“It’s ok,mom. I got it!”: Exploring the experiences of young adults with intellectual disabilities in a postsecondary program affected by the COVID-19 pandemic from their perspective and their families’ perspective
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2021
“It’s ok,mom. I got it!”: Exploring the experiences of young adults with intellectual disabilities in a postsecondary program affected by the COVID-19 pandemic from their perspective and their families’ perspective
Students’ resilience in a postsecondary program for individuals with an intellectual disability impacted by the COVID-19 disruption and the challenges they faced during this time was captured in the context of social network analysis interviews that included students’ and families’ experiences as they managed the pandemic. Students’ experiences spoke to their resilience in using the skills they gained through the program to navigate the COVID-19 disruption even though it was sometimes tricky. Parents’ experiences revealed their increased confidence and sense of pride in their adult children when they observed growth in independence, self-determination, and familiarity with technology. Innovative and engaging instructional practices and e-mentoring support offered by peer mentors motivated students in their academics and encouraged their social development during this time. Student and parent experiences offer hope that young adults with an intellectual disability can gain skills in a postsecondary program that better prepares them to meet life’s challenges.
AldridgePRJeffreyPTaylorG, et al. (2017) Social skills training for students of color with disabilities through the use of social networking. Multicultural Education24(2): 34–38.
2.
AltemuellerLLindquistC (2017) Flipped classroom instruction for inclusive learning. Journal of Special Education44(3): 341–358.
3.
AmadoANStancliffeRJMcCarronM, et al. (2013) Social inclusion and community participation of individuals with intellectual/developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities51(5): 360–375.
4.
Asselt-GovertsAEEmbregtsPJCMHendriksHC (2015) Social networks of people with mild intellectual disabilities: characteristics, satisfaction, wishes and quality of life. Journal of Intellectual disabilities Research59(5): 450–461.
5.
BolibarM (2015) Macro, meso, micro: broadening the ‘social’ of social network analysis with a mixed methods approach. Quality & Quantity3: 2217–2236.
6.
CookAHusseyS (2007) Assistive Technologies. Principles and Practice. St Louis, MO: Mosby.
7.
DevliegerPTrachJ (1999) Mediation as a transition process: the impact on postschool employment outcomes. Exceptional Children65(4): 507–523.
8.
EisenmanLTFarley-RippleECulnaneM, et al. (2013) Rethinking social network assessment for students with intellectual disabilities (ID) in postsecondary education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability26(4): 367–384.
FrancisGLGordonSKliethermesAJ, et al. (2018) Developing and implementing a postsecondary education program for young adults with intellectual disabilities: processes and procedures. Teacher Educators’ Journal11: 134–156.
11.
GrigalMHartDWeirC (2012) A survey of postsecondary education programs for students with intellectual disabilities in the United States. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual disabilities9(4): 223–233.
12.
GrigalMPapayCSmithF, et al. (2019) Experiences that predict employment for students with intellectual and development disabilities in federally funded higher education programs. Career Developments and Transition for Exceptional Individuals42(1): 17–28.
13.
JohnsonRBChristensenL (2020) Educational Research. Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
14.
KernLHarrisonJCusterB, et al. (2018) Factors that enhance the quality of relationships between mentors and mentees during check and connect. Behavioral Disorders44(3): 148–161.
15.
McCartyCLubbersMJVaccaR, et al. (2019) Conducting Personal Network Research. A Practical Guide. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16.
MooreEJSchellingA (2015) Postsecondary inclusion for individuals with an intellectual disability and its effects on employment. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities19(2): 130–148.
17.
Nearpod (2020) Making every lesson interactive. Here’s how Nearpod works. Available at: https://nearpod.com/how-it-works (accessed 21 September 2020).
18.
PattersonKBCavanaughT (2012) Assistive technology in the transition education process. In: WehmeyerMLWebbKW (eds) Handbook of Adolescent Transition Education for Youth with Disabilities. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 236–248.
19.
PapayCTrivediKSmithF, et al. (2017) One Year After Exit. A First Look at Outcomes of Students Who Completed TPSIDs. Think College Fast Facts, Issue No. 17. Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts Boston, Institute for Community Inclusion.
20.
RaghavendraPHutchinsonCGraceE, et al. (2018) “I like talking to people on the computer”: outcomes of a home-based intervention to develop social media skills in youth with disabilities living in rural communities. Research in Developmental Disabilities76: 110–123.
21.
SchultzS (2013) Social media as a communication tool for individuals with disabilities living in rural settings. In: American Council on Rural Special Education 32nd Annual Conference, Orlando, FL, USA, 6–9 March 2013, pp. 22–26. Orlando: Rural Special Education (ACRES) Conference.
22.
ShanayMWienerJAssidoM (2013) Friendship predictors of global self-worth and domain-specific self-concepts in university students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities46(5): 444–452.
23.
ShpigelmanC (2016) Leveraging social capital of individuals with intellectual disabilities through participation on Facebook. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities31: 79–91.
24.
SmithFGrigalMShepardJ (2018) Impact of Postsecondary Education on Employment Outcomes of Youth with Intellectual Disabilities Served by Vocational Rehabilitation. Think College Fast Facts, Issue No. 18. Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts Boston, Institute for Community Inclusion.
25.
SpencerPVan HaneghanJPBaxterA (2020b) Exploring Social Networks, Employment and Self-Determination Outcomes of Graduates from a Postsecondary Program for Young Adults with an Intellectual Disability [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Alabama, AL: Department of Counseling and Instructional Sciences, University of South Alabama.
26.
SpencerPVan HaneghanJPBaxterA, et al. (2020a) Tracking Network Growth of Students with Intellectual Disabilities (ID) and Understanding the Challenges, Expectations, and Realizations of Families in a Postsecondary Program [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Alabama, AL: Department of Counseling and Instructional Sciences, University of South Alabama.
27.
SteinfieldCEllisonNBLampeC (2008) Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites. A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Development Psychology29: 434–445.
28.
ThomaCALakinKCCarlsonD, et al. (2011) Participation in postsecondary education for students with intellectual disabilities: a review of the literature 2001-2010. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability24(3): 175–191.
29.
WehmeyerM (2014) Disability in the 21st century: seeking a future of equity and full participation. In: AgranMBrownFHughesCQuirkCRyndakD (eds) Equity and Full Participation for Individuals with Severe Disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Inc., pp. 3–23.
30.
WhitePForrester-JonesR (2019) Valuing e-inclusion. Social media and the social networks of adolescents with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities24(3): 381–397.
31.
WilsonNJJacquesHJohnsonABrothertonML (2016) From social exclusion to supported inclusion: adults with intellectual disabilities discuss their lived experiences of a structured social group. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities30: 847–858.
