Pre-match meetings are popular scenes in team sports, with coaches typically gathering the full squad within the dressing room and sharing their thoughts before the warm-up and/or competition. Whilst researchers have outlined the effects of informational or emotional talks, little is known about the actual verbal strategies that coaches adopt to influence their players. Therefore, this study examined the motivational content of football coaches’ verbal behaviours and underpinning perceptions of pre-match talks’ delivery. Five coaches (Mage= 36.2 years) working at a La Liga academy were involved in six pre-match talks (n = 30) and one semi-structured interview each. Talks were analysed using a two-stage coding process after adaptation of validated and motivationally relevant instruments, and interviews were assessed following thematic analysis procedures. Game strategy units were the most commonly employed topic across all coaches, which involved ‘neutral’ behaviours such as role description, game objective specification, and opposition statements. These were complemented with autonomy and competence supportive messages such as facilitating choices/opinions, offering rationales, supporting past performance, or ego-oriented and social climate support dimensions, depending on the coach. Data suggested that contextual factors could strengthen or attenuate the use of these verbal behaviours/dimensions. Build-up play contents were more likely to feature autonomy support game strategy comments than defending aspects, whereas lower-ranked and underdog opponents were associated with increased disapproving past performance and ego-involving statements compared to when facing higher-ranked opponents or playing derbies. Thus, it is suggested that the use of autonomy-, competence- and relatedness-supportive dimensions in addition to task-oriented messages should be reconsider by coaches if attempting to convey a need-supportive motivational climate.
DudaJLAppletonPR. Empowering and disempowering coaching climates: conceptualization, measurement considerations, and intervention implications. In: Raab M, Wylleman R, Seiler AM, et al. (eds) Sport and exercise psychology research: from theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Elsevier Academic Press, 2016, pp.373–388.
2.
FordPRYatesIWilliamsAM. An analysis of practice activities and instructional behaviours used by youth soccer coaches during practice: exploring the link between science and application. J Sports Sci2010; 28: 483–495.
3.
Raya-CastellanoPEReevesMJFraduaL, et al.Post-match video-based feedback: a longitudinal work-based coach development program stimulating changes in coaches’ knowledge and understanding. Int J Sport Sci Coach2021; 16: 1259–1270.
4.
PartingtonMCushionCJ. Performance during performance: using Goffman to understand the behaviours of elite youth football coaches during games. Sport Coach Rev2012; 1: 93–105.
5.
ZachSFurmanE. Feedback from basketball coaches: type, quantity, and real-time outcomes. Int J Sport Sci Coach2022; 17: 1306–1316.
6.
EricksonKCôtéJ. The intervention tone of coaches’ behaviour: development of the assessment of coaching tone (ACT) observational coding system. Int J Sport Sci Coach2015; 10: 699–716.
7.
SmithNTessierDTzioumakisY, et al.Development and validation of the multidimensional motivational climate observation system. J Sport Exerc Psychol2015; 37: 4–22.
8.
GonzálezSMetzlerJNewtonM. The influence of a simulated “pep talk” on athlete inspiration, situational motivation, and emotion. Int J Sport Sci Coach2011; 6: 445–459.
9.
van KleefGACheshinAKoningLF, et al.Emotional games: how coaches’ emotional expressions shape players’ emotions, inferences, and team performance. Psychol Sport Exerc2019; 41: 1–11.
10.
VargasTM. An exploratory examination of the effects of coaches’ pre-game speeches on athletes’ perceptions of self-efficacy and emotion. J Sport Behav2009; 32: 92–111.
11.
VargasTMGuanJ. Athletes’ preferences for informational and emotional pre-game speech content. Int J Sports Sci Coach2007; 2: 171–180.
12.
HastiePA. An instrument for recording coaches’ comments and instructions during time-outs. J Sport Behav1999; 22: 467–478.
13.
VargasTMBartholomewJB. An exploratory study of the effects of pregame speeches on team efficacy beliefs. J Appl Soc Psychol2006; 36: 918–933.
14.
ThrashTMElliotAJ. Inspiration as a psychological construct. J Pers Soc Psychol2003; 84: 871–889.
