The contribution this paper makes to leadership studies is to advance leadership theory towards a process based perspective based on an appreciation of art. The article does this by using a narrative on art in Russia. The narrative forms the basis for discussing the role that symbolism and aesthetics play in (re)interpreting rebel leadership. The article also explores James Downton’s work alongside the narration to develop a socially constructed process based interpretation of rebel leadership. Building on this interpretation fundamental aspects of process-based leadership so far missing from the literature are highlighted. One such aspect is the ridicule (in this case through caricature) of existing leaders and leadership by the incumbent leader and/or leadership process – a pre-stage to the emergence of rebel leadership. Other aspects include stages of social and organizational liminality and introspection. From here suggestions are made for further theoretical and empirical enquiry and practical implications are highlighted.
Aaltio-MarjosolaI (1994) From ‘grand story’ to multiple narratives: Studying an organizational change project. Journal of Organizational Change Management7: 56–67.
2.
AcevedoB (2011) The screaming Pope: Imagery and leadership in two paintings of the Pope Innocent X. Leadership7: 27–50.
3.
AdornoT (1967) Prisms: Cultural Criticism and Society, London: Neville Spearman.
4.
AmannP (1962) Revolution: A redefinition. Political Science Quarterly77: 36–53.
5.
BarkerR (2001) The nature of leadership. Human Relations54(4): 469–494.
6.
BarryDMeisiekS (2010) The art of leadership and its fine art shadow. Leadership6(2): 331–349.
7.
BassBM (1985) Leadership and performance beyond expectations, New York: The Free Press.
BergerJ (1969) Art and Revolution, London: Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative.
10.
BergerJ (1972) Ways of Seeing, London: Penguin.
11.
BojeDM (1995) Stories of the storytelling organization: A postmodern analysis of Disney as ‘Tamara-Land’. Academy of Management Journal38: 997–1035.
12.
BourdieuP (1991 [1969]) The Love of Art: European Art Museums and Their Public, Cambridge: Polity Press.
13.
BourdieuP (1996 [1991]) The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field, Cambridge: Polity.
14.
BowltJE (1983) Nineteenth-century Russian caricature. In: StavrouTG (ed.) Art and Culture in Nineteenth Century Russia, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 221–236.
15.
BrownMHHoskingDM (1986) Distributed leadership and skilled performance as successful organization in social movements. Human Relations39: 65–79.
16.
BurnsJM (1978) Leadership, New York, NY: Harper and Row.
17.
CarrD (1986) Time, Narrative and History, Bloomington, IN: University Press.
18.
ChreimS (2015) The (non)distribution of leaders roles: Considering leadership practices and configurations. Human Relations68(4): 517–543.
19.
CollinsonD (2006) Rethinking followership: A post-structuralist analysis of follower identities. Leadership Quarterly17: 179–189.
20.
CollinsonD (2011) Critical leadership studies. In: BrymanACollinsonDGrintK (eds) The Sage Handbook of Leadership, London: Sage, pp. 179–192.
21.
CurrieM (1998) Postmodern Narrative Theory, New York, NY: St Martin’s Press.
22.
DavisonJ (2010) [In]visible [in]tangibles: Visual portraits of the business elite. Accounting, Organizations and Society35(2): 165–183.
23.
DeleuzeG (1994) Difference and Repetition, London: Athlone Press.
24.
DeleuzeGGuattariF (1987) A Thousand Plateaus, London: Continuum.
25.
DenisJLLangleyARouleauL (2010) The practice of leadership in the messy world of organizations. Leadership6(1): 67–88.
26.
DowntonJV (1973) Rebel Leadership: Commitment and Charisma in the Revolutionary Process, New York, NY: Free Press.
27.
EdwardsGP (2015a) Community as Leadership, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
28.
EdwardsGP (2015b) Anthropological accounts of leadership: Historical and geographical interpretations from indigenous cultures. Leadership11(3): 335–350.
29.
ElyC (2003) The origins of Russian scenery: Volga river tourism and Russian landscape aesthetics. Slavic Review62(4): 666–682.
30.
FordJHardingNLearmonthM (2008) Leadership as Identity, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
31.
FoucaultM (2002) The Order of Things, London: Routledge.
32.
GabrielY (1998) The use of stories. In: SymonGCassellC (eds) Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research: A Practical Guide, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 135–160.
33.
Gayá WicksPRippinA (2010) Art as experience: An inquiry into art and leadership using dolls and doll-making. Leadership6: 259–278.
