Keeping experienced and competent teachers in schools is becoming an important challenge for school leadership. Hence, this research tested an innovative model which explored the direct and indirect relationship between principals’ instructional leadership, collective teacher efficacy, a shared vision, and a teacher’s intent to leave their profession. Data were collected from a survey of 1700 teachers from 130 Jewish and Arab elementary schools randomly selected from the database of the Israeli education system. To test the proposed multilevel model, we conducted multilevel structural equation modeling. The analysis confirmed that collective teacher efficacy and shared vision emerge as prominent mediators between principals’ instructional leadership and a teacher’s intent to leave. Regarding the differences between the two sectors (Arab and Jewish) that exist in the Israeli education system, collective teacher efficacy, as well as shared vision, played a mediating role between instructional leadership and a teacher’s intent to leave in the Jewish elementary schools, while in the Arab elementary schools, only collective teacher efficacy played a mediating role between instructional leadership and a teacher’s intent to leave. This study adds to the body of research directed at identifying administrative support and work-related factors that may decrease a teacher’s intent to leave and are amenable to leadership intervention.
AlperSTjosvoldDLawKS (2000) Conflict management, efficacy, and performance in organizational teams. Personnel Psychology53: 625–642.
2.
AndersonNRWestMA (1998) Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior19: 235–258.
3.
BanduraA (1997) Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
4.
BaronRMKennyDA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173–1182.
5.
BeebeLP (2013) A model of teacher retention: The interrelationships of job satisfaction, professional learning, and collective efficacy. PhD Thesis, University of Louisiana, USA.
6.
BersonYDa'asRWaldmanD (2015) How do leaders and their teams bring about organizational learning and outcomes?Personnel Psychology68(1): 79–108.
7.
BliesePD (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In KleinKJKozlowskiSWJ (eds) Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods In Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp.349–381.
8.
BoyceJBowersA (2018) Towards an evolving conceptualization of instructional leadership as leadership for learning: Meta-narrative review of 109 quantitative studies across 25 years. Journal of Educational Administration56(2): 161–182.
9.
BrownKMWynnSR (2009) Finding, supporting, and keeping: The role of the principal in teacher retention issues. Leadership and Policy in Schools8(1): 37–63.
10.
BrykASebringPAllensworthELuppescuSEastonJ (2009) Organizing Schools For Improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
CalikTSezginFKavagaciHKilincA (2012) Relationships between instructional leadership of school principals and self-efficacy of teachers and collective teacher efficacy. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice12(4): 2498–2504.
12.
ChaSCohen-VogelL (2011) Why they quit: A focused look at teachers who leave for other occupations. School Effectiveness and School Improvement22(4): 371–392.
13.
ChunJUYammarinoFJDionneSDSosikJJMoonHK (2009) Leadership across hierarchical levels: Multiple levels of management and multiple levels of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly20(5): 689–707.
14.
ColemanLJ (2007) An examination of shared vision in the school improvement process of one Indiana high school. ETD collection for Purdue University. PhD Thesis, Purdue University, USA.
15.
ConleySYouS (2009) Teacher role stress, satisfaction, commitment, and intentions to leave: A structural model. Psychological Reports105(3): 771–786.
16.
ConleySYouS (2016) Key influences on special education teachers’ intentions to leave: The effects of administrative support and teacher team efficacy in a mediational model. Educational Management Administration and Leadership45(3): 521–540.
17.
Da'asR (2017) School principals' leadership skills: Measurement equivalence across cultures. A Journal of Comparative and International Education47(2): 207–222.
18.
Da'asR (2019) Teachers’ skill flexibility: Examining the impact of principals’ skills and teachers’ participation in decision making during educational reform. International Journal of Educational Management33(2): 287–299.
19.
DayDV (2012) Leadership. In KozlowskiSWJ (ed) The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.696–732.
20.
EnsleyMDHmieleskiKMPearceCL (2006) The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups. The Leadership Quarterly17(3): 217–231.
21.
EyalRRothG (2011) Principals’ leadership and teachers’ motivation: Self-determination theory analysis. Journal of Educational Administration49(3): 256–275.
22.
FernetCChanalJGuayF (2017) What fuels the fire: Job- or task-specific motivation (or both)? On the hierarchical and multidimensional nature of teacher motivation in relation to job burnout. Work Stress31(2): 145–63.
23.
FleissJ (1986) The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York: Wiley.
24.
