Abstract
Objectives
The aim of this review was to summarise the existing literature concerning the implementation of menstrual cycle tracking in applied sport settings.
Methods
For this scoping review, database searches were conducted in ProQuest, PubMed, Scopus, SportDISCUS, and Web of Science. Screening was performed by two independent reviewers to identify academic publications that related to the concept of menstrual cycle tracking in applied sport settings.
Results
Twenty-six articles published between 2001 and 2024 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. These were most commonly original research articles (n = 19) and published in the last two years (n = 20). One research protocol paper and six opinion articles published in academic journals were also included. Twelve of the 26 publications recommend implementing tracking in sport settings; many publications also encourage providing education (n = 13) and facilitating more open communication (n = 10) on menstrual-related topics. Where tracking was conducted, this was done using calendar-based methods alone (n = 5) or in conjunction with urinary (n = 3), capillary blood (n = 2) and venous blood (n = 1) hormone measures, and ovulation test kits (n = 1).
Conclusions
Menstrual cycle tracking may be a useful tool for promoting self-awareness, identifying menstrual dysfunction, and managing menstrual symptoms. However, in practice there are potential risks, such as loss of privacy or misuse of data. There is also a need for ecologically valid tracking tools that can identify subtle menstrual disturbances, to make tracking more beneficial and efficient.
Introduction
Athlete monitoring is a prominent component of athlete support and preparation strategies in high performance settings. These monitoring processes can be undertaken with a variety of tools and consider a multitude of variables, including internal (i.e., rating of perceived exertion, heart rate response) and external load (i.e., power output, movement demands). 1 With the growing professionalisation of sport for female athletes there is increasing interest in monitoring additional variables pertaining to the menstrual cycle. Menstrual cycle tracking is a practice where an individual records when they experience menstruation, to indicate the start and end of consecutive menstrual cycles. Tracking may also involve recording additional variables, such as heaviness of menstrual blood flow and symptoms, and female sex hormone concentrations, or estimated day of ovulation to capture a more detailed picture of menstrual health. 2
A functional menstrual cycle, also referred to as eumenorrhea, is characterised by an individual experiencing menstruation on a regular basis (i.e., every 21–35 days), and demonstrating ovulation and an expected hormonal profile throughout. 3 Menstrual function can be described on a continuum (Figure 1), where an appropriately functioning menstrual cycle would first demonstrate subtle disturbances (i.e., anovulation or luteal phase deficiency) before progressing to more severe forms of dysfunction like oligomenorrhea, then amenorrhea. 4 Some research indicates longitudinal tracking to capture menstrual cycle length and ovulation could enable identification of conditions along this continuum 5 ; for example, flagging menstrual cycles that last longer 35 days or where no positive ovulation test results are recorded. As such, tracking menstrual function may be useful in sport settings due its relation to relative energy deficiency in sport (REDs) risk, bone health, and fertility. 6 Tracking may also help to identify menstrual dysfunction related to abnormal bleeding or symptoms (i.e., menorrhagia, premenstrual syndrome/dysphoric disorder). 7

Continuum of menstrual function, adapted from Mallinson and De Souza. 4 .
