This study modelled the factors that influence fake news spreading behaviour among social media users. To gather our data, we used an online survey to sample 385 social media users in Nigeria, using a chain referral approach. Smart PLS structural equation modelling was used to analyse the data (SEM). We discovered that lack of mindfulness, religiosity, instant news sharing, self-expression all predicted fake news sharing behaviour of social media users. The impacts of lack of mindfulness and religiosity were found to have a greater effect on fake news sharing behaviour. Exploration was found to have a negative effect on fake news sharing. We concluded this study with some theoretical and practical implications.
Agarwal B, Agarwal A, Harjule P, et al. (2023) Understanding the intent behind sharing misinformation on social media. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 35(4): 573–587.
2.
AliKLiCZain-ul-abdinK, et al. (2022) The effects of emotions, individual attitudes towards vaccination, and social endorsements on perceived fake news credibility and sharing motivations. Computers in Human Behavior134: 107307.
3.
AllcottHGentzkowM (2017) Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives31(2): 211–236.
4.
AlwreikatA (2022) The role of information literacy competencies in reducing the effect of infodemic: The case of COVID-19 pandemic. Science & Technology Libraries41(4): 367–384.
5.
AlzaninSMAzmiAM (2018) Detecting rumors in social media: A survey. Procedia Computer Science142: 294–300.
6.
ApukeODGeverCV (2023) A quasi experiment on how the field of librarianship can help in combating fake news. The Journal of Academic Librarianship49(1): 102616.
7.
ApukeODOmarB (2020a) Fake news proliferation in Nigeria: Consequences, motivations, and prevention through awareness. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews8(2): 318–327.
8.
ApukeODOmarB (2020b) User motivation in fake news sharing during the COVID-19 pandemic: An application of the uses and gratification theory. Online Information Review 45(1): 1–17.
9.
ApukeODOmarB (2021a) Fake news and COVID-19: Modelling the predictors of fake news sharing among social media users. Telematics and Informatics56: 101475.
10.
ApukeODOmarB (2021b) Social media affordances and information abundance: Enabling fake news sharing during the COVID-19 health crisis. Health Informatics Journal27(3): 1–23.
11.
ApukeODOmarBAsude TuncaE (2023) Literacy concepts as an intervention strategy for improving fake news knowledge, detection skills, and curtailing the tendency to share fake news in Nigeria. Child & Youth Services44(1): 88–103.
12.
AtoyMBGarciaFROCadungogRR, et al. (2020) Linking digital literacy and online information searching strategies of Philippine university students: The moderating role of mindfulness. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science52(4): 1015–1027.
13.
BabbieE. (2010) The Practice of Social Research (12th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.
ChenXSinSCJ (2013) ‘Misinformation? What of it?’Motivations and individual differences in misinformation sharing on social media. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology50(1): 1–4.
16.
ChenXSinSCJThengYL, et al. (2015) Why students share misinformation on social media: Motivation, gender, and study-level differences. Journal of Academic Librarianship41(5): 583–592.
17.
CohenJ. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
18.
DabbousAAoun BarakatKde Quero NavarroB (2021) Fake news detection and social media trust: A cross-cultural perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology 41(14): 1–20.
19.
Del VicarioMQuattrociocchiWScalaA, et al. (2019) Polarization and fake news: Early warning of potential misinformation targets. ACM Transactions on the Web13(2): 5–18.
20.
DoiseWLorenzi-CioldiF (2020) Patterns of diffrentiation within and between groups. In In Ethnic Minorities. London: Garland Science, pp.43–57.
21.
DuffyATandocELingR (2019) Too good to be true, too good not to share: The social utility of fake news. Information Communication and Society23(13): 1–15.
22.
GeverCV (2021) Why does misinformation about COVID-19 strive on social media platforms?: Suggesting an intervention strategy for Nigerian government. Ianna Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies2(1): 1–4.
23.
