The draw for the 2022 FIFA World Cup has been organised before the identity of three winners of the play-offs is revealed. Seeding has been based on the FIFA World Ranking released on 31 March 2022 but these three teams have been drawn from the weakest Pot 4. We show that the official seeding policy does not balance the difficulty levels of the groups to the extent possible: a better alternative would have been to assign the placeholders according to the highest-ranked potential winner, similar to the rule used in the UEFA Champions League qualification. Our simulations reinforce that this is the best strategy in general to create balanced groups in the FIFA World Cup.
GuyonJ. Rethinking the FIFA World CupTM Final Draw. Manuscript2014. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2424376.
2.
GuyonJ. Rethinking the FIFA World CupTM Final Draw. J Quant Anal Sports2015; 11(3): 169–182.
3.
CeaSDuránGGuajardoMSauréDSiebertJZamoranoG. An Analytics Approach to the FIFA Ranking Procedure and the World Cup Final Draw. Ann Oper Res2020; 286(1-2): 119–146.
CsatóL. UEFA Against the Champions? An Evaluation of the Recent Reform of the Champions League Qualification. J Sports Econom2022d. in press. DOI: 10.1177/1527002522107470010.1177/15270025221074700.
7.
JonesMC. The World Cup Draw’s Flaws. The Mathematical Gazette1990; 74(470): 335–338.
8.
RathgeberARathgeberH. Why Germany was Supposed to Be Drawn in the Group of Death and why it Escaped. Chance2007; 20(2): 22–24.
9.
CsatóL. On the Fairness of the Restricted Group Draw Problem in the 2018 FIFA World Cup. Manuscript2022a. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2103.11353.
10.
RobertsGORosenthalJS. Football Group Draw Probabilities and Corrections. Manuscript2022. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2205.06578.
11.
LalienaPLópezFJ. Fair Draws for Group Rounds in Sport Tournaments. Int Trans Oper Res2019; 26(2): 439–457.
CsatóL. Quantifying the Unfairness of the 2018 FIFA World Cup Qualification. Int J Sports Sci Coach2022c. in press. DOI: 10.1177/1747954121107345510.1177/17479541211073455.
