Several studies have stated that coaches’ ability to teach life skills to their athletes intentionally is associated with various aspects of positive youth development. This study aimed to adapt and validate the English version of the Coaching Life Skills in Sport Questionnaire in the Italian context (IT-CLSS-Q), a tool developed to assess the intentionality of coaches in teaching and transferring life skills through sport. The original English version was adapted to Italian using the back-translation procedure. A sample of 590 youth sport coaches completed the IT-CLSS-Q. The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the five-factor structure of the original questionnaire, and the reliability analyses demonstrated high internal consistency for all subscales. Measurement invariance testing showed consistency between groups with different coaching experience, while significant correlations with empathy and leadership self-efficacy supported the construct validity of the questionnaire. Overall, the results indicate that IT-CLSS-Q is a useful tool for evaluating life skills coaching in Italy, providing a foundation for future research and interventions to improve positive youth development through sport. Future research should include a more balanced representation of disciplines and genders, integrating athletes’ perspectives and longitudinal studies to deepen understanding of the long-term impact of life skills transfer.
BiddleSJHCiaccioniSThomasG, et al.Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: an updated review of reviews and an analysis of causality. Psychol Sport Exerc2019; 42: 146–155.
2.
GuddalMHStenslandSØSmåstuenMC, et al.Physical activity and sport participation among adolescents: associations with mental health in different age groups. Results from the Young-HUNT study: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open2019; 9: e028555.
3.
McMahonEMCorcoranPO’ReganG, et al.Physical activity in European adolescents and associations with anxiety, depression and well-being. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry2017; 26: 111–122.
4.
PattonGCSawyerSMSantelliJS, et al.Our future: a Lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing. Lancet2016; 387: 2423–2478.
5.
GouldDCarsonS. Life skills development through sport: current status and future directions. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol2008; 1: 58–78.
CamiréMTurgeonSKramersS, et al.Development and initial validation of the coaching life skills in sport questionnaire. Psychol Sport Exerc2021; 53: 101845.
8.
World Health Organization. Life skills education for children and adolescents in schools. Introduction and guidelines to facilitate the development and implementation of life skills programmes. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1994.
9.
CamiréMSantosF. Promoting positive youth development and life skills in youth sport: challenges and opportunities amidst increased professionalization. J Sport Pedagogy Res2019; 5: 27–34.
10.
BeanCFornerisT. Examining the importance of intentionally structuring the youth sport context to facilitate positive youth development. J Appl Sport Psychol2016; 28: 410–425.
11.
PierceSGouldDCamiréM. Definition and model of life skills transfer. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol2017; 10: 186–211.
12.
TurnnidgeJCôtéJHancockDJ. Positive youth development from sport to life: explicit or implicit transfer?Quest2014; 66: 203–217.
13.
BeanCKramersSFornerisT, et al.The implicit/explicit continuum of life skills development and transfer. Quest2018; 70: 456–470.
14.
KramersSTurgeonSBeanC, et al.Examining the roles of coaching experience and coach training on coaches’ perceived life skills teaching. Int J Sports Sci Coach2020; 15: 576–583.
15.
PierceSKendellenKCamiréM, et al.Strategies for coaching for life skills transfer. J Sport Psychol Action2018; 9: 11–20.
16.
CamiréMFornerisTTrudelP, et al.Strategies for helping coaches facilitate positive youth development through sport. J Sport Psychol Action2011; 2: 92–99.
17.
SantosFRathwellSSabinoB, et al.Analyzing continuous coach education courses in Portugal: implications for youth development. Int J Sports Sci Coach2023; 18: 1036–1044.
18.
BaeJLimT. The validation of Korean coaching life skills in sport questionnaire (KCLSS-Q). Korean J Sport Sci2022; 33: 382–395.
19.
CiampoliniVSantosFQuinaudRT, et al.Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Portuguese coaching life skills in sport questionnaire. SAGE Open2021; 11: 21582440211024224.
20.
TurgeonSMotzDRathwellS, et al.Initial development and validation of the French-Canadian version of the coaching life skills in sport questionnaire (FC-CLSS-Q). Revue phénEPS-PHEnex J2024; 14: 1–27.
21.
