Teacher well-being plays an important role in education reform because it marks teachers’ positive evaluation of and healthy functioning in their work environment. However, there has been insufficient research on the relationship between distributed leadership and teacher well-being and on how organisational trust works as a mediator between these two constructs. Based on responses from 587 teachers in primary schools in southwest China, this study examined how distributed leadership contributes to teacher well-being with attention to the mediating role of organisational trust. Using structural equation modelling and bootstrapping tests, the analysis showed a nonsignificant direct effect between distributed leadership and teacher well-being. Organisational trust and its two dimensions, namely trust in the working team and trust in the principal, had significant mediating effects on the relationship between distributed leadership and teacher well-being. However, the dimension of trust in the work setting did not appear to be a significant mediator. This study contributes to a better understanding of the transferability of leadership theories across cultures and to a deepening comprehension of strategies for improving teacher well-being in Chinese schools and similar contexts. Implications of the study and future research direction are presented.
AlganEKUmmanelA (2019) Toward sustainable schools: a mixed methods approach to investigating distributed leadership, organizational happiness, and quality of work life in preschools. Sustainability11(19): 5489.
2.
Awaworyi ChurchillSMishraV (2017) Trust, social networks and subjective wellbeing in China. Social Indicators Research132(1): 313–339.
3.
BanduraA (2000) Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science9: 75–78.
4.
BradyJWilsonE (2020) Teacher wellbeing in England: teacher responses to school-level initiatives. Cambridge Journal of Education36(3): 1–19.
5.
BushT (2018) Leadership and context: why one-size does fit all. Educational Management Administration & Leadership46(1): –4.
6.
BushTNgAYM (2022) Distributed leadership in centralised context: the case of Malaysia. In: BushT (ed) School Leadership in Malaysia: Policy, Research and Practice. London: Routledge, pp.138–155.
7.
CelepCYilmazturkOE (2012) The relationship among organizational trust, multidimensional organizational commitment and perceived organizational support in educational organizations. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences46: 5763–5776.
8.
ChenCCChenXMeindlJR (1998) How can cooperation be fostered? The cultural effects of individualism-collectivism. The Academy of Management Review23(2): 285–304.
9.
ChenS (2018) Influence of functional and relational perspectives of distributed leadership on instructional change and school climate. Elementary School Journal119: 298–326.
10.
ChengC (2009) On harmony as transformation: paradigms from the Yijing. Journal of Chinese Philosophy36: 11–36.
11.
CollieRJShapkaJDPerryNE, et al. (2015) Teacher well-being: exploring its components and a practice-oriented scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment33(8): 744–756.
12.
Confucius (2007) The Analects of Confucius (B. Watson, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
13.
CreswellJW (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th edThousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Cui B (2020) Teacher wellbeing in rural China: An appreciative mixed-methods study in Jilin Province. PhD Thesis. The University of Adelaide, South Australia.
15.
DayCHongJ (2016) Influences on the capacities for emotional resilience of teachers in schools serving disadvantaged urban communities: challenges of living on the edge. Teaching and Teacher Education59: 115–125.
16.
DemirKAkifM (2015) The effect of organizational trust on the culture of teacher leadership in primary schools. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice15(3): 621–634.
17.
DeVellisRF (2012) Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
DevosGVanderheydenK (2002) Attracting, Developing and Retaining Teachers: Thematic Review on the Flemish Community of Belgium. OECD.16 July. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/32/33/2404904.pdf
19.
DiamondJBSpillaneJP (2016) School leadership and management from a distributed perspective. Management in Education30(4): 147–154.
20.
DouDDevosGValckeM (2017) The relationships between school autonomy gap, principal leadership, teachers’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership45(6): 959–977.
21.
DouglasSPCraigCS (2007) Collaborative and iterative translation: an alternative approach to back translation. Journal of International Marketing15(1): 30–43.
22.
DuckworthALQuinnPDSeligmanMEP (2009) Positive predictors of teacher effectiveness. The Journal of Positive Psychology4(6): 540–547.
23.
