Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Information sharing is a critical aspect of effective team functioning. However, it can be challenging to discern whether the information communicated is fact, opinion, or someone’s best guess (FOG) due to the varied understandings, assumptions, and interests team members bring to any collaboration. In this article, we introduce a role-play exercise that helps participants better understand the complexities associated with information sharing in teams and how to sort through the FOG associated with information exchanges. Drawing upon research on motivated information processing, this exercise simulates the challenges of information sharing and assists teachers in demonstrating strategies to overcome them.

Keywords

teams/team dynamics experiential exercises information sharing hidden profile paradigm team effectiveness conflict status power leadership

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Argote

Ingram

(2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2893

Argote

McEvily

Reagans

(2003). Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49(4), 571–582. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.571.14424

Bendersky

Hays

N. A.

(2012). Status conflict in groups. Organization Science, 23(2), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0734

Grand

J. A.

Braun

M. T.

Kuljanin

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

Chao

G. T.

(2016). The dynamics of team cognition: A process-oriented theory of knowledge emergence in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(10), 1353–1385. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000136

Hackman

J. R.

(2011). Collaborative intelligence: Using teams to solve hard problems. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Hackman

J. R.

Katz

(2010). Group behavior and performance. In Fiske

S. T.

Gilbert

D. T.

Lindzey

(Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 1208–1251). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002032

Jehn

K. A.

(1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256–282. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393638

Lewis

Belliveau

Herndon

Keller

(2007). Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.01.005

Nembhard

I. M.

Edmondson

A. C.

(2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941–966. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.413

10.

Stasser

Titus

(1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1467–1478. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467

11.

Wittenbaum

G. M.

Hollingshead

A. B.

Botero

I. C.

(2004). From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Communication Monographs, 71(3), 286–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363452042000299894

12.

Woolley

A. W.

Aggarwal

Malone

T. W.

(2015). Collective intelligence and group performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(6), 420–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415599543

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB

0.04 MB