Although the knowledge base on instructional leadership is quite well developed in Western societies empirical studies have only recently begun to emerge in the developing societies of Asia, Africa and Latin America. The current study was undertaken to fill a gap in leadership research in Iran, where there have been no prior studies of principal instructional leadership (PIL). The current study sought to understand the relationship between principal self-efficacy, instructional leadership, teacher collective efficacy and teacher organizational commitment in Iranian primary schools. Survey data collected from 111 principals and 345 teachers were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM). The results confirmed the proposed conceptual model affirming the impact of both principal and teacher beliefs (i.e. self-efficacy) on their behaviors and on teacher commitment. More specifically, the SEM results identified robust, positive and statistically significant relationships among the constructs. These findings extend prior research by revealing how leader self-efficacy beliefs and instructional leadership behaviors interact to shape collective teacher efficacy and commitment. This research makes a distinct contribution not only to school leadership research in Iran, but also to the growing body of research on the effects of PIL in non-Western, developing societies.
AbdollahiBKarimiM (2013) The study of indigenous dimensions of the principals’ instructional leadership role in Iranian elementary schools based on grounded theory. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences89: 817–820.
AhmadZAYektaZA (2010) Relationship between perceived organizational support, leadership behavior, and job satisfaction: an empirical study in Iran. Intangible Capital6(2): 162–184.
4.
AliakbariMSadeghiA (2014) Iranian teachers’ perceptions of teacher leadership practices in schools. Educational Management Administration and Leadership42(4): 576–592.
5.
AtherleyS (2013) An examination of the relationship between principals’ instructional leadership and teacher efficacy. Unpublished master thesis, The University of West Indies Cave Hill Campus, West Indies.
6.
AydinASarierYUysalS (2013) The effect of school principals’ leadership styles on teachers’ organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice13(2): 806–811.
7.
BajunidIA (1996) Preliminary explorations of indigenous perspectives of educational management: the evolving Malaysian experience. Journal of Educational Administration34(5): 50–73.
8.
BanduraA (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9.
BarthRS (1990) Improving Schools from Within: Teachers, Parents, and Principals Can Make the Difference. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
BellibasMSBulutOHallingerPWangW-C (2016) Developing a validated instructional leadership profile of Turkish primary school principals. International Journal of Educational Research75: 115–173.
11.
BhenguTTNaickerIMthiyaneSE (2014) Chronicling the barriers to translating instructional leadership learning into practice. Journal of Social Science40(2): 203–212.
12.
BossertSTDwyerDCRowanBLeeG (1982) The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly18(3): 34–64.
13.
BramaR (2004) The Professional Self-Efficacy of School Principals. Jerusalem: Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
14.
BridgesEM (1967) Instructional leadership: A concept re-examined. Journal of Educational Administration5(2): 136–147.
15.
BridgesEHallingerP (1995) Implementing Problem-Based Learning in Leadership Development. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse.
16.
BrinsonDSteinerL (2007) Building Collective Efficacy: How Leaders Inspire Teachers to Achieve. Washington, DC: Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement.
17.
BrislinRW (1970) Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology1(3): 185–216.
18.
BushT (2013) Instructional leadership and leadership for learning: Global and South African perspectives. Education as Change17(sup1): S5–S20.
19.
CalikTSezginFKavgaciHKilincA (2012) Examination of relationships between instructional leadership of school principals and self-efficacy of teachers and collective teacher efficacy. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice12(4): 2498–2504.
20.
CapraraGVBarbaranelliCStecaPMaloneP (2006) Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology44(6): 473–490.
21.
ChanWYLauSNieYLimSHoganD (2008) Organizational and personal predictors of teacher commitment: The mediating role of teacher efficacy and identification with school. American Educational Research Journal45(3): 597–630.
22.
ClarkI (2009) An analysis of the relationship between K-5 elementary school teachers’ perceptions of principal instructional leadership and their science teaching efficacy. PhD Dissertation, University of Minnesota, USA. Available at: http://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/50780/1/Clark_umn_0130E_10289.pdf (accessed 5 January 2010).
