Coaching philosophy is an important topic in both coaching literature and education. However, there is little research regarding the way that coaches’ philosophies translate into their practices. Additionally, there is very little information about the specific effectiveness criteria coaches use to evaluate their philosophies and practice. This study addresses the complex set of relationships among coaches’ philosophies, perceptions of their practice, and effectiveness criteria. Ten elite coaches were selected for the study (nine males; one female), all of whom had successful careers in their respective sports. The coaches responded to an interview guide that addressed the topics of philosophy, practice, and effectiveness criteria. Deductive and inductive data analysis procedures were used to organize the collected information. The results indicated four main themes: (a) the importance of athlete motivation, (b) the importance of building a relationship with athletes based on personal respect, (c) the presence of high levels of cohesion among the team, and (d) the need for formal and informal rules that regulate the team’s functioning. There were several areas in which coaches did not establish a relationship linking philosophy, practice, and effectiveness criteria. The results suggest the need to educate coaches regarding methods of establishing a relationship among their philosophies, their practices, and the effectiveness criteria they use to evaluate their performance as coaches.
CassidyTJonesRPotracP. Understanding sports coaching: the social, cultural and pedagogical foundations of coaching practice, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2009.
2.
JenkinsSCoaching philosophy. In: LyleJCushionC (eds). Sports coaching: professionalisation and practice, London, England: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, 2010, pp. 233–42.
3.
GouldDPierceSCowburnI, et al.How coaching philosophy drives coaching action: a case study of renowned wrestling coach J Robinson. Int Sport Coach J2017; 4: 13–37.
4.
KidmanLHanrahanSJ. The coaching process, 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 2011.
5.
MartensR. Successful coaching, 4 ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2012.
6.
BennieAO’ConnorD. Coaching philosophies: perceptions from professional cricket, rugby league and rugby union players and coaches in Australia. Int J Sports Sci Coach2010; 5: 309–320.
7.
CamiréMTrudelPFornerisT. Examining how model youth sport coaches learn to facilitate positive youth development. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy2014; 19: 1–17.
8.
CollinsKBarberHMooreK, et al.The first step: assessing the coaching philosophies of pre-service coaches. J Res Health, Phys Educ Recreation Sport Dance2011; 6: 21–29.
9.
RobbinsJEHoustonEDummerGM. Philosophies and expectations of wheelchair and stand-up collegiate basketball coaches. J Sport Behav2010; 33: 42–62.
10.
ValléeCBloomG. Building a successful university program: key and common elements of expert coaches. J Appl Sport Psychol2005; 17: 179–196.
11.
CushionCPartingtonM. A critical analysis of the conceptualisation of ‘coaching philosophy’. Sport Educ Soc2016; 21: 851–867.
12.
JacobsFClaringbouldIKnoppersA. Becoming a ‘good coach’. Sport Educ Soc2016; 21: 411–430.
13.
LyleJCoaching philosophy and coaching behaviour. In: CrossNLyleJ (eds). The coaching process, Oxford, England: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1999, pp. 25–46.
14.
CallaryBWerthnerPTrudelP. Exploring coaching actions based on developed values: a case study of a female hockey coach. Int J Lifelong Educ2013; 32: 209–229.
15.
YukelsonDRoseR. The psychology of ongoing excellence: an NCAA coach’s perspective on winning consecutive multiple national championships. J Sport Psychol Action2014; 5: 44–58.
16.
JonesRArmourKPotracP. Constructing expert knowledge: a case study of a top-level professional soccer coach. Sport Educ Society2003; 8: 213–229.
17.
PartingtonMCushionC. An investigation of the practice activities and coaching behaviors of professional top-level youth soccer coaches. Scandinavian J Med Sci Sports2013; 23: 374–382.
18.
CarlessDDouglasK. Stories as personal coaching philosophy. Int J Sports Sci Coach2011; 6: 1–12.
19.
ValléeCBloomG. Four keys to building a championship culture. Int Sport Coach J2016; 3: 170–177.
20.
GomesRLiderança e gestão de equipas desportivas: desenvolvimento de um guião de entrevistas para treinadores [Leadership styles and sports team management: developing a interview guide for coaches]. In: CruzJSilvérioJGomesA, et al.(eds). Actas da conferência internacional de psicologia do desporto e exercício, Braga, Portugal: Universidade do Minho, 2007, pp. 100–115.
21.
