In a form priming experiment with a lexical decision task, we investigated whether the representational structure of lexical tone in lexical memory impacts spoken-word recognition in Mandarin. Target monosyllabic words were preceded by five types of primes: (1) the same real words (/lun4/-/lun4/), (2) real words with only tone contrasts (/lun2/-/lun4/), (3) unrelated real words (/pie3/-/lun4/), (4) pseudowords with only tone contrasts (*/lun3/-/lun4/), and (5) unrelated pseudowords (*/tai3/-/lun4/). We found a facilitation effect in target words with pseudoword primes that share the segmental syllable but contrast in tones (*/lun3/-/lun4/). Moreover, no evident form priming effect was observed in target words primed by real words with only tone contrasts (/lun2/-/lun4/). These results suggest that the recognition of a tone word is influenced by the representational level of tone accessed by the prime word. The distinctive priming patterns between real-word and pseudoword primes are best explained by the connectionist models of tone-word recognition, which assume a hierarchical representation of lexical tone.
BaayenR. H.DavidsonD. J.BatesD. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modelling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.
2.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.
3.
BoersmaP.WeeninkD. (2013). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 5.3.39). Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam. http://www.praat.org
4.
CookS. V.GorK. (2015). Lexical access in L2: Representational deficit or processing constraint?The Mental Lexicon, 10, 247–270.
5.
CutlerA.ChenH. C. (1997). Lexical tone in Cantonese spoken-word processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 165–179.
6.
CutlerA.OtakeT. (1999). Pitch accent in spoken-word recognition in Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 1877–1888.
7.
CutlerA.Van DonselaarW. (2001). Voornaam is not (really) a homophone: Lexical prosody and lexical access in Dutch. Language and Speech, 44, 171–195.
8.
DuanmuS. (2002). The phonology of standard Chinese. Oxford University Press.
9.
DufourS.NguyenN. (2017). Does talker-specific information influence lexical competition? Evidence from phonological priming. Cognitive Science, 41, 2221–2233.
10.
DufourS.PeeremanR. (2003). Inhibitory priming effects in auditory word recognition: When the target’s competitors conflict with the prime word. Cognition, 88, B33–B44.
11.
ForsterK. I.ForsterJ. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124.
12.
ForsterK. I.VeresC. (1998). The prime lexicality effect: Form-priming as a function of prime awareness, lexical status, and discrimination difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 498–514.
13.
FriedericiA. D.AlterK. (2004). Lateralization of auditory language functions: A dynamic dual pathway model. Brain and Language, 89, 267–276.
14.
GandourJ.DzemidzicM.WongD.LoweM.TongY.HsiehL.SatthamnuwongN.LuritoJ. (2003). Temporal integration of speech prosody is shaped by language experience: An fMRI study. Brain and Language, 84, 318–336.
15.
GaoX.YanT.-T.TangD.-L.HuangT.ShuH.NanY.ZhangY.-X. (2019). What makes lexical tone special: A reverse accessing model for tonal speech perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2830.
16.
GoldingerS. D.LuceP. A.PisoniD. B.MarcarioJ. K. (1992). Form-based priming in spoken word recognition: The roles of competition and bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 1211–1238.
17.
GorK.CookS. (2020). A mare in a pub? Nonnative facilitation in phonological priming. Second Language Research, 36, 123–140.
HeathcoteL.NationK.CastlesA.BeyersmannE. (2018). Do “blacheap” and “subcheap” both prime “cheap?” An investigation of morphemic status and position in early visual word processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 1645–1654.
20.
HoA.BoshraR.SchmidtkeD.OralovaG.MoroA. L.ServiceE.ConnollyJ. F. (2019). Electrophysiological evidence for the integral nature of tone in Mandarin spoken word recognition. Neuropsychologia, 131, 325–332.
21.
Language Teaching Research Centre for Beijing Language Institute. (1986). 现代汉语频率词典 [Modern Chinese word frequency dictionary]. Beijing Language Institute Press.
22.
LeeC.-Y. (2007). Does horse activate mother? Processing lexical tone in form priming. Language and Speech, 50, 101–123.
23.
LibermanA. M.CooperF. S.ShankweilerD. P.Studdert-KennedyM. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431–461.
24.
MalinsJ. G.JoanisseM. F. (2010). The roles of tonal and segmental information in Mandarin spoken word recognition: An eyetracking study. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 407–420.
