Athlete selection, as a crucial step for the success of competitive sports, is the last hurdle in the whole sports talent cultivation chain, which is related to the stability and sustainable development of the sports. In athlete selection, coaches play the role of decision-makers in selecting the most suitable athletes for a specific sport or competition from a large pool of talented athletes. Therefore, understanding how coaches’ decisions impact athlete selection is crucial in establishing selection rules, formulating effective decision-making, and developing accurate athlete development policies. This review was conducted by searching the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus databases for English-language literature on coaching decision-making and talent selection, and screening and categorizing the literature according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 10 articles were included in this review. Based on the meta-synthesis findings, coaches’ decision-making styles, intuition, and abilities play a significant role in athlete selection. Additionally, coaches’ personalities are also an important factor that influences their decision-making process in identifying and selecting talented players. This review also emphasizes that coach decision-making is essential not only in athlete selection, but also in athlete detection, identification, and development, as coach behavior affects the success of the entire team. In addition, reinforcement of professional competence development and maintenance of continuous learning for coaches is the requirement of the times and the key to the success of athlete selection.
BakerJSchorerJWattieN. Compromising talent: issues in identifying and selecting talent in sport. Quest2018; 70: 48–63.
2.
XiangCDongWTengku KamaldenTF, et al. Structural analysis of environmental factors of sports talent development. Curr Psychol2024; 43: 6516–6532. Epub ahead of print 15 June 2023.
3.
BakerJJohnstonKWattieN. Survival versus attraction advantages and talent selection in sport. Sports Med-Open2022; 8:1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-022-00409-y
4.
WangYRuheG. The cognitive process of decision making. Int J Cogn Inform Na2007; 1: 73–85.
5.
MoghadamSSKhodadadFSKhazaeinezhadV. An algorithmic model of decision making in the human brain. Basic Clin Neurosci2019; 10: 443–450.
6.
BrockmannENAnthonyWP. Tacit knowledge and strategic decision making. Group Organ Manage2002; 27: 436–455.
7.
SimonHA. The new science of management decision. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, C, 1977.
8.
KearneyPECarsonHJCollinsD. Implementing technical refinement in high-level athletics: exploring the knowledge schemas of coaches. J Sport Sci2017; 36: 1118–1126.
9.
ChristensenMK. ‘An eye for talent’: talent identification and the ‘practical sense’ of top-level soccer coaches. Sociol Sport J2009; 26: 365–382.
10.
DayD. Craft coaching and the ‘discerning eye’ of the coach. Int J Sports Sci Coa2011; 6: 179–195.
11.
NgKHHeX. Embedded courts: judicial decision-making in China. Cambridge, United Kingdom; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
12.
TillKMuirBAbrahamA, et al.A framework for decision-making within strength and conditioning coaching. Strength Cond J2019; 41: 14–26.
13.
CollinsDCollinsLCarsonHJ. ‘If it feels right, do it’: Intuitive decision making in a sample of high-level sport coaches. Front Psychol2016; 7: 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00504
14.
UrietaPAlujaAGarciaLF, et al.Decision-making and the alternative five factor personality model: exploring the role of personality traits, age, sex and social position. Front Psychol2021; 12: 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717705
15.
LathFKoopmannTFaberI, et al.Focusing on the coach’s eye; towards a working model of coach decision-making in talent selection. Psychol Sport Exerc2021; 56: 102011.
16.
MorganKMouchetAThomasG. Coaches’ perceptions of decision making in rugby union. Phys Educ Sport Peda2020; 25: 1–16.
17.
KayaA. Decision making by coaches and athletes in sport. Procedia Soc Behav Sci2014; 152: 333–338.
18.
MisasiSMorinGKwasnowskiL (eds). (2016, July). Leadership: Athletes and Coaches in Sport. The Sport Journal, Published by the United States Sports Academy, United States, https://thesportjournal.org/article/leadership-athletes-and-coaches-in-sport/ (2016).
19.
JokuschiesNGutVConzelmannA. Systematizing coaches’ ‘eye for talent’: player assessments based on expert coaches’ subjective talent criteria in top-level youth soccer. Int J Sports Sci Coa2017; 12: 565–576.
20.
HunsakerPLAlessandraAJ. The art of managing people. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1980.
21.
ArrobaT. Styles of decision making and their use: an empirical study. Brit J Guid Couns1977; 5: 149–158.
22.
RaabMJohnsonJG. Implicit learning as a means to intuitive decision making in sports. In: PlessnerHBetschCBetschT (eds), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 119–133). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2008.
KahnemanD. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.
25.
SvensonO. Decision making and the search for fundamental psychological regularities: what can be learned from a process perspective?Organ Behav Hum1996; 65: 252–267.
26.
GoldsteinWMWeberEU. Content and discontent: indications and implications of domain specificity in preferential decision making. In: Psychology of learning and motivation, Academic Press, United States, 1995; 32: 83–136.
27.