Menstrual cycle tracking is also considered as a potential tool to optimise performance by modifying training, recovery, or nutrition programs based on menstrual cycle phase. Multiple systematic reviews, investigating the effect of menstrual cycle phase on performance, 8 exercise induced muscle damage, 9 athletes’ perceptual responses, 10 thermoregulatory responses to exercise in heat, 11 and responses and adaptations to resistance training 12 have been published within the last five years, demonstrating the recent surge in interest in this topic. The main findings from these reviews are that any effect from cycle phase is small and many studies were limited by small sample sizes. Based on these review findings, it was recommended approaches to menstrual cycle tracking and any changes to programming are both individualised to the athlete.8,10
There is some uptake of these suggestions, with athletes choosing to track their menstrual cycles personally, or tracking being undertaken as either mandatory or optional additions to their sporting organisations’ athlete monitoring processes. 13 While there is now guidance for menstrual cycle tracking within research design, 3 there is limited guidance on how to track menstrual cycles in applied sport settings to support the decision-making process (i.e., the initial decision to track cycles and subsequent decisions regarding what to track, how to use data, data privacy, etc). Tracking may also be implemented without end-users having sufficient understanding of menstrual cycle physiology, with current evidence showing many athletes and practitioners have limited knowledge pertaining to menstrual health.14,15 This understanding of menstrual cycle physiology is important as the purpose of tracking may be influenced by the users’ characteristics. For example, menstrual cycle tracking is not a useful practice for identifying menstrual dysfunction such as anovulation or amenorrhea in hormonal contraceptive users, who make up a considerable proportion (approximately 40%) of the female athlete population. 16
It is crucial to provide specific guidance for practitioners because various constraints and considerations – such as the purpose of tracking, financial and time costs, athlete availability and scheduling, menstrual stigma, and practitioner expertise – mean that research-focused menstrual cycle tracking likely differs from tracking occurring in practice. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review is to summarise the existing literature exploring the concept of implementing of menstrual cycle tracking in the context of applied sport settings. For practitioners in applied settings, this review will provide a summary of available evidence to inform decision making around their menstrual cycle tracking practices. For researchers, this review will highlight the scope for future research to address gaps in the literature.
Methods
This scoping review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines and was prospectively registered on Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TW2JX).
Search strategy
An electronic literature search (Table 1) for terms related to menstrual cycle tracking and sport was conducted in the following databases: ProQuest, PubMed, Scopus, SportDiscus, and Web of Science on the 9th January 2024 and repeated on the 26th August 2024 to capture recent publication. The search results were exported into EndNote 21 17 where duplicates were removed before being uploaded to review management software Covidence 18 for screening. Additional studies were identified via forward and backward citation searches of the articles included following full-text screening using citationchaser. 19
Full search strategy.
Source selection
Any academic publication that was peer-reviewed, published in English, and relevant to the concept of implementing menstrual cycle tracking in the context of sport settings was eligible for inclusion. Further, the aim of the article either needed to relate to the implementation of menstrual cycle tracking, or tracking emerged as an outcome or focus of the article. Many original research articles examining the effect of menstrual cycle phases on outcome variables recommend implementing menstrual cycle tracking. However, these articles were excluded because the implementation of tracking in applied settings was not the main purpose of the study. For the purpose of this review, menstrual cycle tracking refers to the ongoing recording of when menstruation occurs, and potentially other outcomes (e.g., ovulation, heaviness of bleeding, symptoms, hormone measures). Any articles that focused on menstrual health screening (i.e., a historical questionnaire) rather than prospective tracking were not included in this review as the periodic versus continuous nature of screening and tracking, respectively, mean there are different considerations to be made in the implementation of these practices in applied settings. Articles were considered relevant to an applied sport context if the participants were referred to as ‘athletes’ or described as training to compete or perform, were part of the athlete support network (e.g., with practitioners, coaches, or parents of athletes), or the article discussed menstrual cycle tracking as an athlete monitoring tool (i.e., used to support health, wellbeing, and/or performance). Articles were excluded if the participants were from general or clinical populations, or if the discussion of menstrual cycle tracking took place within the context of conducting research (i.e., guidance for cycle tracking in research protocols).
Two reviewers (MC, AC) completed independent title and abstract screening, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer (KP). The full-texts of potentially relevant articles, identified in this initial stage of screening, were sourced from open-access sources, the University library, and where required, contacting the corresponding author. Full-text screening was completed by two independent reviewers (MC, KP) and conflicts were resolved via a consensus meeting with a third reviewer (AC).