34.
GerthHWright-MillsC (1954) Character and Social Structure: The Psychology of Social Institutions, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.
35.
GergenK (2010) Co-constitution, causality, and confluence: Organising in a world without entities. In: HernesTMaitlisS (eds) Process, Sensemaking and Organization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 55–69.
36.
Graham-DixonA(Narrator) (2009) Art in Russia, London: BBC.
37.
GrayC (1986 [1962]) The Russian Art Experiment in Art 1863–1922, London: Thames and Hudson.
38.
GriffeyEJacksonB (2010) The portrait as leader: Commissioned portraits and the power of tradition. Leadership6(2): 133–157.
39.
GutheyEJacksonB (2005) CEO portraits and the authenticity paradox. Journal of Management Studies12(5): 1057–1082.
40.
HarterN (2006) Clearing in the Forest: On the Study of Leadership, West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
41.
HawkinsB (2015) Ship-shape: Materializing leadership in the British Royal Navy. Human Relations68(6): 951–971.
42.
HawkinsBEdwardsGP (2015) Managing the monsters of doubt: Liminality, threshold concepts and leadership learning. Management Learning46(1): 24–43.
43.
HeifetzRA (1994) Leadership without Easy Answers, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
HernesT (2008) Understanding Organization as Process: Theory for Tangled World, London: Routledge.
45.
HoskingDM (1988) Organising, leadership and skilful process. Journal of Management Studies25: 147–166.
46.
HoskingDM (1997) Organising, leadership, and skilful process. In: GrintK (ed.) Leadership: Classical, Contemporary and Critical Approaches, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
HoskingDM (2007) Not leaders, not followers: A post-modern discourse of leadership processes. In: ShamirBPillaiRBlighM (eds) Follower-centered Perspectives on Leadership: A Tribute to the Memory of James R. Meindl, Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
48.
HumphreysJH (2005) Contextual implications for transformational and servant leadership: A historical investigation. Management Decision43(10): 1410–1431.
49.
HumphreysJHEinsteinWO (2003) Nothing new under the sun: Transformational leadership from a historical perspective. Management Decision41(1): 85–95.
50.
HuntJG (1999) Transformational/charismatic leadership’s transformation of the field: An historical essay. Leadership Quarterly10(2): 129–144.
51.
HuntingtonS (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
52.
InglisD (2005a) Thinking ‘art’ sociologically. In: InglisDHughsonJ (eds) The Sociology of Art: Ways of Seeing, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 11–29.
53.
InglisD (2005b) The sociology of art: Between cynicism and reflexivity. In: InglisDHughsonJ (eds) The Sociology of Art: Ways of Seeing, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 98–109.
54.
InglisDHughsonJ (2005) Introduction: ‘Art’ and sociology. In: InglisDHughsonJ (eds) The Sociology of Art: Ways of Seeing, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 1–7.
55.
JacksonD (1991) The ‘Golgotha’ of Ilya Repin in context. Record of the Art Museum, Princeton University50(1): 2–15.
56.
JacobsenCHouseRJ (2001) Dynamics of charismatic leadership: A process theory, simulation model and tests. Leadership Quarterly12: 75–112.
57.
JamesI (2012) The New French Philosophy, Cambridge: Polity Press.
58.
Kandinsky W (1911) Über das Geistige in der Kunst. Translated into English (1914) The Art of Spiritual Harmony. All take from the 1977 edition Concerning The Spiritual in Art. New York, NY: Dover Classics. Translated by MTH Sadler.
59.
KimmelMS (1990) Revolution: A Sociological Interpretation, Cambridge: Polity Press.
60.
KnightsDO’LearyM (2006) Leadership, ethics and responsibility to the other. Journal of Business Ethics67: 125–137.
61.
KoivunenN (2007) The processual nature of leadership discourses. Scandinavian Journal of Management23: 285–305.
62.
KrantzJ (2006) Leadership, betrayal and adaption. Human Relations59(2): 221–240.
63.
LadkinD (2008) Leading beautifully: How mastery, congruence and purpose create the aesthetic of embodied leadership practice. The Leadership Quarterly19(1): 31–41.
64.
LadkinDTaylorS (2010) Leadership as art: Variations on a theme. Leadership6: 235–241.
65.
LaneJF (2005) When does art become art? Assessing Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of artistic fields. In: InglisDHughsonJ (eds) The Sociology of Art: Ways of Seeing, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 30–42.