KleinGWeickKE. Decisions: making the right ones. Learning from the wrong ones. Across Board2000; 37: 16–22.
28.
LipshitzRKleinGOrasanuJ, et al.Taking stock of naturalistic decision making. J Behav Decis Making2001; 14: 331–352.
29.
MosierKFischerUHoffmanRR, et al. Expert professional judgments and “naturalistic decision making”. In: EricssonKAHoffmanRRKozbeltA, etal (eds) The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018, pp. 453–475. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480748.025
RobertsAHGreenwoodDStanleyM, et al.Understanding the ‘gut instinct’ of expert coaches during talent identification. J Sport Sci2021; 39: –9.
32.
SchorerJRienhoffRFischerL, et al.Long-term prognostic validity of talent selections: comparing national and regional coaches, laypersons and novices. Front Psychol2017; 8: 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01146
33.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an Updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj-Brit Med J2021; 372: 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
RitchieLWright-St ClairVAKeoghJ, et al.Community integration after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of the clinical implications of measurement and service provision for older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehab2014; 95: 163–174.
36.
HillBSotiriadouP. Coach decision-making and the relative age effect on talent selection in football. Eur Sport Manag Q2016; 16: 292–315.
37.
KoopmannTFaberIRFaberIR, et al.Exploring the subjective beliefs of expert coaches on ‘talent’ and player selection in German table tennis. Int J Sports Sci Coa2023; 18: 1952-1963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541231185544
38.
SieghartsleitnerRZuberCZibungM, et al.Science or coaches’ eye? – Both! beneficial collaboration of multidimensional measurements and coach assessments for efficient talent selection in elite youth football. J Sport Sci Med2019; 18: 32–43.
39.
LarkinPMarchantDSyderA, et al.An eye for talent: the recruiters’ role in the Australian football talent pathway. PLOS ONE2020; 15: e0241307.
40.
HillMScottSMcGeeD, et al.Coaches’ evaluations of match performance in academy soccer players in relation to the adolescent growth spurt. J Sci Sport Exer2020; 2: 359–366.
41.
JohnstonKBakerJ. Sources of information used by elite distance running coaches for selection decisions. PLOS ONE2022; 17: e0268554.
42.
JohanssonAFahlénJ. Simply the best, better than all the rest? Validity issues in selections in elite sport. Int J Sports Sci Coa2017; 12: 470–480.
43.
GiskeRBenestadBHaraldstadK, et al.Decision-Making styles among Norwegian soccer coaches: an analysis of decision-making style in relation to elite and non-elite coaching and level of playing history. Int J Sports Sci Coa2013; 8: 689–701.
44.
BloyceDSmithA. Sport policy and development : an introduction. London: Routledge, 2009.
45.
RegnierGSalmelaJRussellSJ. Talent detection and development in sport. In SingerRNMurphyMTennantLK (eds) Handbook of research on sport psychology. New York, NY: Macmillan, 1993, pp. 290-313.
46.
VaeyensRLenoirMWilliamsAM, et al.Talent identification and development programmes in sport. Sports Med2008; 38: 703–714.
47.
WilliamsAMReillyT. Talent identification and development in soccer. J Sport Sci2000; 18: 657–667.
48.
WilliamsAM. Perceptual skill in soccer: implications for talent identification and development. J Sport Sci2000; 18: 737–750.
49.
RobertsAHGreenwoodDAStanleyM, et al.Coach knowledge in talent identification: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. J Sci Med Sport2019; 22: 1163–1172.
50.
SweeneyLTaylorJMacNamaraÁ. Push and pull factors: contextualising biological maturation and relative age in talent development systems. Children2023; 10: 130.
51.
JohnstonKWattieNSchorerJ, et al. Talent identification in sport: a systematic review. Sports Med2017; 48: 97–109.
52.
TróznaiZUtczásKPápaiJ, et al.Talent selection based on sport-specific tasks is affected by the relative age effects among adolescent handball players. Int J Env Res Pub He2021; 18: 11418.
53.
DriverMJ. Individual decision-making and creativity. In: KerrS (eds) Organizational behavior. Columbus, OH: Grid Publishing, 1979, pp. 59–94.
54.
ScottSGBruceRA. Decision-Making style: the development and assessment of a new measure. Educ Psychol Meas1995; 55: 818–831.
55.
DriverMJBrousseauKRHunsakerPL. The dynamic decision maker: five decision styles for executive and business success. New York: Harper and Row, 1990.
56.
ParkSMcleanGYangB. Revision and Validation of an Instrument Measuring Managerial Coaching Skills in Organizations Sohee Park Personnel Decisions International, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED501617.pdf, 2008.
57.
HeslinPAVandewalleDLathamGP. Keen to help? Managers’ implicit person theories and their subsequent employee coaching. Pers Psychol2006; 59: 871–902.
58.
FriesAKammerlanderNLeitterstorfM. Leadership styles and leadership behaviors in family firms: a systematic literature review. J Fam Bus Strateg2020; 12: 1-16.
