As secondary school environments become increasingly complex, shifts are occurring in the way leadership is being practised. New leadership practices emphasize shared or distributed leadership. A senior executive leadership team with responsibility for school leadership is likely to be one of the many, varied forms of new leadership practices adopted in secondary schools. However, research has shown that many teams do not reach their potential and many more fail. Therefore, the purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate the processes that underlie senior executive leadership team performance and effectiveness. A multi-case study design was used. Three randomly selected senior executive leadership teams from government secondary schools within the Sydney metropolitan area, in New South Wales, Australia participated. Data were obtained from individual, digitally recorded face-to-face semi-structured interviews. The findings from this exploratory study suggest that complex environmental events necessitated a shift from single leader to team centred leadership in these three schools. Principals in the study played a critical role, fulfilling the role of team leader, and applying leadership functions flexibly to enable team development, management and effectiveness. Further, the results provide insights into the innate complexity of leadership conducted synchronously by a collective.
BandowD (2001) Time to create sound teamwork. Journal of Quality and Participation24(2): 41–47.
2.
BanduraA (1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
3.
BazeleyP (2007) Analysing qualitative data: more than identifying themes. Paper presented at the Qualitative Research Convention, Selangor, Malaysia, 3–5 September.
4.
BurkeS (1999) Examination of the cognitive mechanisms through which team leaders promote effective team processes and adaptive performance. Doctoral thesis, George Mason University, Virginia.
5.
BurkeSFioreSSalasE (2003) The role of shared cognition in enabling shared leadership and team adaptability. In: PearceCCongerJ (eds) Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 103–122.
6.
BurkeSStaglKKleinC (2006) What types of leadership behaviour are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. Leadership Quarterly17(3): 288–307.
7.
Cannon-BowersJSalasE (1993) Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In: CastellanN Jr, (ed.) Current Issues in Individual and Group Decision Making. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 221–246.
8.
CarronA (1982) Cohesiveness in sports groups: interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology4(2): 123–138.
9.
CohenSBaileyD (1997) What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3): 239–290.
10.
CosnerS (2009) Building organisational capacity through trust. Educational Administration Quarterly45(3): 248–291.
11.
DayDGronnPSalasE (2004) Leadership capacity in teams. Leadership Quarterly15(5): 857–880.
12.
DickinsonTMcIntyreR (1997) A conceptual framework for teamwork measurement. In: BrannickMSalasEPrinceC (eds) Team Performance Assessment and Measurement: Theory, Methods and Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 3–18.
13.
DruskatVPescosolidoT (2002) The content of effective teamwork mental models in self-managing teams: ownership, learning and heedful interrelating. Human Relations55(3): 283–314.
14.
DyerKRennM (2010) Development programs for educational leaders. In: Van VelsorEMcCauleyCRudermanM (eds) Handbook of Leadership Development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 177–196.
15.
EdmondsonA (1999) Psychological safety and learning behaviour in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly44(2): 350–383.
16.
FleishmanEMumfordMZaccaroS (1991) Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behaviour: a synthesis and functional interpretation. Leadership Quarterly2(4): 245–287.
17.
FriedrichTVesseyWSchuelkeM (2009) A framework for understanding collective leadership: the selective utilization of leader and team expertise within networks. Leadership Quarterly20(6): 933–958.
18.
GioiaDChittipeddiK (1991) Sense-making and sense-giving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal12(6): 433–448.
19.
GronnP (2000) Distributed properties: a new architecture for leadership. Educational Management & Administration28(3): 317–338.
20.
HackmanJ (1976) Group influence on individuals. In: DunnetteM. (ed.) Handbook of Industrial and Organisational Psychology. Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally, 1455–1525.
21.
HackmanJ (1998) Why teams don’t work. In: TindaleRHeathLEdwardsJ (eds) Theory and Research on Small Groups. New York: Plenum, 245–267.
22.
HackmanJWagemanR (2005) A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review30(2): 269–287.
23.
HarrisA (2008) Distributed School Leadership. London: Routledge.
24.
HarrisA (2009) Distributed School Leadership: Evidence, Issues and Future Directions. ACEL Monograph 44.
25.
HillerNDayDVanceR (2006) Collective enactment of leadership roles and team effectiveness: a field study. Leadership Quarterly17(4): 387–397.
26.
HoytCBlascovichJ (2003) Transformational and transactional leadership in virtual and physical environments. Small Group Research34(6): 678–715.
27.
