The current study investigated the relationship between the psychological contract (PC), trust, perceived organizational support (POS), organizational commitment, and turnover intention among collegiate head coaches. In addition, this study explored the moderating effect of procedural justice on the relationship between these variables. Data were collected from 283 full-time head coaches in the NCAA and were primarily analyzed using PLS-SEM. The results indicated that relational PC (R-PC), compared to transactional PC (T-PC), was more influential in affecting coaches’ POS, trust, and commitment, while T-PC influenced POS only, but not trust and commitment. In addition, both trust and POS were positively associated with coaches’ affective commitment, while affective commitment, POS, and trust, in this order, were negatively related to their turnover intentions. Coaches’ perceived procedural justice moderated the relationship between T-PC and employee consequences, indicating that T-PC was more meaningful in high justice situations.
ChoHLeeYH. Understanding sport coaches’ turnover intention and well-being: an environmental psychology approach. Psychol Health2022; 37: 375–396.
13.
RyanTDSagasM. Relationships between pay satisfaction, work-family conflict, and coaching turnover intentions. Team Perform Manag2009; 15: 128–140.
14.
DixonMABrueningJE. Perspectives on work-family conflict in sport: an integrated approach. Sport Manag Rev2005; 8: 227–253.
15.
RyanTSagasM. Interrole conflict and turnover intent in the high school teacher/coach. Int J Sport Manag2006; 7: 425–444.
16.
KiloRAHassménP. Burnout and turnover intentions in Australian coaches as related to organisational support and perceived control. Int J Sports Sci Coach2016; 11: 151–161.
17.
InglisSDanylchukKEPastoreD. Understanding retention factors in coaching and athletic management positions. J Sport Manag1996; 10: 237–249.
18.
SurujlalJDhurupM. Antecedents predicting coaches’ intentions to remain in sport organisations. Pol J Managt Stud2017; 16: 234–247.
19.
JonesRLBaileyJThompsonA. Ambiguity, noticing and orchestration: further thoughts on managing the complex coaching context. In: PotracPGilbertWDenisonJ (eds) Routledge handbook of sports coaching. London: Routledge, 2013, pp.271–283.
20.
JudgeLWKirkpatrickKBolinJ, et al.Understanding the occupational stress of collegiate track and field coaches during the championship season. Int J Sports Sci Coach2015; 10: 769–782.
21.
FletcherDScottM. Psychological stress in sports coaches: a review of concepts, research, and practice. J Sports Sci2010; 28: 127–137.
22.
NorrisLADidymusFFKaiselerM. Stressors, coping, and well-being among sports coaches: a systematic review. Psychol Sport Exerc2017; 33: 93–112.
23.
RousseauDM. Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Empl Responsib Rights J1989; 2: 121–139.
24.
RousseauD. Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1995.
25.
JayaweeraTBalMChudzikowskiK, et al.The impact of economic factors on the relationships between psychological contract breach and work outcomes: a meta-analysis. Empl Relat Int J2020; 43: 667–686.
26.
ZhaoHWayneSJGlibkowskiBC, et al.The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: a meta-analysis. Pers Psychol2007; 60: 647–680.
27.
Coyle-ShapiroJA-MKesslerI. Exploring reciprocity through the lens of the psychological contract: employee and employer perspectives. Eur J Work Organ Psychol2002; 11: 69–86.
28.
BravoGAWonDChiuW. Psychological contract, job satisfaction, commitment, and turnover intention: exploring the moderating role of psychological contract breach in National Collegiate Athletic Association coaches. Int J Sports Sci Coach2019; 14: 273–284.
29.
BravoGShonkDWonD, et al.The psychological contract in the context of sport organizations. In: RobinsonLChelladuraiPBodetG (eds) Routledge handbook of sport management. New York: Routledge, 2012, pp.193–213.
30.
DirksKTFerrinDL. The role of trust in organizational settings. Organ Sci2001; 12: 450–467.
31.
MeyerJPAllenNJ. A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review1991; 1: 61–89.
32.
EisenbergerRHuntingtonRHutchisonS, et al.Perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol1986; 71: 500–507.
33.
Coyle-ShapiroJADiehlM-R. Social exchange theory: where is trust? In: SearleRHNienaberAMISitkinSB (eds) The Routledge companion to trust. London: Routledge, 2018, pp.197–217.
KimSAndrewDP. Relationships between organizational justice and coaches’ attitudinal outcomes in intercollegiate sports. Int J Sports Sci Coach2015; 10: 305–337.
37.
KimMBeehrTA. Making the case for procedural justice: employees thrive and work hard. J Manag Psychol2020; 35: 100–114.
38.
RaytonBAYalabikZY. Work engagement, psychological contract breach and job satisfaction. Int J Human Resour Manag2014; 25: 2382–2400.