FochsenGKSjogrenKJosephsonMLagerstromM (2005) Factors contributing to the decision to leave nursing care: A study among Swedish nursing personnel. Journal of Nursing Management13(4): 338–344.
25.
GeijselFSleegersPLeithwoodKJantziD (2003) Transformational leadership effects on subordinates’ commitment and effort toward school reform. Journal of Educational Administration41(3): 228–256.
26.
GoddardRGoddardYKimESMillerR (2015) A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education121(4): 501–530.
27.
GrissomJALoebS (2011) Triangulating principal effectiveness: How perspectives of parents, teachers, and assistant principals identify the central importance of managerial skills. American Educational Research Journal48(5): 1091–1123.
28.
HallingerP (2011) Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration49(2): 125–142.
29.
HallingerPHosseingholizadehRHashemiNKouhsariM (2017) Do beliefs make a difference? Exploring how principal self-efficacy and instructional leadership impact teacher efficacy and commitment in Iran. Educational Management Administration and Leadership46(5): 800–819.
30.
HallingerPMurphyP (1985) Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal86(2): 217–247.
31.
HallingerPMurphyJ (1986) The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education94(3): 328–355.
32.
HallingerPWangWC (2015) Assessing instructional leadership with The Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale. Dordrecht: Springer.
33.
HambrickDC (2007) Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review32(2): 334–343.
34.
HeckRHHallingerP (2010) Collaborative leadership effects on school improvement: Integrating unidirectional- and reciprocal-effects models. The Elementary School Journal111(2): 226–252.
35.
HeckRHHallingerP (2014) Modeling the longitudinal effects of the school leadership on teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Administration52(5): 653–681.
36.
HensleyPABurmeisterL (2009) Leadership Connectors: Six Keys to Developing Relationships in Schools. Larchmont: Eye on Education.
37.
HillNSSeoMGKangJHTaylorMS (2012) Building employee commitment to change across organizational levels: The influence of hierarchical distance and direct managers’ transformational leadership. Organization Science23(3): 758–777.
38.
HorngELoebS (2010) New thinking about instructional leadership. Phi Delta Kappan92(3): 66–69.
39.
Israeli National Central Bureau of Statistics (2016) Israeli Annual Statistical Report 67 Jerusalem.
40.
JamesLDemareeRGWolfG (1993) rWG: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology78(2): 306–309.
41.
JosephsonMLindbergPVossMAlfredssonLVingardE (2008) The same factors influence job turnover and long spell of sick leave: A 3 year follow-up of Swedish nurses. European Journal of Public Health18(4): 380–385.
42.
KaplanSBradleyJCLachmanJNHaynessD (2009) On the role of positive and negative affectivity in job performance: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology94(1): 76–162.
43.
KarkRShamirBChenG (2003) The two faces of transformational leadership: Dependence and empowerment. Journal of Applied Psychology88(2): 243–255.
44.
KirbySNBerendsMNaftelS (1999) Supply and demand of minority teachers in Texas: Problems and prospects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis21(1): 47–66.
45.
KooTKLiMY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine15(2): 155–163.
46.
LamberskyJJ (2014) Understanding the human side of school leadership: Improving teacher morale, efficacy, motivation, and commitment. PhD thesis, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto. Available from: ProQuest. Dissertations and Theses Global (1668380833).
47.
LeeMGoodmanCDandapaniNKekahioW (2015) Review of international research on factors underlying teacher absenteeism. Report for The National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, USA. Washington, DC: US Department of Education. Report no. REL 2015–087, April. Available at:https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED555740.pdf(accessed 19 October 2018).
LeithwoodKPattenSJantziD (2010) Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly46(5): 671–706.
50.
LoiRHang-YueNFoleyS (2006) Linking employees’ justice perceptions to organizational commitment and intention to leave: The mediating role of perceived organizational support. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology79(1): 101–120.
51.
LopezV (2018) Teachers’ job satisfaction and efficacy as indicators of intent-to-leave teaching. PhD Thesis, Walden University (online). Available at:http://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations(accessed 19 October 2018).
52.
LouisKSDretzkeaBWahlstromK (2010) How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement21(3): 315–336.
53.
MacKinnonD (2008) Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis. New York: Erlbaum.
54.
MarkowDPieteresA (2009) The Metlife Survey Of The American Teacher: Collaborating For Student Success. New York: MetLife, Inc.
55.
