Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Distributed leadership,teacher autonomy,and well-being: A multilevel analysis of novice teachers’ teaching practice quality in Taiwan using TALIS 2018 data
In response to global educational reform, improving novice teachers’ teaching practice quality is essential for student learning and system sustainability. However, empirical evidence on how leadership influences instructional outcomes for early-career teachers is limited. Using data from 1311 teachers in Taiwan with less than 5 years of experience from the 2018 Teaching and Learning International Survey dataset, this study employs hierarchical linear modeling to examine the impact of distributed leadership on teaching practice quality, with teacher autonomy and well-being as mediators. The findings reveal that distributed leadership indirectly improved teaching practice quality by enhancing teachers’ perceived autonomy in curriculum and instruction, supporting its role as a psychological mechanism that links organizational support to professional behavior. While distributed leadership positively predicted teacher well-being, well-being did not significantly affect teaching practice quality, neither directly nor indirectly. No significant association was found between autonomy and well-being. The results highlight that novice teachers’ teaching improvements stem more from professional agency and decision-making authority than emotional well-being. The findings augment existing studies by clarifying the differential pathways through which distributed leadership operates while identifying the limits of well-being as a performance driver in this context. Implications for school leadership and teacher development are discussed.
AdmiraalWKittelsen RøbergK-IWiers-JenssenJ, et al. (2023) Mind the gap: early-career teachers’ level of preparedness, professional development, working conditions, and feelings of distress. Social Psychology of Education26: 1759–1787.
2.
BellibaşMŞGümüşSChenJ (2024) The impact of distributed leadership on teacher commitment: the mediation role of teacher workload stress and teacher well-being. British Educational Research Journal50(2): 814–836.
3.
BellibaşMŞGümüşSLiuY (2021) Does school leadership matter for teachers’ classroom practice? The influence of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on instructional quality. School Effectiveness and School Improvement32(3): 387–412.
4.
BliesePD (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: implications for data aggregation and analysis. In: KleinKJKozlowskiSWJ (eds) Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass, pp.349–381.
5.
BlömekeSKleinP (2013) When is a school environment perceived as supportive by beginning mathematics teachers? Effects of leadership, trust, autonomy and appraisal on teaching quality. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education11: 1029–1048.
6.
BurgerJBellhäuserHImhofM (2021) Mentoring styles and novice teachers’ well-being: the role of basic need satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education106: 103436.
7.
BurićIKimLE (2020) Teacher self-efficacy, instructional quality, and student motivational beliefs: an analysis using multilevel structural equation modeling. Learning and Instruction66: 101302.
8.
ByrneBM (2016) Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. 3rd ed.New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
9.
ChangTSungYChiouH (2023) Relationships between teacher autonomy and teaching practices among junior high school teachers: the mediating role of teacher self-efficacy. Journal of Education & Psychology46(1): 1–37.
10.
ChenSC (2020) Challenges and breakthroughs: experiences and reflections of novice teachers implementing mixed-age teaching. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly9(9): 160–164.
11.
DaiJ (2023) New teachers are leaving the profession: how can school leadership make a difference?SHS Web of Conferences157: 01002.
12.
DeciELRyanRM (2008) Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology49(1): 14–23.
13.
De NeveDDevosGTuytensM (2015) The importance of job resources and self-efficacy for beginning teachers’ professional learning in differentiated instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education47: 30–41.
14.
EbersoldSRahmTHeiseE (2019) Autonomy support and well-being in teachers: differential mediations through basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration. Social Psychology of Education22: 921–942.
15.
ErdemCKoçyiğitM (2025) The interplay among school climate, instructional quality and teacher job satisfaction: mediation of teacher motivation. International Journal of Educational Development114: 103231.
16.
FieldA (2018) Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 5th ed.London, UK: Sage Publications.
17.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
18.
GagnéMDeciEL (2005) Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior26(4): 331–362.
19.
