By means of a cross-longitudinal quantitative content analysis of the Chilean national press, this article analyses the changes in reporting styles and the framing of politics in news coverage between 2006 and 2011, exploring whether the features of political reporting found in studies of Western countries are evident in the case of Chile. According to the data, while politicians trigger the majority of political news stories, political coverage originates significantly more from events than from statements or issues. Likewise, although framing politics as a game is a dominant and significant characteristic of the Chilean press, there is a systematic increase in the public policy frame. The results also indicate low levels of interventionism in covering political news, showing the practice of journalism where politicians have a strong influence on news content. The research allows for discussion on how politicians are adapting to the needs of the media and presents a deeper understanding of the characteristics that define political journalism in new democracies.
AalbergTStrömbäckJde VreeseCH (2012) The framing of politics as strategy and game: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly13(2): 162–178.
2.
BecerraMMastriniG (2009) Los Dueños de la Palabra. Acceso, Estructura y Concentración de los Medios en la América Latina del siglo XXI, Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
3.
Bennett L (2003) News: The Politics of Illusion. New York: Addison Wesley, Longman.
4.
BensonRHallinD (2007) How states, markets and globalization shape the news. The French and US National Press, 1965–97. European Journal of Communication22(1): 27–47.
5.
BlumlerJGurevitchM (1995) The Crisis of Political Communication, London: Routledge.
6.
BoylanD (1996) Taxation and transition: The politics of the 1990 Chilean Tax Reform. Latin American Research Review31(1): 7–32.
7.
BresnahanR (2003) The media and the neoliberal transition in Chile: Democratic promise unfulfilled. Latin American Perspectives30(6): 39–68.
8.
BruggemannM (2012) Transnational trigger constellations: Reconstructing the story behind the story. Journalism14(3): 401–418.
9.
CappellaJJamiesonK (1997) Spiral of Cynicism The Press and the Public Good, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
ChecaLPeña y LilloMLagosC (2012) Cobertura de prensa del caso “Colusión de las Farmacias”. Análisis de contenido, Comunicación y medios25(1): 6–26.
11.
ConboyM (2006) Tabloid Britain: Constructing a Community Through Language, Abingdon: Routledge.
12.
CookT (1998) Governing the News: The News Media as a Political Institution, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
CushionS (2012) The Democratic Value of News: Why Public Service Media Matter, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
DavisA (2009) Journalist-source relations, mediated reflexivity and the politics of politics. Journalism Studies10(2): 204–219.
15.
D’AlessioDAllenM (2000) Media bias in presidential elections: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication50(4): 133–156.
16.
DermotaK (2002) Chile Inédito. El Periodismo Bajo Democracia, Santiago de Chile: Ediciones B.
17.
De VreeseCHSemetkoHA (2002) Cynical and engaged: Strategic campaign coverage, public opinion, and mobilization in a referendum. Communication Research29(6): 615–641.
18.
DonsbachWPattersonT (2004) Political news journalists, partisanship, professionalization, and political roles in five countries. In: PfetschBEsserF (eds) Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 251–270.
19.
EsserF (2008) Dimensions of political news cultures: Sound bite and image bite news in France, Germany, Great Britain, and the United States. The International Journal of Press/Politics13(4): 401–428.
20.
FernandezAVeraM (2012) The Bachelet Presidency and the end of Chile’s Concertación era. Latin American Perspectives39(4): 5–18.
21.
FranklinB (2004) Packaging Politics. Political Communications in Britain’s Media Democracy, London: Arnold.
22.
GaberI (2000) Government by spin: An analysis of the process. Media Culture Society22(4): 507–518.
23.
GansH (1980) Deciding What’s News. A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time, New York: Vintage.
24.
HanitzschTMelladoC (2011) What shapes the news around the world? How journalists in eighteen countries perceive influences on their work. The International Journal of Press/Politics16(3): 404–426.
25.
HarcupTO’NeillD (2001) What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journalism Studies2(2): 261–280.
26.
HofstetterR (1976) Bias in the News: Network Television Coverage of the 1972 Election Campaign, Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
27.
HughesS (2006) Newsrooms in Conflict: Journalism and the Democratization of Mexico, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
28.
HughesSLawsonCh (2005) The barriers to media opening in Latin America. Political Communication22(1): 9–25.
29.
KaidLLStrömbäckJ (2008) Election news coverage around the world: A comparative perspective. In: StrömbäckJKaidLL (eds) The Handbook of Election News Coverage Around the World, New York: Routledge, pp. 419–429.
30.
KepplingerH (2002) Mediatization of politics: Theory and data. Journal of Communication52(4): 972–986.
31.
LawrenceR (2000) Game-framing the issues: Tracking the strategy frame in public policy news. Political Communication17(2): 93–114.
32.
LouwE (2010) The Media and the Political Process, London: SAGE.
33.
MairA (2004) My Trade—A Short History of British Journalism, London: Macmillan.
34.
MazzoleniGSchulzW (1999) ‘Mediatization’ of politics: A challenge to democracy?Political Communication16(3): 247–261.
35.
MattosC (2012) Media and Politics in Latin America: Globalization, Democracy and Identity, New York: Tauris.
36.
McNairB (2011) An Introduction of Political Communication, London: Routledge.
37.
McMenaminIFlynnRO’MalleyE (2013) Commercialism and election framing: A content analysis of twelve newspapers in the 2011 Irish general election. International Journal of Press/Politics18(2): 167–187.
38.