15.
DudaJL. The conceptual and empirical foundations of empowering CoachingTM: setting the stage for the PAPA project. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol2013; 11: 311–318.
16.
DeciELRyanRM. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq2000; 11: 227–268.
17.
DelrueJReyndersBBroekGV, et al.Adopting a helicopter-perspective towards motivating and demotivating coaching: a circumplex approach. Psychol Sport Exerc2019; 40: 110–126.
18.
PulidoJJLópez-GajardoMAPonce-BordónJC, et al.Does coaches’ satisfaction with the team determine their interpersonal style? The mediating role of basic psychological needs. Eur J Sport Sci2022; 22: 248–256.
19.
BartholomewKJNtoumanisNThøgersen-NtoumaniC. A review of controlling motivational strategies from a self-determination theory perspective: implications for sports coaches. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol2009; 2: 215–233.
20.
SheldonKMFilakV. Manipulating autonomy, competence, and relatedness support in a game-learning context: new evidence that all three needs matter. Br J Soc Psychol2008; 47: 267–283.
21.
DudaJLBalaguerI. Coach-created motivational climate. In: Jowett S and Lavalle D (eds) Social psychology in sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2007, pp.117–130.
22.
BalaguerIDudaJLCrespoM. Motivational climate and goal orientations as predictors of perceptions of improvement, satisfaction and coach ratings among tennis players. Scand J Med Sci Sports1999; 9: 381–388.
23.
DudaJL. Goal setting and achievement motivation in sport. In: Encyclopedia of applied sport psychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004, pp.108–119.
24.
SmithNTessierDTzioumakisY, et al.The relationship between observed and perceived assessments of the coach-created motivational environment and links to athlete motivation. Psychol Sport Exerc2016; 23: 51–63.
25.
AlvarezMSBalaguerICastilloI, et al.The coach-created motivational climate, young athletes’ well-being, and intentions to continue participation. J Clin Sport Psychol2012; 6: 166–179.
26.
BalaguerIGonzálezLFabraP, et al.Coaches’ interpersonal style, basic psychological needs and the well-and ill-being of young soccer players: a longitudinal analysis. J Sports Sci2012; 30: 1619–1629.
27.
DudaJL. Achievement goal research in sport: pushing the boundaries and clarifying some misunderstandings. In: Roberts GC (ed.) Advances in motivation in sport and exercise. Leeds: Human Kinetics, 2001, pp.129–182.
28.
KeeganRJSprayCMHarwoodCG, et al.A qualitative investigation of the motivational climate in elite sport. Psychol Sport Exerc2014; 15: 97–107.
29.
PulidoJJSánchez-OlivaDLeoFM, et al.Effects of an interpersonal style intervention for coaches on young soccer Players’ motivational processes. J Hum Kinet2019; 59: 107–120.
30.
McKennaM. Exploring coach communication and the role of match analysis in pre-match, half-time, and post-match team meetings in an International Youth Football (Soccer) Squad: An ethnographic case study (B00288838). MRes Thesis, University of West Scotland, UK, 2021.
31.
ArthurCABastardozNEklundR. Transformational leadership in sport: current status and future directions. Curr Opin Psychol2017; 16: 78–83.
32.
BergBL. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson & Allyn Bacon, 2007.
33.
MorseJMNiehausL. Mixed method design: principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Walnut Creek, 2009.
34.
GrünbaumNN. Identification of ambiguity in the case study research typology: what is a unit of analysis?Qual Mark Res2007; 10: 78–97.
35.
DarstPWZakrajsekDBManciniVH. Analysing Physical Education and Sport Instruction. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1989.
36.
BrewerCJJonesRL. A five-stage process for establishing contextually valid systematic observation instruments: the case of Rugby Union. Sport Psychol2002; 16: 138–159.
37.
PulidoJJSánchez-OlivaDSilvaMN, et al.Development and preliminary validation of the coach interpersonal style observational system. Int J Sport Sci Coach2019; 14: 471–479.
38.
PulidoJJMerinoASánchez-OlivaD, et al.Effects of an intervention program on the interpersonal style of football coaches. Cuad Psicol del Deport2019; 19: 32–49.