GawneL (2023) School-based mandates versus teacher autonomy: three early career teacher viewpoints of leadership impacting the teaching of reading. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy46(1): 89–103.
20.
GoreJJaremusFMillerA (2022) Do disadvantaged schools have poorer teachers? Rethinking assumptions about the relationship between teaching quality and school-level advantage. The Australian Educational Researcher49(4): 635–656.
21.
GronnP (2000) Distributed properties: a new architecture for leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership28(3): 317–338.
22.
HanJGaoC (2023) University teachers’ well-being in ICT-enhanced teaching: the roles of teacher self-efficacy and teaching support. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology39(6): 89–104.
23.
HằngNHangNLiênN (2022) Classroom management competence of novice teachers in Vietnam. Cogent Education9(1): 2124042.
24.
HarrisA (2008) Distributed leadership: according to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration46(2): 172–188.
25.
HascherTWaberJ (2021) Teacher well-being: a systematic review of the research literature from the year 2000–2019. Educational Research Review34: 100411.
26.
HawJYKingRB (2023) Perceived need-supportive leadership, perceived need-supportive teaching, and student engagement: a self-determination perspective. Social Psychology of Education26(5): 1289–1319.
27.
HolzbergerDSchiepe-TiskaA (2021) Is the school context associated with instructional quality? The effects of social composition, leadership, teacher collaboration, and school climate. School Effectiveness and School Improvement32(3): 465–485.
28.
HsiehCCChenYRLiHC (2023) Impact of school leadership on teacher professional collaboration: evidence from multilevel analysis of Taiwan TALIS 2018. Journal of Professional Capital and Community9(6): 1–18.
29.
HsiehCCSongYLiHC (2024) Analyzing the relationship between distributed leadership and instructional quality in Taiwan: the mediating roles of teacher autonomy and teacher innovation. Educational Management Administration & Leadership53(5): 1153–1171.
30.
HuangYNalipayMJNWangH (2024) Profiles of occupational well-being among Chinese teachers: associations with basic psychological needs satisfaction and teaching quality. Teaching and Teacher Education139: 104461.
31.
JangJYooHRubadeauK (2025) Profiles of instructional practices and associations with teachers’ self-efficacy, classroom autonomy, teacher collaboration, and school climate in Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review26(1): 75–90.
32.
JerrimJMorganASimsS (2023) Teacher autonomy: good for pupils? Good for teachers?British Educational Research Journal49(6): 1187–1209.
33.
KemethoferDHelmCWarwasJ (2022) Does educational leadership enhance instructional quality and student achievement? The case of Austrian primary school leaders. International Journal of Leadership in Education53(5): 1153–1171.
34.
LeBretonJMSenterJL (2008) Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods11(4): 815–852.
35.
LinQ (2022) The relationship between distributed leadership and teacher innovativeness: mediating roles of teacher autonomy and professional collaboration. Frontiers in Psychology13: 948152.
36.
LinQZhouB (2022) Can increasing teachers’ teaching autonomy help improve instructional quality? – Based on the results of TALIS 2018. Frontiers of Education in China17(2): 272–299.
37.
LiuJQiangFKangH (2023) Distributed leadership, self-efficacy and wellbeing in schools: a study of relations among teachers in Shanghai. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications10(1): 1–9.
38.
LiuLLiuPYangH, et al. (2022) The relationship between distributed leadership and teacher well-being: the mediating roles of organisational trust. Educational Management Administration & Leadership52: 837–853.
39.
LiuSKeeleyJWSuiY, et al. (2021) Impact of distributed leadership on teacher job satisfaction in China: The mediating roles of teacher autonomy and teacher collaboration. Studies in Educational Evaluation71: 101099.
40.
LoNPKPunzalanCH (2025) The impact of positive psychology on language teachers in higher education. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice22(1): 1–19.
41.
MaXMarionR (2025) Linking distributed leadership to teacher job satisfaction in China: mediating roles of teacher well-being and work motivation. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. DOI: 10.1177/17411432241303299.
