This article seeks to model the socio-political influences of media use in diaspora. Participant observation and semi-structured interviews were used to collect data from Tunisian diaspora members residing in France, Denmark and Sweden. The article proposes ‘mediatized diaspora’ as a new model explaining the transnational intertwining between media and politics in the diaspora. Four sets of influences enabled by multimodal communication were defined and discussed as components of the model: (1) aspirations for the country of origin; (2) political meaning-making; (3) engaging in political actions; and (4) perceptions of social reality.
BennettWLSegerbergA (2013) The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BimberBFlanaginAJStohlC (2005) Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory15(4): 365–388.
3.
BlernacklBWaldorfD (1981) Snowball sampling problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research10(2): 141–163.
4.
BoubekeurA (2018) Islamists, secularists and old regime elites in Tunisia: Bargained competition. Mediterranean Politics21(1): 107–127.
5.
BozdagCHeppASunaL (2012) Diasporic media as the ‘focus’ of communicative networking among migrants. In: RigoniISaittaE (eds) Mediating Cultural Diversity in a Globalized Public Space. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.96–115.
BuckletSChaabiSOuardaB (2012) Assessment of Media Development in Tunisia. Based on UNESCO’s Media Development Indicators. Paris: UNESCO.
8.
CharmazK (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
9.
CohenR (2008) Global Diasporas: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
10.
CohenR (2023) Global Diasporas: An Introduction, 3rd edn.London: Routledge.
11.
CorbinJMStraussA (1990) Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology13(1): 3–21.
12.
CorbinJStraussA (2015) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 4th edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
13.
CouldryNHeppA (2013) Conceptualizing mediatization: Contexts, traditions, arguments. Communication Theory23(3): 191–202.
14.
CouldryNHeppA (2017) The Mediated Construction of Reality, Society, Culture, Mediatization. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15.
CreswellJW (2009) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 3rd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
16.
CreswellJWMillerDL (2000) Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice39(3): 124–130.
17.
el-IssawiF (2012) Tunisian Media in Transition. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
18.
EtchegarayNCorreaT (2015) Media consumption and immigration: Factors related to the perception of stigmatization among immigrants. International Journal of Communication9: 3601–3620.
GrazianoT (2012) The Tunisian diaspora: Between “digital riots” and web activism. Social Science Information51(4): 534–550.
22.
GrossmanJ (2019) Toward a definition of diaspora. Ethnic and Racial Studies42(8): 1263–1282.
23.
HeppABozdagCSunaL (2011) Mediatized migrants: Media cultures and communicative networking in the diaspora. In: FortunatiLPertierraRVincentJ (eds) Migrations, Diaspora, and Information Technology in Global Societies. London: Routledge, pp.172–188.
HjarvardS (2012) Doing the right thing: Media and communication studies in a mediatized world. Nordicom Review33(1): 27–34.
26.
HjarvardS (2013) The Mediatization of Culture and Society. New York: Routledge
27.
JewittCBezemerJO’HalloranK (2016) Introducing Multimodality. New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
KangT (2009) vHomeland re-territorialized: Revisiting the role of geographical places in the formation of diasporic identity in the digital age. Information, Communication & Society12(3): 326–343.
29.
KüblerJ (2017) Distant proximity: A comparative analysis of migrant netizen engagement before and during the Arab Spring. Doctoral dissertation. European University Institute, Florence.
30.
KukierJ (2020) Mediatization of social reality and media experience of seniors. Mediatization Studies4: 71–80.
31.
KvaleS (2007) Doing Interviews. London: Sage.
32.
MadianouM (2019) Migration, transnational families, and new communication technologies. In: RetisJTsagarousianouR (eds) The Handbook of Diasporas, Media, and Culture. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell, pp.97–111.
33.
MasriSM (2017) Tunisia: An Arab anomaly. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
RagabNMcGregorESiegelM (2013) Diaspora engagement in development: An analysis of the engagement of the Tunisian diaspora in Germany and the potentials for cooperation. Available at: https://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/uploads/1427888303.pdf (accessed October 2020)
36.
RebhunUAriLL (2010) American Israelis Migration, Transnationalism, and Diasporic Identity. Leiden: Brill.
37.
ShehataM (2017) Are people more connective than political actions? Towards an empirical approach for action participants. Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture8(2–3): 115–132.
38.
ShehataM (2020) Supportive, transformative and reverse effects of media on Tunisian diaspora’s political identity. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research13(1): 85–103.
39.
SmetsK (2019) Doing diasporic media research: Methodological challenges and innovations. In: RetisJTsagarousianouR (eds) The Handbook of Diasporas, Media, and Culture. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell, pp.97–111.
40.
StehlingMThomasTKruseM (2019) Media, participation, and collaboration in post-migrant societies. In: ThomasTKruseMStehlingM (eds) Media and Participation in Post-migrant Societies. London: Rowman and Littlefield International, pp.3–15.
41.
ToepflF (2017) From connective to collective action: Internet elections as a digital tool to centralize and formalize protest in Russia. Information, Communication & Society21(4): 531–547.
Van DijckJPoellT (2013) Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication1(1): 2–14.
44.
WilesR (2012) What are Qualitative Research Ethics?London: Bloomsbury.
45.
WolfA (2014) Power Shift in Tunisia: Electoral Success of Secular Parties Might Deepen Polarization. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit. Available at: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-412112 (accessed September 2020).
