While the literature is well represented in accounting for how aging influences segmental properties of speech, less is known about its influences on suprasegmental properties such as lexical tones. In addition, foreign language learning is increasingly endorsed as being a potential intervention to boost cognitive reserve and overall well-being in older adults. Empirical studies on young learners learning lexical tones are aplenty in comparison with older learners. Challenges in this domain for older learners might be different due to aging and other learner-internal factors. This review consolidates behavioural and neuroscientific research related to lexical tone, speech perception, factors characterising learner groups, and other variables that would influence lexical tone perception and learning in older adults. Factors commonly identified to influence tone learning in younger adult populations, such as musical experience, language background, and motivation in learning a new language, are discussed in relation to older learner groups and recommendations to boost lexical tone learning in older age are provided based on existing studies.
AlexanderJ. A.WongP. C.BradlowA. R. (2005, September4–8). Lexical tone perception in musicians and non-musicians[Conference session]. Ninth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Lisbon, Portugal.
2.
AntoniouM.ChinJ. L. (2018). What can lexical tone training studies in adults tell us about tone processing in children?Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1.
3.
AntoniouM.GunasekeraG. M.WongP. C. (2013). Foreign language training as cognitive therapy for age-related cognitive decline: A hypothesis for future research. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(10), 2689–2698.
4.
AntoniouM.LiangE.EttlingerM.WongP. C. (2015). The bilingual advantage in phonetic learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(4), 683–695.
5.
AntoniouM.WrightS. M. (2017). Uncovering the mechanisms responsible for why language learning may promote healthy cognitive aging. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2217.
6.
AsaridouS. S.TakashimaA.DediuD.HagoortP.McQueenJ. M. (2016). Repetition suppression in the left inferior frontal gyrus predicts tone learning performance. Cerebral Cortex, 26(6), 2728–2742.
7.
AshbyF. G.EllS. W.WaldronE. M. (2003). Procedural learning in perceptual categorization. Memory & Cognition, 31(7), 1114–1125.
8.
BakT. H.LongM. R.Vega-MendozaM.SoraceA. (2016). Novelty, challenge, and practice: The impact of intensive language learning on attentional functions. PLOS ONE, 11(4), Article e0153485.
9.
BerggrenR.NilssonJ.BrehmerY.SchmiedekF.LövdénM. (2020). Foreign language learning in older age does not improve memory or intelligence: Evidence from a randomized controlled study. Psychology and Aging, 35(2), 212–219.
10.
BestC. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In StrangeW. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). York Press.
11.
BialystokE.CraikF. I.KleinR.ViswanathanM. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19(2), 290–303.
12.
BialystokE.PoarchG.LuoL.CraikF. I. (2014). Effects of bilingualism and aging on executive function and working memory. Psychology and Aging, 29(3), 696–705.
13.
BidelmanG. M.AlainC. (2015). Musical training orchestrates coordinated neuroplasticity in auditory brainstem and cortex to counteract age-related declines in categorical vowel perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(3), 1240–1249.
14.
BidelmanG. M.VillafuerteJ. W.MorenoS.AlainC. (2014). Age-related changes in the subcortical–cortical encoding and categorical perception of speech. Neurobiology of Aging, 35(11), 2526–2540.
15.
BirdsongD. (1999). Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis. Routledge.
16.
BrouwerJ.van den BergF.KnooihuizenR.LoertsH.KeijzerM. (2020). Exploring language learning as a potential tool against cognitive impairment in late-life depression: Two meta-analyses and suggestions for future research. Behavioral Sciences, 10(9), 132.
17.
BubbicoG.ChiacchiarettaP.ParentiM.Di MarcoM.PanaraV.SepedeG.FerrettiA.PerrucciM. G. (2019). Effects of second language learning on the plastic aging brain: Functional connectivity, cognitive decline, and reorganization. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, Article 423.
18.