DuifTHarrisonCvan DartelN, et al. (2013) Distributed Leadership in Practice: A Descriptive Analysis of Distributed Leadership in European Schools. European School Heads Association and European Trade Union Committee for Education, for the European Policy Network on School Leadership. Available at http://www.schoolleadership.eu/sites/default/files/esha-etuce_report_on_dl.pdf
24.
GibbCA (1958) An interactional view of the emergence of leadership. Australian Journal of Psychology10(1): 101–110.
25.
GronnP (2008) The future of distributed leadership. Journal of Educational Administration46(2): 141–158.
26.
GumusSBellibasMSEsenM, et al. (2016) A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014. Educational Management Administration & Leadership46(1): 25–48.
27.
HairJFHultGTMRingleC, et al. (2017) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
HallingerPLiuSPiyamanP (2017) Does principal leadership make a difference in teacher professional learning? A comparative study China and Thailand. Compare49(3): 341–357.
29.
HanPLiuXChenX (2017) An exploration into the relationship among organizational trust, psychological safety and work stress. Management Review29(10): 108–119.
HayesAF (2009) Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs76(4): 408–420.
32.
HowardSJohnsonB (2004) Resilient teachers: resisting stress and burnout. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal7(4): 399–420.
33.
HuffLKelleyL (2003) Levels of organizational trust in individualist versus collectivist societies: a seven-nation study. Organization Science14(1): 81–90.
34.
HulpiaHDevosGRosseelY (2009) The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers’ and teacher leaders’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. School Effectiveness & School Improvement20(3): 291–317.
35.
JiangZGollanPBrooksG (2017) Relationships between organizational justice, organizational trust and organizational commitment: a cross-cultural study of China, South Korea and Australia. International Journal of Human Resource Management28(7): 973–1004.
36.
KondakciYZayimMBeyciogluK, et al. (2016) The mediating roles of internal context variables in the relationship between distributed leadership perceptions and continuous change behaviours of public school teachers. Educational Studies42(4): 410–426.
37.
LauermannFKönigJ (2016) Teachers’ professional competence and wellbeing: understanding the links between general pedagogical knowledge, self-efficacy and burnout. Learning and Instruction45: 9–19.
38.
LeeMHallingerPWalkerA (2012) A distributed perspective on instructional leadership in international baccalaureate (IB) schools. Educational Administration Quarterly48(4): 664–698.
39.
LeithwoodKSunJ (2012) The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: a meta-analytic review of unpublished research. Educational Administration Quarterly48(3): 387–423.
40.
LeithwoodKSunJSchumackerR (2020) How school leadership influences student learning: a test of “the four paths model.”. Educational Administration Quarterly56(4): 570–599.
41.
LiangWSongHSunR (2020) Can a professional learning community facilitate teacher well-being in China? The mediating role of teaching self-efficacy. Educational Studies48(3): 358–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1755953.
42.
LiuP (2015) Motivating teachers’ commitment to change through transformational school leadership in Chinese urban upper secondary schools. Journal of Educational Administration53(6): 735–754.
43.
LiuP (2019) Building collective teacher efficacy through distributed leadership in Chinese primary schools. International Studies in Education Administration47(3): 70–87.
44.
LiuP (2020a) Motivating teachers’ commitment to change through distributed leadership in Chinese urban primary schools. International Journal of Educational Management34(7): 1171–1183.
45.
LiuPXiuQ (2019) Teacher professional collaboration in China: practices and issues. Beijing International Review of Education1(1): 162–178.
46.
LiuY (2020b) Focusing on the practice of distributed leadership: the international evidence from the 2013 TALIS. Educational Administration Quarterly56(5): 779–818.
47.
LiuYBellibasMGumusS (2020) The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership49(3): 430–453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220910438.
48.
LiuYWerblowJ (2019) The operation of distributed leadership and the relationship with organizational commitment and job satisfaction of principals and teachers: a multi-level model and meta-analysis using the 2013 TALIS data. International Journal of Educational Research96: 41–55.
49.
MascallBLeithwoodKStraussT, et al. (2009) The relationship between distributed leadership and teachers’ academic optimism. Journal of Educational Administration46(2): 81–100.
