Although talent selection in professional soccer mainly relies on the subjective judgment of scouts and coaches, little is known to date about top-level soccer coaches’ conceptions of talent. Drawing on a constructivist approach, this mixed method study intends to give an in-depth insight into coaches’ subjective talent criteria and to investigate the validity and reliability of their player assessments based on these criteria. Five national youth soccer coaches were examined using semistructured inductive interviews and the repertory grid technique. The results reveal experienced soccer coaches’ subjective talent criteria and indicate the multidimensional nature of their concepts of talent. There is a high correlation (−.57 ≤ rs ≤ −.81) between the coaches’ assessment of their players based on their own talent criteria and their previous evaluation of these players’ overall potential, indicating criterion validity. Repeated evaluations of the players according to a coach’s talent criteria display an adequate test–retest reliability over a period of 10 weeks.
WilliamsAMFranksA. Talent identification in soccer. Sports Exerc Inj1998; 4: 159–165.
2.
van RossumJGagnéFTalent development in sports. In: DixonFAMoonSM (eds). The handbook of secondary gifted education, Waco: Prufrock Press, 2006, pp. 281–316.
3.
VaeyensRLenoirMWilliamsAMet al.Talent identification and development programmes in sport – Current models and future directions. Sports Med2008; 38: 703–714.
4.
AbbottACollinsD. A theoretical and empirical analysis of a “State of the Art” talent identification model. High Abil Stud2002; 13: 157–178.
5.
MeylanCCroninJOliverJet al.Talent identification in soccer: the role of maturity status on physical, physiological and technical characteristics. Int J Sports Sci Coach2010; 5: 571–592.
VaeyensRCoelhoESilvaMJVisscherCet al.Identifying young players. In: WilliamsAM (ed). Science and soccer: developing elite performers, 3rd ed. Milton Park: Routledge, 2013, pp. 289–306.
8.
MartindaleRCollinsDDaubneyJ. Talent development: a guide for practice and research within sport. Quest2005; 57: 353–375.
9.
WilliamsAMReillyT. Talent identification and development in soccer. J. Sports Sci2000; 18: 657–667.
10.
ChristensenMK. “An eye for talent”: talent identification and the “practical sense” of top-level soccer coaches. Sociol Sport J2009; 26: 365–382.
11.
NelsonLGroomRPotracP. Research methods in sports coaching, London: Routledge, 2014.
12.
GiskeRBenestadBHaraldstadKet al.Decision-making styles among Norwegian soccer coaches: an analysis of decision-making style in relation to elite and non-elite coaching and level of playing history. Int J Sports Sci Coach2013; 8: 689–702.
13.
LyleJVergeerIRecommendations on the methods used to investigate coaches’ decision making. In: PotracPGilbertWDenisonJ (eds). Routledge handbook of sports coaching, New York: Routledge, 2013, pp. 121–132.
14.
AbrahamACollinsDMartindaleR. The coaching schematic: validation through expert coach consensus. J Sports Sci2006; 24: 549–564.
15.
CôtéJGilbertW. An intergative definition of coaching effectiveness and expertise. Int J Sports Sci Coach2009; 4: 307–323.
16.
CôtéJSalmelaJTrudelPet al.The coaching model: a grounded assessment of expert gymnastic coaches’ knowledge. J Sport Exerc Psychol1995; 17: 1–17.
17.
NashCCollinsD. Tacit knowledge in expert coaching: science or art?Quest2006; 58: 465–477.
18.
VergeerILyleJ. Mixing methods in assessing coaches’ decision making. Res Q Exerc Sport2007; 78: 225–235.
19.
AbrahamACollinsD. Examining and extending research in coach development. Quest1998; 50: 59–79.
20.
ChristensenMK. Exploring biographical learning in elite soccer coaching. Sport Educ Soc2014; 19: 204–222.
21.
ThomasKTThomasJR. What squirrels in the trees predicts about expert athletes. J Sport Psychol1999; 30: 221–234.
22.
VrljicKMalletCJ. Coaching knowledge in identifying football talent. Int J Coach Sci2008; 2: 63–81.
23.
MillerPKCroninCBakerG. Nurture, nature and some very dubious social skills: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of talent identification practices in elite English youth soccer. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health2015; 7: 642–662.
24.
ReillyTWilliamsAMRichardsonDIdentifying talented players. In: ReillyTWilliamsAM (eds). Science and soccer, London: Routledge, 2003, pp. 307–326.
25.
RégnierGSalmelaJRussellSJTalent detection and development in sport. In: SingerRNMurpheyMTennantLK (eds). Handbook of research on sport psychology, 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1993, pp. 290–313.
26.
CookM. Personnel selection: adding value through people, 5th ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
27.
ConnollyTArkesHRHammondKR. Judgment and decision making: an interdisciplinary reader, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
28.