BurnhamD.BrookerR.ReidA. (2015). The effects of absolute pitch ability and musical training on lexical tone perception. Psychology of Music, 43(6), 881–897.
19.
BusseV.WalterC. (2013). Foreign language learning motivation in higher education: A longitudinal study of motivational changes and their causes. The Modern Language Journal, 97(2), 435–456.
20.
ChanR. K.LeungJ. H. (2020). Why are lexical tones difficult to learn? Insights from the incidental learning of tone-segment connections. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(1), 33–59.
21.
ChandrasekaranB.SampathP. D.WongP. C. (2010). Individual variability in cue-weighting and lexical tone learning. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(1), 456–465.
22.
ChauvetteL.FournierP.SharpA. (2022). The frequency-following response to assess the neural representation of spectral speech cues in older adults. Hearing Research, 418, 108486.
23.
ChenJ.AntoniouM.BestC. T. (2023). Phonological and phonetic contributions to perception of non-native lexical tones by tone language listeners: Effects of memory load and stimulus variability. Journal of Phonetics, 96, 101199.
24.
ChenJ.BestC. T.AntoniouM. (2020). Native phonological and phonetic influences in perceptual assimilation of monosyllabic Thai lexical tones by Mandarin and Vietnamese listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 83, 101013.
25.
ChenT. H.MassaroD. W. (2008). Seeing pitch: Visual information for lexical tones of Mandarin-Chinese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(4), 2356–2366.
26.
ClinardC. G.CotterC. M. (2015). Neural representation of dynamic frequency is degraded in older adults. Hearing Research, 323, 91–98.
27.
ClinardC. G.TremblayK. L.KrishnanA. R. (2010). Aging alters the perception and physiological representation of frequency: Evidence from human frequency-following response recordings. Hearing Research, 264(1–2), 48–55.
28.
CodóE.SunyolA. (2019). “A plus for our students”: The construction of Mandarin Chinese as an elite language in an international school in Barcelona. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(5), 436–452.
29.
CoxJ. G. (2017). Explicit instruction, bilingualism, and the older adult learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 29–58.
30.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182.
31.
DengZ.ChandrasekaranB.WangS.WongP. C. (2016). Resting-state low-frequency fluctuations reflect individual differences in spoken language learning. Cortex, 76, 63–78.
32.
DeyA. (2016). The interaction of crystallized and fluid abilities in aging and speech perception. Washington University in St. Louis.
33.
DongY.LiP. (2015). The cognitive science of bilingualism. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(1), 1–13.
34.
Dordi-nezhadF. (2015). Construction, validation and reliability of the foreign language attitude and motivation questionnaire. Language Related Research, 6(2), 107–128.
35.
DornyeiZ.RyanS. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge.
36.
DuffP.AndersonT.IlnyckyjR.VanGayaE.WangR. T.YatesE. (2013). Learning Chinese. De Gruyter Mouton.
37.
EberhardD.SimonsG.FennigC. (2022). Ethnologue: Languages of the world (25th ed.). SIL International, Dallas.
38.
EckertM. A.WalczakA.AhlstromJ.DenslowS.HorwitzA.DubnoJ. R. (2008). Age-related effects on word recognition: Reliance on cognitive control systems with structural declines in speech-responsive cortex. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 9(2), 252–259.
39.
ErbJ.ObleserJ. (2013). Upregulation of cognitive control networks in older adults’ speech comprehension. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, Article 116.
40.
FengY.MengY.PengG. (2019, August4–10). The categorical perception of Mandarin tones in normal aging seniors and seniors with mild cognitive impairment[Conference session]. ICPhS 2019–19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
FongC. J.PatallE. A.VasquezA. C.StautbergS. (2019). A meta-analysis of negative feedback on intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 31(1), 121–162.
43.
FongM. C.-M.MaM. K.-H.ChuiJ. Y. T.LawT. S. T.HuiN.-Y.AuA.WangW. S. (2022). Foreign language learning in older adults: Anatomical and cognitive markers of vocabulary learning success. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16, Article 787413.
