass. Available at: http://dusia.telekritika.ua/oprosy/25737 (accessed 23 January 2016).
