This study aims to investigate the Palestinian government’s digital diplomacy performance on Twitter (now X) by examining 2841 tweets tweeted or retweeted by the Palestinian government’s digital diplomacy actors, @pmofa and @PalestinePMO. This study applies Bjola and Holmes’ (2015) framework of digital diplomacy. Through content analysis, the study concludes that Palestine, through its representative actors, does not perform digital diplomacy effectively on Twitter. The findings of this study reveal critical gaps in the performance of the Palestinian government's digital diplomacy efforts, characterized by a lack of diversification, an absence of a clear digital diplomacy strategy, a deficiency of active engagement, and missing opportunities to enrich narratives.
AdesinaOS (2017) Foreign policy in an era of digital diplomacy. Cogent Social Sciences3(1): 1–13. DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2017.1297175.
2.
AlbishriOTarasevichSProverbsP, et al (2019) Mediated public diplomacy in the digital age: Exploring the Saudi and the U.S. governments’ agenda-building during Trump’s visit to the Middle East. Public Relations Review45(4): 101820. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101820.
3.
Al-MuftahHWeerakkodyVRanaNP, et al (2018) Factors influencing e-diplomacy implementation: Exploring causal relationships using interpretive structural modelling. Government Information Quarterly35(3): 502–514. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.002.
4.
AntonALăcătușM (2022) Digital diplomacy: The case of the embassy of Sweden in Bucharest. In SebastiãoS. P.SpínolaS. d. C. (Eds.) Diplomacy Organisations and Citizens: A European Communication Perspective (pp. 199–218) Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-81877-7_12.
5.
Antwi-BoatengOAl MazroueiKAM (2021) The challenges of digital diplomacy in the era of globalization: The case of the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Communication15: 19.
6.
AyoubHH (2023) Assessing Palestinian public diplomacy: Realities challenges and opportunities. Global Media and Communication19(2): 207–223. DOI: 10.1177/17427665231184681.
7.
BjolaC.HolmesM. (2015). Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice (1st ed.). Routledge.
8.
BjolaCJiangL (2015) Social media and public diplomacy: A comparative analysis of the digital diplomatic strategies of the EU Us and Japan in China. In BjolaC.HolmesM. (Eds.) Digital Diplomacy Theory and Practice (pp. 71–88) Routledge.
9.
ChanEY (2017) Exposure to the American flag polarizes democratic-republican ideologies. British Journal of Social Psychology56(4): 809–818. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12197.
10.
CollinsSDDeWittJRLeFebvreRK (2019) Hashtag diplomacy: Twitter as a tool for engaging in public diplomacy and promoting US foreign policy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy15: 78–96. DOI: 10.1057/s41254-019-00119-5.
11.
CrilleyRManorIBjolaC (2020) Visual narratives of global politics in the digital age: an introduction. Cambridge Review of International Affairs33(5): 628–637. DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2020.1813465.
12.
CyrillMMPashaAK (2019) Diplomacy in the Internet Age—Challenges and Opportunities for the UAE. Smart Technologies and Innovation for a Sustainable Future Cham.
13.
DadooS (2018) From Jenin to Johannesburg: The digital Intifada and transnational advocacy for Palestine. In EndongFPC (Ed.) Exploring the Role of Social Media in Transnational Advocacy (pp. 73–100) IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-2854-8.ch005.
14.
DoA (2022) Sentiment Analysis: A Comparison of the Instagram Accounts of PLNU and Other Universities. Point Loma Nazarene University.
15.
EriksenTHJenkinsR (2007) Flag Nation and Symbolism in Europe and America. Routledge.
16.
FordJM (2004) Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Personnel Psychology57(4): 1110.
17.
GrinchevaN (2013) Cultural diplomacy 2.0: Challenges and opportunities in museum international practices. Museum and Society11(1): 39–49. DOI: 10.29311/mas.v11i1.221.
18.
GultekinBGültekinT (2016) Diplomatic public relations techniques for official recognition of Palestine State in Europe. Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 3605401Türkiye. DOI: 10.20472/IAC.2016.023.038.
19.
GumperzJJ (1982) Language and Social Identity. Cambridge University Press.
20.
HealeRTwycrossA (2015) Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence-based Nursing18(3): 66–67. DOI: 10.1136/eb-2015-102129.
21.
HolmesM (2015) Digital diplomacy and international change management. In BjolaC.HolmesM. (Eds.) Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice. Routledge.
22.
JansenF (2010) Digital activism in the Middle East: mapping issue networks in Egypt Iran Syria and Tunisia. Knowledge Management for Development Journal6(1): 37–52. DOI: 10.1080/19474199.2010.493854.
23.
KalmoeNPGrossK (2016) Cueing patriotism prejudice and partisanship in the age of Obama: Experimental tests of US flag imagery effects in presidential elections. Political Psychology37(6): 883–899. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44132933
24.
KleinhekselAJRockich-WinstonNTawfikH, et al (2020) Demystifying Content Analysis. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education84(1): 7113. DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7113.
25.
LeeCSMaLGohDHL (2011) Why do people share news in social media?Active Media Technology: 7th International Conference AMT 2011 Lanzhou China September 7–9, 2011. Proceedings 7; 2011.
26.
LeeK.-PSongS (2022) Developing insights from the collective voice of target users in Twitter. Journal of Big Data9(1): 75. DOI: 10.1186/s40537-022-00611-5.
MayringP (2004) Qualitative content analysis. A Companion to Qualitative Research1(2): 159–176.
29.
NaqiraAKRAHashishYA (2023) The Palestinian Elite’s use on digital diplomacy in the face of the Israeli narrative. Albahith Alalami15(61): 1–24. DOI: 10.33282/abaa.v15i61.1090.
30.
PoellTDarmoniK (2012) Twitter as a multilingual space: The articulation of the Tunisian revolution through# sidibouzid. NECSUS-European Journal of Media Studies 1. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2154288
31.
PotterE. H (2002) Cyber-diplomacy: Managing Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century. McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP.
RoumateF (2021) Artificial Intelligence and Digital Diplomacy: Challenges and Opportunities. Springer Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-68647-5.
34.
SakranS (2017) The creation of the non-member observer state of Palestine: A legal analysis of UN general assembly resolution 67/19. Amsterdam LF9: 131.
35.
SchillD (2012) The visual image and the political image: A review of visual communication research in the field of political communication. Review of Communication12(2): 118–142. DOI: 10.1080/15358593.2011.653504.
36.
SobelMRiffeDHesterJB (2016) Twitter diplomacy? A content analysis of eight US embassies’ Twitter feeds. The Journal of Social Media in Society5(2): 75–107.
37.
TangLNiZXiongH, et al (2015) Locating targets through mention in Twitter. World Wide Web18: 1019–1049. DOI: 10.1007/s11280-014-0299-8.
38.
TsinovoiA (2020) The management of visibility in digital diplomacy: Infrastructures and techniques. First Monday25(5): 1–18. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v25i5.10116
39.
VidmarJ (2013) Palestine and the conceptual problem of implicit statehood. Chinese Journal of International Law12(1): 19–41. DOI: 10.1093/chinesejil/jmt011.
40.
WittmannV (2020) Digital diplomacy versus downfall. An agenda for international relations in the global age. Русская Политология – Russian Political Science2(15): 31–41. DOI: 10.51180/RPS.2020.15.2.001.
41.
ZytoonMHusainS (2023) Digital diplomacy as tools of communications networks in foreign policy. Wireless Personal Communications: 1–15. DOI: 10.1007/s11277-022-10124-2.