44.
FrancisA. L.CioccaV.Chit NgB. K. (2003). On the (non) categorical perception of lexical tones. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(7), 1029–1044.
45.
FrisinaR. D.WaltonJ. P. (2006). Age-related structural and functional changes in the cochlear nucleus. Hearing Research, 216, 216–223.
46.
GardnerR. C. (2001). Integrative motivation and second language acquisition. Motivation and Second Language Acquisition, 23(1), 1–19.
47.
GassS. M.BehneyJ.PlonskyL. (2020). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Routledge.
48.
GilakjaniA. P.Lai-MeiL.SabouriN. B. (2012). A study on the role of motivation in foreign language learning and teaching. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 4(7), 9–16.
49.
GlickH.SharmaA. (2021). The brain on hearing aids: Can treatment with hearing aids improve neurocognitive function in age-related hearing loss. Hear Rev, 28(1), 28–32.
Gordon-SalantS.Yeni-KomshianG. H.FitzgibbonsP. J.BarrettJ. (2006). Age-related differences in identification and discrimination of temporal cues in speech segments. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(4), 2455–2466.
52.
Graf EstesK.HayJ. F. (2015). Flexibility in bilingual infants’ word learning. Child Development, 86(5), 1371–1385.
53.
GreenT.FaulknerA.RosenS. (2002). Spectral and temporal cues to pitch in noise-excited vocoder simulations of continuous-interleaved-sampling cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112(5), 2155–2164.
54.
GrossmannJ. A.KoelschV. M.DegirmenciM. G.AschenbrennerS.TeichmannB.MeyerP. (2021). Effects of foreign language learning on executive functions in healthy older adults: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatrics, 21(1), 1–14.
55.
HarkriderA. W.PlylerP. N.HedrickM. S. (2005). Effects of age and spectral shaping on perception and neural representation of stop consonant stimuli. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116(9), 2153–2164.
56.
HarrisK. C.DubnoJ. R.KerenN. I.AhlstromJ. B.EckertM. A. (2009). Speech recognition in younger and older adults: A dependency on low-level auditory cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(19), 6078–6087.
57.
HarrisK. C.MillsJ. H.HeN.-J.DubnoJ. R. (2008). Age-related differences in sensitivity to small changes in frequency assessed with cortical evoked potentials. Hearing Research, 243(1–2), 47–56.
58.
HayJ. F.Graf EstesK.WangT.SaffranJ. R. (2015). From flexibility to constraint: The contrastive use of lexical tone in early word learning. Child Development, 86(1), 10–22.
59.
HeN.-j.DubnoJ. R.MillsJ. H. (1998). Frequency and intensity discrimination measured in a maximum-likelihood procedure from young and aged normal-hearing subjects. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103(1), 553–565.
60.
HeN.-j.MillsJ. H.DubnoJ. R. (2007). Frequency modulation detection: Effects of age, psychophysical method, and modulation waveform. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(1), 467–477.
61.
HosodaC.TanakaK.NariaiT.HondaM.HanakawaT. (2013). Dynamic neural network reorganization associated with second language vocabulary acquisition: A multimodal imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(34), 13663–13672.
62.
HumesL. E. (1996). Speech understanding in the elderly. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 7, 161–167.
63.
IngvalsonE. M.BarrA. M.WongP. C. (2013). Poorer phonetic perceivers show greater benefit in phonetic-phonological speech learning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(3), 1045–1050.
64.
IngvalsonE. M.LansfordK. L.FedorovaV.FernandezG. (2017). Cognitive factors as predictors of accented speech perception for younger and older adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(6), 4652–4659.
65.
IngvalsonE. M.NowickiC.ZongA.WongP. C. (2017). Non-native speech learning in older adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 148.
66.