50.
Mayer RCDavis JHSchoormanFD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trustAcademy of Management Review20(3): 709–734.
51.
Memon MATingHRamayahT, et al. (2017) A review of the methodological misconceptions and guidelines related to the application of structural equation modelling: A Malaysian scenario. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modelling1(1): i–xiii.
52.
PakarienEKiuruNLerkkanenM-K, et al. (2010) Classroom organization and teacher stress predict learning motivation in kindergarten children. European Journal of Psychology of Education25(3): 281–300.
53.
PolatS (2007) The relationship between organizational justice perceptions, level of school and administrator trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors of secondary school teachers in Turkey PhD Thesis, Kocaeli University, Turkey.
54.
ShiXYuZZhengX (2020) Exploring the relationship between paternalistic leadership, teacher commitment, and job satisfaction in Chinese schools. Frontiers in Psychology11: 1481–1481.
55.
SkaalvikEMSkaalvikS (2011) Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education27(6): 1029–1038.
56.
SpillaneJP (2005) Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum69(2): 143–150.
57.
SunAXiaJ (2018) Teacher-distributed leadership, teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: A multilevel SEM approach using the 2013 TALIS data. International Journal of Educational Research92: 86–97.
58.
TalebizadehSMHosseingholizadehRMŞB (2021) Analyzing the relationship between principals’ learning-centered leadership and teacher professional learning: the mediation role of trust and knowledge sharing behavior. Studies in Educational Evaluation68: 100970.
59.
ThienLMChanSY (2022) One-size-fits-all? A cross-validation study of distributed leadership and teacher academic optimism. Educational Management Administration & Leadership50(1): 43–63.
60.
TianMRiskuMCollinK (2016) A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013: theory development, empirical evidence and future research focus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership44(1): 146–164.
61.
TianMVirtanenT (2020) Shanghai teachers’ perceptions of distributed leadership: resources and agency. ECNU Review of Education4(4): 808–829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120921051.
62.
Tschannen-MoranMGareisCR (2015) Faculty trust in the principal: an essential ingredient in high-performing schools. Journal of Educational Administration53(1): 66–92.
63.
TurnerKThielkingM (2019) Teacher wellbeing: its effects on teaching practice and student learning. Issues in Educational Research29(3): 938–960.
64.
Van GeelMKeuningTVisscherA, et al. (2018) Changes in educational leadership during a data-based decision-making intervention. Leadership and Policy in Schools18(4): 628–647.
WalkerAHuRQianH (2012) Principal leadership in China: an initial review. School Effectiveness & School Improvement23(4): 369–399.
67.
WalkerAQianH (2018) Deciphering Chinese School Leadership: Conceptualisation, Context and Complexities, 1st ed.Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315665375.
68.
WongY-HPZhangL-F (2014) Perceived school culture, personality types, and wellbeing among kindergarten teachers in Hong Kong. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood39(2): 100–108.
69.
YangRYouXZhangY, et al. (2019) Teachers’ mental health becoming worse: the case of China. International Journal of Educational Development70: 102077.
70.
Yong RheeK (2010) Different effects of workers’ trust on work stress, perceived stress, stress reaction, and job satisfaction between Korean and Japanese workers. Safety and Health at Work1(1): 87–97.
71.
ZayimMKondakciY (2015) An exploration of the relationship between readiness for change and organizational trust in Turkish public schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership43(4): 610–625.
72.
ZhangJYinHWangT (2020) Exploring the effects of professional learning communities on teacher’s self-efficacy and job satisfaction in Shanghai, China. Educational Studies: 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1834357.
73.
ZhangYTsangKK (2021) Performance-based accountability and teacher emotions: role of Zhongyong thinking. Frontiers in Psychology12: 612206–612206.
74.
ZhengXYinHLiuY (2019) The relationship between distributed leadership and teacher efficacy in China: the mediation of satisfaction and trust. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher28(6): 509–518.
75.
ZhuCDevosGLiY (2011) Teacher perceptions of school culture and their organizational commitment and well-being in a Chinese school. Asia Pacific Education Review12(2): 319–328.