23.
CochranWG (1977) Sampling Techniques. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Wiley.
DaleAPhillipsR (2011) Influences of instructional leadership, transformational leadership and the mediating effects of self-efficacy on student achievement. In: LariA (ed) The 6th international conference of the American institute of higher education, Vol. 4. Charleston, SC, pp. 91–100.
26.
DastmalchianAJavidanMAlamK (2001) Effective leadership and culture in Iran: An empirical study. Applied Psychology50(4): 532–558.
27.
DimmockCHattieJ (1996) School principals’ self-efficacy and its measurement in a context of restructuring. School Effectiveness and School Improvement7(1): 62–75.
28.
DomschGD (2009) A study investigating relationships between elementary principals’ and teachers’ self-efficacy and student achievement. PhD Dissertation, Saint Louis University, USA.
29.
DwyerD (1986) Understanding the principal’s contribution to instruction. Peabody Journal of Education63(1): 3–18.
30.
EbmeierH (2003) How supervision influences teacher efficacy and commitment: An investigation of a path model. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision18(2): 110–141.
31.
EdmondsR (1979) Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership37(1): 15–24.
32.
FanceraSFBlissJR (2011) Instructional leadership influence on collective teacher efficacy to improve school achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools10(3): 349–370.
33.
FarahbakhshS (2012) The role of emotional intelligence in increasing quality of work life in school principals. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences46(1): 31–35.
34.
FedericiRASkaalvikEM (2011) Principal self-efficacy and work engagement: Assessing a Norwegian principal self-efficacy scale. Social Psychology of Education14(4): 575–600.
35.
Fromm G HallingerPVolantePWangWC (2016) Validating a Spanish version of the PIMRS: Application in national and cross-national research on instructional leadership. Educational Management Administration and Leadership45(3): 419–444.
36.
GallantePE (2015) Principal leadership behaviors and teacher efficacy. PhD Dissertation, Walden University, USA.
37.
GareisCRTschannen-MoranM (2005) Cultivating principals’ sense of efficacy: supports that matter. In: The annual meeting of the university council for educational administration, Nashville, TN, 11112005.
38.
GeijselFSleegersPLeithwoodKJantzi (2003) Transformational leadership effects on teachers’ commitment and effort toward school reform. Journal of Educational Administration41(3): 228–256.
39.
GoddardRDHoyWKHoyAW (2000) Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal37(2): 479–507.
HairJFRingleCMSarstedtM (2013) Editorial-partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning46(1–2): 1–12.
42.
HallingerP (1982, 1990) Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale. Sarasota, FL: Leading Development Associates.
43.
HallingerP (2003) Reshaping the landscape of school leadership development: A global perspective. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
44.
HallingerP (2011) Leadership for learning: sessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration49(2): 125–142.
45.
HallingerP (2016) Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership1–20. doi: 10.1177/1741143216670652
46.
HallingerPHeckRH (1998) Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement9(2): 157–191.
47.
HallingerPLuJF (2014) Modeling the effects of principal leadership teacher commitment on teacher professional learning in Hong Kong primary schools. School Leadership and Management35(5): 481–501.
48.
HallingerPMurphyJ (1985) Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal86(2): 217–247.
49.
HallingerPMurphyJF (2012) Running on empty? Finding the time and capacity to lead learning. NASSP Bulletin97(1): 5–21.
50.
HallingerPWangWC (2015) Assessing Instructional Leadership with the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
51.
HeckRHHallingerP (2014) Modeling the longitudinal effects of school leadership on teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Administration52(5): 653–681.
52.
HortonT (2013) The relationship between teachers’ sense of efficacy and perceptions of principal instructional leadership behaviors in high poverty schools. PhD Dissertation, University of Texas at Arlington, USA.
53.
HoyAW (2008) What motivates teachers? Important work on a complex question. Learning and Instruction18(5): 492–498.
54.
HoyWKSweetlandSRSmithPA (2002) Toward an organizational model of achievement in high schools: The significance of collective efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly38(1): 77–93.