IntartagliaB.White-SchwochT.MeunierC.RomanS.KrausN.SchönD. (2016). Native language shapes automatic neural processing of speech. Neuropsychologia, 89, 57–65.
67.
IoupG.BoustaguiE.El TigiM.MoselleM. (1994). Reexamining the critical period hypothesis: A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(1), 73–98.
68.
JonesS. A.BeierholmU.MeijerD.NoppeneyU. (2019). Older adults sacrifice response speed to preserve multisensory integration performance. Neurobiology of Aging, 84, 148–157.
69.
KaanE.WaylandR.KeilA. (2013). Changes in oscillatory brain networks after lexical tone training. Brain Sciences, 3(2), 757–780.
70.
KaczorA. (2011). Az ötven év felettiek nyelvtanulási motivációi és lehetőségei Magyarországon [The second language learning motivation and language learning opportunities of people over the age of 50 in Hungary]. Gerontedukáció, 2011(11), 44–66.
71.
KalaivananK.WongP. C. M.WongF. C. K.ChanA. H. D. (2023). Native language perceptual sensitivity predicts nonnative speech perception differently in younger and older Singaporean bilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 66(3), 987–1017.
72.
KaushanskayaM.MarianV. (2009a). The bilingual advantage in novel word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(4), 705–710.
73.
KaushanskayaM.MarianV. (2009b). Bilingualism reduces native-language interference during novel-word learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(3), 829–835.
74.
KeizerA. W.VermentR. S.HommelB. (2010). Enhancing cognitive control through neurofeedback: A role of gamma-band activity in managing episodic retrieval. Neuroimage, 49(4), 3404–3413.
75.
KlieschM.BeckerR.Hervais-AdelmanA. (2022). Global and localized network characteristics of the resting brain predict and adapt to foreign language learning in older adults. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1–12.
76.
KlieschM.GiroudN.MeyerM. (2021). EEG resting-state and event-related potentials as markers of learning success in older adults following second language training: A pilot study. Brain Plasticity, 7(2), 143–162.
77.
KlimovaB.PikhartM.Cierniak-EmerychA.DziubaS.FirlejK. (2021). A comparative psycholinguistic study on the subjective feelings of well-being outcomes of foreign language learning in older adults from the Czech Republic and Poland. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 606083.
78.
KlimovaB.SlaninovaG.PrazakP.KacetlJ.ValisM. (2020). Enhancing cognitive performance of healthy Czech seniors through non-native language learning—A mixed-methods pilot study. Brain Sciences, 10(9), 573.
79.
KnyazevG. G. (2007). Motivation, emotion, and their inhibitory control mirrored in brain oscillations. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 31(3), 377–395.
80.
KousaieS.PhillipsN. A. (2017). A behavioural and electrophysiological investigation of the effect of bilingualism on aging and cognitive control. Neuropsychologia, 94, 23–35.
81.
KrishnanA.XuY.GandourJ. T.CarianiP. A. (2004). Human frequency-following response: Representation of pitch contours in Chinese tones. Hearing Research, 189(1–2), 1–12.
82.
KrishnanA.XuY.GandourJ. T.CarianiP. A. (2005). Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(1), 161–168.
83.
LeeC.-Y.HungT.-H. (2008). Identification of Mandarin tones by English-speaking musicians and nonmusicians. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(5), 3235–3248.
84.
LeeC.-Y.LeeY.-F. (2010). Perception of musical pitch and lexical tones by Mandarin-speaking musicians. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(1), 481–490.
85.
Lee SalvatierraJ.RosselliM. (2011). The effect of bilingualism and age on inhibitory control. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(1), 26–37.
86.
LegattA. D. (2015). Electrophysiologic auditory tests. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 129, 289–311.
87.
LennebergE. H. (1967). The biological foundations of language. Hospital Practice, 2(12), 59–67.
88.
LesicaN. A. (2018). Why do hearing aids fail to restore normal auditory perception?Trends in Neurosciences, 41(4), 174–185.
89.
