Previous research found that musicians often outperform non-musicians in speech perception. However, the exact mechanism underlying the musicians’ advantage is equivocal. This study aimed to investigate the pathway(s) between musicianship and speech perception. Specifically, the study examined the mediating role of auditory sensitivity and executive function in the relation between musicianship and speech perception. A total of 136 Cantonese-speaking adults were recruited. Participants completed a series of tests assessing their musicianship, auditory sensitivity, executive function, and speech perception. The findings showed that auditory sensitivity mediates the effect of musicianship on speech perception, whereas executive function does not serve as a significant mediator.
AmitayS.IrwinA.HawkeyD. J. C.CowanJ. A.MooreD. R. (2006). A comparison of adaptive procedures for rapid and reliable threshold assessment and training in naive listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(3), 1616–1625. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2164988
2.
AsanoY. (2018). Discriminating non-native segmental length contrasts under increased task demands. Language and Speech, 61(3), 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830917731907
3.
BaddeleyA. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829–839. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1201
4.
BarrettK.AshleyR.StraitD.KrausN. (2013). Art and science: How musical training shapes the brain. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 713. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00713
5.
BentT.BradlowA. R.WrightB. A. (2006). The influence of linguistic experience on the cognitive processing of pitch in speech and nonspeech sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.97
6.
BialystokE.DePapeA.-M. (2009). Musical expertise, bilingualism, and executive functioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(2), 565–574. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012735
7.
BoebingerD.EvansS.RosenS.LimaC. F.ManlyT.ScottS. K. (2015). Musicians and non-musicians are equally adept at perceiving masked speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(1), 378–387. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4904537
8.
BolducJ.GosselinN.ChevretteT.PeretzI. (2021). The impact of music training on inhibition control, phonological processing, and motor skills in kindergarteners: A randomized control trial. Early Child Development and Care, 191(12), 1886–1895. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2020.1781841
9.
BugosJ. A.DeMarieD. (2017). The effects of a short-term music program on preschool children’s executive functions. Psychology of Music, 45(6), 855–867. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735617692666
10.
ChandrasekaranB.SampathP. D.WongP. C. M. (2010). Individual variability in cue-weighting and lexical tone learning. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(1), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3445785
11.
ChenJ.AntoniouM.BestC. T. (2023). Phonological and phonetic contributions to perception of non-native lexical tones by tone language listeners: Effects of memory load and stimulus variability. Journal of Phonetics, 96, 101199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2022.101199
12.
ChenJ.SchellerM.WuC.HuB.PengR.LiuC.LiuS.ZhuL.ChenJ. (2022). The relationship between early musical training and executive functions: Validation of effects of the sensitive period. Psychology of Music, 50(1), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735620978690
13.
ChobertJ.FrançoisC.VelayJ. L.BessonM. (2014). Twelve months of active musical training in 8- to 10-year-old children enhances the preattentive processing of syllabic duration and voice onset time. Cerebral Cortex, 24(4), 956–967. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs377
14.
ChoiW. (2020). The selectivity of musical advantage: Musicians exhibit perceptual advantage for some but not all Cantonese tones. Music Perception, 37(5), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2020.37.5.423
15.
ChoiW. (2021). Musicianship influences language effect on musical pitch perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 712753. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712753
16.
ChoiW. (2022). Towards a native OPERA hypothesis: Musicianship and English stress perception. Language and Speech, 65(3), 697–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309211049458
17.
ChoiW.ChanL. Y. (2025). The comparative effects of Cantonese and Mandarin tone language backgrounds on musical pitch perception. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 31558. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17171-2
18.
ChoiW.LaiV. K. W.KongS.-H.BautistaA. (2025). Examining the cognitive and perceptual perspectives of music-to-language transfer: A study of Cantonese–English bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 249, 106069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106069
19.
ChoiW.LingC. L. K.WuC. H. J. (2024). Musical advantage in lexical tone perception hinges on musical instrument: A comparison between pitched musicians, unpitched musicians, and nonmusicians. Music Perception, 41(5), 360–377. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2024.41.5.360
20.
ChoiW.ToC. Y.ChengR. (2023). The choice of musical instrument matters: Effect of pitched but not unpitched musicianship on tone identification and word learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 44(5), 844–857. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716423000358
21.
ChoiW.TongX.SinghL. (2017). From lexical tone to lexical stress: A cross-language mediation model for Cantonese children learning English as a second language. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 492. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00492
22.
ChoiW.TsuiK. Y. R. (2023). Perceptual integrality of foreign segmental and tonal information: Dimensional Transfer Hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(4), 1056–1073. https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0272263122000511
23.