Data extraction and analysis
A descriptive-analytical approach was taken to charting the data, meaning we collected standard information from each study to understand the context in which the articles were published to help us make sense of their findings. 20 The following information was extracted from all included articles: year of publication, country, type of publication, details regarding menstrual cycle tracking methods or processes, and the authors’ conclusions or practical takeaways regarding menstrual cycle tracking. Additional information such as study design, participant characteristics, and study findings were also extracted from the included original research articles. One reviewer (MC) populated a data extraction form on Microsoft Excel, 21 which was cross-checked by a second reviewer (VK). A narrative synthesis of the extracted results was then conducted, in which the results were considered together and findings summarised in text.
Results
The database searches retrieved a total of 10,757 articles. Following the removal of duplicates, and title and abstract screening, the full-texts of 87 publications were sourced and their eligibility assessed (Figure 2). Overall, 26 publications were included in this review; 19 original research articles, one original research protocol, and six opinion articles published in academic journals. The earliest original research article was a 2001 non-randomised control trial on the usefulness and feasibility of monitoring athletes’ ovarian hormone responses to training. 5 However, the majority of included publications were published in in the last two years (n = 20). The included publications most frequently originated from the United Kingdom (n = 10), followed by Australia (n = 4).

Flow chart of literature search results.
Within the included original research articles (Table 2), most studies used a quantitative methodology (n = 13) and one article was a protocol for a study that is currently underway. 22 Mixed methods (n = 3) and qualitative (n = 3) approaches were also utilised. These studies predominantly focused solely on athlete participants (n = 14), while some looked at both athlete and their support network (e.g., coaches, support staff, and parents) (n = 3) or were only with sports practitioners (e.g., coaches) (n = 2). Many of these studies included participants involved in a variety of sports (n = 7) or specifically in soccer (n = 7). In the articles where menstrual cycle tracking was conducted (n = 11), five studies used calendar-based methods only.23–27 In addition to calendar-based tracking, the remaining articles included urinary hormone measures (n = 3),5,22,28 hormone measures via capillary (n = 2)29,30 and venous blood (n = 1), 31 and ovulation test kits (n = 1). 31
Original research articles that fulfilled inclusion criteria.
AMH = anti-mullerian hormone; AUS = Australia; avg = average; CAN = Canada; CZE = Czech Republic; E1G = urinary estrone glucuronide; E13G = estrone-3-glucuronide; FRA = France; FSH = follicle stimulating hormone; GH = growth hormone; HC = hormonal contraception; IND = India; LH = luteinising hormone; LPD = luteal phase deficiency; MC = menstrual cycle; n = sample size; OCP = oral contraceptive pill; PdG = pregnanediol glucuronide; SIN = Singapore; SHBG = Sex hormone-binding globulin; sRPE = sessional rating of perceived exertion; UK = United Kingdom; USA = United States of America.
The non-original research publications (n = 6) (Table 3) largely advocated for further research on menstrual cycle tracking in sport32–34 and provided suggestions for cycle tracking in research and applied settings.33,35–37
Non-research publications that fulfilled inclusion criteria.
AUS = Australia; AUT = Austria; GER = Germany; MC = menstrual cycle; NZ = New Zealand; UK = United Kingdom; USA = United States of America.
The concepts relating to menstrual cycle tracking, including the reasons why one might track, how tracking can be implemented, and additional considerations to be aware of, are summarised in Figure 3. The prevalence of menstrual cycle tracking was reported in four studies and was practiced in 22–67% of their population, across youth, 38 endurance, 39 and team40,41 sports. Twelve of the twenty-six publications suggest or recommend that athletes track their cycles. Numerous publications also encourage practitioners to consider risks and limitations of menstrual cycle tracking (n = 13); this includes three of the aforementioned publications that suggest or recommend tracking.24,42,43 These considerations include the usefulness (i.e., validity, reliability) of tracking tools (n = 4),28,31,33,34 appropriate use of tracking data (n = 4),35,41,44,45 age appropriateness if working with junior athletes (n = 2),38,45 whether practice is supported by research (n = 3),33,35,45 athletes’ autonomy and/or privacy (n = 4),35,37,45,46 varying cultural views of menstruation (n = 2),37,46 and the disadvantages of athletes’ focussing their attention on their cycle (n = 2).42,46 Within the articles included in this review, many (n = 13) recommended athletes and/or practitioners engage in education relating to menstrual cycles24,27,28,32,36–39,41,43,45–48 and encouraged more open communication between athletes and practitioners (n = 10).24,26,36,38,39,41,43,46–48

Summary of why menstrual cycle tracking is recommended or currently takes place, how tracking is currently implemented, and considerations noted to be aware of if tracking based on the results of the existing literature.