LiuC.XuC.WangY.XuL.ZhangH.YangX. (2021). Aging effect on Mandarin Chinese vowel and tone identification in six-talker babble. American Journal of Audiology, 30(3), 616–630.
90.
LiuH.HolmesP. (2018). Ideologies of the Chinese language in Finland. Global Chinese, 4(2), 247–270.
91.
LiuL.KagerR. (2014). Perception of tones by infants learning a non-tone language. Cognition, 133(2), 385–394.
92.
LongM. H. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(3), 251–285.
93.
LongM. R.Vega-MendozaM.RohdeH.SoraceA.BakT. H. (2020). Understudied factors contributing to variability in cognitive performance related to language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(4), 801–811.
94.
MackeyA.SachsR. (2012). Older learners in SLA research: A first look at working memory, feedback, and L2 development. Language Learning, 62(3), 704–740.
95.
MaddoxW. T.ChandrasekaranB.SmaydaK.YiH.-G. (2013). Dual systems of speech category learning across the lifespan. Psychology and Aging, 28(4), 1042–1056.
96.
MagneC.SchönD.BessonM. (2006). Musician children detect pitch violations in both music and language better than nonmusician children: Behavioral and electrophysiological approaches. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(2), 199–211.
97.
MarinM. M. (2018). Speech processing in congenital amusia: A review of the literature and future directions. In LuefE. M.MarinM. M. (Eds.), The talking species: Perspectives on the evolutionary, neuronal and cultural foundations of language (pp. 127–116). Uni-Press Graz Verlag GmbH.
98.
MårtenssonJ.ErikssonJ.BodammerN. C.LindgrenM.JohanssonM.NybergL.LövdénM. (2012). Growth of language-related brain areas after foreign language learning. Neuroimage, 63(1), 240–244.
99.
MattockK.MolnarM.PolkaL.BurnhamD. (2008). The developmental course of lexical tone perception in the first year of life. Cognition, 106(3), 1367–1381.
100.
MeltzerJ. A.Kates RoseM.LeA. Y.SpencerK. A.GoldsteinL.GubanovaA.LaiA. C.YossofzaiM.ArmstrongS. E.BialystokE. (2023). Improvement in executive function for older adults through smartphone apps: A randomized clinical trial comparing language learning and brain training. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 30, 150–171.
101.
MussoiB. S. (2021). The impact of music training and working memory on speech recognition in older age. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64(11), 4524–4534.
102.
NhemD. (2019). Language learning strategies: A comparative study of young and adolescent Cambodian learners. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 1(2), 34–45.
103.
NijmeijerS. E.Van TolM.-J.AlemanA.KeijzerM. (2021). Foreign language learning as cognitive training to prevent old age disorders? Protocol of a randomized controlled trial of language training vs. musical training and social interaction in elderly with subjective cognitive decline. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 13, Article 550180.
104.
NilssonJ.BerggrenR.GarzónB.LebedevA. V.LövdénM. (2021). Second language learning in older adults: Effects on brain structure and predictors of learning success. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 13, Article 666851.
105.
NomuraE.MaddoxW.FiloteoJ.IngA.GitelmanD.ParrishT.MesulamM.ReberP. (2007). Neural correlates of rule-based and information-integration visual category learning. Cerebral Cortex, 17(1), 37–43.
106.
OxfordR.ShearinJ. (1994). Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal, 78(1), 12–28.
107.
ParkD. C.Reuter-LorenzP. (2009). The adaptive brain: Aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 173–196.
108.
PeelleJ. E.WingfieldA. (2016). The neural consequences of age-related hearing loss. Trends in Neurosciences, 39(7), 486–497.
109.
PelzlE. (2019). What makes second language perception of Mandarin tones hard? A non-technical review of evidence from psycholinguistic research. Chinese as a Second Language. The Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, USA, 54(1), 51–78.
110.
PerrachioneT. K.LeeJ.HaL. Y.WongP. C. (2011). Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(1), 461–472.