CooperA.WangY. (2010). Can musical aptitude and experience predict success in non-native tone word learning?The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(4), 2478. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3508890
24.
CooperA.WangY.AshleyR. (2017). Thai rate-varied vowel length perception and the impact of musical experience. Language and Speech, 60(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830916642489
25.
CriscuoloA.BonettiL.SärkämöT.KliuchkoM.BratticoE. (2019). On the association between musical training, intelligence and executive functions in adulthood. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1704. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01704
26.
DanemanM.CarpenterP. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6
27.
DarcyI.MoraJ. C.DaidoneD. (2016). The role of inhibitory control in second language phonological processing. Language Learning, 66(4), 741–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12161
28.
DarcyI.ParkH.YangC. L. (2015). Individual differences in L2 acquisition of English phonology: The relation between cognitive abilities and phonological processing. Learning and Individual Differences, 40, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.04.005
29.
DegéF.KubicekC.SchwarzerG. (2011). Music lessons and intelligence: A relation mediated by executive functions. Music Perception, 29(2), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2011.29.2.195
30.
DeguchiC.BoureuxM.SarloM.BessonM.GrassiM.SchönD.ColomboL. (2012). Sentence pitch change detection in the native and unfamiliar language in musicians and non-musicians: Behavioral, electrophysiological and psychoacoustic study. Brain Research, 1455, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.03.034
DriscollV. D. (2012). The effects of training on recognition of musical instruments by adults with cochlear implants. Seminars in Hearing, 33(4), 410–418. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1329230
33.
DuY.ZatorreR. J. (2017). Musical training sharpens and bonds ears and tongue to hear speech better. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(51), 13579–13584. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1712223114
34.
DubinskyE.WoodE. A.NespoliG.RussoF. A. (2019). Short-term choir singing supports speech-in-noise perception and neural pitch strength in older adults with age-related hearing loss. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 1153. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01153
35.
EscobarJ.MussoiB. S.SilbererA. B. (2020). The effect of musical training and working memory in adverse listening situations. Ear & Hearing, 41(2), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000754
36.
EustacheF.LechevalierB.ViaderF.LambertJ. (1990). Identification and discrimination disorders in auditory perception: A report on two cases. Neuropsychologia, 28(3), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(90)90019-K
37.
FengY.MengY.LiH.PengG. (2021). Effects of cognitive load on the categorical perception of Mandarin tones. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64(10), 3794–3802. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00695
38.
FieldA. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.
39.
FranklinM. S.Sledge MooreK.YipC.-Y.JonidesJ.RattrayK.MoherJ. (2008). The effects of musical training on verbal memory. Psychology of Music, 36(3), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735607086044
40.
FriedericiA. D.MuellerJ. L.ObereckerR. (2011). Precursors to natural grammar learning: Preliminary evidence from 4-month-old infants. PLoS One, 6(3), Article e17920. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017920
FullerC. D.GalvinJ. J.MaatB.BaşkentD.FreeR. H. (2018). Comparison of two music training approaches on music and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Trends in Hearing, 22, 2331216518765379. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216518765379
43.
GeiserE.ZieglerE.JanckeL.MeyerM. (2009). Early electrophysiological correlates of meter and rhythm processing in music perception. Cortex, 45(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2007.09.010
44.
GeorgeD.MalleryP. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. Pearson.
GervainJ.MacagnoF.CogoiS.PeñaM.MehlerJ. (2008). The neonate brain detects speech structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(37), 14222–14227. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806530105
GottfriedT. L.RiesterD. (2000). Relation of pitch glide perception and Mandarin tone identification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108(5), 2604. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4743698
49.
GrassiM.FellineA.OrlandiN.ToffaninM.GoliG. P.SenyuvaH. A.MigliardiM.ContemoriG. (2024). PSYCHOACOUSTICS-WEB: A free online tool for the estimation of auditory thresholds. Behavior Research Methods, 56(7), 7465–7481. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02430-3
50.
GrubeM.CooperF. E.ChinneryP. F.GriffithsT. D. (2010). Dissociation of duration-based and beat-based auditory timing in cerebellar degeneration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(25), 11597–11601. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910473107
51.
HabibiA.WirantanaV.StarrA. (2014). Cortical activity during perception of musical rhythm: Comparing musicians and nonmusicians. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 24(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/pmu0000046
52.
HannonE. E.TrainorL. J. (2007). Music acquisition: Effects of enculturation and formal training on development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(11), 466–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.008
53.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.
54.