AntonakiX-ETrivellasP. Psychological contract breach and organizational commitment in the Greek banking sector: the mediation effect of job satisfaction. Procedia Social Behav Sci2014; 148: 354–361.
41.
McDonaldDJMakinPJ. The psychological contract, organisational commitment and job satisfaction of temporary staff. Leadersh Organ Dev J2000; 21: 84–91.
42.
EyounKChenHAyounB, et al.The relationship between purpose of performance appraisal and psychological contract: generational differences as a moderator. Int J Hosp Manag2020; 86: 102449.
43.
ShoreLMTetrickLETaylorMS, et al.The employee-organization relationship: a timely concept in a period of transition. In: MartocchioJ (eds) Research in personnel and human resources management. Oxford: Elsevier, 2004, pp. 291–370.
44.
BlauPM. Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1964.
45.
GouldnerAW. The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. Am Sociol Rev1960; 25: 161–178.
46.
Coyle-ShapiroJAShoreLM. The employee–organization relationship: where do we go from here?Human Resour Manag Rev2007; 17: 166–179.
47.
CropanzanoRMitchellMS. Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. J Manag2005; 31: 874–900.
48.
ShoreLMBommerWHRaoAN, et al.Social and economic exchange in the employee-organization relationship: the moderating role of reciprocation wariness. J Manag Psychol2009; 24: 701–721.
49.
RaiAAgarwalUA. Linking interactional injustice to EVLN outcomes: effects of psychological contract violation and conscientiousness (a moderated mediation model). Int Journal of Organizational Analysis2020; 28: 488–506.
50.
McLean ParksJKidderDLGallagherDG. Fitting square pegs into round holes: mapping the domain of contingent work arrangements onto the psychological contract. J Organ Behav Int J Ind Occup Organ Psychol Behav1998; 19: 697–730.
51.
MorrisonEWRobinsonSL. When employees feel betrayed: a model of how psychological contract violation develops. Acad Manag Rev1997; 22: 226–256.
52.
ConwayNBrinerRB. Understanding psychological contracts at work: a critical evaluation of theory and research. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
53.
GuestDE. The psychology of the employment relationship: an analysis based on the psychological contract. Appl Psychol2004; 53: 541–555.
54.
MacneilIR. The many futures of contracts. South Calif Law Rev1974; 47: 691–816.
55.
RousseauDM. New hire perceptions of their own and their employer's obligations: a study of psychological contracts. J Organ Behav1990; 11: 389–400.
56.
RobinsonSLKraatzMSRousseauDM. Changing obligations and the psychological contract: a longitudinal study. Acad Manag J1994; 37: 137–152.
57.
Coyle-ShapiroJKesslerI. Consequences of the psychological contract for the employment relationship: a large scale survey. J Manag Stud2000; 37: 903–930.
58.
MontesSDIrvingPG. Disentangling the effects of promised and delivered inducements: relational and transactional contract elements and the mediating role of trust. J Appl Psychol2008; 93: 1367–1381.
59.
FulmerCAGelfandMJ. At what level (and in whom) we trust: trust across multiple organizational levels. J Manag2012; 38: 1167–1230.
60.
NairMSSallehR. Linking trust and turnover intention: a conceptual framework. Glob Bus Manag Res2017; 9: 281–288.
61.
NevesPEisenbergerR. Perceived organizational support and risk taking. J Manag Psychol2014; 29: 187–205.
62.
RhoadesLEisenbergerRArmeliS. Affective commitment to the organization: the contribution of perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol2001; 86: 825–836.
63.
RousseauDMSitkinSBBurtRS, et al.Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Acad Manag Rev1998; 23: 393–404.
64.
TsuiASWuJB. The new employment relationship versus the mutual investment approach: implications for human resource management. Human Resour Manag2005; 44: 115–121.
65.
ZandDE. Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Sci Q1972; 17: 229–239.
66.
LewisJDWeigertA. Trust as a social reality. Soc Forces1985; 63: 967–985.
67.
AtkinsonC. Trust and the psychological contract. Empl Relat2007; 29: 227–246.
68.
HerzbergFI. Work and the nature of man. Cleveland: World, 1966.
69.
AhmadIZafarMA. Impact of psychological contract fulfillment on organizational citizenship behavior: mediating role of perceived organizational support. Int J Contemp Hosp M2018; 30: 1001–1015.
70.
ChoYJSongHJ. Determinants of turnover intention of social workers: effects of emotional labor and organizational trust. Public Pers Manag2017; 46: 41–65.
71.
MölleringGBachmannRLeeSH. Introduction: understanding organizational trust–foundations, constellations, and issues of operationalisation. J Manag Psychol2004; 19: 556–570.
72.
FerresNConnellJTravaglioneA. Co-worker trust as a social catalyst for constructive employee attitudes. J Manag Psychol2004; 19: 608–622.
73.
EisenbergerRArmeliSRexwinkelB, et al.Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol2001; 86: 42–51.