111.
PfenningerS. E.PolzS. (2018). Foreign language learning in the third age: A pilot feasibility study on cognitive, socio-affective and linguistic drivers and benefits in relation to previous bilingualism of the learner. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 2(1), 1–13.
112.
Pichora-FullerM. K. (2003). Cognitive aging and auditory information processing. International Journal of Audiology, 42(Suppl. 2), 26–32.
113.
Pichora-FullerM. K.SchneiderB. A.MacDonaldE.PassH. E.BrownS. (2007). Temporal jitter disrupts speech intelligibility: A simulation of auditory aging. Hearing Research, 223(1–2), 114–121.
114.
PikhartM.KlimovaB.Cierniak-EmerychA.DziubaS. (2021). Psychosocial rehabilitation through intervention by second language acquisition in older adults. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50(5), 1181–1196.
115.
PotA.PorkertJ.KeijzerM. (2019). The bidirectional in bilingual: Cognitive, social and linguistic effects of and on third-age language learning. Behavioral Sciences, 9(9), 98.
116.
PratC. S.YamasakiB. L.KluenderR. A.StoccoA. (2016). Resting-state qEEG predicts rate of second language learning in adults. Brain and Language, 157, 44–50.
117.
ProfantO.JilekM.BuresZ.VencovskyV.KucharovaD.SvobodovaV.KoryntaJ.SykaJ. (2019). Functional age-related changes within the human auditory system studied by audiometric examination. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 11, Article 26.
118.
RamosS.GarcíaY. F.AntónE.CasaponsaA.DuñabeitiaJ. A. (2017). Does learning a language in the elderly enhance switching ability?Journal of Neurolinguistics, 43, 39–48.
119.
Reuter-LorenzP. A. (2002). New visions of the aging mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(9), 394–400.
120.
Reuter-LorenzP. A.JonidesJ.SmithE. E.HartleyA.MillerA.MarshuetzC.KoeppeR. A. (2000). Age differences in the frontal lateralization of verbal and spatial working memory revealed by PET. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(1), 174–187.
121.
RypmaB.D’EspositoM. (2000). Isolating the neural mechanisms of age-related changes in human working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 3(5), 509–515.
122.
SadakataM.McQueenJ. M. (2014). Individual aptitude in Mandarin lexical tone perception predicts effectiveness of high-variability training. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1318.
123.
SalthouseT. A. (1992). Influence of processing speed on adult age differences in working memory. Acta Psychologica, 79(2), 155–170.
124.
SanderK.BarbeauE. B.ChaiX.KousaieS.PetridesM.BaumS.KleinD. (2022). Frontoparietal anatomical connectivity predicts second language learning success. Cerebral Cortex, 32(12), 2602–2610.
125.
SchillerE.DornerH. (2022). Factors influencing senior learners’ language learning motivation. A Hungarian perspective. Journal of Adult Learning, Knowledge and Innovation, 5(1), 12–21.
126.
ServiceE.CraikF. (1993). Differences between young and older adults in learning a foreign vocabulary. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(5), 608–623.
127.
SharmaB. K. (2018). Chinese as a global language: Negotiating ideologies and identities. Global Chinese, 4(1), 1–10.
128.
SharpD. J.ScottS. K.MehtaM. A.WiseR. J. (2006). The neural correlates of declining performance with age: Evidence for age-related changes in cognitive control. Cerebral Cortex, 16(12), 1739–1749.
129.
ShenJ.WrightR.SouzaP. E. (2016). On older listeners’ ability to perceive dynamic pitch. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(3), 572–582.
130.
ShenX. S.LinM. (1991). A perceptual study of Mandarin tones 2 and 3. Language and Speech, 34(2), 145–156.
131.
SinghL.FuC. S. (2016). A new view of language development: The acquisition of lexical tone. Child Development, 87(3), 834–854.
132.