Discussion
This scoping review offers an overview of the existing literature pertaining to the implementation of menstrual cycle tracking within applied sports settings. The publications included in this review highlight the progress that has been made in the last two and half decades in this field, the uses and methods of menstrual cycle tracking, the role of education and communication in supporting tracking processes, and the future of menstrual cycle tracking technology.
Progress since 2001
The earliest publication captured in this review was Morris and Wark's 5 study in 2001 on serial urine sampling to identify hormone changes in youth and elite adult rowers over a competitive season. The authors recommended their tracking protocol be an “integral part of routine clinical practice” to preserve female athlete's bone health. 5 (p.13) This study was published not long after the female athlete triad was conceived and the consequences of menstrual dysfunction to bone health were more widely understood. 49 Despite this, only recently menstrual cycle tracking has gained popularity as an athlete monitoring tool. Current interest in tracking can be evidenced by the large number of articles included in this review that were published in the last two years and reporting of cycle tracking occurring in professional and representative sporting teams in popular media. 13
Research investigating the links between menstrual health and other aspects such as bone health, body composition, and energy availability have been summarised elsewhere50–53 over a longer period of time, and as such, was not a focus of this scoping review. However, this information forms the basis for why menstrual cycle tracking may be relevant for female athletes. The discussion of menstrual cycle tracking by popular media potentially indicates a broader societal shift in the public perception of this topic, a result of greater resourcing with increased professionalisation, or perhaps increased visibility of various sports for female athletes. For example, there were many discussions of how National teams prepared athletes and utilised cycle tracking in media coverage pertaining to the 2023 Women's Football World Cup.54,55 The prevalence of cycle tracking for athlete monitoring in different settings appears to vary and it remains unknown how widely used menstrual cycle tracking is, specifically as an athlete monitoring tool (i.e., used to support athlete health, wellbeing, and/or performance). Furthermore, there is still little evidence to indicate tracking menstrual cycles leads to improved health or performance outcomes in athletes. Anecdotally, some athletes report benefits of tracking their cycle but whether this has tangible impacts on outcomes related to health or performance needs to be investigated to understand how useful cycle tracking is in applied settings. Specifically, field-based studies investigating the efficacy of tracking in identifying menstrual dysfunction, preventing the development of REDs or bone stress injuries, and assisting in the management of negative side-effects.
While the body of literature on this topic is relatively new, there is also a noteworthy geographical and cultural bias present. With almost all articles originating from Western countries, there is a gap in literature that does not account for the breadth of perspectives on menstrual-related topics that exist globally and across different cultures.56,57 This bias could point to greater funding and publication opportunities in Western countries. It may also be that cycle tracking is not a research focus outside of these regions due to socio-cultural differences in how female sport participation, 58 menstruation, and menstrual health is perceived, or that other topics such as period poverty and menstrual hygiene are priortised. 59 It is also important to acknowledge the authors of this scoping review are all white women living and working in a Western country and a limitation of this review is that only English language publications were included.