GomesARCruzJ. Relação treinador-atleta e exercício da liderança no desporto: a percepção de treinadores de alta competição [Coach-athlete relationship and leadership practice: the perceptions of high level competition coaches]. Estudos de Psicologia2006; 11: 5–15.
22.
GomesARLeadership and positive human functioning: a triphasic proposal. In: GomesARResendeRAlbuquerqueA (eds). Positive human functioning from a multidimensional perspective: promoting high performance2014; Vol. 3, New York, NY: Nova Science, pp. 157–169.
23.
PattonMQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002.
24.
CôtéJSalmelaJBariaA, et al.Organising and interpreting unstructured qualitative data. Sport Psychol1993; 7: 127–137.
25.
TeschR. Qualitative research analysis types and software tools, New York, NY: Falmer Press, 1990.
26.
CôtéJSalmelaJRusselS. The knowledge of high performance gymnastics coaches: methodological framework. Sport Psychol1995; 9: 65–75.
27.
MilesMBHubermanAM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook, London, England: Sage Publications, 1994.
28.
CorbinJStrausA. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 4th ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 2015.
29.
CampbellJLQuincyCOssermanJ, et al.Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociol Methods Res2013; 42: 294–320.
30.
PidgeonNHenwoodKUsing grounded theory in psychological research. In: HayesN (ed). Doing qualitative analysis in psychology, Hove, England: Psychology Press, 1997, pp. 245–273.
31.
SmithBMcGannonKR. Developing rigor in qualitative research: problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. Int Rev Sport and Exerc Psychol2018; 11(1): 1–21.
32.
SmithBSparkesAC. Narrative inquiry in psychology: exploring the tensions within. Qualitative Res Psychol2006; 3: 169–192.
33.
LightR. Complex learning theory, its epistemology and its assumptions about learning: implications for physical education. J Teach Phys Educ2008; 27: 21–37.
34.
GavazziSM. Turning boys into men: the incentive-based system in urban meyer’s plan to win. Int Sport Coach J2015; 2: 298–304.
35.
SilvaJ. Psychological aspects of competition: an interview with Anson Dorrance head women’s soccer coach at the University of North Carolina. J Excel2006; 11: 88–102.
36.
WeinbergRSGouldD. Foundations of sport and exercise psychology, 4th ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2007.
37.
MacDonaldDTinningR. Physical education teacher education and the trend to proletarianization: a case study. J Teach Phys Educ1995; 15: 98–118.
38.
PotracPJonesRArmourK. ‘It’s All About Getting Respect’: the coaching behaviors of an expert English soccer coach. Sport Educ Soc2002; 7: 183–202.
39.
SmithRESmollFLCurtisB. Coach effectiveness training: a cognitive-behavioral approach to enhancing relationship skills in youth sport. J Sport Psychol Action1979; 1: 59–75.
40.
LaVoiNMInterpersonal communication and conflict in the coach-athlete relationship. In: JowettSLavalleeD (eds). Social psychology in sport, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2007, pp. 29–40.
41.
CarronAVBrawleyLGroup dynamics in sport and physical activity. In: HornTS (ed). Advances in sport psychology, 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2008, pp. 213–237.
42.
DriskellTSalasETraining teams to high performance: efficacy and implications for practice. In: GomesARResendeRAlbuquerqueA (eds). Positive human functioning from a multidimensional perspective: promoting high performance2014; Vol. 3, New York, NY: Nova Science, pp. 33–57.
43.
LorimerRJowettS. The influence of role and gender in the empathic accuracy of coaches and athletes. Psychol Sport Exerc2010; 11: 206–211.
44.
TrudelPGilbertWCoaching and coach education. In: KirkDO’SullivanMMcDonaldM (eds). Handbook of research in physical education, London, England: Sage, 2006, pp. 516–539.
45.
NelsonLCushionCPotracP. Enhancing the provision of coach education: the recommendations of UK coaching practitioners. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy2013; 18: 204–218.
46.
PiggottD. Coaches’ experiences of formal coach education: a critical sociological investigation. Sport Educ Soc2012; 17: 535–554.
47.
ChesterfieldGPotracPJonesR. Studentship and impression management in an advanced soccer coach education award. Sport Educ Soc2010; 15: 299–314.
48.
DenisonJ. Social theory for coaches: a Foucauldian reading of one athlete’s poor performance. Int J Sports Sci Coach2007; 2: 369–383.
49.
PeelJCropleyBHantonS, et al.Learning through reflection: values, conflicts, and role interactions of a youth sport coach. Reflect Pract2013; 14: 729–742.
