Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Deciphering the mechanisms linking school leadership to instructional practices through collective teacher efficacy: The moderated mediation role of school climate
The present study aims to examine the relationship between school leadership and teachers’ instructional practices and to explore the roles of collective teacher efficacy and school climate in this association. Data were collected from 2663 teachers working in 135 schools across 12 regions of Türkiye. Structural equation modelling was employed using Bayesian estimation. The findings indicate that school leadership is positively associated with teachers’ instructional practices. Furthermore, collective teacher efficacy was found to mediate the relationship between school leadership and instructional practices. Finally, school climate was found to moderate both the direct relationship between school leadership and collective teacher efficacy and the indirect relationship between school leadership and instructional practices through collective teacher efficacy. These results highlight the critical role of school leadership in relation to teachers’ instructional practices and suggest that collective teacher efficacy may function as a key psychological mechanism underlying this association. Moreover, a positive school climate appears to be an important contextual factor that can strengthen school leadership on both collective teacher efficacy and instructional practices. Therefore, the study emphasises the need to conceptualise leadership as a context-sensitive and interactional process and offers important theoretical and practical implications for school leadership practices in centralised education systems.
AliuJKaçanikuFSaqipiB (2024) Teacher leadership: a review of literature on the conceptualization and outcomes of teacher leadership. International Journal of Educational Reform33(4): 388–408.
2.
AlmessabiA (2021) Culturally foreign teachers’ perceptions of school climate and its relationship to their self-efficacy. SAGE Open11(3). DOI: 10.1177/21582440211043927.
3.
AsparouhovTMuthénB (2019) Latent variable centering of predictors and mediators in multilevel and time-series models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal26(1): 119–142.
4.
BanduraA (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.
BanduraA (1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: WH Freeman.
6.
BellibaşMŞGümüşS (2019) A systematic review of educational leadership and management research in Turkey. Journal of Educational Administration57(6): 731–747.
7.
BellibaşMŞGümüşSLiuY (2021a) Does school leadership matter for teachers’ classroom practice? The influence of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on instructional quality. School Effectiveness and School Improvement32(3): 387–412.
8.
BellibaşMŞKılınçAPolatcanM (2021b) The moderation role of transformational leadership in the effect of instructional leadership on teacher professional learning and instructional practice: an integrated leadership perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly57(4): 776–814.
9.
BliesePD (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: implications for data aggregation and analysis. In: KleinKJKozlowskiSWJ (eds) Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp.349–381.
10.
BongMChoCAhnHS, et al. (2012) Comparison of self-beliefs for predicting student motivation and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research105(5): 336–352.
11.
BushTGloverD (2014) School leadership models: what do we know?School Leadership and Management34(5): 553–571.
12.
CanlıSDemirtaşHÖzerN (2018) Okul iklimi ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. İlköğretim Online17(4): 1797–1811.
13.
CansoyRParlarH (2018) Examining the relationship between school principals’ instructional leadership behaviors, teacher self-efficacy, and collective teacher efficacy. International Journal of Educational Management32(4): 550–567.
14.
ÇobanÖÖzdemirNBellibaşMŞ (2023) Trust in principals, leaders’ focus on instruction, teacher collaboration, and teacher self-efficacy: testing a multilevel mediation model. Educational Management Administration & Leadership51(1): 95–115.
15.
ÇobanÖYalçınMT (2023) The mediating role of instructional climate in the relationship between school leadership and classroom instruction. Anatolian Journal of Educational Leadership and Instruction11(2): 253–265.
16.
DayCGuQSammonsP (2016) The impact of leadership on student outcomes: how successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly52(2): 221–258.
17.
De LisleJAnnisetteSBowrin-WilliamsC (2020) Leading high-poverty primary schools in Trinidad and Tobago: what do successful principals do?Educational Management Administration and Leadership48(5): 703–723.
18.
DeMarisA (2004) Regression with Social Data: Modeling Continuous and Limited Response Variables. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. DOI: 10.1002/0471677566.
19.
DonohooJKatzS (2020) Leader Efficacy: Bringing the Collective into Focus. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
20.
DuttaVSahneyS (2021) Relation of principal instructional leadership, school climate, teacher job performance and student achievement. Journal of Educational Administration60(2): 148–166.
21.
DuyarİGümüşSBellibaşMŞ (2013) Multilevel analysis of teacher work attitudes. International Journal of Educational Management27(7): 700–719.
22.
ErdoğanUDönmezB (2015) Adaptation of the collective teacher efficacy scale into Turkish: a validity and reliability study. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice21(3): 345–366.
23.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
24.
GeijselFPSleegersPJCStoelRD, et al. (2009) The effect of teacher psychological, school organizational, and leadership factors on teachers’ professional learning in Dutch schools. The Elementary School Journal109(4): 406–427.
25.
GhamrawiNShalTGhamrawiNAR (2024) Cultivating teacher leadership: evidence from a transformative professional development model. School Leadership and Management44(4): 413–441.
26.
GoddardRD (2002) Collective efficacy and school organization: a multilevel analysis of teacher influence in schools. Theory and Research in Educational Administration1: 169–184.
27.
GoddardRDGoddardYLTschannen-MoranM (2015) A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education121(4): 501–530.
28.
GoddardRDHoyWKWoolfolk HoyA (2000) Collective teacher efficacy: its meaning, measure and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal37(2): 479–507.
29.
GoddardRDLoGerfoLHoyWK (2004) High school accountability: implications of the organizational health and collective efficacy of teachers. American Secondary Education32(3): 63–75.
30.
GümüşSBellibaşMŞ (2020) The relationship between professional development and school principals’ leadership practices: the mediating role of self-efficacy. International Journal of Educational Management34(7): 1155–1170.
31.