The uses and methods of tracking
Early publications outlined the potential usefulness of tracking in preventing overtraining, bone density losses, and bone stress injuries via the identification of menstrual dysfunction.5,60 However, this scoping review highlights there are multiple applications of tracking including improving athletes’ self-awareness, identification and subsequent management of menstrual dysfunction and negative menstrual-related side-effects, and facilitation of conversations between athletes and practitioners. The reasoning behind implementing tracking will likely influence the selection of method(s) used to track cycles. 61 The calendar-based method of tracking used were conducted with mobile tracking applications or daily questionnaires.23,24,31,38,41 These tools provide athletes and practitioners insights into menstrual cycle duration, which is necessary for the identification of amenorrhea and oligomenorrhea, and trends related to positive or negative side-effects experienced (i.e., perceptions of improved/impaired performance, menstrual-related symptoms). However, some menstrual cycle tracking apps also provide training and nutrition suggestions for users at different points within their cycles, which practitioners should consider when selecting tracking tools and warrant further attention in research to understand the subjective and objectives effects this may have on athletes. 62
The tracking of symptoms appears to be a useful inclusion in menstrual cycle tracking systems for athletes as there is a relationship between the number of symptoms and sleep, an important aspect of athlete health and wellbeing. 25 However, when used alone, calendar-based tracking has limited use in identifying conditions occurring early on the menstrual dysfunction continuum (i.e., luteal phase defects or anovulation with regular menstruation). This is notable given subtle menstrual disturbances have been observed in close to 50% of exercising and athletic populations, 28 while within a rugby league squad, seven of the eleven menstruating athletes had subtle disturbances. 31 Gold-standard approaches to identifying ovulation (i.e., transvaginal ultrasound) and measuring sex hormones (i.e., serum hormone concentration) to capture these subtle disturbances are cost- and time-consuming, invasive,33,63 and impractical in sport settings. Less valid and reliable measures could still be useful; as seen in Morris and Wark's study 5 serial urinary hormone monitoring was sensitive enough to capture changes in hormone concentrations and ovulatory status over the rowing season, and an athlete moving through the menstrual dysfunction continuum. This method requires storage and transport of samples, and incurs costs associated with consumables and assays, so may not be feasible in all settings. The costs and benefits of tracking with these additional measures, or how the use of these measures could be triaged or used intermittently are likely to need consideration in applied settings.
Compliance with tracking
While the implementation of menstrual cycle tracking can be influenced by constraints such as time and financial costs, another consideration is the impact/usefulness of tracking for practitioners and athletes (i.e., ability to identify menstrual dysfunction, or trends in positive- or negative- side effects), is compliance. Like any athlete self-report measure, menstrual cycle tracking relies on consistent and accurate reporting. Athletes’ compliance with menstrual cycle tracking, conducted with different methods with varying levels of burden, was high in multiple studies included in this scoping review. Overall, 87 and 99.3% of daily tracking questionnaires were completed by athletes across a soccer season 24 and rugby league athletes over a 16 week period, 31 respectively. When rowing athletes were required to collect, dilute, and store urine samples every second day, the authors’ considered compliance to be “high”, although a specific value to quantify this was not provided. 5 In a similar study with female Australian football players, only 66% routinely collected urine samples every other day across a competitive season. 64 Athletes’ level of interest in the nutritional, physiological, and psychological influences of the menstrual cycle reportedly had a significant positive correlation with compliance to calendar-based tracking 24 ; therefore, where tracking is implemented, practitioners should consider how to pique athletes’ interest and buy-in to tracking processes. In studies where compliance is recorded,24,31,64 it is only done so over a single season or period, hence, it is unknown how interest and compliance may change over a longer term (i.e., multiple seasons).
