Teachers in India occupy conflicted social positions, both culturally valued and institutionally marginalised. We explore teacher perceptions of their autonomy through a survey of 177 teachers working in Chennai, India. Conceptually, autonomy offers insight into the degree of centralisation or professionalisation that structure the work of teachers. Our respondents reported high perceptions of autonomy across a range of domains, a surprising finding within the context of schooling in India. We argue our findings represent teachers making meanings of the concept of autonomy in ways that differ from other international contexts. We suggest these understandings include teachers interpreting their positionalities within a loosely coupled organisation, a teacher workforce seeking professionalism in a post-colonial institution, and persistent expectations of a culture of compliance. Teacher autonomy is understudied in India, and our tentative findings serve as a starting place for exploring teacher perceptions of their work in the rapidly changing institution of education.
Annual Status of Education Report (2023) Annual Status of Education Report 2023 - Beyond Basics. New Delhi: Pratham.
2.
AslamMMalikRRawalS, et al. (2019) Methodological lessons on measuring quality teaching in Southern contexts, with a focus on India and Pakistan. Research in Comparative and International Education14(1): 77–98.
3.
BatraP (2005) Voice and agency of teachers: missing link in national curriculum framework 2005. Economic and Political Weekly40(40): 4347–4356.
4.
ChandranM (2022) Teacher accountability and education restructuring: an exploration of teachers’ work identities in an urban school for poor in India. International Studies in Sociology of Education31(3): 305–324.
5.
ChudgarACreedB (2016) How are private school enrolment patterns changing across Indian districts with a growth in private school availability?Oxford Review of Education42(5): 543–560.
6.
ChudgarASakamotoJ (2021) Similar work, different pay? Private school teacher working conditions in India. International Journal of Educational Development86: 102478.
7.
CribbAGewirtzS (2007) Unpacking autonomy and control in education: some conceptual and normative groundwork for a comparative analysis. European Educational Research Journal6(3): 203–213.
8.
DieudéAPrøitzTS (2024) Curriculum policy and instructional planning: teachers’ autonomy across various school contexts. European Educational Research Journal23(1): 28–47.
9.
ErssM (2018) ‘Complete freedom to choose within limits’–teachers’ views of curricular autonomy, agency and control in Estonia, Finland and Germany. Curriculum Journal29(2): 238–256.
10.
ErssMKalmusV (2018) Discourses of teacher autonomy and the role of teachers in Estonian, Finnish and Bavarian teachers' newspapers in 1991–2010. Teaching and Teacher Education76: 95–105.
11.
EvettsJ (2009) New professionalism and new public management: changes, continuities and consequences. Comparative Sociology8(2): 247–266.
GutmannA (1999) Democratic Education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
14.
HärmäJ (2021) Low-fee Private Schooling and Poverty in Developing Countries. London and New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
15.
HopmannST (2003) On the evaluation of curriculum reforms. Journal of Curriculum Studies35(4): 459–478.
16.
IndiraVijaysimha (2013) Teachers as Professionals: Accountable and Autonomous? Review of the Report of the Justice Verma. Contemporary Education Dialogue10(2): 293–299. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0973184913485021
17.
IngersollRM (2009) Who Controls Teachers’ Work?: Power and Accountability in America’s Schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
JainM (2018) Public, private and education in India: a historical overview. In: JainMMehendaleAMukhopadhyayR, et al. (eds) School Education in India: Market, State and Quality. New York: Taylor & Francis, 31–66.
19.
KumarK (2015) Politics of Education in Colonial India. New Delhi: Routledge India.
20.
Lennert da SilvaALMølstadCE (2020) Teacher autonomy and teacher agency: a comparative study in Brazilian and Norwegian lower secondary education. Curriculum Journal31(1): 115–131.
21.
MajumdarM (2011) Politicians, civil servants or professionals? Teachers’ voices on their work and worth. Contemporary Education Dialogue8(1): 33–65.
22.
MajumdarMMooijJ (2012) Education and Inequality in India: A Classroom View. London: Routledge.
23.
MausethagenSMølstadCE (2015) Shifts in curriculum control: contesting ideas of teacher autonomy. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy1: 30–41.
24.
MehtaJ (2013) The Allure of Order: High Hopes, Dashed Expectations, and the Troubled Quest to Remake American Schooling. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
MiliWinchC (2019) Teaching through textbooks: teachers as practitioners of a discipline?Theory and Research in Education17(2): 181–201.
26.
NarayananM (2021) Negotiating power within school structures. Education and Urban Society53(8): 960–982.
27.
NarayananMOrdynansJG (2021) Meaning making and self-efficacy: teacher reflections through COVID-19. The Teacher Educator57(1): 26–44.
28.
NarayananMShieldsALDelhagenTJ (2024) Autonomy in the spaces: teacher autonomy, scripted lessons, and the changing role of teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies56(1): 17–34.
29.
NieveenNKuiperW (2012) Balancing curriculum freedom and regulation in The Netherlands. European Educational Research Journal11(3): 357–368.
30.
NilakantanRA (2022) South vs North: India’s Great Divide. New Delhi: Juggernaut Books.
31.
PaulsrudDWermkeW (2020) Decision-making in context: Swedish and Finnish teachers’ perceptions of autonomy. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research64(5): 706–727.
32.
PearsonLCHallBW (1993) Initial construct validation of the teaching autonomy scale. The Journal of Educational Research86(3): 172–178.
33.
PearsonLCMoomawW (2006) Continuing validation of the teaching autonomy scale. The Journal of Educational Research100(1): 44–51.
34.
RamachandranVBhattacharjeaSSheshagiriK (2008) Primary School Teachers; the Twist and Turns of Everyday Practice: A Project Supported by Azim Premji Foundation. Bangalore: Educational Resource Unit.
35.
RamachandranVBeteilleTTobyL, et al. (2018) Getting the Right Teachers into the Right Schools: Managing India’s Teacher Workforce. Washington, DC: World Bank.
36.
SaldañaJ (2021) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: Sage.
37.
SalokangasMWermkeWHarveyG (2020) Teachers’ autonomy deconstructed: Irish and Finnish teachers’ perceptions of decision-making and control. European Educational Research Journal19(4): 329–350.
38.
SarangapaniPM (2003) Constructing School Knowledge: An Ethnography of Learning in an Indian Village. New Delhi: Sage.
39.
SarangapaniPMWinchC (2010) Tooley, Dixon and Gomathi on private education in Hyderabad: a reply. Oxford Review of Education36(4): 499–515.
SethS (2007) Subject Lessons: The Western Education of Colonial India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
42.
SkaalvikEMSkaalvikS (2014) Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy: relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Psychological Reports114(1): 68–77.
43.
SmailA (2014) Rediscovering the teacher within Indian child-centred pedagogy: implications for the global Child-Centred Approach. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education44(4): 613–633.
44.
WermkeWHöstfältG (2014) Contextualizing teacher autonomy in time and space: a model for comparing various forms of governing the teaching profession. Journal of Curriculum Studies46(1): 58–80.
45.
WorthJVan den BrandeJ (2020) Teacher Autonomy: How Does it Relate to Job Satisfaction and Retention?UK: National Foundation for Educational Research.