GibsonJ. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In: ShawRBransfordJ (eds.) Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing:Towardanecologicalpsychology. Hillsdale, NJ: LawrenceErlbaumAssociates Inc., pp.67–82.
24.
GuptaMDennehyDParraCM, et al. (2023) Fake news believability: The effects of political beliefs and espoused cultural values. Information & Management60(2): 103745.
25.
HabesMElareshiMMansooriA, et al. (2023) Factors indicating media dependency and online misinformation sharing in Jordan. Sustainability15(2): 1474.
26.
HairJFJr.HowardMCNitzlC (2020) Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research109: 101–110.
27.
HairJFJr.HultGTMRingleC, et al. (2017) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). USA: Sage Publications.
28.
HairJFRisherJJSarstedtM, et al. (2019) When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review31(1): 2–24.
29.
HenselerJRingleCMSarstedtM (2014) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science43(1): 115–135.
30.
HouZDuFJiangH, et al. (2020) Assessment of public attention, risk perception, emotional and behavioural responses to the COVID-19 outbreak: social media surveillance in China. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.14.20035956
31.
HuntE (2016) What is fake news? how to spot it and what you can do to stop it. The Guardian.
32.
IgbinoviaMOOkuonghaeOAdebayoJO (2021) Information literacy competence in curtailing fake news about the COVID-19 pandemic among undergraduates in Nigeria. Reference Services Review49(1): 3–18.
33.
IhmJKimEM (2018) The hidden side of news diffusion: Understanding online news sharing as an interpersonal behavior. New Media and Society20(11): 4346–4365.
34.
IslamAKMNLaatoSTalukderS, et al. (2020) Misinformation sharing and social media fatigue during COVID-19: An affordance and cognitive load perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change159(July): 120201.
35.
JangSMKimJK (2018) Third person effects of fake news: Fake news regulation and media literacy interventions. Computers in Human Behavior80: 295–302.
36.
KashdanTBRosePFinchamFD (2004) Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment82(3): 291–305.
37.
Khan GF, Sarstedt M, Shiau WL, et al. (2019) Methodological research on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS–SEM) an analysis based on social network approaches. Internet Research 29(3): 407–429.
38.
KhanMLIdrisIK (2019) Recognise misinformation and verify before sharing: A reasoned action and information literacy perspective. Behaviour and Information Technology38(12): 1194–1212.
39.
KimADennisAR (2019) Says who? The effects of presentation format and source rating on fake news in social media. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems43(3): 1025–1039.
40.
KumarAShankarABehlA, et al. (2023) Should I share it? Factors influencing fake news-sharing behaviour: A behavioural reasoning theory perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change193: 122647.
41.
LaatoSIslamAKMNIslamMN, et al. (2020) What drives unverified information sharing and cyberchondria during the COVID-19 pandemic?European Journal of Information Systems29(3): 288–305.
42.
LazerDMJBaumMABenklerY, et al. (2018) The science of fake news. Science (New York, N.Y.)359(6380): 1094–1096.
43.
ManleySCJrJFHJrRIW, et al. (2020) Essential new PLS-SEM analysis methods for your entrepreneurship analytical toolbox. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Online ahe 17(1): 1–21.
44.
MetzgerMJFlanaginAJMenaP, et al. (2021) From dark to light: The many shades of sharing misinformation online. Media and Communication9(1): 1–10.
45.
NormanDA (1988) The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
46.
ObadăD-RDabijaD-C (2022a) “In flow”! why do users share fake news about environmentally friendly brands on social media?International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19(8): 4861.
47.
ObadăD-RDabijaD-C (2022b) The mediation effects of social media usage and sharing fake news about companies. Behavioral Sciences12(10): 372.
48.
OmarBApukeODNorZM (2023) The intrinsic and extrinsic factors predicting fake news sharing among social media users: the moderating role of fake news awareness. Current Psychology 16(3): 1–16.
49.