The role of education in tracking
Providing information on menstrual-related topics is likely to rationalise the use of tracking, and promote buy-in to tracking and open communication between athletes and practitioners. As such, many of the authors of the publications included in this review highlight the need for education about menstrual cycles in sport settings. Athletes and practitioners generally feel their knowledge on these topics is poor or inadequate43,65 and education was identified as one of the overarching considerations to be made in tracking menstrual cycles in sport. 46 Importantly, a link has been established between knowledge and health, as athletes with lower knowledge of menstrual dysfunction are more likely to experience amenorrhea or oligomenorrhea. 66 This may be observed because female athletes with an understanding of menstrual health are also more likely to be equipped to discuss these topics and highlight concerns to relevant practitioners. 42 Coach and practitioner knowledge in this area should also be addressed, as they are a point of contact for athletes and making decisions regarding the implementation of tracking. Indeed, practitioners involved in cycle tracking within Women's Super League and Women's Championship soccer clubs in the United Kingdom were often unsure of the purpose and application of tracking at their club and whose role it was to discuss menstrual-related concerns with athletes. 41 Therefore physiology-specific knowledge around the menstrual cycle, contextual knowledge around individuals’ specific roles and where to get further support and information is necessary for athletes and practitioners.
Education interventions have been effective in leading to short-term improvements in knowledge pertaining to menstrual cycles and hormonal contraceptives, 67 and female athlete triad and REDs.68,69 However, athletes and practitioners feel they have limited access to resources to develop their knowledge.43,65 Systemic changes above a club-level (i.e., sport governing bodies) are an important step in improving the environment female athletes train and perform in; with practitioners noting governing bodies should hold more responsibility in their education.43,65 Examples put forward by practitioners working with soccer athletes and swimmers include receiving a guide for good practice and including education on these female-specific topics within coaching courses and continuing professional development requirements.43,65 It appears, at least in some cases, there is room for improvement at an organisational level, despite the first position stand on the Female Athlete Triad in 1997 70 advocating for a proactive approach from sport governing bodies to educate coaches and offer professional certifications to those that have undertaken education. Whilst guidance, factsheets, and education modules are available, for example through the Australian Institute of Sport's Female Performance and Health Initiative 71 or England Netball and the Well HQ's NetballHer site, 72 their reach and uptake are likely limited by a lack of awareness of these resources or being optional elements of practitioner education. Additionally, the longer-term retention of this information and the need for subsequent education has not been observed.
The role of communication in tracking
Providing regular feedback and developing trust between athletes and those with access to data collected are key to improving athletes’ experiences of self-report measures in general. 73 Verrier 74 has begun to explore athletes’ perceptions of menstrual cycle tracking, and within a rugby environment athletes believed tracking could enhance relationships between teammates, providing a platform from which athletes can discuss their experiences with each other, as well as between athletes and practitioners, with practitioners being able to approach athletes with more understanding and tracking being an avenue for athletes to flag concerns with practitioners. As previously mentioned, knowledge is an important factor that may influence conversations within the sporting environment; this has been recognised and coaches have shown interest in learning how to approach discussions on these topics with the athletes they work with. 48
Some barriers to open communication from athletes include stigma surrounding menstruation and the assumption that coaches are uninterested in or not knowledgeable of menstrual health. 75 Some athletes do not discuss their menstrual cycle as they do not believe it negatively impacts their performance or do not believe they have any menstrual related issues. This can be true for some individuals, but in some cases may be a result of limited knowledge, such as the belief that absent menstruation is normal in athletes. 76 The role of gender as a barrier or facilitator to communication regarding menstrual cycles is not fully understood. In some studies, gender is not identified as a barrier to communication behaviour,77,78 but others show it does affect athlete's willingness or comfort to discuss menstrual cycles with their coaches.43,79 The relationship between communication and education becomes apparent as many of these barriers can start to be addressed via education (i.e., informing those in sport what is normal or not normal in terms of menstrual cycles and related symptoms, beginning to address stigma, and demonstrating coaches and practitioners engaging in education). The efficacy of education interventions in facilitating this communication and promoting buy-in to menstrual cycle tracking processes should be investigated in future research. The barriers and facilitators to menstrual cycle tracking in sport should be further investigated in case there are unique considerations to be made.
