Fear extinction is not permanent but is instead more vulnerable than the original fear memory, as traditionally shown by the return of fear phenomena. Because of this, techniques to mitigate the return of fear are needed in the clinical treatment of related psychological conditions. One promising strategy is the occasional reinforced extinction treatment, introducing a gradual and sparse number of conditioned stimulus–unconditioned stimulus (CS-US) pairings within the extinction treatment. We present the results of three experiments in which we used a threat conditioning procedure in humans. Our main aim was to evaluate whether occasional reinforced extinction could reduce two different forms of relapse: spontaneous recovery (Experiments 1 and 2) and reinstatement (Experiment 3). Contrary to our predictions and previous literature, the results indicate that an occasional reinforcement treatment did not mitigate relapse compared with standard extinction. From a theoretical standpoint, these results are more consistent with the idea that extinction entails the acquisition of new knowledge than with the idea that there are conditions in which extinction leads to a weakening of the original fear memory. These findings also question the generality of the potential benefits of using occasional reinforced extinction in clinical settings.
BoddezY.BaeyensF.LuytenL.VansteenwegenD.HermansD.BeckersT. (2013). Rating data are underrated: Validity of US expectancy in human fear conditioning. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 44(2), 201–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.08.003
2.
BoutonM. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.80
3.
BoutonM. E. (2002). Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: Sources of relapse after behavioral extinction. Biological Psychiatry, 52(10), 976–986. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01546-9
4.
BoutonM. E. (2004). Context and behavioral processes in extinction. Learning & Memory, 11(5), 485–494. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.78804
5.
BoutonM. E.WoodsA. M.PineñoO. (2004). Occasional reinforced trials during extinction can slow the rate of rapid reacquisition. Learning and Motivation, 35(4), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2004.05.001
CapaldiE. J. (1994). The sequential view: From rapidly fading stimulus traces to the organization of memory and the abstract concept of number. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(2), 156–181. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200771
CraskeM. G.HermansD.VervlietB. (2018). State-of-the-art and future directions for extinction as a translational model for fear and anxiety. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1742), Article 20170025. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0025
10.
CraskeM. G.LiaoB.BrownL.VervlietB. (2012). Role of inhibition in exposure therapy. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 3(3), 322–345. https://doi.org/10.5127/jep.026511
11.
CraskeM. G.MystkowskiJ. L. (2006). Exposure therapy and extinction: Clinical studies. In CraskeM. G.HermansD.VansteenwegenD. (Eds.), Fear and learning: From basic processes to clinical implications (pp. 217–233). American Psychological Association. http://doi.org/10.1037/11474-011
12.
CraskeM. G.TreanorM.ConwayC. C.ZbozinekT.VervlietB. (2014). Maximizing exposure therapy: An inhibitory learning approach. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 58, 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2014.04.006
13.
CulverN. C.StevensS.FanselowM. S.CraskeM. G. (2018). Building physiological toughness: Some aversive events during extinction may attenuate the return of fear. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 58, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2017.07.003
14.
DunsmoorJ. E.CampeseV. D.CeceliA. O.LeDouxJ. E.PhelpsE. A. (2015). Novelty-facilitated extinction: Providing a novel outcome in place of an expected threat diminishes recovery of defensive responses. Biological Psychiatry, 78(3), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.12.008
15.
FloresA.LópezF. J.VervlietB.CobosP. L. (2018). Intolerance of uncertainty as a vulnerability factor for excessive and inflexible avoidance behavior. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 104, 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2018.02.008
GershmanS. J.JonesC. E.NormanK. A.MonfilsM. H.NivY. (2013). Gradual extinction prevents the return of fear: Implications for the discovery of state. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, Article 164. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00164
18.
GershmanS. J.MonfilsM. H.NormanK. A.NivY. (2017). The computational nature of memory modification. eLife, 6, Article e23763. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23763
19.