SinghL.FuC. S.RahmanA. A.HameedW. B.SanmugamS.AgarwalP.JiangB.ChongY. S.MeaneyM. J.Rifkin-GraboiA. (2015). Back to basics: A bilingual advantage in infant visual habituation. Child Development, 86(1), 294–302.
133.
SinghL.PohF. L.FuC. S. (2016). Limits on monolingualism? A comparison of monolingual and bilingual infants’ abilities to integrate lexical tone in novel word learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 667.
134.
SkoeE.KrausN. (2012). A little goes a long way: How the adult brain is shaped by musical training in childhood. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(34), 11507–11510.
SoC. K.BestC. T. (2010). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech, 53(2), 273–293.
137.
SoC. K.BestC. T. (2011). Categorizing Mandarin tones into listeners’ native prosodic categories: The role of phonetic properties. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 47(1), 133.
138.
SoC. K.BestC. T. (2014). Phonetic influences on English and French listeners’ assimilation of Mandarin tones to native prosodic categories. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(2), 195–221.
139.
StrouseA.AshmeadD. H.OhdeR. N.GranthamD. W. (1998). Temporal processing in the aging auditory system. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104(4), 2385–2399.
140.
TanJ.DowellR.VogelA. (2016). Mandarin lexical tone acquisition in cochlear implant users with prelingual deafness: A review. American Journal of Audiology, 25(3), 246–256.
141.
TangW.XiongW.ZhangY-xDongQ.NanY. (2016). Musical experience facilitates lexical tone processing among Mandarin speakers: Behavioral and neural evidence. Neuropsychologia, 91, 247–253.
142.
TessmerR.ChandrasekaranB. (2016). Stability and plasticity in the neural representation of linguistic pitch patterns. Tonal Aspects of Languages, 2016, 1–5.
143.
ThompsonL.GarciaE.MalloyD. (2007). Reliance on visible speech cues during multimodal language processing: Individual and age differences. Experimental Aging Research, 33(4), 373–397.
144.
ThompsonL. A.MalloyD. (2004). Attention resources and visible speech encoding in older and younger adults. Experimental Aging Research, 30(3), 241–252.
145.
ThompsonL. A.MalmbergJ.GoodellN. K.BoringR. L. (2004). The distribution of attention across a talker’s face. Discourse Processes, 38(1), 145–168.
146.
TierneyA.RosenS.DickF. (2020). Speech-in-speech perception, nonverbal selective attention, and musical training. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(5), 968–979.
147.
TremblayK. L.PiskoszM.SouzaP. (2003). Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114(7), 1332–1343.
148.
TremblayP.BrissonV.DeschampsI. (2021). Brain aging and speech perception: Effects of background noise and talker variability. Neuroimage, 227, 117675.
149.
TsukadaK.HanJ.-I. (2019). The perception of Mandarin lexical tones by native Korean speakers differing in their experience with Mandarin. Second Language Research, 35(3), 305–318.
150.
TsukadaK.KondoM.SunaokaK. (2016). The perception of Mandarin lexical tones by native Japanese adult listeners with and without Mandarin learning experience. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 2(2), 225–252.
151.
TsukadaK.XuH. L.RattanasoneN. X. (2015). The perception of Mandarin lexical tones by listeners from different linguistic backgrounds. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 4(2), 141–161.
152.
UshiodaE. (2012). Motivation: L2 learning as a special case? In MercerS.RyanS.WilliamsM. (Eds.), Psychology for language learning (pp. 58–73). Springer.
153.
ValisM.SlaninovaG.PrazakP.PoulovaP.KacetlJ.KlimovaB. (2019). Impact of learning a foreign language on the enhancement of cognitive functions among healthy older population. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48(6), 1311–1318.
154.
WagnerM.ShaferV. L.HaxhariE.KiprovskiK.BehrmannK.GriffithsT. (2017). Stability of the cortical sensory waveforms, the P1-N1-P2 complex and T-complex, of auditory evoked potentials. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(7), 2105–2115.