JacobsTJacquesE (1987) Leadership in complex systems. In: ZeidnerJ (ed.) Human Productivity Enhancement. New York: Praeger, 7–65.
28.
Katz-NovanTFrezM (2005) When collective efficacy and self-efficacy affect team performance. Small Group Research36(4): 437–465.
29.
KlimoskiRKolesK (2001) The chief executive officer and top management team interface. In: ZaccaroSKlimoskiR (eds) The Nature of Organisational Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 219–269.
30.
KozlowskiSWatolaDNowakowskiJ (2009) Developing adaptive teams: a theory of dynamic team leadership. In: SalasEGoodwinGBurkeS (eds) Team Effectiveness in Complex Organisations: Cross Disciplinary Perspectives and Approaches. New York: Psychology Press, 113–155.
31.
LeithwoodKMascallBStraussT (2009) Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. London: Routledge.
32.
LordRHallR (2005) Identity, deep structure, and the development of leadership skill. Leadership Quarterly15(4): 591–615.
33.
LouisM (1980) Surprise and sense making- what newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organisational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly25(2): 226–251.
34.
MarksMMathieuJZaccaroS (2001) A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review26(3): 356–376.
35.
MathieuJHefnerTGoodwinG (2000) The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology85(6): 273–283.
36.
McCormickJBarnettKAlaviSB (2006) Board governance of independent schools: a framework for investigation. Journal of Educational Administration44(5): 429–445.
37.
McGrathJ (1962) Leadership training: Requirements for Leadership Training. WashingtonDC: Office of Career Development, US Civil Service Commission.
38.
MorganRHuntS (1994) The commitment trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing58(3): 20–38.
39.
MorgensonFLindoerferDLoringD (2010) Developing team leadership capability. In: Van VelsorEMcCauleyCRudermanM. (eds) Handbook of Leadership Development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 285–312.
40.
MumfordMFriedrichTCaughronJ (2007) Leader cognition in real-world settings: How do leaders think about crises?Leadership Quarterly18(6): 515–543.
41.
PearceC (2004) The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of Management Executive18(1): 47–57.
42.
PisapiaJReyes-GuerraDCoukos-SemmelE (2005) Developing a strategic mindset: constructing the measures. Leadership Review5(Spring): 41–68.
43.
PorterCHollenbeckJIlgenD (2003) Backup behaviours in teams: the role of personality and legitimacy of need. Journal of Applied Psychology88(3): 391–403.
44.
RandallK (2008) Adaptation in knowledge based teams: an examination of team composition, leader sense giving and cognitive, behavioural and motivational mechanisms. Doctoral thesis, Florida International University, Florida.
45.
RouseWMorrisN (1986) On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search of mental models. Psychological Bulletin100(3): 349–363.
46.
SalasESimsDBurkeS (2005) Is there a big five in team work?Small Group Research36(5): 555–559.
47.
SimonsTPetersonR (2000) Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology85(1): 102–111.
48.
SmithKSmithKOlianJ (1994) Top management team demography and process: the role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly39(3): 412–438.
49.
SomechA (2008) Managing conflict in school teams: the impact of task and goal interdependence on conflict management and team effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly44(3): 359–389.
50.
StoutRCannon-BowersJSalasE (1999) Planning shared mental models and coordinated performance: an empirical link is established. Human Factors41(1): 61–71.
51.
WagemanRNunesDBurrussJ (2008) Senior Leadership Teams: What it Takes to Make Them Great. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
52.
WeickK (1995) Sensemaking in Organisations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
53.
YinR (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
54.
ZaccaroSBlairVPetersonC (1995) Collective efficacy. In: MadduxJ (ed.) Self-Efficacy, Adaptation and Adjustment. New York: Plenum, 305–328.
55.
ZaccaroSHeinenBShufflerM (2009) Team leadership and team effectiveness. In: SalasEGoodwinGBurkeS (eds) Team Effectiveness in Complex Organisations: Cross Disciplinary Perspectives and Approaches. New York: Psychology Press, 83–111.
56.
ZaccaroSKlimoskiR (2002) The interface of leadership and team processes. Group and Organisational Management23(1): 4–13.
57.
ZaccaroSMarksMO’Connor-BoesA (1995) The Nature and Assessment of Leader Mental Models. Bethesda, MD: Management Research Institute.
58.
ZaccaroSRittmanAMarksM (2001) Team leadership. Leadership Quarterly12(4): 451–483.
