The current study was undertaken to explore how U.S. National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I female and male head coaches defined and implemented care in their coaching practice. Eighteen coaches (M = 39.2 years; nine females, nine males) from eight different sports (baseball, rowing, soccer, softball, swimming, track and field/cross-country, volleyball, and golf) consented to be interviewed via a semi-structured interview guide based on the care literature. Data analysis was conducted using Consensual Qualitative Research with a team of five researchers including an external auditor. Results revealed that care revolved around six domains: (a) definition of care; (b) manifestations of care; (c) limits to capacity to be caring; (d) development of care; (e) factors facilitating care, and (f) factors hindering care. Each domain contained several categories (N = 22 total categories) composed of core ideas. Results are presented using participants’ own words to illustrate domains and categories. Implications for research and practice are also put forth, which link the findings to the broader U.S. National Collegiate Athletic Association coaching context.
HillCE. Consensual qualitative research: a practical resource for investigating social science phenomena, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2012.
BeckLG. Reclaiming educational administration as a caring profession, New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 1994.
4.
NoddingsN. The challenge to care in schools: an alternative approach to education, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 1992.
5.
JowettSWyllemanP. Interpersonal relationships in sport and exercise settings: crossing the chasm. Psychology of Sport and Exercise2006; 7: 119–123.
6.
CôtéJGilbertW. An integrative definition of coaching effectiveness and expertise. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching2009; 4: 307–323.
7.
GilbertWCôtéJDefining coaching effectiveness: focus on coaches’ knowledge. In: PotracPGilbertWDenisonJ (eds). Routledge handbook of sports coaching, New York, NY: Routledge, 2013, pp. 147–159.
8.
BeckerAJQuality coaching behaviours. In: PotracPGilbertWDenisonJ (eds). Routledge handbook of sports coaching, New York, NY: Routledge, 2013, pp. 184–195.
9.
GearityBT. Poor teaching by the coach: a phenomenological description from athletes’ experience of poor coaching. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy2012; 17: 79–96.
10.
PotracPJonesRArmourK. “It’s all about getting respect”: the coaching behaviours of a top-level English football coach. Sport, Education and Society2002; 7: 183–202.
11.
EhrmannJJordanG. InsideOut coaching: how sports can transform lives, New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, 2011.
12.
JonesRL. Coaching as caring (the smiling gallery): accessing hidden knowledge. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy2009; 19: 377–390.
13.
JohnsonM. The athlete’s experience of being coached: an existential-phenomenological investigation (unpublished doctoral dissertation), Knoxville: University of Tennessee, 1998.
14.
JowettSPoczwardowskiAUnderstanding the coach-athlete relationship. In: JowettSLavalleeD (eds). Social psychology in sport, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2007, pp. 3–14.
15.
Lavoi N. Dimensions of closeness and conflict in the coach–athlete relationship. The meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Applied Sport Psychology, Minneapolis, MN2004.
16.
Poczwardowski A. Athletes and coaches: an exploration of their relationship and its meaning. Department of Exercise and Sport Science, unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Utah, 1997.
17.
WyllemanP. Interpersonal relationships in sport: uncharted territory in sport psychology research. International Journal of Sport Psychology2000; 31: 555–572.
18.
NewtonMMagyarMKimMS. Psychometric properties of the caring climate scale in a physical activity setting. Revista de Psicología del Deporte2007; 16: 67–84.
19.
Gano-OverwayLANewtonMMagyarTM. Influence of caring youth sport contexts on efficacy-related beliefs and social behaviors. Developmental Psychology2009; 45: 329–340.
KnustSKFisherLA. NCAA Division I female head coaches’ experiences of exemplary care within coaching. International Sport Coaching Journal2015; 2: 94–107.
22.
NoeRA. An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships. Personnel Psychology1988; 41: 457–479.
23.
WerthnerPTrudelP. A new theoretical perspective for understanding how coaches learn to coach. The Sport Psychologist2006; 20: 198–212.
24.
GilliganC. In a different voice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
25.
PattonM. Qualitative research and evaluation methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002.
26.
NoddingsN. Caring: a feminine approach to ethica & moral education, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984.
27.
BuberM. I and thou (RG Smith, Trans.), New York: Scribner’s, 1958.
28.
BuberM. The knowledge of man: a philosophy of the interhuman, New York, NY: Harper & Row, 1965.
29.
FoxM. A spirituality named compassion, San Francisco, CA: Harper, 1990.
30.
FrommE. Love and its disintegration. Pastoral Psychology1956; 7: 37–44.
31.
GaylinW. Caring, New York, NY: Knopf, 1976.
32.
MacmurrayJ. Persons in relation, London: Faber and Faber, 1961.
33.
MayeroffM. On caring, New York, NY: Harper and Row, 1971.
34.
JowettSCarpenterP. The concept of rules in the coach-athlete relationship. Sports Coaching Review2015; 4: 1–23.
35.
NiebuhrHR. Christ and culture, New York, NY: Harper & Row, 1956.
36.
KenistonK. The uncommitted: alienated youth in American society, New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1974.
37.
RothABasowSA. Femininity, sports, and feminism: developing a theory of physical liberation. Journal of Sport & Social Issues2004; 38: 245–265.
38.
NoddingsN. The maternal factor: two paths to morality, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2010.
39.
BellahRNMadsenRSullivanWM. Habits of the heart: individualism and commitment in American life, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1985.
40.
GilliganC. The birth of pleasure: a new map of love, New York, NY: Random House, 2011.
