Force–time (F-t) variables derived from the countermovement jump (CMJ) offer insights into neuromuscular performance and may differ across sexes and sports. This study aimed to assess variables from the F–t curve and analyse force profiles by sex and sport. A total of 550 CMJs from 188 elite athletes representing nine sports were analyzed. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) reduced dimensionality and identified latent components describing force production. PCA extracted three components explaining 91.6% of variance: PC1 (propulsive, 38.0%), PC2 (braking, 29.3%), and PC3 (temporal–impulse, 24.3%). Component scores differed significantly across sports in both sexes (all p < 0.001). In males, gymnastics and fencing showed the highest PC1 scores, while triathlon consistently presented the lowest. Badminton displayed superior PC2 and PC3 characteristics. In females, artistic gymnastics exhibited the highest PC1 capacity, whereas taekwondo and triathlon showed the lowest. Badminton and gymnastics outperformed several sports in PC2 and PC3. PCA mapping showed male fencing and judo clustered in high propulsive–high braking profiles, while triathlon athletes showed low braking strategy efficiency. Most female athletes displayed reduced propulsive and braking capacity, except gymnasts and judokas. F–t profiles differentiate neuromuscular strategies across sexes and sports, supporting their application to guide discipline- and sex-specific training interventions.
JamesLPConnickMHaffGG, et al.The countermovement jump mechanics of mixed martial arts competitors. J Strength Cond Res2020; 34: 982–987.
2.
McMahonJRejSComfortP. Sex differences in countermovement jump phase characteristics. Sports2017; 5: 8.
3.
CabarkapaDCabarkapaDFryAC. Starters vs. non-starters differences in vertical jump force-time metrics in female professional volleyball players. Front Sports Act Living2024; 6: 1389001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1389001.
4.
FerreiraAMacedoVBoullosaD, et al.Identifying consistent metrics from the force-time curve of the countermovement jump in combat fighters and physically active men. Int J Exerc Sci2023; 16: 1038–1051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70252/lbrw9042.
5.
McMahonJJMurphySRejSJE, et al.Countermovement-jump-phase characteristics of senior and academy rugby league players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2017; 12: 803–811.
6.
LakeJPMundyPDComfortP, et al.Do the peak and mean force methods of assessing vertical jump force asymmetry agree?Sports Biomech2020; 19: 227–234.
7.
ClaudinoJGCroninJMezêncioB, et al.The countermovement jump to monitor neuromuscular status: a meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport2017; 20: 397–402.
8.
BertonRLixandrãoMEPintoE, et al.Effects of weightlifting exercise, traditional resistance and plyometric training on countermovement jump performance: a meta-analysis. J Sports Sci2018; 36: 2038–2044.
9.
PedleyJSLloydRSReadP, et al.Drop jump: a technical model for scientific application. Strength Cond J2017; 39: 36–44.
10.
TurnerANJeffreysI. The stretch-shortening cycle: proposed mechanisms and methods for enhancement. Strength Cond J2010; 32: 87–99.
11.
Rodríguez-RosellDMora-CustodioRFranco-MárquezF, et al.Traditional vs. sport-specific vertical jump tests: reliability, validity, and relationship with the legs strength and sprint performance in adult and teen soccer and basketball players. J Strength Cond Res2017; 31: 196–206.
12.
VescoviJDMcguiganMR. Relationships between sprinting, agility, and jump ability in female athletes. J Sports Sci2008; 26: 97–107.
13.
BarnesJLSchillingBKFalvoMJ, et al.Relationship of jumping and agility performance in female volleyball athletes. J Strength Cond Res2007; 21: 1192.
14.
ChavdaSBromleyTJarvisP, et al.Force-Time characteristics of the countermovement jump: analyzing the curve in excel. Strength Cond J2018; 40: 67–77.
15.
McMahonJJSuchomelTJLakeJP, et al.Understanding the key phases of the countermovement jump force-time curve. Strength Cond J2018; 40: 96–106.
16.
SoleCJMizuguchiSSatoK, et al.Phase characteristics of the countermovement jump force-time curve: a comparison of athletes by jumping ability. J Strength Cond Res2018; 32: 1155–1165.
