The spread of fake news (FN) has attracted attention from disciplines ranging from social sciences to Artificial Intelligence. This work is novel because it explores the news-sharing behaviour of social-media users, focussing on those that spread FN, rather than the psychological motivations behind them. The 14-item Risky News-Sharing Quotient (RNSQ) was developed and Exploratory Factor Analysis discovered three relevant factors: (i) news-sharing behaviour that contributes to debunking FN; (ii) news-sharing frequency and attitudes to sharing; and (iii) news-sharing behaviour that contributes to the spread of FN. The study, conducted among university students, found that 75% reported risky news-sharing behaviour that spreads FN. No link was found between perceiving FN as a problem and debunking it. Moreover, 83% of survey participants were unable to identify a FN story. Overall, the findings suggest an inability to apply knowledge of the relevant FN detection strategies to debunk FN, but importantly an apparent lack of motivation to check the veracity of a news story. From these conclusions, better-informed educational intervention strategies can be implemented to address the FN problem in-situ, such as promoting the importance of responsible news-sharing by raising awareness of how the spread of FN can impede the proper functioning of societies.
AllcottHGentzkowM (2017) Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives31(2): 211–236.
2.
ApukeODOmarB (2021) Fake news and COVID-19: modelling the predictors of fake news sharing among social media users. Telematics and Informatics56: 1–16.
3.
BaronRJ (2019) Digital literacy. In: The International Encyclopedia of Media Literacy. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, pp.1–6.
4.
BhagatSKimDJ (2023) Examining users news sharing behaviour on social media: Role of perception of online civic engagement and dual social influences. Behaviour & Information Technology42(8): 1194–1215.
5.
BondielliAMarcelloniF (2019) A survey on fake news and rumour detection techniques. Information Sciences497: 38–55.
6.
Bonet-JoverASepúlveda-TorresRSaqueteE, et al. (2023, August 6) Run-as: A novel approach to annotate news reliability for disinformation detection. Language Resources and Evaluation1–31. DOI: 10.1007/s10579-023-09678-9.
7.
CalvaniAFiniARanieriM, et al. (2012) Are young generations in secondary school digitally competent? A study on Italian teenagers. Computers & Education58(2): 797–807.
8.
CantarellaMFraccaroliNVolpeR (2023) Does fake news affect voting behaviour?Research Policy52(1): 1–12.
9.
CorbuNOpreaDANegrea-BusuiocE, et al. (2020) They cant fool me, but they can fool the others!’ Third person effect and fake news detection. European Journal of Communication35(2): 165–180.
10.
Council of Europe (2001) The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Council of Europe.
11.
DabbousAAoun BarakatKde Quero NavarroB (2022) Fake news detection and social media trust: A cross-cultural perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology41(14): 2953–2972.
12.
DaleR (2017) NLP in a post-truth world. Natural Language Engineering23(2): 319–324.
13.
EidMIMAl-JabriIM (2016) Social networking, knowledge sharing, and student learning: The case of university students. Computers & Education99: 14–27.
14.
Eshet-AlkalaiY (2004) Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia13(1): 93–106.
15.
FallisD (2014) The varieties of disinformation. In: FloridiLIllariP (eds). The Philosophy of Information Quality, vol. 358. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp.135–161.
16.
HaenschenK (2020) Self-reported versus digitally recorded: Measuring political activity on facebook. Social Science Computer Review38: 567–583.
17.
HairJF (ed.) (2006) Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th edn.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
18.
HussainSKilagwaRZaaliY, et al. (2018) The effect of message credibility on media use and perception of fake news among students. Human Communication1(2): 1–21.
19.
JangSMKimJK (2018) Third person effects of fake news: Fake news regulation and media literacy interventions. Computers in Human Behavior80: 295–302.
20.
KaiserHF (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika39(1): 31–36.
21.
KarimiHTangJ (2019) Learning Hierarchical Discourse-level Structure for Fake News Detection. In: NAACL HLT 2019 - 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies - Proceedings of the Conference, vol. 1, pp. 3432–3442.
22.
KhanMLIdrisIK (2019) Recognise misinformation and verify before sharing: A reasoned action and information literacy perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology38(12): 1194–1212.
23.
LeeJ (2022) The effect of web add-on correction and narrative correction on belief in misinformation depending on motivations for using social media. Behaviour & Information Technology41(3): 629–643.
24.
LeeT (2019) The global rise of fake news and the threat to democratic elections in the usa. Public Administration and Policy22(1): 15–24.
25.
LikertR (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archiv fur Psychologie22: 5–55.
26.
ListA (2019) Defining digital literacy development: An examination of pre-service teachers’ beliefs. Computers & Education138: 146–158.
27.
MarinL (2021) Three contextual dimensions of information on social media: Lessons learned from the covid-19 infodemic. Ethics and Information Technology23: 79–86.
28.
MarshallHDrieschovaA (2018) Post-truth politics in the uk’s brexit referendum. New Perspectives26(3): 89–105.
29.
McGrewS (2020) Learning to evaluate: An intervention in civic online reasoning. Computers & Education145: 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103711.
MöllerJvan de VeldeRNMertenL, et al. (2020) Explaining online news engagement based on browsing behavior: Creatures of habit?Social Science Computer Review38: 616–632.
32.
NaeemSBBhattiRKhanA (2021) An exploration of how fake news is taking over social media and putting public health at risk. Health Information and Libraries Journal38(2): 143–149.
33.
NgW (2012) Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?Computers & Education59(3): 1065–1078.
34.
Romero-LópezMPichardoCDe HocesI, et al. (2021) Problematic internet use among university students and its relationship with social skills. Brain Sciences11(10): 1301.
35.
RubinVConroyNChenY, et al. (2016) Fake news or truth? using satirical cues to detect potentially misleading news. In: Proceedings of the second workshop on computational approaches to deception detection, pp. 7–17.
36.
SaqueteETomásDMoredaP, et al. (2020) Fighting post-truth using natural language processing: A review and open challenges. Expert Systems with Applications141: 1–27.
37.
ShuKSlivaAWangS, et al. (2017) Fake news detection on social media. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter19(1): 22–36.
38.
ȘtefănițăOCorbuNButuroiuR; National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Bucharest, Romania National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Bucharest, Romania and National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Bucharest, Romania (2018) Fake news and the third-person effect: They are more influenced than me and you. Journal of Media Research11(3(32)): 5–23.
39.
StefanoneMVollmerMCovertJ (2019) In news we trust?: Examining credibility and sharing behaviors of fake news. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp.136–147.
40.
TalwarSDhirAKaurP, et al. (2019) Why do people share fake news? Associations between the dark side of social media use and fake news sharing behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services51: 72–82.
41.
TandocECLimZWLingR (2018) Defining fake news: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism6(2): 137–153.
42.
TorresRRGerhartNNegahbanA (2018) Epistemology in the era of fake news: An exploration of information verification behaviors among social networking site users. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems49(3): 78–97.
43.
VordererPKrömerNSchneiderFM (2016) Permanently online – Permanently connected: Explorations into university students’ use of social media and mobile smart devices. Computers in Human Behavior63: 694–703.
44.
VosoughiSRoyDAralS (2018) The spread of true and false news online. Science359(6380): 1146–1151.
45.
YooJKimDKimWG (2022) Fake news on you, not me: The third-person effects of fake news in south korea. Communication Research Reports39(3): 115–125.
