The objective of this “How to” research series article is to provide guidance on getting started in Health Services Research. The purpose of health services research is to contribute knowledge that can be used to help improve health systems and clinical services through influencing policy and practice. The methods used are broad, have varying levels of rigor, and may require different specialist skills. This paper sets out practical steps for undertaking health services research. Importantly, use of the highlighted techniques can identify solutions to address inadequate knowledge translation or promote greater access to evidence-based stroke care to optimize patient outcomes.
LohrKNSteinwachsDM. Health services research: an evolving definition of the field. Health Serv Res2002; 37: 7–9.
2.
GrolRGrimshawJ. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet2003; 362: 1225–1230.
3.
MorrisZSWoodingSGrantJ. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med2011; 104: 510–520.
4.
WolfendenLYoongSLWilliamsCet al.Embedding researchers in health service organizations improves research translation and health service performance: the Australian Hunter New England Population Health example. J Clin Epidemiol2017; 85: 3–11.
5.
CadilhacDAAndrewNELanninNAet al.Quality of acute care and long-term quality of life and survival: the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry. Stroke2017; 48: 1026–1032.
6.
MiddletonSMcElduffPWardJet al.Implementation of evidence-based treatment protocols to manage fever, hyperglycaemia, and swallowing dysfunction in acute stroke (QASC): a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet2011; 378: 1699–1706.
7.
BrayBDAyisSCampbellJet al.Associations between the organisation of stroke services, process of care, and mortality in England: prospective cohort study. BMJ2013; 346: f2827.
8.
SaverJLFonarowGCSmithEEet al.Time to treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and outcome from acute ischemic stroke. JAMA2013; 309: 2480–2488.
9.
CadilhacDAKimJLanninNAet al.National stroke registries for monitoring and improving the quality of hospital care: a systematic review. Int J Stroke2016; 11: 28–40.
10.
MorrisSHunterRMRamsayAIet al.Impact of centralising acute stroke services in English metropolitan areas on mortality and length of hospital stay: difference-in-differences analysis. BMJ2014; 349: g4757.
11.
TurnerMBarberMDoddsHet al.Implementing a simple care bundle is associated with improved outcomes in a national cohort of patients with ischemic stroke. Stroke2015; 46: 1065–1070.
12.
HaweP. Lessons from complex interventions to improve health. Annu Rev Public Health2015; 36: 307–323.
13.
RaineRFitzpatrickRde PuryJ. Challenges, solutions and future directions in evaluative research. J Health Serv Res Policy2016; 21: 215–216.
14.
FilipeARenedoAMarstonC. The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biol2017; 15: e2001403.
15.
HeatonJDayJBrittenN. Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study. Implement Sci2016; 11: 20.
16.
The James Lind Alliance. The James Lind alliance guidebook, version 6, United Kingdom: National Insitute for Health Research, 2016.
17.
SandercockPWhiteleyW. How to do high quality clinical research 1: first steps. Int J Stroke2018; 13: 121–128.
18.
MichieSvan StralenMMWestR. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci2011; 6: 42.
19.
LauerMSGordonDWeiGPearsonG. Efficient design of clinical trials and epidemiological research: is it possible?. Nat Rev Cardiol2017; 14: 493–501.
20.
CraigPCooperCGunnellDet al.Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance. J Epidemiol Community Health2012; 66: 1182–1186.
21.
LangbeinL. Public Program evaluation: a statistical guide, Oxon: M.E. Sharpe, 2006.
22.
MooreGFAudreySBarkerMet al.Process evaluation of complex interventions: medical Research council guidance. BMJ2015; 350: h1258.
23.
DruryPLeviCD'EsteCet al.Quality in Acute Stroke Care (QASC): process evaluation of an intervention to improve the management of fever, hyperglycemia, and swallowing dysfunction following acute stroke. Int J Stroke2014; 9: 766–776.
24.
CadilhacDAMoloczijNDenisenkoSet al.Establishment of an effective acute stroke telemedicine program for Australia: protocol for the Victorian Stroke Telemedicine project. Int J Stroke2014; 9: 252–258.
25.
