The purpose of this study was to assess an a priori model that included perceptions of coach behavior, coach–athlete relationship, stress appraisals, and coping. A total of 274 athletes from the United Kingdom, Austalia, and Hong Kong completed relevant measures that assessed each construct. Our results revealed that perceptions of coach behavior were associated with aspects of the coach–athlete relationship and stress appraisals. In particular, closeness was positively associated with challenge appraisals and negatively with threat appraisals. However, commitment was positively associated with threat, indicating that there might be some negative implications of having a highly committed coach–athlete relationship. Further, commitment was also positively associated with disengagement-oriented coping, which has previously been linked to poor performance and lower goal-attainment. Applied practitioners could monitor athlete’s perceptions of the coach–athlete relationship, particularly commitment levels, and provide training in appraising stress and coping to those who also score highly on threat and disengagement-oriented coping, but low on task-oriented coping.
NichollsARJonesCRPolmanRCJ. Stressors, coping, and emotion among professional rugby union players during training and matches. Scand J Med Sci Sports2009; 19: 113–120.
2.
ArnoldRFletcherD. A research synthesis and taxonomic classification of the organizational stressors encountered by sport performers. J Sport Exercise Psychol2012; 34: 397–429.
3.
LafrenièreM-AKJowettSVallerandRJ. Passion for coaching and the quality of the coach–athlete relationship: The mediating role of coaching behaviours. Psychol Sport Exercise2011; 12: 144–152.
4.
LazarusRS. Stress and emotion: A new synthesis, New York: Springer, 1999.
5.
NicolasMGadureauPFrancheV. Perception of coaching behaviors, coping, and achievement in a sport competition. J Sport Exercise Psychol2011; 33: 460–468.
6.
NtoumanisNBiddleSJHHaddockG. The mediating role of coping strategies on the relationship between achievement motivation and affect in sport. Anxiety Stress Coping1999; 12: 299–327.
7.
ChowGMMurrayKEFeltzDL. Individual, team, and coach predictors of players’ likelihood to aggress in youth soccer. J Sport Exercise Psychol2009; 31: 425–443.
8.
ZourbanonsNHarzigeorgiadisATsiakarasSC. A multimethod examination of the relationship between coaching behaviour and athletes inherent self-talk. J Sport Exercise Psychol2010; 32: 764–785.
9.
LedochowskiLUnterrainerCRuedlG. Quality of life, coach behaviour and competitive anxiety in winter youth olympic games participants. Br J Sport Med2012; 46: 1044–1047.
10.
HøigaardRJonesGWPetersDM. Preferred coach leadership behaviour in elite soccer in relation to success and failure. Int J Sport Sci Coach2008; 2: 241–250.
11.
CôtéJYardleyJHayJ. An exploratory examination of the coaching behavior scale for sport. Avante1999; 5: 82–92.
12.
JowettSCockerillIMIncompatibility in the coach–athlete relationship. In: CockerillIM (eds). Solutions in sport psychology, London: Thompson Learning, 2002, pp. 16–31.
13.
JowettSPaullGPensgaardAMCoach–athlete relationship. In: TaylorJWilsonGS (eds). Applying sport psychology: Four perspectives, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2005, pp. 153–170.
14.
LaVoiNM. Expanding the interpersonal dimension: Closeness in the coach–athlete relationship. Int J Sport Sci Coach2007; 4: 497–512.
15.
PoczwardowskiAHenschenKPBarottJE. The athlete and the coach: Their relationship and its meaning. Results of an interpretive study. Int J Sport Psychol2002; 33: 114–140.
16.
LyleJ. Sports coaching concepts: A framework for coaches, Oxon: Routledge, 2002.
17.
ChelladuraiP. Coach leadership: A review. Int J Sport Psychol1990; 21: 328–354.
18.
JowettSCramerD. The prediction of young athletes’ physical self from perceptions of relationships with parents and coaches. Psychol Sport Exercise2010; 11: 140–147.
