This study aimed to identify the difficulties that caregivers of chronically ill patients experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic and to provide directions for future studies.
Methods
Five electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL Plus Full Text, EMBASE, and Scopus, were systematically searched from January 2019 to February 2021. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses were employed for the literature screening, inclusion, and exclusion. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was adopted for qualifying appraisal.
Results
Six studies met the study criteria, including three quantitative studies, two qualitative studies, and one mixed-method study. Mental health, personal experience, financial problems, physical health, and improvement approaches were the major five themes that participants reported regarding the impact of COVID-19 they encountered during the pandemic.
Discussion
The results could heighten healthcare providers, stakeholders, and policy leaders' awareness of providing appropriate support for caregivers. Future research incorporating programs that support caregivers’ needs is recommended.
SiddiquiSKhalidJ. Determining the caregivers’ burden in caregivers of patients with mental illness. Pak J Med Sci2019; 35: 1329.
2.
GrapsaEPanteliasKNtentaE, et al.Caregivers’ experience in patients with chronic diseases. Soc Work Health Care2014; 53: 670–678.
3.
Sutter-LeveRPassintENessD, et al.The caregiver experience after stroke in a COVID-19 environment: a qualitative study in inpatient rehabilitation. J Neurol Phys Ther2021; 45: 14.
4.
ShethKLorigKStewartA, et al.Effects of COVID-19 on informal caregivers and the development and validation of a scale in English and spanish to measure the impact of COVID-19 on caregivers. J Appl Gerontol. 2020; 40: 235–243.
5.
EmSBozkurtMCaglayanM, et al.Psychological health of caregivers and association with functional status of stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil2017; 24: 323–329.
6.
KuzuyaMEnokiHHasegawaJ, et al.Impact of caregiver burden on adverse health outcomes in community-dwelling dependent older care recipients. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry2011; 19: 382–391.
7.
IsikATSoysalPSolmiM, et al.Bidirectional relationship between caregiver burden and neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with Alzheimer's Disease: a narrative review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry2019; 34: 1326–1334.
8.
CobleyCSFisherRJChouliaraN, et al.A qualitative study exploring patients’ and carers’ experiences of early supported discharge services after stroke. Clin Rehabil2013; 27: 750–757.
9.
del CastilloOIA-RMorales-VigilTVázquez-PinedaF, et al.Anxiety and depression in Patient's Caregivers with 485 chronic pain and in palliative care. Revista Médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2008; 46: 485–494.
10.
HuangCWangYLiX, et al.Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in wuhan. China. The lancet2020; 395: 497–506.
11.
ZhuNZhangDWangW, et al.A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med2020; 382: 727–733.
12.
FauciASLaneHCRedfieldRR. Covid-19—navigating the uncharted. Mass Medical Soc2020; 63: 1268–1269.
13.
RuksakulpiwatSZhouWChiaranaiC, et al.Human travelling and COVID-19 pandemic. Siriraj Medical Journal2021; 73: 562–569.
14.
MarkusHSBraininM. COVID-19 and stroke—A global world stroke organization perspective. Int J Stroke2020; 15: 361–364.
15.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al.Reprint—preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Phys Ther2009; 89: 873–880.
16.
HongQNPluyePFàbreguesS, et al.Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT), version 2018. Registration of copyright2018; 1148552: 10.
17.
PluyePGagnonM-PGriffithsF, et al.A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. Int J Nurs Stud2009; 46: 529–546.
18.
D’AmenBSocciMSantiniS. Intergenerational caring: a systematic literature review on young and young adult caregivers of older people. BMC Geriatr2021; 21: 1–17.
19.
MoolaSMunnZTufanaruC, et al.Chapter 7: systematic reviews of etiology and risk. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual The Joanna Briggs Institute2017; 5: 217–267.
20.
MckenzieGWillisCShieldsN. Barriers and facilitators of physical activity participation for young people and adults with childhood-onset physical disability: a mixed methods systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol2021; 63: 914–924.
21.
SandelowskiMVoilsCIBarrosoJ. Defining and designing mixed research synthesis studies. Research in the schools: a nationally refereed journal sponsored by the Mid-South Educational Research Association and the University of Alabama2006; 13: 29.
22.
GuliaAMishraSBhatnagarS. Multiple caregiving role with the novel challenge of COVID-19 pandemic: a crisis situation. Indian J Palliat Care2020; 26: S163–S165.
23.
NeeceCMcIntyreLLFenningR. Examining the impact of COVID-19 in ethnically diverse families with young children with intellectual and developmental disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res2020; 64: 739–749.
24.