ArabiMHamrahL. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the coaching life skills questionnaire in sport. Sport Psychology Studies2023; 12: 87–106.
22.
BortoliLVitaliFTommasiniA, et al.Insegnare life skills attraverso l’attività sportiva. G Ital Psic Sport2015; 22: 3–11.
23.
AngelucciM. Il paradosso dello sport in Italia. Frankfurt am Main: Biblioteca italiana/Italienische Bibliothek, 2015.
24.
BrustioPRRainoldiAMossoCO, et al.Italian student-athletes only need a more effective daily schedule to support their dual career. Sport Sci Health2020; 16: 177–182.
25.
GuidottiFMingantiCCortisC, et al.Validation of the Italian version of the student athletes’ motivation toward sport and academics questionnaire. Sport Sci Health2013; 9: 51–58.
26.
AlbieroPMatricardiGTosoD. La basic empathy scale, uno strumento per la misura della responsività empatica negli adolescenti: un contributo alla validazione italiana. Psicol Clin Sviluppo2010; 3: 693–706.
27.
LorimerR. The development of empathic accuracy in sports coaches. J Sport Psychol Action2013; 4: 26–33.
28.
CamiréMRathwellSTurgeonS, et al.Coach-athlete relationships, basic psychological needs satisfaction and thwarting, and the teaching of life skills in Canadian high school sport. Int J Sports Sci Coach2019; 14: 591–606.
29.
CroninLDAllenJ. Examining the relationships among the coaching climate, life skills development and well-being in sport. Int J Sports Sci Coach2018; 13: 815–827.
30.
BeatonDEBombardierCGuilleminF, et al.Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine2000; 25: 3186–3191.
31.
BobbioAManganelliAM. Leadership self-efficacy scale: a new multidimensional instrument. TPM Test Psychom Methodol Appl Psychol2009; 16: 3–24.
32.
DavisM. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog Sel Doc Psychol1980; 10: 85.
33.
IngogliaSLo CocoAAlbieroP. Development of a brief form of the interpersonal reactivity Index (B–IRI). J Pers Assess2016; 98: 461–471.
34.
BurkardAWKnoxS. Effect of therapist color-blindness on empathy and attributions in cross-cultural counseling. J Couns Psychol2004; 51: 387–397.
35.
GiniGAlbieroPBenelliB, et al.Determinants of adolescents’ active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. J Adolesc2008; 31: 93–105.
36.
LiZEdwardsJA. The relationship between system justification and perspective-taking and empathy. Pers Soc Psychol Bull2021; 47: 106–117.
37.
BeauducelAHerzbergPY. On the performance of Maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Struct Equ Modeling2006; 13: 186–203.
38.
BrownTA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press, 2015.
39.
KlineRB. Principles of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford, 1998.
40.
TabachnickBGFidellLS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. New York: Pearson, 2007.
41.
RosseelY. Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Soft2012; 48: 1–36.
42.
ZumboBGadermannAZeisserC. Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. J Mod Appl Stat Methods2007; 6: 21–29.
43.
NunnallyJCBernsteinI. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
44.
BagozziRPYiY. Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci2012; 40: 8–34.
45.
WangJWangX. Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. 2nd ed. West Sussex, UK: Wiley, 2019.
46.
ByrneB. Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge, 2012.
47.
CohenJ. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
48.
MuthénBKaplanD. A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. Br J Math Stat Psychol1985; 38: 171–189.
KramersSCamiréMCiampoliniV, et al.Development of a life skills self-assessment tool for coaches. J Sport Psychol Action2021; 13: 54–64.
52.
PierceSO’NeilLCamiréM, et al.Examining the relationship between perceived coaching approaches for life skills development and life skills outcomes for high school athletes. Int Sport Coach J2024; 1: 1–12.
53.
DanishSFornerisTHodgeK, et al.Enhancing youth development through sport. World Leis J2004; 46: 38–49.
54.
Fraser-ThomasJLCôtéJDeakinJ. Youth sport programs: an avenue to foster positive youth development. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy2005; 10: 19–40.
55.
HoltNLNeelyKCSlaterLG, et al.A grounded theory of positive youth development through sport based on results from a qualitative meta-study. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol2017; 10: 1–49.
