Education and self-management for people newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study of patients' views

Abstract

Objectives: We explored the perceptions, views and experiences of diabetes education in people with type 2 diabetes who were participating in a UK randomized controlled trial of methods of education. The intervention arm of the trial was based on DESMOND, a structured programme of group education sessions aimed at enabling self-management of diabetes, while the standard arm was usual care from general practices.

Methods: Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 36 adult patients, of whom 19 had attended DESMOND education sessions and 17 had been randomized to receive usual care. Data analysis was based on the constant comparative method.

Results: Four principal orientations towards diabetes and its management were identified: `resisters', `identity resisters, consequence accepters', `identity accepters, consequence resisters' and `accepters'. Participants offered varying accounts of the degree of personal responsibility that needed to be assumed in response to the diagnosis. Preferences for different styles of education were also expressed, with many reporting that they enjoyed and benefited from group education, although some reported ambivalence or disappointment with their experiences of education. It was difficult to identify striking thematic differences between accounts of people on different arms of the trial, although there was some very tentative evidence that those who attended DESMOND were more accepting of a changed identity and its implications for their management of diabetes.

Discussion: No one single approach to education is likely to suit all people newly diagnosed with diabetes, although structured group education may suit many. This paper identifies varying orientations and preferences of people with diabetes towards forms of both education and self-management, which should be taken into account when planning approaches to education.

Keywords

Diabetes self-management Qualitative research Type 2 diabetes

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

World Health Organization. Diabetes Factsheet, 2006. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs312/en/index.html (accessed February 2007).

Department of Health. Diabetes, 2007. Available at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/PolicyAndGuidance/HealthAndSocialCareTopics/Diabetes/fs/en (accessed February 2007).

National Institute for Clinical Excellence. The clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of patient education models for diabetes. Technology Appraisal No. 60, 2003. Available at: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/TA60 (accessed June 2007).

Expert Patients Programme. Available at: http://www.expertpatients.co.uk/public/default.aspx (accessed June 2007).

Department of Health. Choosing health: making healthy choices easier. 2004. Available at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4094550 (accessed June 2007).

Rickheim PL , Weaver TW , Flader JL , Kendall DM Assessment of group versus individual diabetes education: a randomized study . Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 269—74.

Barlow J. , Wright C. , Sheasby J. , Turner A. , Hainsworth J. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Educ Couns 2002; 48: 177—87.

Alderson M. , Starr L. , Gow S. , Moreland J. The program for rheumatic independent self-management: a pilot evaluation . Clin Rheumatol 1999; 18: 283—92.

Clark NM , Becker MH , Janz NK , Lorig K. , Rakowski W. , Anderson L. Self-management of chronic disease by older adults: a review and questions for research. J Aging Health 1991; 3: 3—27.

10.

Desmond. Structured education for people with type 2 diabetes. Available at: http:// www.cgsupport.nhs.uk/downloads/NDST/Providing_DESMOND_info.pdf (accessed June 2007).

11.

Skinner TC , Carey ME , Cradock S. , et al. Diabetes education and self-management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND): process modelling of pilot study. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 64: 369—77.

12.

Glaser BG , Strauss AL The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research, Chicago: Aldine, 1967.

13.

QSR International N6. 2002. Available at: http://www.qsrinternational.com/products_previous-products_n6.aspx (accessed January 2008).

14.

Bury M. Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociol Health Illness 1982; 4: 167—82.

15.

Parsons T. The social system., Glencoe, IL: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1951.

16.

Crossley M. `Sick role' or `empowerment'? The ambiguities of life with an HIV positive diagnosis. Sociol Health Illness 1998; 20: 507—31.

17.

Maclean HM Patterns of diet related self care in diabetes. Soc Sci Med 1991; 32: 689—96.

18.

May C. Chronic illness and intractability: professional—patient interactions in primary care. Chronic Illness 2005; 1: 15—20.

19.

Hunt LM , Jordan B. , Irwin S. Views of what's wrong: diagnosis and patients' concepts of illness. Soc Sci Med 1989; 28: 945—56.

20.

Townsend A. , Wyke S. , Hunt K. Self-managing and managing self: practical and moral dilemmas in accounts of living with chronic illness. Chronic Illness 2006; 2: 185—94.

21.

Bramley N. , Eatough V. The experience of living with Parkinson's disease: an interpretative phenomenological analysis case study. Psychol Health 2005; 20: 223—35.

22.

Lawton J. , Peel E. , Parry O. , Araoz G. , Douglas M. Lay perceptions of type 2 diabetes in Scotland: bringing health services back in. Soc Sci Med 2005; 60: 1423—35.

23.

Murphy E. , Kinmonth AL No symptoms, no problem? Patients' understandings of non-insulin dependent diabetes. Family Pract 1995; 12: 184—92.

24.

Rayman KM , Ellison GC Home alone: the experience of women with type 2 diabetes who are new to intensive control. Health Care Women Int 2004; 25: 900—15.