OnuoraCTorti ObasiNEzeahGH, et al. (2021) Effect of dramatized health messages: Modelling predictors of the impact of COVID-19 YouTube animated cartoons on health behaviour of social media users in Nigeria. International Sociology36(1): 124–140.
50.
OrehekEHumanLJ (2017) Self-expression on social media: Do tweets present accurate and positive portraits of impulsivity, self-esteem, and attachment style?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin43(1): 60–70.
51.
ParikhSBPatilVMakawanaR, et al. (2019) Towards impact scoring of fake news. 2019 IEEE Conference on Multimedia Information Processing and Retrieval (MIPR), pp.529–533. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIPR.2019.00107
52.
PennycookGRandDG (2021) The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences25(5): 388–402.
53.
PennycookGMcPhetresJZhangY, et al. (2020) Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention. Psychological Science31(7): 770–780.
54.
PlumeCJSladeEL (2018) Sharing of sponsored advertisements on social media: A uses and gratifications perspective. Information Systems Frontiers20(3): 471–483.
55.
PrestonSAndersonARobertsonDJ, et al. (2021) Detecting fake news on Facebook: The role of emotional intelligence. PLoS ONE16(3 March): 1–13.
56.
RodrigoPArakpogunEOVuMC, et al. (2022) Can you be mindful? The effectiveness of mindfulness-driven interventions in enhancing the digital resilience to fake news on COVID-19. Information Systems Frontiers 12(6): 1–9.
57.
RoemerESchuberthFHenselerJ (2021) HTMT2–an Improved criterion for assessing discriminant validity in structural equation modeling. Industrial Management & Data Systems121(12): 2637–2650.
SchuetzSWSykesTAVenkateshV (2021) Combating COVID-19 fake news on social media through fact checking: Antecedents and consequences. European Journal of Information Systems30(4): 376–388.
60.
ShinJJianLDriscollK, et al. (2018) The diffusion of misinformation on social media: Temporal pattern, message, and source. Computers in Human Behavior83: 278–287.
61.
SilvaRMSantosRLSAlmeidaTA, et al. (2020) Towards automatically filtering fake news in Portuguese. Expert Systems With Applications146: 113199.
62.
SongHSoJShimM, et al. (2023) What message features influence the intention to share misinformation about COVID-19 on social media? The role of efficacy and novelty. Computers in Human Behavior138: 107439.
63.
Spohr, D. (2017) Fake news and ideological polarization: Filter bubbles and selective exposure on social media. Business Information Review 34(3): 150–160.
64.
TalwarSDhirASinghD, et al. (2020) Sharing of fake news on social media: Application of the honeycomb framework and the third-person effect hypothesis. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services57: 102197.
65.
TanW-KHsuCY (2023) The application of emotions, sharing motivations, and psychological distance in examining the intention to share COVID-19-related fake news. Online Information Review47(1): 59–80.
66.
TrninićDKuprešanin VukelićABokanJ (2021) Perception of “fake news” and potentially manipulative content in digital media—a generational approach. Societies12(1): 3.
67.
WeiLGongJXuJ, et al. (2023) Do social media literacy skills help in combating fake news spread? Modelling the moderating role of social media literacy skills in the relationship between rational choice factors and fake news sharing behaviour. Telematics and Informatics76: 101910.
68.
WiskerZL (2021) The effect of fake news in marketing halal food: A moderating role of religiosity. Journal of Islamic Marketing12(3): 558–575.
69.
WuBLiFZhouL, et al. (2022) Are mindful people less involved in online trolling? A moderated mediation model of perceived social media fatigue and moral disengagement. Aggressive Behavior48(3): 309–318.
70.
YangYSuFLiuH, et al. (2023) The effect of mindfulness intervention on internet negative news perception and processing: An implicit and explicit approach. Frontiers in Psychology14: 1–16.
71.
ZhangQGuoZZhuY, et al. (2023) A deep learning-based fast fake news detection model for cyber-physical social services. Pattern Recognition Letters168: 31–38.