66.
LangleyATsoukasH (2010) Introducing perspectives on process organization studies. In: HernesTMaitlisS (eds) Process, Sensemaking and Organization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–26.
67.
MacIntyreA (1981) After Virtue, London: Duckworth.
68.
MeadG (2014) Telling the Story: The Heart and Soul of Successful Leadership, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
69.
OrwellG (1940) The Lion and the Unicorn, London: Penguin.
70.
PetteeGS (1938) The Process of Revolution, New York, NY: Howard Fertig.
71.
PettigrewAM (1992) On studying managerial elites. Strategic Management Journal1: 163–182.
72.
RejaiMPhillipsK (1979) Leaders of RevolutionVol 73, Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Library of Social Science.
73.
RhodesC (2001) Writing Organization: (Re)presentation and Control in Narratives at Work. Advances in Organization Studies 7, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
74.
RhodesCBrownAD (2005) Narrative, organizations and research. International Journal of Management Reviews7(3): 167–188.
75.
RippinA (2012) Eliza, Anita and me: An art investigation into using portraiture as a research method in organization studies. Culture and Organization18(4): 305–322.
76.
RopoASauerESalovaaraP (2013) Embodiment of leadership through material place. Leadership9(3): 378–395.
77.
SalovaaraP (2014) Leadership in spaces and places. Organizational Aesthetics3(1): 79.
78.
SalancikGRCalderBJRowlandKM (1975) Leadership as an outcome of social structure and process: A multidimensional analysis. In: HuntJGLarsonLL (eds) Leadership Frontiers, Kent, OH: Kent State University, pp. 81–101.
79.
ShatskikhA (2012) Black Square, Yale, NH: Yale University Press.
80.
SingerD (1970) Prelude to Revolution: France in May 1968, Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.
81.
Smircich L and Morgan G (1982) Leadership: The management of meaning. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 18(3): 257–273.
82.
SmithSA (2002) The Russian Revolution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
83.
SontagS (1964 [2009]) Against Interpretation and Other Essays, London: Penguin Classics.
84.
SpectorB (2014) Flawed from the ‘get-go’: Lee Iacocca and the origins of transformational leadership. Leadership10: 361–379.
85.
SpringborgC (2010) Leadership as art – Leaders coming to their senses. Leadership6: 243–258.
86.
StarrSF (1983) Russian art and society, 1800–1850. In: StavrouTG (ed.) Art and Culture in Nineteenth Century Russia, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 87–112.
87.
StavrouTG (1983) Introduction. In: StavrouTG (ed.) Art and Culture in Nineteenth Century Russia, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. ix–xix.
88.
SutherlandNLandCBöhmS (2014) Anti-leaders(hip) in social movement organisations: The case of autonomous grassroots groups. Organization21(6): 759–781.
89.
TodorovV (1995) Red Square, Black Square, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
90.
TourishD (2013) The Dark Side of Transformational Leadership: A Critical Perspective, Hove, UK: Routledge.
91.
TourishD (2014) Leadership, more or less? A processual, communication perspective on the role of agency in leadership theory. Leadership10: 79–98.
92.
TurnerV (1969) The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure, London: Routledge.
93.
TurnerV (1979) Frame, flow and reflection: Ritual and drama in public liminality. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies6(4): 465–499.
94.
TurnerV (1987) Betwixt and between: The liminal period in rites of passage. In: MahdiLCFosterSLittleM (eds) Betwixt and Between: Patterns of Masculine and Feminine Initiation, Illinois: Open Court Publishing.
95.
Valkenier EK (1983) The intelligentsia and art. In: Stavrou TG (ed.) Art and Culture in Nineteenth-Century Russia. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 153–171.
96.
Van BuskirkWMcGrathD (1992) Organizational stories as a window on affect organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management5: 9–24.
97.
WarnerNO (2014) Picturing power: The depiction of leadership in art. Leadership and the Humanities2(1): 4–26.
98.
Washton LongR (1987) Occultism, anarchism and abstraction: Kandinsky’s art of the future. Art Journal46(1): 38–45.
99.
Weber M (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organisations, trans. T. Parsons. New York: Free Press.
100.
WoodM (2005) The fallacy of misplaced leadership. Journal of Management Studies42(6): 1101–1121.
101.
YipJRaelinJA (2012) Threshold concepts and modalities for teaching leadership practice. Management Learning43: 333–354.