HennessyS.WoodA.WilcoxR.HabibiA. (2021). Neurophysiological improvements in speech-in-noise task after short-term choir training in older adults. Aging, 13(7), 9468–9495. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.202931
55.
HillP. R.HogbenJ. H.BishopD. M. V. (2005). Auditory frequency discrimination in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(5), 1136–1146. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/080)
56.
HolochwostS. J.PropperC. B.WolfD. P.WilloughbyM. T.FisherK. R.KolaczJ.VolpeV. V.JaffeeS. R. (2017). Music education, academic achievement, and executive functions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000112
57.
HornickelJ.KrausN. (2013). Unstable representation of sound: A biological marker of dyslexia. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(8), 3500–3504. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4205-12.2013
58.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
59.
IngvalsonE. M.DharS.WongP. C. M.LiuH. (2015). Working memory training to improve speech perception in noise across languages. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(6), 3477–3486. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4921601
60.
JanusM.LeeY.MorenoS.BialystokE. (2016). Effects of short-term music and second-language training on executive control. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 144, 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.11.009
61.
JiamN. T.DerocheM. L.JiradejvongP.LimbC. J. (2019). A randomized controlled crossover study of the impact of online music training on pitch and timbre perception in cochlear implant users. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 20(3), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-018-00704-0
62.
KachlickaM.SaitoK.TierneyA. (2019). Successful second language learning is tied to robust domain-general auditory processing and stable neural representation of sound. Brain and Language, 192, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2019.02.004
63.
KempeV.BublitzD.BrooksP. J. (2015). Musical ability and non-native speech-sound processing are linked through sensitivity to pitch and spectral information. British Journal of Psychology, 106(2), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12092
64.
Kishon-RabinL.AmirO.VexlerY.ZaltzY. (2001). Pitch discrimination: Are professional musicians better than non-musicians?Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology, 12(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1515/JBCPP.2001.12.2.125
65.
KongE. J.LeeH. (2021). Relationship between executive function and cue weighting in Korean stop perception across different dialects and ages. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 13(3), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2021.13.3.021
66.
KrausN.BanaiK. (2007). Auditory-processing malleability: Focus on language and music. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(2), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00485.x
67.
KrausN.ChandrasekaranB. (2010). Music training for the development of auditory skills. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(8), 599–605. https://doi.org/10/fr7fwh
68.
KumarP.SanjuH. K.NikhilJ. (2016). Temporal resolution and active auditory discrimination skill in vocal musicians. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 20, 310–314. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1570312
69.
LeeC. Y.HungT. H. (2008). Identification of Mandarin tones by English-speaking musicians and nonmusicians. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(5), 3235–3248. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2990713
70.
LehnertG.ZimmerH. D. (2008). Modality and domain specific components in auditory and visual working memory tasks. Cognitive Processing, 9(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-007-0187-6
71.
LengerisA.HazanV. (2010). The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels for native speakers of Greek. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(6), 3757–3768. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3506351
72.
Lev-AriS.PeperkampS. (2013). Low inhibitory skill leads to non-native perception and production in bilinguals’ native language. Journal of Phonetics, 41(5), 320–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.06.002
73.
LevittH. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49(2B), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1912375
74.
LingC. L. K.ChoiW. (2025). Strings versus keys: A comparison of violinists, pianists, and non-musicians in lexical tone perception and tone word learning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 68(10), 4889–4916. https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00133
75.
MagimairajB. M.NagarajN. K.BenafieldN. J. (2018). Children’s speech perception in noise: Evidence for dissociation from language and working memory. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(5), 1294–1305. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0312
76.
MaillardE.JoyalM.MurrayM. M.TremblayP. (2023). Are musical activities associated with enhanced speech perception in noise in adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Current Research in Neurobiology, 4, 100083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crneur.2023.100083
77.
MarieC.DeloguF.LampisG.BelardinelliM. O.BessonM. (2011). Influence of musical expertise on segmental and tonal processing in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 2701–2715. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21585
78.
MarquesC.MorenoS.Luís CastroS.BessonM. (2007). Musicians detect pitch violation in a foreign language better than nonmusicians: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(9), 1453–1463. https://doi.org/10/brkpqw
79.
MattysS. L.WigetL. (2011). Effects of cognitive load on speech recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.004
80.
MicheylC.DelhommeauK.PerrotX.OxenhamA. J. (2006). Influence of musical and psychoacoustical training on pitch discrimination. Hearing Research, 219(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2006.05.004
81.
MillmanR. E.MattysS. L. (2017). Auditory verbal working memory as a predictor of speech perception in modulated maskers in listeners with normal hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(5), 1236–1245. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0105
82.
