This paper begins by defining what is meant by action research and locates it as a form of a new paradigm of research. Next it describes some present-day concerns about its use in health-care practice and then goes on to describe a vision of research policy and practice which suggests that action research may have a greater role to play in the next millennium. In conclusion, a cautious and pragmatic approach to the use of action research is advocated which is based on rigorous, systematic and visible methods of data collection, analysis and verification of findings.
Carr, W., Kemmis, S. Becoming Critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: The Falmer Press, 1986.
2.
Lewin, K.Action research a nd minority problems. Journal of Social Issues1946; 2: 34-46.
3.
Clark, P.Action Research and Organisational Change. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.
4.
Ebbutt, D.Educational action research: some general concerns and specific quibbles. In: Burgess, R. (ed.) Issues in Educational Research. London: The Falmer Press, 1985.
5.
Elliott, J.A ction Research for Educational Change: Developing teachers and teaching . Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1991.
6.
Meyer, J.New paradigm research in practice: the trials and tribulations of action research . Journal ofAdvancedNursing1993; 18:1066-1072.
7.
Susman, G.I. , Evered, R.D.An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly1978; 23: 582-603.
8.
Schutz, A. ThePhenomenologyof the Social World. Evanston: North-western University Press, 1967.
9.
Berger, P.L., Luckman, T.The Social Construction of Reality. London: The Penguin Press, 1967.
10.
Schon, D. TheReflective PractitionerLondon: Temple Smith Ltd, 1983.
11.
Clarke, M.Action and reflection: practice and theory in nursing. Journal of Advanted Nursing1986; 11:1, 3-11.
12.
George, P.The Nurse as Reflective Practitioner. Oxford: Internal Discussion Paper, Oxford Polytechnic, January 1987.
13.
Hart, E., Bond, M.Action Research for Health and Social Care. Buckingham : Open University Press, 1995.
14.
Department of Health.Research for Health; A research and development strategy for the NHS. London: HMSO, 1991.
15.
Holter, I.M. , Schwartz-Barcott , D.Action research: what is it? How has it been used and how can it be used in nursing?Journal of Advanced Nursing1993; 18: 2, 298-304.
16.
Titchen, A.Action research as a research strategy: finding ourwaythrough a philosophical and methodological maze. In: Titchen, A. (ed.) Changing Nursing Practice Through Action Research. Report No 6. Oxford: Centre for Practice Development and Research. 1993.
17.
Greenwood, J.Action research: a few details, a caution and something new. Journal of Advanced Nursing1994; 20:1,13-18.
18.
Webb, C.Action research: philosophy, methods and personal experiences. Journal of Advanced Nursing1989; 14:403-410.
19.
Johns, C., Kingston, S.Implementing a philosophy of care on a children's ward using action research . Nursing Practice1990; 4: 1, 2-9.
20.
Titchen, A. , Binnie, A.Changing power relationships between nurses: a case study of early changes towards patient-centred nursing. Journal of Clinical Nursing1993; 2:219-229.
21.
Waterman, H.Meaning of Visual Impairment: Developing ophthalmic nursing care. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Manchester, 1994.
22.
Meyer, J. LayParticipation in Care in a Hospital Setting: An action research study. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London, 1995.
23.
Meyer, J.Lay participation in care: a challenge for multidisciplinary teamwork. Journal of Interprofessional Care1993; 7:1, 57-66.
24.
Somekh, B.Inhabiting each other's castles:
25.
towards knowledge and mutual growth through collaboration. Educational Action Research1994; 2:3, 357-381.
26.
Simmons, 5. From paradigm to method in interpretive action research. Journal of Advanced Nursing1995; 21: 5, 838-844.
27.
East, L., Robinson, J.Change in process: bringing about change in health care through action research . Journal of Clinical Nursing1994; 3:57-61.
28.
Gibbon, B., Little, V.Improving stroke care through action research. Journal of Clinical Nursing1995; 4: 2, 93-100.
29.
Closs, S.J. , Cheater, F.M.Audit or research — what is the difference?Journal of Clinical Nursing1996; 5: 4, 249-256.
30.
Rapoport, R.Three dilemmas in action research. Human Relations1970; 23: 6, 499-513.
31.
Moseley, L. (undated) Response to Discussion Paper No. 5. Unpublished paper, Department of Maths and Computer Science, University of Wales College of Swansea , Singleton Park, Swansea. (Copies available from: Lynn Batehup, Department of Nursing Studies, King's College London, Comwall House, Waterloo Road, London SE18WA.)
32.
Rolfe, G.Going to extremes: action research, grounded practice and the theory-practice gap in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing1996; 24: 6, 1315-1320.
33.
Titchen, A. , Binnie, A.Action research: a strategy for theory generation and testing. International Journal of Nursing Studies1994; 31: 1,1-12.
34.
Argyris, C., Schon, D.Participatory action research and action science compared: a commentary. In: Foote Whyte, W. (ed.) ParticipatoryAction Research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications , 1991.
35.
Bellman, L.Changing nursing practice through reflection on the Roper, Logan and Tierney model: the enhancement approach to action research. Joumal ofAdvanced Nursing1996; 24: 1, 129-138.
36.
Hyrkas, K.Can action research be applied in developing clinical teaching? Journal of Advanced Nursing1997; 25:4, 801-808.
37.
Traynor, M., Rafferty, A.M.The NHS R&D Context for Nursing Research: A working paper. London: Centre for Policy in Nursing Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 1997.
38.
Guba, E.G., Lincoln, Y.S.Effective Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1981.
39.
Simons, H.Process evaluation in schools. In: Lacey, C., Lawton, D. (ed.) Issues in Evaluation and Accountability. London: Methuen, 1981 ; pp115-144.
40.
Blaxter, M.Consumers and Research in the NHS. Leeds: Department of Health NHS Executive, 1995.
41.
Department of Health.Working for Patients. London: HMSO, 1989.
42.
Department of Health.The Health of the Nation: Astrategy for Health in England. London: HMSO, 1992.
43.
Ham, C.The New National Health Service; OrganisationandmanagementOxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 1991.
44.
Lorentzon, M.Multidisciplinary collaboration: life line or drowning pool for nurse researchers? (Guest editorial.)Journal of Advanced Nursing1995: 22: 5, 825.
45.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H. et al. The Production ofNewKnowledge. The dynamicsof science andresearch in contemporary societies. London: Sage Publications, 1994.