19.
PeacockEJWongPTP. The stress appraisal measure (SAM): A multidimensional approach to cognitive appraisal. Stress Med1990; 6: 227–236.
20.
MooreLJWilsonMRVineSJ. Champ or chump?: Challenge and threat states during pressurized competition. J Sport Exercise Psychol2013; 35: 551–562.
21.
TurnerMJJonesMVSheffieldD. Who thrives under pressure? Predicting the performance of elite academy cricketers using the cardiovascular indicators of challenge and threat states. J Sport Exercise Psychol2013; 35: 387–397.
22.
NichollsARPolmanRCJLevyAR. A path analysis of stress appraisals, emotions, coping, and performance satisfaction among athletes. Psychol Sport Exercise2012; 13: 263–270.
23.
LazarusRSFolkmanS. Stress, appraisal and coping, New York: Springer, 1984.
24.
GaudreauPBlondinJ-P. Different athletes cope differently during sport competition: A cluster analysis of coping. Personality Individual Difference2004; 36: 1865–1877.
25.
NichollsARLevyARJonesL. An exploration of the two-factor schematization of relational meaning and emotions among professional rugby union players. Int J Sport Exercise Psychol2011; 9: 1–14.
26.
JowettSOn enhancing and repairing the coach–athlete relationship. In: JowettSJonesM (eds). The psychology of coaching, Leicester: British Psychological Society, 2005, pp. 14–26.
27.
GaudreauPNichollsARLevyAR. The ups and downs of sports performance: An episodic process analysis of within-person associations. J Sport Exercise Psychol2010; 32: 298–311.
28.
JurkoDTomljanovićMČularD. Initial validation of coach behavior scales in volleyball, Split, Croatia: Sport SPA, 2010, pp. 47–50.
29.
JowettSNtoumanisN. The Coach–Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q): Development and initial validation. Scand J Med Sci Sport2004; 14: 245–257.
30.
YangSXJowettS. Examination of the Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Coach Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q). Int J Coach Sci2010; 4: 73–89.
31.
PerryJLNichollsARCloughPJ. Assessing model fit: Caveats and recommendations for confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modeling. Measure Phys Educ Exercise Sci2015; 19: 12–21.
32.
GaudreauPBlondinJ-P. Development of a questionnaire for the assessment of coping strategies employed by athletes in competitive sport settings. Psychol Sport Exercise2002; 3: 1–34.
33.
NichollsARPerryJLCalmeiroL. Pre-competitive achievement goals, appraisal, emotions, and coping in sport. J Sport Exercise Psychol2014; 36: 433–445.
34.
DunnTJBaguleyTBrunsdenV. From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. Br J Psychol2013; 105: 399–412.
35.
ZhuW. Sadly, the earth is still round (p < 0.05). J Sport Health Sci2012; 1: 9–11.
MarshHWHauK-TWenZ. In search of golden rules: comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralising Hu & Bentler’s (1999) findings. Struct Equat Model2004; 11: 320–341.
38.
HayesAF. Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun Monograph2009; 76: 408–420.
R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria, 2012, http://www.R-project.org/.
41.
NichollsARHoltNLPolmanRCJ. A phenomenological analysis of coping effectiveness in golf. Sport Psychol2005; 19: 111–130.
42.
SchellenbergBJIGaudreauPCrockerPRE. Passion and coping: Relationships with changes in burnout and goal attainment in collegiate volleyball players. J Sport Exercise Psychol2013; 35: 270–280.
43.
DoronJGaudreauP. A point-by-point analysis of performance in a fencing match: Psychological processes associated with winning and losing streaks. J Sport Exercise Psychol2014; 36: 3–13.
44.
NichollsARPolmanRCJLevyAR. The mediating role of coping: A cross-sectional analysis of the relationship between coping self-efficacy and coping effectiveness among athletes. Int J Stress Manage2010; 17: 181–192.