MayHSupovitzJA (2011) The scope of principal efforts to improve instruction. Educational Administration Quarterly47(2): 332–352.
56.
McCannLHughesCMAdairCG (2009) Assessing job satisfaction and stress among pharmacists in Northern Ireland. Pharmacy World and Science32(2): 188–194.
57.
MorrellK (2004) Towards a typology of nursing turnover: The role of shocks in nurses’ decisions to leave. Journal of Advanced Nursing49(3): 315–322.
58.
MuthénLKMuthénBO (1998–2011) Mplus User’s Guide (6th edn). Los Angeles: Muthén And Muthén.
59.
NeumerskiCM (2012) Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here?Educational Administration Quarterly49(2): 310–347.
60.
NirABen-DavidABoglerRZoharA (2016) School autonomy and 21st century skills in the Israeli educational system. International Journal of Educational Management30(7): 1231–1246.
61.
OplatkaI (2010) Principals in late career: Toward a conceptualization of principals’ tasks and experiences in the pre-retirement period. Educational Administration Quarterly46(5): 776–815.
62.
ParryJ (2008) Intention to leave the profession: Antecedents and role in nurse turnover. Journal of Advanced Nursing64(2): 157–167.
63.
PearceCLEnsleyMD (2004) A reciprocal and longitudinal investigation of the innovation process: The central role of shared vision in product and process innovation teams (PPITs). Journal of Organizational Behavior25(2): 259–278.
64.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSCPodsakoffNPLeeJ (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
65.
PreacherKJZyphurMJZhangZ (2010) A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods15(3): 209–233.
66.
QadachMSchechterCDa'asR (2017) An integrative model for predicting faculty properties and student achievement in Israeli elementary schools: Exploring the role principals' characteristics and organizational learning mechanisms. In: AREA Annual Meeting, TX, USA.
67.
RichardsonBKAlexanderACastleberryT (2008) Examining teacher turnover in low performing schools: Relationships among emotional labor, communication symmetry, and intent to leave. Communication Research Reports25(1): 10–22.
68.
RigbyJG (2014) Three logics of instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly50(4): 610–644.
69.
RobinsonVMLloydCARoweKJ (2008) The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly44(5): 635–674.
70.
RossJAGrayP (2006) School leadership and student achievement: The mediating effects of teacher beliefs. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l’éducation29(3): 798–822.
71.
SchechterC (2015) Toward collective learning in schools: Exploring U.S.A. and Israeli teachers’ perceptions of collective learning from success. International Journal of Educational Reform24(2): 160–184.
72.
SchechterCGanonS (2015) Reforming schoolwork: The collective doubting perspective. International Journal of Educational Management29(1): 62–72.
73.
Shapira-LishchinskyO (2012) Teachers’ withdrawal behaviors: Integrating theory and findings. Journal of Educational Administration50(3): 307–326.
74.
Shapira-LishchinskyORosenblattZ (2009) Organizational ethics and teachers’ intent to leave: An integrative approach. Educational Administration Quarterly45(5): 725–758.
75.
ShawJDGuptaNDeleryJE (2005) Alternative conceptualizations of the relationship between voluntary turnover and organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal48(1): 50–68.
76.
ShroutPEBolgerN (2002) Mediation in experimental and non-experimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods7(4): 422–445.
77.
SkaalvikEMSkaalvikS (2014) Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy: Relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Psychological Reports114(1): 68–77.
78.
SunJLeithwoodK (2017) Calculating the power of alternative choices by school leaders for improving student achievement. School Leadership and Management37(1–2): 80–93.
TrochimWMDonnellyJP (2005) Research Methods: The Concise Knowledge Base. Cincinnati: Atomic.
81.
Tschannen-MoranMBarrM (2004) Fostering student learning: The relationship of collective teacher efficacy and student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools3(3): 189–209.
82.
Van MaeleDVan HoutteM (2015) Trust in school: A pathway to inhibit teacher burnout?Journal of Educational Administration53(1): 93–115.
83.
WiedowerKA (2002) A shared vision: The relationship of management communication and contingent reinforcement of the corporate vision with job performance, organizational commitment, and intent to leave. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Alliant International University, USA.
84.
YahayaREbrahimF (2016) Leadership styles and organizational commitment: Literature review. Journal of Management Development35(2): 190–216.
85.
ZembylasMPapanastasiouE (2004) Job satisfaction among school teachers in Cyprus. Journal of Educational Administration42(8): 357–374.