ZorcecTJakovskaTMicevskaV, et al.Pandemic with COVID-19 and families with children with chronic respiratory diseases. Prilozi (Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite Oddelenie za medicinski nauki)2020; 41: 95–101.
25.
LeeJJTsangWNYangSC, et al.Qualitative study of Chinese stroke Caregivers’ caregiving experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Stroke. 2021; 52: 1407–1414.
26.
WanigasingheJJayawickramaAHewawitharanaG, et al.Experience during COVID-19 lockdown and self-managing strategies among caregivers of children with epilepsy: a study from low middle income country. Seizure2021; 84: 112–115.
27.
HoriuchiSShinoharaROtawaS, et al.Caregivers’ mental distress and child health during the COVID-19 outbreak in Japan. PloS one2020; 15: e0243702.
28.
FitzpatrickOCarsonAWeiszJR. Using mixed methods to identify the primary mental health problems and needs of children, adolescents, and their caregivers during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Child Psychiatry & Human Development2020; 52: 1–12.
29.
ChakrabartiSHamletLCKaminskyJ, et al.Association of human mobility restrictions and race/ethnicity–based, Sex-based, and income-based factors With inequities in well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. JAMA Network Open. 2021; 2021: e217373-e.
30.
HuangYMaoBQNiPW, et al.Investigation of the status and influence factors of caregiver's Quality of life on caring for patients with chronic wound during COVID-19 epidemic. Int Wound J2021; 18: 440–447.
31.
BrooksSKWebsterRKSmithLE, et al.O impacto psicológico da quarentena e como reduzi-la: revisão rápida das provas. Lancet2020; 395: 912–920.
32.
KuhlenRSchickJScribaP, et al.The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown on routine hospital care for other illnesses. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International2020; 117: 488.
33.
BlumenthalDFowlerEJAbramsM, et al.Covid-19—implications for the health care system. Mass Medical Soc2020; 383: 1483–1488.
34.
CrawfordBKasmidiMKorompisF, et al.Factors influencing progress in establishing community-based marine protected areas in Indonesia. Coast Manage2006; 34: 39–64.
35.
GkiotsalitisKCatsO. Public transport planning adaption under the COVID-19 pandemic crisis: literature review of research needs and directions. Transport Reviews2020; 41: 1–19.
36.
BaiHMZaidACatrinS, et al.The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): a review. Int J Surg2020; 8: 8–17.
37.
GereffiG. What does the COVID-19 pandemic teach us about global value chains? The case of medical supplies. Journal of International Business Policy2020; 3: 287–301.
38.
SuomiASchofieldTPButterworthP. Unemployment, employability and COVID19: how the global socioeconomic shock challenged negative perceptions toward the less fortunate in the Australian context. Front Psychol2020; 11: 2745.
39.
GoetzeHBrählerEGanseraL, et al.Exhaustion and overload of family caregivers of palliative cancer patients. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol2014; 65: 66–72.
40.
KangS-GSongS-WKimS-H, et al.Fatigue and mental Status of caregivers of severely chronically Ill patients. Pain Research and Management2020; 2020: 1–6.
41.
SullivanABMillerD. Who is taking care of the caregiver?Journal of patient experience2015; 2: 7–12.
42.
LutzkySAlecxihLMBDuffyJ, et al.Review of the medicaid 1915 (c) home and community based services waiver program literature and program data. The Lewin Group, Virginia, USA: Citeseer, 2000.
43.
LuD-MSunNHongS, et al.Occupational stress and coping strategies among emergency department nurses of China. Arch Psychiatr Nurs2015; 29: 208–212.
44.
RahmaniFRanjbarFHosseinzadehM, et al.Coping strategies of family caregivers of patients with schizophrenia in Iran: a cross-sectional survey. International journal of nursing sciences2019; 6: 148–153.
45.
AlmathamiHKYWinKTVlahu-GjorgievskaE. Barriers and facilitators that influence telemedicine-based, real-time, online consultation at patients’ homes: systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res2020; 22: e16407.
46.
DangSPenneyLSTrivediR, et al.Caring for caregivers during COVID-19. J Am Geriatr Soc2020; 68: 2197–2201.
47.
FriedmanEMTongPKRudinRS. The Coronavirus Pandemic Highlights Why Family Caregivers Need to Be Integrated into the Health Care Team and Shows Us How to Make it Happen. 2021.
48.
REPORT Impact study of COVID-19 on older people and caregivers in Armenia 2020.
49.
ChiangL-CChenW-CDaiY-T, et al. The effectiveness of telehealth care on caregiver burden, mastery of stress, and family function among family caregivers of heart failure patients: A quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Nursing Studies2012; 49(10): 1230–1242.
50.
HollanderJECarrBG. Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for COVID-19. N Engl J Med2020; 382: 1679–1681.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