MonteiroR. A. M.NascimentoF. M.SoaresC. D.da Costa FerreiraM. I. D. (2010). Temporal resolution abilities in musicians and no musicians violinists. Arquivos Internacionais de Otorrinolaringologia, 14(3), 302–308. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1809-48722010000300006
83.
MüllensiefenD.GingrasB.MusilJ.StewartL. (2014). The musicality of non-musicians: An index for assessing musical sophistication in the general population. PLoS One, 9(2), e89642. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089642
NanY.LiuL.GeiserE.ShuH.GongC. C.DongQ.GabrieliJ. D. E.DesimoneR. (2018). Piano training enhances the neural processing of pitch and improves speech perception in Mandarin-speaking children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(28), E6630–E6639. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1808412115
86.
NascimentoF. M.MonteiroR. A. M.SoaresC. D.da Costa FerreiraM. I. D. (2010). Temporal sequencing abilities in musicians violinists and non-musicians. Arquivos Internacionais de Otorrinolaringologia, 14(2), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.7162/S1809-48722010000200012
87.
NikjehD. A.ListerJ. J.FrischS. A. (2009). The relationship between pitch discrimination and vocal production: Comparison of vocal and instrumental musicians. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(1), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3021309
88.
O’BrienR. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
89.
OkadaB. M.SlevcL. R. (2018). Individual differences in musical training and executive functions: A latent variable approach. Memory & Cognition, 46(7), 1076–1092. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0822-8
90.
OngJ. H.WongP. C. M.LiuF. (2020). Musicians show enhanced perception, but not production, of native lexical tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 148(6), 3443–3454. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0002776
Parbery-ClarkA.StraitD. L.AndersonS.HittnerE.KrausN. (2011). Musical experience and the aging auditory system: Implications for cognitive abilities and hearing speech in noise. PLoS One, 6(5), e18082. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018082
93.
PatelA. D. (2011). Why would musical training benefit the neural encoding of speech? The OPERA hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 142. https://doi.org/10/c6tqhg
94.
PatelA. D. (2014). Can nonlinguistic musical training change the way the brain processes speech? The expanded OPERA hypothesis. Hearing Research, 308, 98–108. https://doi.org/10/gmvx4w
95.
PernaF.PavaniF.ZampiniM.MazzaV. (2018). Behavioral dynamics of rhythm and meter perception: The effect of musical expertise in deviance detection. Timing & Time Perception, 6(1), 32–53. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134468-00002100
96.
PerrachioneT. K.LeeJ.HaL. Y. Y.WongP. C. M. (2011). Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(1), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3593366
97.
RammsayerT.AltenmüllerE. (2006). Temporal information processing in musicians and nonmusicians. Music Perception, 24(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2006.24.1.37
98.
Rodriguez-GomezD. A.Talero-GutiérrezC. (2022). Effects of music training in executive function performance in children: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.968144
99.
RussoN. M.SkoeE.TrommerB.NicolT.ZeckerS.BradlowA.KrausN. (2008). Deficient brainstem encoding of pitch in children with autism spectrum disorders. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119(8), 1720–1731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.01.108
100.
SachsM.KaplanJ.SarkissianA. D.HabibiA. (2017). Increased engagement of the cognitive control network associated with music training in children during an fMRI Stroop task. PLoS One, 12(10), e0187254. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187254
101.
SaitoK.TierneyA. (2022). Domain-general auditory processing as a conceptual and measurement framework for second language speech learning aptitude: A test-retest reliability study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226312200047X
102.
SalmelaV. R.MoisalaM.AlhoK. (2014). Working memory resources are shared across sensory modalities. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(7), 1962–1974. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0714-3
103.
SchellenbergE. G. (2011). Examining the association between music lessons and intelligence: Music lessons and intelligence. British Journal of Psychology, 102(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02000.x
104.
SchellenbergE. G. (2015). Music training and speech perception: A gene-environment interaction: Music training and speech perception. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1337(1), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12627
105.
SchoemannA. M.BoultonA. J.ShortS. D. (2017). Determining power and sample size for simple and complex mediation models. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617715068
106.
SlaterJ.SkoeE.StraitD. L.O’ConnellS.ThompsonE.KrausN. (2015). Music training improves speech-in-noise perception: Longitudinal evidence from a community-based music program. Behavioural Brain Research, 291, 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2015.05.026
107.
SlevcL. R.DaveyN. S.BuschkuehlM.JaeggiS. M. (2016). Tuning the mind: Exploring the connections between musical ability and executive functions. Cognition, 152, 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.017
108.