17.
StruzikAZawadzkiJRokitaA. Leg stiffness and potential energy in the countermovement phaseand the CMJ jump height. Biomed Hum Kinet2016; 8: 39–44.
18.
McMahonJJJonesPASuchomelTJ, et al.Influence of the reactive strength index modified on force– and power–time curves. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2018; 13: 220–227.
19.
BarkerLAHarryJRMercerJA. Relationships between countermovement jump ground reaction forces and jump height, reactive strength Index, and jump time. J Strength Cond Res2018; 32: 248–254.
20.
MoirGLGarciaADwyerGB. Intersession reliability of kinematic and kinetic variables during vertical jumps in men and women. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2009; 4: 317–330.
21.
AnicicZJanicijevicDKnezevicOM, et al.Assessment of countermovement jump: what should we report?Life2023; 13: 190.
22.
RobertsTJ. Contribution of elastic tissues to the mechanics and energetics of muscle function during movement. J Exp Biol2016; 219: 266–275.
23.
KolliasIHatzitakiVPapaiakovouG, et al.Using principal components analysis to identify individual differences in vertical jump performance. Res Q Exerc Sport2001; 72: 63–67.
24.
LaffayeGWagnerPPTomblesonTIL. Countermovement jump height: gender and sport-specific differences in the force-time variables. J Strength Cond Res2014; 28: 1096–1105.
25.
LinJHGoldsteinSSchroederET. Sex- and sport-specific differences in jump strategies: key qualities for jump performance. Sports2025; 13: 292.
26.
NicholsonGEproGMerlinoS, et al.Differences in run-up, take-off, and flight characteristics: successful vs. Unsuccessful high jump attempts at the IAAF world championships. Front Sports Act Living2024; 6: 1352725.
27.
CabarkapaDVCabarkapaDAleksicJ, et al.Sport-Specific differences in vertical jump force-time metrics between professional female volleyball, basketball, and handball players. J Strength Cond Res2025; 39: 587–592.
28.
Martín-MiguelIMartínez-OrtegaJDDTorrontegi-RoncoE, et al.Vertical jump performance in elite athletes: a study of sex -and sportbased differences. Rev Iberoam Cienc Act Física El Deporte2025; 14: 231–249.
29.
AlegreLMLaraAJElviraJLL, et al.Muscle morphology and jump performance: gender and intermuscular variability. J Sports Med Phys Fitness2009; 49: 320–326.
30.
Rubio-AriasJÁRamos-CampoDJPeña AmaroJ, et al.Gender variability in electromyographic activity, in vivo behaviour of the human gastrocnemius and mechanical capacity during the take-off phase of a countermovement jump. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging2017; 37: 741–749.
Becerra-PatiñoBSarria-LozanoJCJavier-PalominoF. Characterization of variables associated with sports performance: interdiscisplinarity in women’s soccer in Colombia. J Phys Educ Sport2023; 23: 76–85.
33.
Vaccaro BenetPUgalde-RamírezAGómez-CarmonaCD, et al.Identification of game periods and playing position activity profiles in elite-level beach soccer players through principal component analysis. Sensors2024; 24: 7708.
34.
GløersenØMyklebustHHallénJ, et al.Technique analysis in elite athletes using principal component analysis. J Sports Sci2018; 36: 229–237.
35.
Oliva-LozanoJMRojas-ValverdeDGómez-CarmonaCD, et al.Impact of contextual variables on the representative external load profile of spanish professional soccer match-play: a full season study. Eur J Sport Sci2021; 21: 497–506.
36.
ParmarNJamesNHearneG, et al.Using principal component analysis to develop performance indicators in professional rugby league. Int J Perform Anal Sport2018; 18: 938–949.
37.
GabbettTJJenkinsDGAbernethyB. Correlates of tackling ability in high-performance rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res2011; 25: 72–79.
38.
GabbettTJJenkinsDGAbernethyB. Relative importance of physiological, anthropometric, and skill qualities to team selection in professional rugby league. J Sports Sci2011; 29: 1453–1461.
39.
JamesLPSuppiahHMcGuiganMR, et al.Dimensionality reduction for countermovement jump metrics. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2021; 16: 1052–1055.