55.
HuLTBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling6(1): 1–55.
56.
JussimLHarberKD (2005) Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review9(2): 131–155.
57.
KhanyRAmoliFA (2013) The impact of leadership style, thinking style and job satisfaction on Iranian EFL teacher retention. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences2(2 s): 533–544.
58.
KeithS (1989) Teacher efficacy and the relationship between elementary principals’ instructional leadership and self-perception of efficacy. PhD Dissertation, University of Virginia, USA.
59.
LanGS (2014) The relationships between instructional leadership behavior, school climate and teacher efficacy in secondary schools in Kedah, Malaysia. PhD Dissertation, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia.
60.
LeithwoodKJantziD (2006) Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement17(2): 201–227.
61.
LeithwoodKJantziD (2008) Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly44(4): 496–528.
62.
LeithwoodKPattenSJantziD (2010) Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly46(5): 671–706.
63.
LittkyDSchenM (2003) Developing school leaders: One principal at a time. In: HallingerP (ed.) Reshaping the Landscape of School Leadership Development: A Global Perspective. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger, pp.87–100.
64.
LubbersM (1988) An investigation to determine if a relationship exists between teacher efficacy, principal behaviors and student achievement. PhD Dissertation, Michigan State University, USA.
65.
LucasSE (2003) The development and impact of principal leadership self-efficacy in middle level schools: Beginning an inquiry. PhD Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.
66.
McGuiganLHoyWK (2006) Principal leadership: Creating a culture of academic optimism to improve achievement for all students. Leadership and Policy in Schools5(3): 203–229.
67.
MackenzieSSV (2001) Collective efficacy and collaborative climate in Maine high schools. PhD Dissertation, University of Maine, USA.
68.
MarksHMPrintySM (2003) Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly39(3): 370–397.
69.
MarshallIA (2015) Principal leadership style and teacher commitment among a sample of secondary school teachers in Barbados. Journal of Arts and Humanities4(5): 43–58.
70.
MarshallK (1996) How I confronted HSPS (hyperactive superficial principal syndrome) and began to deal with the heart of the matter. Phi Delta Kappan76(5): 336–345.
71.
MehralizadehYSepaceHAtashfeshanF (2006) Globalization and decentralization of management: A study of the feasibility of application of school-based management in Iran’s secondary schools. Alberta Journal of Educational Research52(1): 84–98.
72.
MeyerJPAllenNJ (2004) TCM Employee Commitment Survey Academic Users Guide 2004. London and Ontario: University of Western Ontario.
73.
MillerMS (2015) High school principals and self-efficacy: A phenomenological examination into the belief in ability to perform the principalship. PhD Dissertation, Illinois State University, USA.
74.
MirzaMRedzuanMR (2012) The relationship between principal’s leadership styles and teacher’s organizational trust and commitment. Life Science Journal9(3): 1356–1362.
75.
MurphyJ (1992) The landscape of leadership preparation: reframing the education of school administrators. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
76.
NirAEKranotN (2006) School principal’s leadership style and teachers’ self-efficacy. Planning and Changing37(3/4): 205–214.
77.
NiyaziÖ (2013) Investigation of the primary school principals’ sense of self-efficacy and professional burnout. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research15(5): 682–691.
78.
NunnallyJCBernsteinIH (1994) The assessment of reliability. Psychometric Theory3(1): 248–292.
79.
OmidifarR (2013) Leadership style, organizational commitment and job satisfaction: A case study on high school principals in Tehran, Iran. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences1(4): 263–267.
80.
PaivandiS (2012) Education in the Islamic Republic of Iran and Perspectives on Democratic Reforms. London, UK: Legatum Institute.
81.
Pelzang (2014) Influence of principals’ instructional leadership on teachers’ job satisfaction and role commitment in Bhutan. Master Thesis, Jaipur National University, India.
82.
PonnusamyP (2010) The relationship of instructional leadership, teachers’ organizational commitment and school effectiveness in Malaysia. Master Thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.