74.
SimosiM. Disentangling organizational support construct: the role of different sources of support to newcomers’ training transfer and organizational commitment. Pers Rev2012; 41: 301–320.
75.
ColquittJALePineJAPiccoloRF, et al.Explaining the justice–performance relationship: trust as exchange deepener or trust as uncertainty reducer?J Appl Psychol2012; 97: 1–15.
76.
ColquittJAScottBARodellJB, et al.Justice at the millennium, a decade later: a meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. J Appl Psychol2013; 98: 199–236.
77.
CropanzanoRPreharCAChenPY. Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group Organ Manag2002; 27: 324–351.
78.
ChelladuraiPKimACH. Human resource management in sport and recreation. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2022.
79.
KoJHurS. The impacts of employee benefits, procedural justice, and managerial trustworthiness on work attitudes: integrated understanding based on social exchange theory. Public Adm Rev2014; 74: 176–187.
80.
RochSGShanockLR. Organizational justice in an exchange framework: clarifying organizational justice distinctions. J Manag2006; 32: 299–322.
81.
MastersonSSLewisKGoldmanBM, et al.Integrating justice and social exchange: the differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Acad Manag J2000; 43: 738–748.
82.
LindEATylerTR. The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 1988.
83.
McFarlinDBSweeneyPD. Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Acad Manag J1992; 35: 626–637.
84.
TanHHTanCS. Toward the differentiation of trust in supervisor and trust in organization. Gen Psychol Monogr2000; 126: 241.
85.
RestubogSLDBordiaPBordiaS. The interactive effects of procedural justice and equity sensitivity in predicting responses to psychological contract breach: an interactionist perspective. J Bus Psychol2009; 24: 165–178.
86.
RobinsonSLMorrisonEW. Psychological contracts and OCB: the effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior. J Organ Behav1995; 16: 289–298.
87.
RobinsonSLRousseauDM. Violating the psychological contract: not the exception but the norm. J Organ Behav1994; 15: 245–259.
88.
BangHLeeCWonD, et al.Exploring attitudes of mandatory volunteers: the role of perceived organizational support, role clarity, and self-efficacy toward service. Nonprofit Volunt Sec Q2023; 52: 421–442.
89.
TylerTLindE. A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychol1992; 25: 115–191.
90.
TylerTR. Why people obey the law: procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990.
91.
CohenA. Values and psychological contracts in their relationship to commitment in the workplace. Career Dev Int2011; 16: 646–667.
92.
WonDBravoGAChiuW. Reciprocal and non-reciprocal employee–organization relationship: the mediating roles of felt obligation and workplace familism among collegiate coaches. Int J Sports Sci Coach2021; 16: 1074–1085.
93.
Van SelmMJankowskiN. Conducting online surveys. Qual Quant2006; 40: 435–456.
94.
MoncriefWCReisingerHBaldaufA. Examining motivations to refuse in industrial surveys. Market Res Soc J1999; 41: 1–10.
95.
KockN. Common method bias: a full collinearity assessment method for PLS-SEM. In: LatanHNoonanR (eds) Partial least squares path modeling: basic concepts, methodological issues and applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp.245–257.
HairJFHultGTMRingleC, et al.A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2022.
98.
NunnallyJCBernsteinIH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
99.
HenselerJRingleCMSarstedtM. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Market Sci2015; 43: 115–135.
100.
FornellCLarckerDF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res1981; 18: 39–50.
101.
Ramayah, T, Cheah, J, Chuah, F, et al.Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0: An updated guide and practical guide to statistical analysis (2nd ed.). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Pearson, 2018.
102.
ParzefallMRJacquelineAM. Making sense of psychological contract breach. J Manag Psychol2011; 26: 12–27.
103.
BundersonJS. How work ideologies shape the psychological contracts of professional employees: doctors’ responses to perceived breach. J Organ Behav Int J Ind Occup Organ Psychol Behav2001; 22: 717–741.
104.
KurtessisJNEisenbergerRFordMT, et al.Perceived organizational support: a meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. J Manage2017; 43: 1854–1884.
105.
WongY-WWongY-T. The effects of perceived organisational support and affective commitment on turnover intention: a test of two competing models. Journal of Chinese Human Resource Management2017; 8: 2–21.
106.
ConwayNGuestDTrenberthL. Testing the differential effects of changes in psychological contract breach and fulfillment. J Vocat Behav2011; 79: 267–276.
107.
ChienMSLawlerJSUenJ-F. Performance-based pay, procedural justice and job performance for R&D professionals: evidence from the Taiwanese high-tech sector. The Int Journal of Human Resource Management2010; 21: 2234–2248.
108.
ShiXCGordonS. Organizational support versus supervisor support: the impact on hospitality managers’ psychological contract and work engagement. Int J Hosp Manag2020; 87: 102374.