Tracking-related risks
While socio-environmental factors and streamlining of tracking processes can be addressed to potentially improve the process and impact of cycle tracking, some publications included in this scoping review highlighted potential risks in tracking menstrual cycles. The concerns highlighted by Casto 35 raise an important point – the question of how to track cycles is being investigated, with seemingly little consideration of whether athletes’ cycles should be tracked by practitioners. Various risks may arise from the implementation of menstrual cycle tracking within athlete monitoring systems, including loss of privacy pertaining to menstrual health and fertility information and mishandling of data by practitioners. 35 Taim et al. 38 also called attention to the importance of the safeguarding of young athletes when considering how to promote open communication related to menstrual concerns, with periodic menstrual health screening rather than regular cycle tracking suggested. Howe 45 reinforced these concerns relating to privacy, misuse of data, and safeguarding of youth athletes but extended their exploration of the risks of tracking to other vulnerable athletes, which include those in high pressure environments, those with differences in sex development, or transgender athletes. A number of policy recommendations to address these risks were outlined and include ensuring athletes are aware how and why tracking is conducted so they may give informed consent, excluding youth athletes from tracking, blocking practitioners who have not received education on menstrual health, and risks of tracking from accessing tracking data. 45
Future tracking technology
The implementation of menstrual cycle tracking may be impacted by how burdensome reporting processes are for athletes. Streamlined processes for athletes to input responses are crucial for athlete friendly reporting systems that are perceived to be useful and low burden. It has been established that the use of additional tools alongside calendar-based tracking are important to the ability of a menstrual cycle tracking system to identify earlier stages of menstrual dysfunction (and enable earlier intervention) but increase the burden and costs of tracking. Within the publications included in this narrative review, there was a protocol to validate a point of care device to measure urinary hormones and indicate ovulation, 22 and two original research articles on the use of artificial intelligence to model hormone fluctuations over the menstrual cycle.29,30 This research points to how processes for both athletes and practitioners potentially handling data can be streamlined. These advances in tracking technology can allow serial samples to be collected, using non-invasive methods, which can provide real-time results and negate the need for sample storage. Artificial intelligence modelling could also reduce sample collection frequency, to not only save time but also lower costs of consumables and hormonal assays. Advances in sport-specific tracking technology are being showcased by the partnership between the United Kingdom Sports Institute and Mint Diagnostics, who have developed a point of care device measuring female sex hormones from salivary samples, which is currently being used by sporting organisations. 80 Outside of the sport-specific context of this review, wearable devices are also being used in a general population to predict ovulation based on skin temperature81–83 and artificial intelligence to predict the timing of menstruation and ovulation.84–86 Further research in athletic populations and the application of fertility research should continue to develop easy to use and cheap, but valid and reliable methods of menstrual cycle tracking in sport settings.
Conclusion
Menstrual cycle tracking is the subject of a recent surge in interest but has been discussed as a potential athlete monitoring tool for more than twenty years. Whilst many publications on this topic recommend tracking be implemented in sport settings and highlight the various arguments for its inclusion in athlete monitoring, such as promoting self-awareness, identifying menstrual dysfunction, and managing menstrual symptoms, some of these publications also draw attention to the potential risks of menstrual cycle tracking, such as loss of privacy or misuse of data. Where these risks can be managed and tracking is implemented, practitioners should consider the purpose of cycle tracking in their setting, what methods of tracking are feasible and suit their needs, and how education may be delivered alongside tracking to improve its outcomes. A one-size-fits-all approach to menstrual cycle tracking is unlikely to be appropriate to all sports, and athletes of different ages and cultural backgrounds, so any guidance developed for practitioners related to tracking should remain evidence-based but flexible. Future research should focus on the development of ecologically valid tracking tools, which are cost- and time-effective, and exploring the current practices to understand use of tracking in sport settings, and the barriers and facilitators (i.e., costs, stigma, practitioner expertise) to menstrual cycle tracking in sport.
Footnotes
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethical considerations
Ethical approval was not required.