155.
WangS.HuJ.DongR.LiuD.ChenJ.MusacchiaG.LiuB. (2016). Voice pitch elicited frequency following response in Chinese elderlies. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 8, Article 286.
WangY.SerenoJ. A.JongmanA.HirschJ. (2003). FMRI evidence for cortical modification during learning of Mandarin lexical tone. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(7), 1019–1027.
158.
WangY.YangX.DingH.XuC.LiuC. (2021). Aging effects on categorical perception of Mandarin lexical tones in noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64(4), 1376–1389.
159.
WangY.YangX.LiuC. (2017). Categorical perception of Mandarin Chinese tones 1–2 and tones 1–4: Effects of aging and signal duration. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(12), 3667–3677.
160.
WangY.YangX.ZhangH.XuL.XuC.LiuC. (2017). Aging effect on categorical perception of Mandarin tones 2 and 3 and thresholds of pitch contour discrimination. American Journal of Audiology, 26(1), 18–26.
161.
WareC.DamneeS.DjabelkhirL.CristanchoV.WuY.-H.BenoviciJ.PinoM.RigaudA.-S. (2017). Maintaining cognitive functioning in healthy seniors with a technology-based foreign language program: A pilot feasibility study. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 9, Article 42.
162.
WareC.DautricourtS.GonneaudJ.ChételatG.(2021). Does second language learning promote neuroplasticity in aging? A systematic review of cognitive and neuroimaging studies. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 13, Article 706672.
163.
WaylandR. P.LiB. (2008). Effects of two training procedures in cross-language perception of tones. Journal of Phonetics, 36(2), 250–267.
164.
WickensC. D. (2007). Attention to the second language. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 177–191.
165.
WildC. J.YusufA.WilsonD. E.PeelleJ. E.DavisM. H.JohnsrudeI. S. (2012). Effortful listening: The processing of degraded speech depends critically on attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(40), 14010–14021.
166.
WongP. C.LamK. Y. (2021). Characteristics of effective auditory training: Implications from two training programs that successfully trained nonnative Cantonese tone identification in monolingual Mandarin and bilingual Mandarin–Taiwanese tone speakers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64(7), 2490–2512.
167.
WongP. C.EttlingerM.SheppardJ. P.GunasekeraG. M.DharS. (2010). Neuroanatomical characteristics and speech perception in noise in older adults. Ear and Hearing, 31(4), 471–479.
168.
WongP. C.OuJ.PangC. W.ZhangL.TseC. S.LamL. C.AntoniouM. (2019). Language training leads to global cognitive improvement in older adults: A preliminary study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(7), 2411–2424.
169.
WongP. C.PerrachioneT. K. (2007). Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(4), 565–585.
170.
WongP. C.PerrachioneT. K.ParrishT. B. (2007). Neural characteristics of successful and less successful speech and word learning in adults. Human Brain Mapping, 28(10), 995–1006.
171.
WongP. C.WarrierC. M.PenhuneV. B.RoyA. K.SadehhA.ParrishT. B.ZatorreR. J. (2008). Volume of left Heschl’s gyrus and linguistic pitch learning. Cerebral Cortex, 18(4), 828–836.
172.
XiJ.ZhangL.ShuH.ZhangY.LiP. (2010). Categorical perception of lexical tones in Chinese revealed by mismatch negativity. Neuroscience, 170(1), 223–231.
173.
YangX.WangY.XuL.ZhangH.XuC.LiuC. (2015). Aging effect on Mandarin Chinese vowel and tone identification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(4), EL411–EL416.
174.
YipM. (2002). Tone. Cambridge University Press.
175.
YuK.LiL.ChenY.ZhouY.WangR.ZhangY.LiP. (2019). Effects of native language experience on Mandarin lexical tone processing in proficient second language learners. Psychophysiology, 56(11), Article e13448.
