Novice teachers’ professional contexts may have important implications for their effectiveness, development, and retention. However, due to data limitations, descriptions of these contexts are often unidimensional or vague. Using 10 years of administrative data from the Los Angeles Unified School District, we describe patterns of new teacher sorting using 24 context measures organized along three dimensions—intensity of instructional responsibilities, homophily, and colleagues’ qualifications—and use school-level survey data to measure a fourth dimension. professional culture. Relative to more experienced teachers, novice teachers have placements that are more challenging along the first three dimensions, and composite measures of the dimensions are differentially predictive of teachers’ outcomes. This suggests that policymakers should carefully consider placements to better support novice teachers.
AaronsonD.MeckelK. (2009). How will baby boomer retirements affect teacher labor markets?Economic Perspectives, 33(4), 2–15.
2.
AllensworthE.EastonJ. Q. (2007). What matters for staying on-track and graduating in Chicago public high schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, Consortium on Chicago School Research.
3.
AnziaS. F.MoeT. M. (2014). Collective bargaining, transfer rights, and disadvantaged schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36, 83–111.
4.
AtteberryA.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2017). Teacher churning: Reassignment rates and implications for student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39, 3–30.
5.
BastianK. C.JandaL. (2018). Does quantity affect quality? Teachers’ course preparations and effectiveness. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 11, 535–558.
6.
BlazarD. (2015). Grade assignments and the teacher pipeline: A low-cost lever to improve student achievement?Educational Researcher, 44, 213–227.
7.
BoydD.GrossmanP.IngM.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2011). The influence of school administrators on teacher retention decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 303–333.
8.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.RonfeldtM.WyckoffJ. (2011). The role of teacher quality in retention and hiring: Using applications to transfer to uncover preferences of teachers and schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30, 88–110.
9.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2005). Explaining the short careers of high-achieving teachers in schools with low-performing students. American Economic Review, 95, 166–171.
10.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2013). Analyzing the determinants of the matching of public school teachers to jobs: Disentangling the preferences of teachers and employers. Journal of Labor Economics, 31, 83–117.
11.
BristolT. J.ShirrellM. (2019). Who is here to help me? The work-related social networks of staff of color in two mid-sized districts. American Educational Research Journal, 56, 868–898.
12.
CherngH.-Y. S.HalpinP. F. (2016). The importance of minority teachers: Student perceptions of minority versus White teachers. Educational Researcher, 45, 407–420.
13.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. (2005). Who teaches whom? Race and the distribution of novice teachers. Economics of Education Review, 24, 377–392.
14.
DeeT. S. (2004). Teachers, race, and student achievement in a randomized experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 195–210.
15.
DonaldsonM. L.JohnsonS. M. (2010). The price of misassignment: The role of teaching assignments in Teach for America teachers’ exit from low-income schools and the teaching profession. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 299–323.
16.
DowneyD. B.PribeshS. (2004). When race matters: Teachers’ evaluations of students’ classroom behavior. Sociology of Education, 77, 267–282.
17.
EgaliteA. J.KisidaB. (2018). The effects of teacher match on students’ academic perceptions and attitudes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40, 59–81.
18.
EgaliteA. J.KisidaB.WintersM. A. (2015). Representation in the classroom: The effect of own-race teachers on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 45, 44–52.
19.
FarindeA. A.AllenA.LewisC. W. (2016). Retaining Black teachers: An examination of Black female teachers’ intentions to remain in K–12 classrooms. Equity & Excellence in Education, 49, 115–127.
20.
FengL. (2010). Hire today, gone tomorrow: New teacher classroom assignments and teacher mobility. Education Finance and Policy, 5, 278–316.
21.
FengL.SassT. R. (2017). Teacher quality and teacher mobility. Education Finance and Policy, 12, 396–418.
22.
GershensonS.HoltS. B.PapageorgeN. W. (2016). Who believes in me? The effect of student–teacher demographic match on teacher expectations. Economics of Education Review, 52, 209–224.
23.
GoddardY. L.GoddardR. D.Tschannen-MoranM. (2007). A theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 109, 877–896.
24.
GoldhaberD.LaveryL.TheobaldR. (2015). Uneven playing field? Assessing the teacher quality gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students. Educational Researcher, 44, 293–307.
25.
GoldhaberD.LaveryL.TheobaldR. (2016). Inconvenient truth? Do collective bargaining agreements help explain the mobility of teachers within school districts?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35, 848–880.