39.
MaddenCC. The nature and relative importance of coaching communications in Australian rules football. Int J Sport Psychol1995; 26: 524–540.
40.
TeschR. Qualitative research analysis types and software tools. London: Falmer Press, 1990.
41.
FleissJL. Statistical methods for rates and proportion. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1981.
42.
BrymanATeevanJJ. Social research methods. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
43.
BooroffMNelsonLPotracP. A coach’s political use of video-based feedback: a case study in elite-level academy soccer. J Sports Sci2016; 34: 116–124.
44.
LyleJ. Stimulated recall: a report on its use in naturalistic research. Br Educ Res J2003; 29: 861–878.
45.
StodterACushionCJ. Evidencing the impact of coaches’ learning: changes in coaching knowledge and practice over time. J Sports Sci2019; 37: 2086–2093.
46.
Raya-CastellanoPEMcRobertAPCárdenasD, et al.Exploring the ‘teachable moments’ of questioning during training: a work-based coach development programme affecting behaviour change. Phys Educ Sport Pedagog20221–19. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17408989.2022.2083095.
SmithBMcGannonKR. Developing rigor in qualitative research: problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol2018; 11: 101–121.
MasonRJFarrowDHattieJAC. An exploratory investigation into the reception of verbal and video feedback provided to players in an Australian football league club. Int J Sport Sci Coach2021; 16: 181–191.
51.
BreakeyCJonesMCunninghamCT, et al.Female Athletes’ perceptions of a coach’s speeches. Int J Sports Sci Coach2009; 4: 489–504.
52.
RitchieDAllenJ. Let them get on with it’: coaches’ perceptions of their roles and coaching practices during Olympic and paralympic games. Int Sport Coach J2015; 2: 108–124.
53.
FigginsSGSmithMJSellarsCN, et al.You really could be something quite special”: a qualitative exploration of athletes’ experiences of being inspired in sport. Psychol Sport Exerc2016; 24: 82–91.
54.
SmithMJFigginsSGJewissM, et al.Investigating inspirational leader communication in an elite team sport context. Int J Sport Sci Coach2018; 13: 213–224.
55.
MageauGAVallerandRJ. The coach-athlete relationship: a motivational model. J Sports Sci2003; 21: 883–904.
56.
HalperinIChapmanDWMartinDT, et al.Coaching cues in amateur boxing: an analysis of ringside feedback provided between rounds of competition. Psychol Sport Exerc2016; 25: 44–50.
57.
AeltermanNVansteenkisteMHaerensL, et al.Toward an integrative and fine-grained insight in motivating and demotivating teaching styles: the merits of a circumplex approach. J Educ Psychol2019; 111: 497–521.
58.
ZachSAvugosSBakalo-KufflerL,et al.Winning the second half: the perceived an actual impact of the coach’s half-time speech on basketball players’ performance. Int J Sport Sci Coach2022; 1: 1–11.
59.
SoenensBVansteenkisteM. Understanding the complexity oof praise through the lens of self-determination theory. In: Brummelman E (ed.) Psychological perspectives on praise. London: Routledge, 2020, pp.27–35.
60.
Raya-CastellanoPEReevesMCárdenasD, et al.The half-time talk: a mixed-method examination of youth-elite football coaches’ behaviours and team-management strategies. Int J Sport Sci Coach2022; 18: 655–667.
61.
RaabeJReaddyTHönerO. Fulfillment of basic psychological needs: a qualitative investigation of strategies used by elite youth soccer coaches. Ger J Exerc Sport Res2020; 50: 229–240.
62.
ReyndersBvan PuyenbroeckSCeulemansE, et al.How do profiles of need-supportive and controlling coaching relate to team athletes’ motivational outcomes? A person-centered approach. J Sport Exerc Psychol2020; 42: 452–462.
63.
van De PolPKavussanuMKompierM. Autonomy support and motivational responses across training and competition in individual and team sports. J Appl Soc Psychol2015; 45: 697–710.
64.
PennebakerJWBoydRLJordanK, et al.The development and psychometric properties of LIWC. Austin: University of Texas, 2015.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