83.
RajaeepourSArbabisarjouAAmiriZAbdolghayoumNZamanAPeymanY (2011) Effect of female principal’s management styles on teacher’s job satisfaction in Isfahan-Iran, girls’ high schools. International Education Studies4(3): 124–132.
84.
RashidzadehMA (2002) Burnout among Iranian school principals. Psychological Reports90(1): 61–64.
85.
ReddickK (2014) Investigating the relationships among leadership influence, collective teacher efficacy, and socio-economic status as predictors of instructional leadership. PhD Dissertation, Capella University, Minneapolis, MN.
86.
RewJ (2013) Instructional leadership practices and teacher efficacy beliefs: Cross-national evidence from TALIS. PhD Dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
87.
RobinsonVM (2006) Putting education back into educational leadership. Leading and Managing12(1): 62–76.
88.
RosdiSBH (2012) Instructional management of head teachers and its relation to teachers’ commitment to teaching work. Master Thesis, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Malaysia.
89.
RosenthalRJacobsonL (1968) Pygmalion in the classroom. The Urban Review3(1): 16–20.
90.
RossJA (1992) Teacher efficacy and the effects of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education17(1): 51–65.
91.
RossJAGrayP (2006) Transformational leadership and teacher commitment to organizational values: The mediating effects of collective teacher efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement17(2): 179–199.
92.
RuzicskaJ (1989) The relationships among principals’ sense of efficacy, instructional leadership, and student achievement. PhD Dissertation, University of San Francisco, USA.
93.
SalazarW (2014) The relationship among principal instructional leadership, collective teacher efficacy and student academic achievement in Appalachia Eastern Kentucky high schools. PhD Dissertation, Eastern Kentucky University, USA.
94.
SayadiY (2016) The effect of dimensions of transformational, transactional, and non-leadership on the job satisfaction and organizational commitment of teachers in Iran. Management in Education30(2): 1–9.
95.
SaphierJKingMD’AuriaJ (2006) Three strands form strong school leadership. Journal of Staff Development27(2): 51–57.
96.
SolomonCB (2007) The relationships among middle level leadership, teacher commitment, teacher collective efficacy, and student achievement. PhD Dissertation, University of Missouri-Columbia, USA.
97.
Tschannen-MoranMGareisCR (2004) Principals sense of efficacy: Assessing a promising construct. Journal of Educational Administration42(5): 573–585.
98.
UNESCO (2016) Leading better learning: School leadership and quality in the Education 2030 agenda. UNESCO planning paper.
99.
VerslandTM (2009) Self-efficacy development of aspiring principals in education leadership preparation programs. PhD Dissertation, University of Montana, USA.
100.
WalkerABryantDLeeM (2013) International patterns in principal preparation: Commonalities and variations in pre-service programmes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership41(4): 405–434.
101.
WalkerADHallingerP (2015) A synthesis of reviews of research on principal leadership in East Asia. Journal of Educational Administration53(4): 554–570.
102.
WalkerJSlearS (2011) The impact of principal leadership behaviors on the efficacy of new and experienced middle school teachers. NASSP Bulletin95(1): 46–64.
103.
WilliamsJC (2012) Examining the relationship between Louisiana principals’ self-efficacy beliefs and student achievement. PhD Dissertation, University of New Orleans, USA.
104.
WuJHHoyWKTarterCJ (2013) Enabling school structure, collective responsibility, and a culture of academic optimism: toward a robust model of school performance in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Administration51(2): 176–193.
105.
ZeinabadiHR (2014) Principal–teacher high-quality exchange indicators and student achievement: Testing a model. Journal of Educational Administration52(3): 404–420.
106.
ZeinabadiHRRastegarpourH (2010) Factors affecting teacher trust in principals: Testing the effect of transformational leadership and procedural justice. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences5: 1004–1008.
107.
ZeinabadiHSalehiK (2011) Role of procedural justice, trust, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment in organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) of teachers: Proposing a modified social exchange model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences29: 1472–1481.