26.
GoldringR.TaieS.RiddlesM. (2014, September). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the 2012–13 Teacher Follow-Up Survey (NCES 2014-077). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014077.pdf
27.
GottfriedM. A. (2014). Chronic absenteeism and its effects on students’ academic and socioemotional outcomes. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 19(2), 53–75.
28.
GrissomJ. A. (2011). Can good principals keep teachers in disadvantaged schools? Linking principal effectiveness to teacher satisfaction and turnover in hard-to-staff environments. Teachers College Record, 113, 2552–2585.
29.
GrissomJ. A.KeiserL. R. (2011). A supervisor like me: Race, representation, and the satisfaction and turnover decisions of public sector employees. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30, 557–580.
30.
GrissomJ. A.Nicholson-CrottyJ.KeiserL. (2012). Does my boss’s gender matter? Explaining job satisfaction and employee turnover in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 649–673.
31.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G. (2004). Why public schools lose teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 39, 326–354.
32.
HanushekE. A.RivkinS. G. (2007). Pay, working conditions, and teacher quality. The Future of Children, 17(1), 69–86.
33.
HughesG. D. (2012). Teacher retention: Teacher characteristics, school characteristics, organizational characteristics, and teacher efficacy. Journal of Educational Research, 105, 245–255.
34.
JacksonC. K.BruegmannE. (2009). Teaching students and teaching each other: The importance of peer learning for teachers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(4), 85–108.
35.
JohnsonS. M.KraftM. A.PapayJ. P. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students’ achievement. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1–39.
36.
KalogridesD.LoebS.BéteilleT. (2013). Systematic sorting: Teacher characteristics and class assignments. Sociology of Education, 86, 103–123.
37.
KeigherA. (2010). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the 2008–09 Teacher Follow-Up Survey (NCES 2010-353). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from shttps://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010353.pdf
38.
KoedelC.MihalyK.RockoffJ. E. (2015). Value-added modeling: A review. Economics of Education Review, 47, 180–195.
39.
KraftM. A.MarinellW. H.YeeD. S.-W. (2016). School organizational contexts, teacher turnover, and student achievement evidence from panel data. American Educational Research Journal, 53, 1411–1449.
40.
KraftM. A.PapayJ. P. (2014). Can professional environments in schools promote teacher development? Explaining heterogeneity in returns to teaching experience. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36, 476–500.
41.
Kukla-AcevedoS. (2009). Leavers, movers, and stayers: The role of workplace conditions in teacher mobility decisions. Journal of Educational Research, 102, 443–452.
42.
LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 37–62.
43.
LuekensM. T.LyterD. M.FoxE. E. (2004). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the Teacher Follow-Up Survey, 2000–01 (NCES 2004-301). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
44.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444.
OstB.SchimanJ. C. (2017). Workload and teacher absence. Economics of Education Review, 57, 20–30.
49.
PlayerD.YoungsP.PerroneF.GroganE. (2017). How principal leadership and person–job fit are associated with teacher mobility and attrition. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 330–339.
50.
RonfeldtM. (2015). Field placement schools and instructional effectiveness. Journal of Teacher Education, 66, 304–320.
51.
RonfeldtM.FarmerS. O.McQueenK.GrissomJ. A. (2015). Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 475–514.
52.
RonfeldtM.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 4–36.
53.
RothsteinJ. (2009). Student sorting and bias in value-added estimation: Selection on observables and unobservables. Education Finance and Policy, 4, 537–571.
54.
ScafidiB.SjoquistD. L.StinebricknerT. R. (2007). Race, poverty, and teacher mobility. Economics of Education Review, 26, 145–159.
55.
StrunkK. O.RobinsonJ. P. (2006). Oh, won’t you stay: A multilevel analysis of the difficulties in retaining qualified teachers. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(4), 65–94.
56.
SunM. (2018). Black teachers’ retention and transfer patterns in North Carolina: How do patterns vary by teacher effectiveness, subject, and school conditions?AERA Open, 4(3). doi:10.1177/2332858418784914
57.
SunM.LoebS.GrissomJ. A. (2017). Building teacher teams: Evidence of positive spillovers from more effective colleagues. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39, 104–125.
58.
WrightA.GottfriedM. A.LeV.-N. (2017). A kindergarten teacher like me: The role of student-teacher race in social-emotional development. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1, Suppl.), 78S–101S.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