StenbäckV.HällgrenM.LarsbyB. (2016). Executive functions and working memory capacity in speech communication under adverse conditions. Speech, Language and Hearing, 19(4), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2016.1196034
109.
StoetG. (2010). PsyToolkit: A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1096–1104. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.1096
110.
StoetG. (2017). PsyToolkit: A novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments. Teaching of Psychology, 44(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316677643
111.
StraitD.Parbery-ClarkA.HittnerE.KrausN. (2012). Musical training during early childhood enhances the neural encoding of speech in noise. Brain and Language, 123(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.09.001
112.
SunH.SaitoK.TierneyA. (2021). A longitudinal investigation of explicit and implicit auditory processing in L2 segmental and suprasegmental acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 551–573. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000649
113.
TallalP. (2004). Improving language and literacy is a matter of time. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 5(9), 721–728. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1499
114.
TallalP.MillerS. L.BediG.BymaG.WangX.NagarajanS. S.SchreinerC.JenkinsW. M.MerzenichM. M. (1996). Language comprehension in language-learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech. Science, 271(5245), 81. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.271.5245.81
115.
TeinonenT.FellmanV.NäätänenR.AlkuP.HuotilainenM. (2009). Statistical language learning in neonates revealed by event-related brain potentials. BMC Neuroscience, 10(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-10-21
116.
ThautM. H.TrimarchiP. D.ParsonsL. M. (2014). Human brain basis of musical rhythm perception: Common and distinct neural substrates for meter, tempo, and pattern. Brain Sciences, 4(2), 428–452. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci4020428
117.
TierneyA.KrausN. (2014). Auditory-motor entrainment and phonological skills: Precise auditory timing hypothesis (PATH). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 949. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00949
118.
VasukiP. R. M.SharmaM.DemuthK.ArciuliJ. (2016). Musicians’ edge: A comparison of auditory processing, cognitive abilities and statistical learning. Hearing Research, 342, 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2016.10.008
119.
WangH. L. S.ChenI. C.ChiangC. H.LaiY. H.TsaoY. (2016). Auditory perception, suprasegmental speech processing, and vocabulary development in Chinese preschoolers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 123(2), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512516663164
120.
WenZ.HauK.-T.HerbertW. M. (2004). Structural equation model testing: Cutoff criteria for goodness of fit indices and chi-square test. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 36(2), 186.
121.
WhitefordK. L.BaltzellL. S.ChiuM.CooperJ. K.FaucherS.GohP. Y.HagedornA.IrsikV. C.IrvineA.LimS.-J.MesikJ.MesquitaB.OakesB.RajappaN.RoverudE.SchrlauA. E.Van HedgerS. C.BharadwajH. M.JohnsrudeI. S.. . . OxenhamA. J. (2025). Large-scale multi-site study shows no association between musical training and early auditory neural sound encoding. Nature Communications, 16(1), 7152. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-62155-5
122.
WienerS.BradleyE. D. (2023). Harnessing the musician advantage: Short-term musical training affects non-native cue weighting of linguistic pitch. Language Teaching Research, 27(4), 1016–1031. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820971791
123.
YaoY.ChenX.ChenF.ZhuJ. (2022). Musical training enhances categorical perception of speech in preschoolers: Training duration and musical program matter. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 65(11), 4469–4484. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00216
124.
ZaltzY.GlobersonE.AmirN. (2017). Auditory perceptual abilities are associated with specific auditory experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2080. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02080
125.
ZelazoP. D.CarterA.ReznickJ. S.FryeD. (1997). Early development of executive function: A problem-solving framework. Review of General Psychology, 1(2), 198–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.2.198
126.
ZendelB. R.WestG. L.BellevilleS.PeretzI. (2019). Musical training improves the ability to understand speech-in-noise in older adults. Neurobiology of Aging, 81, 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.05.015
127.
ZhangL.FuX.LuoD.XingL.DuY. (2020). Musical experience offsets age-related decline in understanding speech-in-noise: Type of training does not matter, working memory is the key. Ear and Hearing, 42(2), 258–270. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000921
128.
ZhangL.WangX.AlainC.DuY. (2023). Successful aging of musicians: Preservation of sensorimotor regions aids audiovisual speech-in-noise perception. Science Advances, 9(17), eadg7056. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg7056
129.
ZukJ.BenjaminC.KenyonA.GaabN. (2014). Behavioral and neural correlates of executive functioning in musicians and non-musicians. PLoS One, 9(6), e99868. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099868
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