MelladoC (2012) The Chilean journalist. In: WeaverDWillnatL (eds) The Global Journalist in the 21st Century, New York: Routledge, pp. 382–399.
39.
MelladoCHumanesML (2012) Modeling perceived professional autonomy in Chilean journalism. Journalism13(8): 983–1001.
40.
MelladoCMoreiraSLagosC (2012) Comparing journalism cultures in Latin America: The case of Chile, Brazil and Mexico. Gazette74(1): 60–77.
41.
MurphyPRodríguezC (2006) Introduction: Between Macondo and McWorld: Communication and culture studies in Latin America. Global Media and Communication2(3): 267–277.
42.
NeveuE (2002) Four generations of political journalism. In: KuhnRNeveuE (eds) Political Journalism: New Challenges, New Practices, London: Routledge, pp. 22–43.
43.
NimmoDCombsJ (1983) Mediated Political Realities, New York: Longman.
44.
O’Malley E, Brandenburg H, Flynn R, et al. (2012) Crisis elections and the primacy of policy: Explaining media framing of election coverage, Working Papers in International Studies, 5/2012. Dublin: Centre for International Studies.
45.
PaleyJ (2001) Marketing Democracy. Power and Social Movements in Post-dictatorship Chile, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
46.
PattersonT (1994) Out of Order, New York: Vintage.
47.
PolettiMBrantsB (2010) Between partisanship and cynicism. Italian journalism in a state of flux. Journalism11(3): 329–347.
48.
PorathW (2005) Medios de comunicación y campaña electoral 2005. In: HuneeusCBerríosFGamboaR (eds) Las Elecciones Chilenas de 2005, Santiago de Chile: Catalonia, pp. 197–222.
49.
PorathW (2007) Los Temas de la discusión pública en las elecciones presidenciales chilenas 2005: Relaciones entre las agendas de los medios y las agendas mediatizadas de los candidatos y del gobierno. América Latina Hoy46: 41–73.
50.
Porath W and Portales J (2012) La personalización de la política en la Campaña Presidencial Chilena de 2009. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the designing and building research network maps: Trends in International and Latin American Communication Research, School of Communications of the Pontificia Universidad Universidad Católica de Chile, October 18.
51.
PortoM (2008) Democratization and election news coverage in Brazil. In: StrombackJKaidLL (eds) The Handbook of Election News Coverage Around the World, London: Routledge, pp. 252–272.
52.
PortoMHallinD (2009) Introduction: Media and democratization in Latin America. International Journal of Press/Politics14(3): 291–295.
53.
RiffeDAustCFLacySR (1993) Effectiveness of random, consecutive day and constructed week sampling in newspaper content analysis. Journalism Quarterly70(1): 133–139.
54.
RiffeDLacySRFicoF (2005) Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55.
RossK (2010) Dance Macabre: Politicians, journalists, and the complicated rumba of relationships. International Journal of Press/Politics15(3): 272–294.
56.
SchudsonM (2008) Why Democracies Need an Unlovable Press, Cambridge: Polity.
57.
SemetkoHASchoenbachK (2003) News and elections: German Bundestag campaigns in the Bild, 1990–2002. The International Journal of Press/Politics8(3): 54–69.
58.
ShoemakerPReeseS (1996) Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content, New York: Longman.
59.
ShoemakerPVosT (2009) Gatekeeping Theory, New York: Routledge.
60.
StrömbäckJDimitrovaD (2006) Political and media systems matter: A comparison of election news coverage in Sweden and the United States. The International Journal of Press/Politics11(4): 131–147.
61.
StrömbäckJLuengoO (2008) Polarized pluralist and democratic corporatist models. A comparison of election news coverage in Spain and Sweden. Gazette70(6): 547–562.
62.
StrömbäckJNordL (2006) Swedish journalists and their political sources in the context of election do politicians lead the Tango? A study of the relationship between campaigns. European Journal of Communication21(2): 147–164.
63.
Strömbäck J and van Aelst P (2013) Why political parties adapt to the media: Exploring the fourth dimension of mediatization. International Communication Gazette 75(4): 341--358.
64.
Teichman J (2011) Chile: Democracy in a divided polity. In: Patroni V (ed) The Paradox of Democracy in Latin America: Ten Country Studies of Division and Resilience. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 299–324.
65.
Van DalenAde VreeseCHAlbækE (2012) Different roles, different content? A four-country comparison of the role conceptions and reporting style of political journalists. Journalism13(7): 903–922.
66.
WaisbordS (2000) Watchdog Journalism in South America: News, Accountability, and Democracy, New York: Columbia University Press.
67.
WaisbordS (2009) Research directions for global journalism studies: Ideas from Latin America. Journalism10(3): 393–395.
68.
WalterAVliegenhartR (2010) Negative campaigning across different communication channels: Different ball games?International Journal of Press Politics15(4): 441–461.
69.
WolfsfeldGSheaferT (2006) Competing actors and the construction of political news: The contest over waves in Israel. Political Communication23(3): 333–354.
70.
ValenzuelaS (2013) A new typology of power dynamics between journalists and political sources. In: McCombsMAlgarraMM (eds) Communication and Social Life, Pamplona: Eunsa, pp. 895–913.
71.
Voltmer K and Dobreva A (2009) Friends or foes? Conflict and cooperation between journalists and politicians in post-communist Bulgaria. Paper to be presented at the Political Studies Association conference, 7–9 April, Manchester, UK.
72.
ZallerJ (2003) A news standard of news quality: Burglar alarms for monitorial citizens. Political Communication20(2): 109.