40.
MerriganJJRentzLEHornsbyWG, et al.Comparisons of countermovement jump force-time characteristics among national collegiate athletic association division I American football athletes: use of principal component analysis. J Strength Cond Res2022; 36: 411–419.
41.
BadbyAJMundyPDComfortP, et al.The validity of hawkin dynamics wireless dual force plates for measuring countermovement jump and drop jump variables. Sensors2023; 23: 4820.
42.
Van HoorenBZolotarjovaJ. The difference between countermovement and squat jump performances: a review of underlying mechanisms with practical applications. J Strength Cond Res2017; 31: 2011–2020.
43.
CabarkapaDCabarkapaDWhitingSM, et al.Fatigue-induced neuromuscular performance changes in professional male volleyball players. Sports2023; 11: 120.
44.
MerriganJJStoneJDHornsbyWG, et al.Identifying reliable and relatable force–time metrics in athletes—considerations for the isometric mid-thigh pull and countermovement jump. Sports2020; 9: 4.
45.
PhilippNMCabarkapaDNijemRM, et al.Changes in countermovement jump force-time characteristic in elite male basketball players: a season-long analyses. PLOS ONE2023; 18: e0286581.
46.
WagnerCMBraunerTWarnekeK, et al.Absolute and relative maximum strength measures show differences in their correlations with sprint and jump performances in trained youth soccer players. Montenegrin J Sports Sci Med2023; 12: 69–74.
47.
KaiserHFRiceJ. Little jiffy, mark iv. Educ Psychol Meas1974; 34: 111–117.
48.
KaiserHF. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas1960; 20: 141–151.
49.
ThalheimerWCookS. How to calculate effect sizes from published research: a simplified methodology. Work-Learn Reserach2002; 10: 1–9.
50.
SamozinoPMorinJBHintzyF, et al.A simple method for measuring force, velocity and power output during squat jump. J Biomech2008; 41: 2940–2945.
51.
LaffayeGWagnerP. Eccentric rate of force development determines jumping performance. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin2013; 16: 82–83.
52.
CabarkapaDCabarkapaDBankovicV, et al.Changes in countermovement vertical jump force-time metrics across different competitive levels in women’s volleyball. Int J Strength Cond2024; 4: 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v4i1.294.
53.
HorníkováHSkalaFZemkováE. Sport-specific differences in key performance factors among handball, basketball and table tennis players. Int J Comput Sci Sport2023; 22: 31–41.
54.
OoiCHTanAAhmadA, et al.Physiological characteristics of elite and sub-elite badminton players. J Sports Sci2009; 27: 1591–1599.
55.
MkaouerBHammoudi-NassibSAmaraS, et al.Evaluating the physical and basic gymnastics skills assessment for talent identification in men’s artistic gymnastics proposed by the international gymnastics. Biol Sport2018; 35: 383–392.
56.
ValenzuelaPLMcGuiganMSánchez-MartínezG, et al.Reference power values for the jump squat exercise in elite athletes: a multicenter study. J Sports Sci2020; 38: 2273–2278.
57.
Bachero-MenaBPareja-BlancoFRodríguez-RosellD, et al.Relationships between sprint, jumping and strength abilities, and 800M performance in male athletes of national and international levels. J Hum Kinet2017; 58: 187–195.
58.
Llanos-LagosCRamirez-CampilloRMoranJ, et al.Effect of strength training programs in middle- and long-distance Runners’ economy at different running speeds: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Med2024; 54: 895–932.
59.
NassibSHMkaouerBRiahiSH, et al.Prediction of gymnastics physical profile through an international program evaluation in women artistic gymnastics. J Strength Cond Res2020; 34: 577–586.
60.
BeattieKTawiah-DodooJGraham-SmithP. Countermovement jump characteristics of world-class elite and sub-elite male sprinters. Sport Perform Sci Rep2020; 1: 1–4.
61.
NishiumiDNishiokaTSaitoH, et al.Associations of eccentric force variables during jumping and eccentric lower-limb strength with vertical jump performance: a systematic review. PLOS ONE2023; 18: e0289631.