25.
MalinsJ. G.JoanisseM. F. (2012). Towards a model of tonal processing during Mandarin spoken word recognition [Paper presentation]. 3rd International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages, Nanjing, China.
26.
Marslen-WilsonW. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25, 71–102.
27.
McClellandJ. L.ElmanJ. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–86.
28.
NorrisD.McQueenJ.CutlerA. (2002). Bias effects in facilitatory phonological priming. Memory and Cognition, 30, 399–411.
29.
Politzer-AhlesS.SchluterK.WuK.AlmeidaD. (2016). Asymmetries in the perception of Mandarin tones: Evidence from mismatch negativity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 1547–1570.
30.
RadeauM.MoraisJ.DewierA. (1989). Phonological priming in spoken word recognition: Task effects. Memory & Cognition, 17, 525–535.
31.
SamuelA. G. (2001). Knowing a word affects the fundamental perception of the sounds within it. Psychological Science, 12, 348–351.
32.
SchirmerA.TangS.-L.PenneyT. B.GunterT. C.ChenH. C. (2005). Brain responses to segmentally and tonally induced semantic violations in Cantonese. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1–12.
33.
SerenoJ. A.LeeH. (2015). The contribution of segmental and tonal information in Mandarin spoken word processing. Language and Speech, 58, 131–151.
34.
ShuaiL.MalinsJ. G. (2017). Encoding lexical tones in jTRACE: A simulation of monosyllabic spoken word recognition in Mandarin Chinese. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 230–241
35.
SlowiaczekL. M.HamburgerM. (1992). Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1239–1250.
36.
SlowiaczekL. M.NusbaumH. C.PisoniD. B. (1987). Phonological priming in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 64–75.
37.
Soto-FaracoS.Sebastián-GallésN.CutlerA. (2001). Segmental and suprasegmental mismatch in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(3), 412–432.
38.
SpinelliE.SeguiJ.RadeauM. (2001). Phonological priming in spoken word recognition with bisyllabic targets. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 367–392.
39.
TaftM.ChenH. (1992). Judging homophony in Chinese: The influence of tones. In ChenH.TzengO. J. L. (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 151–172). North-Holland Publishing.
40.
TaftM.LiJ.AryantiT. (2021). Why do non-native English speakers show masked form priming when native speakers do not?Journal of Second Language Studies, 4, 204–223.
41.
TongY.FrancisA. L.GandourJ. T. (2008). Processing dependencies between segmental and suprasegmental features in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 689–708.
42.
WangX.TaftM.WangJ.KimS. Y. (2021). Finding a “flower” in a “peanut” is as easy as in a “garden”: Towards a lemma-based model of bilingual word recognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 36, 1076–1085.
43.
YangQ.ChenY. (2022) Phonological competition in Mandarin spoken word recognition, Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 37, 820–843.
44.
YeY.ConnineC. M. (1999). Processing spoken Chinese: The role of tone information. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 609–630.
YipM. (2006). Tone: Phonology. In BrownK (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of language & linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 761–764). Elsevier.
47.
YipM.LeungP.-Y.ChenH.-C. (1998). Phonological similarity effects in Cantonese spoken-word processing. In Proceedings of International Conference on Speech and Language Processing (ICSLP’98, pp. 52139–52142).
48.
YueJ.AlterK.HowardD.BastiaanseR. (2017). Early access to lexical-level phonological representations of Mandarin word-forms: Evidence from auditory N1 habituation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32, 1148–1163.
49.
YueJ.BastiaanseR.AlterK. (2014). Cortical plasticity induced by rapid Hebbian learning of novel tonal wordforms: Evidence from mismatch negativity. Brain and Language, 139, 10–22.
50.
YueJ.WangP.LiJ.LiZ.LiangX.HeY. (2022). Short-term habituation of auditory N1 in spoken word-forms is modulated by phonological information. Brain Sciences, 12, Article 1279.
51.
ZhaoJ.GuoJ.ZhouF.ShuH. (2011). Time course of Chinese monosyllabic spoken word recognition: Evidence from ERP analyses. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1761–1770.
52.
ZhouX.Marslen-WilsonW. (1994). Words, morphemes and syllables in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 393–422.
53.
ZwitserloodP. (1996). Form priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 589–596.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