KleinDEMitchellG. The psychology of judicial decision making, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
29.
EricssonKA. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
30.
KellyGA. The psychology of personal constructs. Volume one: theory and personality, London: Routledge, 1991.
31.
JokuschiesNConzelmannA. “Das sieht man doch, dass das ein Talent ist!” Subjektive Talentkriterien von Trainern im Spitzenfußball. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie2016; 23: 44–55.
32.
JankowiczDHow can we understand one another if we don’t speak the same language. In: FransellaF (ed). The essential practitioner’s handbook of personal construct psychology, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2005, pp. 145–152.
33.
HaggerMSChatzisarantisNL. Never the twain shall meet? Quantitative psychological researchers’ perspectives on qualitative research. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health2011; 3: 266–277.
34.
HornTS. Multiple pathways to knowledge generation: qualitative and quantitative research approaches in sport and exercise psychology. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health2011; 3: 291–304.
35.
LeechNLOnwuegbuzieAJ. Guidelines for conducting and reporting mixed research in the field of counseling and beyond. J Counsel Dev2010; 88: 61–69.
36.
FrommM. Introduction to the repertory grid interview, Münster: Waxmann, 2004.
37.
MayringP. Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung: Eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken. 5., überarb. und neu ausgestattete Aufl, Weinheim: Beltz, 2002.
38.
PrzyborskiAWohlrab-SahrM. Qualitative Sozialforschung: Ein Arbeitsbuch, München: Oldenbourg, 2014.
39.
FlickU. An introduction to qualitative research, 3rd ed. London: SAGE, 2006.
40.
KvaleS. InterViews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing, Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 1996.
41.
PattonMQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods, Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2002.
42.
HirtzPKoordinative Fähigkeiten und Beweglichkeit. In: MeinelKSchnabelG (eds). Bewegungslehre – Sportmotorik: Abriss einer Theorie der sportlichen Motorik unter pädagogischem Aspekt, Aachen: Meyer & Meyer, 2007, pp. 212–242.
43.
CoetzeeBGrobbelaarHWGirdCC. Sport psychological skills that distinguish successful from less successful soccer teams. J Hum Mov Stud2006; 51: 383–401.
44.
MacNamaraAButtonACollinsD. The role of psychological characteristics in facilitating the pathway to elite performance: part 1: identifying mental skills and behaviors. Sport Psychol2010; 24: 52–73.
45.
Zuber C, Zibung M and Conzelmann A. Motivational patterns as an instrument for prediciting success in promising young football players. J Sports Sci 2015; 33: 160–168.
46.
MorrisT. Psychological characteristics and talent identification in soccer. J Sports Sci2000; 18: 715–726.
47.
HönerOFeichtingerPMurrDReaching the youth academy level in German football: the relevance of motor and psychological predictors. In: BangsboJKrustrupP (eds). The 8th world congress on science and football, Copenhagen: SL Grafik, 2015, pp. 92.
48.
ToeringTTElferink-GemserMTJordetGet al.Self-regulation and performance level of elite and non-elite youth soccer players. J Sports Sci2009; 27: 1509–1517.
49.
Tromp E, Pepping G-J, Lyons J, et al. “Let's Pick Him!”: Ratings of Skill Level on the Basis of In-Game Playing Behaviour in Bantam League Junior Ice Hockey. Int J Coach Sci 2013; 8: 641–660.
50.
Durand-BushNSalmelaJHThe development of talent in sport. In: SingerRNHausenblasHAJanelleCM (eds). Handbook of sport psychology, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2001, pp. 269–289.
51.
FeichtingerPHönerO. Talented football players’ development of achievement motives, volitional components, and self-referential cognitions: a longitudinal study. Eur J Sport Sci2015; 15: 748–756.
52.
BarbourR. Doing focus groups, Los Angeles: SAGE, 2007.
53.
CobleySPSchorerJBakerJ. Relative age effects in professional German soccer: a historical analysis. J Sports Sci2006; 24: 1531–1538.
54.
DelormeNBoicheJRaspaudM. Relative age effect in elite sports: methodological bias or real discrimination?Eur J Sport Sci2010; 10: 91–96.
55.
ZibungMConzelmannA. The role of specialisation in the promotion of young football talents: a person-oriented study. Eur J Sport Sci2013; 13: 452–460.
56.
BergmanLMagnussonD. A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol1997; 9: 291–319.
57.
BergmanLRLundhL. Introduction: the person-oriented approach: roots and roads to the future. J Pers Oriented Res2015; 1: 1–6.
58.
MagnussonDStattinHThe person in context: a holistic-interactionistic approach. In: DamonW (ed). Handbook of child psychology, 6th ed. Hoboken: Wiley, 2006, pp. 400–464.