OECD (2020b) TALIS 2018 Results (Volume II): Teachers and School Leaders as Valued Professionals. Paris: TALIS, OECD Publishing.
46.
ÖzdemirMBuyukgozeHAkmanY, et al. (2023a) Distributed leadership and teachers’ emotional labour: the mediating role of teacher autonomy. Journal of Educational Administration61(4): 405–422.
47.
ÖzdemirNKılınçAÇPolatcanM, et al. (2023b) Exploring teachers’ instructional practice profiles: do distributed leadership and teacher collaboration make a difference?Educational Administration Quarterly59(2): 255–305.
48.
PanH-LWChungC-HLinY-C (2023) Exploring the predictors of teacher well-being: an analysis of teacher training preparedness, autonomy, and workload. Sustainability15(7): 5804.
49.
PanHWHuangLChenW, et al. (2020) Are schools ready? School practitioners’ change readiness for the curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education. Journal of Educational Research and Development16(1): 65–100.
50.
ParadisALutovacSJokikokkoK, et al. (2018) Canadian and Finnish upper-secondary school mathematics teachers’ perceptions of autonomy. Pedagogy, Culture & Society26(3): 381–396.
51.
PengYWuHGuoC (2022) The relationship between teacher autonomy and mental health in primary and secondary school teachers: the chain-mediating role of teaching efficacy and job satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19(22): 15021.
52.
PrintySLiuY (2021) Distributed leadership globally: the interactive nature of principal and teacher leadership in 32 countries. Educational Administration Quarterly57(2): 290–325.
53.
RobertsonLJonesMG (2013) Chinese and US middle-school science teachers’ autonomy, motivation, and instructional practices. International Journal of Science Education35(9): 1454–1489.
54.
RyanRMDeciEL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist55(1): 68–78.
55.
SacréMRiesNWolfK, et al. (2023) Teachers’ well-being and their teaching quality during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective study. Frontiers in Education8: 1136940.
56.
ScherffL (2008) Disavowed: the stories of two novice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education24(5): 1317–1332.
57.
SchuckSAubussonPBuchananJ, et al. (2018) The experiences of early career teachers: new initiatives and old problems. Professional Development in Education44(2): 209–221.
58.
SobelME (1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology13: 290–312.
59.
SoncinMBowersAJAgasistiT (2024) A global perspective on school leadership: evidence from a latent class analysis on OECD TALIS data. Educational Management Administration & Leadership50(3): 1–26.
60.
SpillaneJP (2005) Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum69(2): 143–150.
61.
WangRJShihYH (2022) Improving the quality of teacher education for sustainable development of Taiwan's education system: a systematic review on the research issues of teacher education after the implementation of 12-year national basic education. Frontiers in Psychology13: 921839.
62.
WermkeWSalokangasM (2021) The Autonomy Paradox: Teachers’ Perceptions of Self-Governance Across Europe, Vol. 4. London: Springer.
63.
WHO (World Health Organization) (1946) Preamble, constitution of the World Health Organization. Adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by representatives of 61 states. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hist/official_records/constitution.pdf.
64.
WuMY-HChenH-CChenP (2025) Social and emotional learning enhancing teacher well-being and professional development in Taiwan: a preliminary study of the BEST ME program. Social and Emotional Learning: Research, Practice, and Policy5: 100098.
65.
XuH (2015) The development of teacher autonomy in collaborative lesson preparation: a multiple-case study of EFL teachers in China. System52: 139–148.
66.
ZhangLChenJLiX, et al. (2024) A scope review of the teacher well-being research between 1968 and 2021. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher33(2): 171–186.
67.
ZhengXYinHLiuY (2019) The relationship between distributed leadership and teacher efficacy in China: the mediation of satisfaction and trust. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher28(6): 509–518.
68.
ZhouY (2024) Teacher well-being and teaching quality: the mediating role of work engagement. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal52(11): 1–8.