GrahamB. M.MiladM. R. (2011). The study of fear extinction: Implications for anxiety disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 168(12), 1255–1265. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11040557
20.
IBM Corp. Released 2015. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
21.
KindtM.SoeterM.VervlietB. (2009). Beyond extinction: Erasing human fear responses and preventing the return of fear. Nature Neuroscience, 12(3), 256–258. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2271
22.
KrompingerJ. W.Van KirkN. P.GarnerL. E.PotluriS. I.EliasJ. A. (2019). Hope for the worst: Occasional reinforced extinction and expectancy violation in the treatment of OCD. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 26(1), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2017.12.002
23.
LippO. V. (2006). Human fear learning: Contemporary procedures and measurement. In CraskeM. G.HermansD.VansteenwegenD. (Eds.), Fear and learning: from basic processes to clinical implications (pp. 37–51). APA Books. https://doi.org/10.1037/11474-002
24.
LonsdorfT. B.MenzM. M.AndreattaM.FullanaM. A.GolkarA.HaakerJ.. . .DrexlerS. M. (2017). Don’t fear “fear conditioning”: Methodological considerations for the design and analysis of studies on human fear acquisition, extinction, and return of fear. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 77, 247–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.026
25.
MiladM. R.QuirkG. J. (2012). Fear extinction as a model for translational neuroscience: Ten years of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131631
MorísJ.BarberiaI.VadilloM. A.AndradesA.LópezF. J. (2017). Slower reacquisition after partial extinction in human contingency learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(1), 81–93. http://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000282
28.
MorísJ.CobosP. L.LuqueD.LópezF. J. (2014). Associative repetition priming as a measure of human contingency learning: Evidence of forward and backward blocking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030919
29.
MyersK. M.ResslerK. J.DavisM. (2006). Different mechanisms of fear extinction dependent on length of time since fear acquisition. Learning & Memory, 13(2), 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.119806
30.
PavlovI. P. (1927). Conditional reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. Oxford University Press.
31.
R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
32.
RedishA. D.JensenS.JohnsonA.Kurth-NelsonZ. (2007). Reconciling reinforcement learning models with behavioral extinction and renewal: Implications for addiction, relapse, and problem gambling. Psychological Review, 114(3), 784–805. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.784
33.
RescorlaR. A.HeathC. D. (1975). Reinstatement of fear to an extinguished conditioned stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1(1), 88–96. http://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.1.1.88
34.
RescorlaR. A.WagnerA. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In BlackA. H.ProkasyW. F. (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 64–99). Appleton-Century-Crofts.
35.
RickerS. T.BoutonM. E. (1996). Reacquisition following extinction in appetitive conditioning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 24(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199014
36.
RouderJ. N.MoreyR. D. (2011). A Bayes factor meta-analysis of Bem’s ESP claim. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(4), 682–689. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0088-7
ThompsonA.McEvoyP. M.LippO. V. (2018). Enhancing extinction learning: Occasional presentations of the unconditioned stimulus during extinction eliminate spontaneous recovery, but not necessarily reacquisition of fear. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 108, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2018.07.001
40.
UrcelayG. P. (2012). Exposure techniques: The role of extinction learning. In NeudeckP.WittchenH.-U. (Eds.), Exposure therapy (pp. 35–63). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3342-2_4
41.
van AstV. A.CornelisseS.MeeterM.JoëlsM.KindtM. (2013). Time-dependent effects of cortisol on the contextualization of emotional memories. Biological Psychiatry, 74(11), 809–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.06.022
WetzelsR.van RavenzwaaijD.WagenmakersE. J. (2015). Bayesian analysis. In CautinR.LilienfeldS. (Eds.), The encyclopedia of clinical psychology. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118625392.wbecp453
44.
WoodsA. M.BoutonM. E. (2007). Occasional reinforced responses during extinction can slow the rate of reacquisition of an operant response. Learning and Motivation, 38(1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2006.07.003
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