GümüşSBellibaşMŞEsenM, et al. (2018) A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014. Educational Management Administration and Leadership46(1): 25–48.
32.
HallingerP (2010) Leadership for learning: what we have learned from 30 years of empirical research? In: Paper presented at the Hong Kong school principals’ conference. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Institute of Education.
33.
HallingerPHeckRH (2010) Collaborative leadership and school improvement: understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management30(2): 95–110.
34.
HallingerPWalkerANguyenD, et al. (2017) Perspectives on principal instructional leadership in Vietnam: a preliminary model. Journal of Educational Administration55(2): 222–239.
35.
HammadWPolatcanMMoradH (2024) Investigating links between teacher leadership, collective efficacy and teacher commitment in Egyptian schools: a mediated effects analysis. International Journal of Educational Management38(3): 750–768.
36.
KlassenRMTzeVMCBettsSM, et al. (2011) Teacher efficacy research 1998–2009: signs of progress or unfulfilled promise?Educational Psychology Review23(1): 21–43.
37.
KlineRB (2005) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd ed.New York: Guilford Press.
38.
LeithwoodK (2001) School leadership in the context of accountability policies. International Journal of Leadership in Education4(3): 217–235.
39.
LeithwoodK (2012) The Ontario Leadership Framework 2012 with a Discussion of the Research Foundations. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Institute for Educational Leadership and the Ontario Ministry of Education.
40.
LeithwoodKHarrisAHopkinsD (2020) Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership and Management40(1): 5–22.
41.
LeithwoodKJantziD (2005) A review of transformational school leadership research 1996–2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools4(3): 177–199.
42.
LeithwoodKJantziD (2006) Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement17(2): 201–227.
43.
LeithwoodKSunJ (2012) The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: a meta-analytic review of unpublished research. Educational Administration Quarterly48(3): 387–423.
44.
LeithwoodKSunJSchumackerR (2019) How school leadership influences student learning: a test of the four paths model. Educational Administration Quarterly56(4): 570–599.
NinkovićSKnežević FlorićO (2024) School leadership and teaching practice: a systematic review of studies of the indirect effects. Journal of Educational Administration62(4): 357–372.
50.
NinkovićSRKnežević FlorićOČ (2016) Transformational school leadership and teacher self-efficacy as predictors of perceived collective teacher efficacy. Educational Management Administration and Leadership46(1): 49–64.
51.
PodsakoffPMOrganDW (2012) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. Journal of Management12(4): 531–544.
52.
PolatcanM (2020) The adaptation of professional learning activities scale to Turkish: the validity and reliability study. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research7(2): 281–390.
53.
PolatcanMÖzdemirNKılınçAÇ, et al. (2023) Leading teacher instructional practices in Türkiye: do inner school conditions matter?Journal of Educational Administration61(4): 341–361.
54.
PreacherKJHayesAF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods40(3): 879–891.
55.
PrintySMMarksHM (2006) Shared leadership for teacher and student learning. Theory Into Practice45(2): 125–132.
56.
ŞahinS (2024) Okul müdürlerinin liderlik uygulamalarına yönelik davranışları. Journal of History SchoolLXIX: 1004–1043.
57.
SampsonRJRaudenbushSWEarlsFJ (1997) Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science277(5328): 918–924.
58.
SchedlitzkiDEdwardsG (2021) Studying Leadership: Traditional and Critical Approaches, 3rd ed.London: Sage Publications.
SkaalvikEMSkaalvikS (2007) Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology99(3): 611–625.
61.
SkaalvikEMSkaalvikS (2019) Teacher self-efficacy and collective teacher efficacy: relations with perceived job resources and job demands, feeling of belonging, and teacher engagement. Creative Education10(7): 1400–1424.
62.
TabachnickBGFidellLS (2013) Using Multivariate Statistics, 6th ed.Boston, MA: Pearson.
TimperleyH (2011) Realizing the Power of Professional Learning. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
65.
Tschannen-MoranMBarrM (2004) Fostering student learning: the relationship of collective teacher efficacy and student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools3(3): 189–209.
66.
TsolkaA (2018) Contingency and situational approaches to educational leadership. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.637.
67.
UrickABowersAJ (2014) The impact of principal perception on student academic climate and achievement in high school: how does it measure up?Journal of School Leadership24(2): 386–414.
68.
van de SchootRDepaoliS (2014) Bayesian analyses: where to start and what to report. The European Health Psychologist16(2): 73–82.
69.
WahlstromKLLouisKS (2008) How teachers experience principal leadership: the roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly44(4): 458–495.
70.
WangG (2025) The effect of teacher–student relationships on innovative teaching from the teachers’ perspective: a moderated mediation model of teacher self-efficacy and teacher collaboration. Psychology in the Schools62(9): 3019–3030.
71.
WangLYangDCuiY, et al. (2022) Regulatory focus and creativity: adaptive-innovative cognitive style as a mediator and school climate as a moderator. Psychology in the Schools60(4): 1019–1041.
72.
WeinsteinJMuñozGRaczynskiD (2011) School leadership in Chile: breaking the inertia. In: TownsendTMacBeathJ (eds) International Handbook of Leadership for Learning. Dordrecht: Springer, pp.297–317. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1350-5_18
73.
WoodcockSTournakiN (2022) Bandura’s triadic reciprocal determinism model and teacher self-efficacy scales: A revisit. Teacher Development27(1): 75–91.
74.
YalçınMTAtasoyR (2021) Okul liderliği ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Uluslararası Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi3(2): 103–112.
75.
ZhangZLeeJCYinH, et al. (2023) Doubly latent multilevel analysis of the relationship among collective teacher efficacy, school support, and organizational commitment. Frontiers in Psychology13. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1042798.