FettersMDCurryLACreswellJW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Serv Res2013; 48(6 Pt 2): 2134–2156.
26.
PurvisTMossKFrancisLet al.Benefits of clinical facilitators on improving stroke care in acute hospitals: a new programme for Australia. Intern Med J2017; 47: 775–784.
27.
IversNJamtvedtGFlottorpSet al.Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2012; issue 6. Art No:.CD000259.
28.
DamschroderLJAronDCKeithREet al.Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci2009; 4: 50.
29.
HarveyGKitsonA. PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice. Implement Sci2016; 11: 33.
30.
LanghornePLewseyJDJhundPSet al.Estimating the impact of stroke unit care in a whole population: an epidemiological study using routine data. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2010; 81: 1301–1305.
31.
FisherRJCobleyCSPotgieterIet al.Is stroke early supported discharge still effective in practice? A prospective comparative study. Clin Rehabil2016; 30: 268–276.
32.
ChouliaraNFisherRJKerrMet al.Implementing evidence-based stroke Early Supported Discharge services: a qualitative study of challenges, facilitators and impact. Clin Rehabil2014; 28: 370–377.
33.
EstabrooksCASquiresJECummingsGGBirdsellJMNortonPG. Development and assessment of the alberta context tool. BMC Health Serv Res2009; 9: 234.
34.
CadilhacDAAndrewNEKilkennyMFet al.Improving quality and outcomes of stroke care in hospitals: protocol and statistical analysis plan for the Stroke123 implementation study. Int J Stroke2018; 13: 96–106.
35.
CadilhacDAAndrewNEStroil SalamaEet al.Improving discharge care: the potential of a new organisational intervention to improve discharge after hospitalisation for acute stroke, a controlled before-after pilot study. BMJ Open2017; 7: e016010.
36.
DrummondMMcGuireA. Economic evaluation in health care: merging theory with practice, 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
37.
HusereauDDrummondMPetrouSet al.Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement. Value Health2013; 16: e1–5.
38.
HarrisPATaylorRThielkeRPayneJGonzalezNCondeJG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform2009; 42: 377–381.
39.
AndrewNESundararajanVThriftAGet al.Addressing the challenges of cross-jurisdictional data linkage between a national clinical quality registry and government-held health data. Aust N Z J Public Health2016; 40: 436–442.
PattonMQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1990.
42.
ClarkeDJ. Using qualitative observational methods in rehabilitation research: part two. International. J Ther Rehab2009; 16: 413–419.
43.
CreswellJWClark PlanoVL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, United States: Sage Publications Inc., 2010, pp. 488.
44.
PurvisTCadilhacDA. Observational studies and the chicken and egg issue in stroke. Nat Rev Neurol2017; 13: 382.
45.
BraunVClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol2006; 3: 77–101.
46.
ShentonAK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Edu Inform2004; 22: 63–75.
47.
DavidoffFDixon-WoodsMLevitonLMichieS. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Qual Safe2015; 24: 228–238.
48.
ClarkeDJGodfreyMHawkinsRet al.Implementing a training intervention to support caregivers after stroke: a process evaluation examining the initiation and embedding of programme change. Implement Sci2013; 8: 96.
49.
ThurmondVA. The point of triangulation. J Nurs Scholarsh2001; 33: 253–258.
50.
BagotKLCadilhacDAVuMMossKBladinCF. collaborators VST. Telemedicine in the acute health setting: a disruptive innovation for specialists (an example from stroke). J Telemed Telecare2015; 21: 443–448.
51.
HovMRZakariassenELindnerTet al.Interpretation of brain CT Scans in the field by critical care physicians in a mobile stroke unit. J Neuroimaging2017. 1–6. DOI: 10.1111/jon.12458.
52.
SharmaRFleischutPBarchiD. Telemedicine and its transformation of emergency care: a case study of one of the largest US integrated healthcare delivery systems. Int J Emerg Med2017; 10: 21.
53.
HubertGJMuller-BarnaPAudebertHJ. Recent advances in TeleStroke: a systematic review on applications in prehospital management and Stroke Unit treatment or TeleStroke networking in developing countries. Int J Stroke2014; 9: 968–973.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
