With the global increase in networked forms of organizations come new challenges for the conceptualization and practice of management and leadership. Universities have a networked organizational form being composed internally of multiple groups with both complementary and conflicting characteristics and expectations, and interfacing externally with a wide range of different stakeholders. Eight pro-vice chancellors (PVC) from a formal network of chartered UK universities were interviewed. The PVC role comprised strategic and operational activities associated with their functional role, and representational and decision-making duties associated with their membership of the senior management team. All of these activities required them to operate across multiple internal and external boundaries, and especially emphasize the information processing and representational functions characteristic of boundary spanners. It is argued therefore that management and leadership roles in universities may be more parsimoniously conceptualized as boundary spanning. The implications of this for recruitment to senior positions in universities are considered.
1994 Group (2007) An Overview of the Group. London: 1994 Group.
2.
Aitkin D. ( 1998) What do vice-chancellors do? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management20(2): 117-128.
3.
Aldrich H. and Herker D. ( 1977) Boundary spanning roles and organization structure . Academy of Management Review2: 217-230.
4.
Allix N. and Gronn P. ( 2005) Leadership as a manifestation of knowledge. Educational Management Administration & Leadership33(2): 181-196.
5.
Bargh C., Bocock J., Scott P. and Smith D. ( 2000) University Leadership: The Role of the Chief Executive . Buckingham: SRHE and Open University press.
6.
Barker R. ( 2001) The nature of leadership. Human Relations54(4): 469-494.
7.
Bate P. ( 2000) Changing the culture of a hospital: from hierarchy to networked community. Public Administration78(3): 485-512.
8.
Bazzoli GJ, Shortell SM, Dubbs N., Chan CL and Kralovec P. ( 1999) A taxonomy of health networks and systems: bringing order out of chaos. Health Services Research33(6): 1683-1717.
9.
Becher T. ( 1989) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
10.
Burt RS ( 2005) Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
11.
Bryman A. ( 2007) Effective Leadership in Higher Education: Summary of Findings . London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.
12.
CEC (2005) European Universities: Enhancing Europe’s Research Base. Luxembourg: European Commission.
13.
Cvcp (1985) Steering Committee for Efficiency Studies in Universities. London: Jarratt Report.
14.
Dacin T., Reid D. and Ring PS ( 2008) Alliances and joint ventures: the role of partner selection from an embeddedness perspective. In: Cropper S, Ebers M, Huxham C and Ring PS (eds) Inter-Organizational Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
Deem R., Fulton O., Hillyard S., Johnson RN, Reed M. and Watson S. ( 2001) New Managerialism and the Management of UK Universities. Final Project Report. Swindon: ESRC.
16.
Department for Education and Skills (2003) The Future of Higher Education. London: HMSO.
17.
Dollinger MJ ( 1984) Environmental boundary spanning and information processing effects on organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal27: 351-368.
18.
Gemmill G. and Oakley J. ( 1992) Leadership: an alienating social myth? Human Relations45(2): 113-129.
19.
Gronn P. ( 1996) From transactions to transformations: a new world order in the study of leadership? Educational Management & Administration24(1): 7-30.
20.
Gronn P. ( 2002) Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly12: 423-451.
21.
Hales CP ( 1986) What do managers do? A critical review of the evidence . Journal of Management Studies23(1): 88-115.
22.
Hales CP ( 1999) Why do managers do what they do? Reconciling evidence and theory in accounts of managerial work. British Journal of Management10: 335-350.
23.
Hansen MT ( 1999) The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly44: 82-111.
24.
Hefce (2007) HEFCE Strategic plan 2006-11. Bristol: HEFCE.
25.
Hosking DM ( 1986) Organizing. leadership and skilful process. Journal of Management Studies25(2): 147- 166.
26.
Jackson B. and Parry K. ( 2008) A Very Short, Fairly Interesting and Reasonably Cheap Book About Studying Leadership. London: SAGE.
27.
Krause K. ( 2009) Interpreting changing academic roles and identities in higher education. In: Tight M, Mok KH, Huisman J and Morphew CC (eds) The Routledge International Handbook of Higher Education. Oxford: Routledge.
28.
Lambert R. ( 2003) Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration. Final Report. Norwich: HMSO.
29.
Meindl JR ( 1995) The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: a social constructionist approach. Leadership Quarterly6(3): 329-341.
30.
Mintzberg H. ( 1980) The Nature of Managerial Work. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31.
National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education ( 1997) Higher Education in the Learning Society. London: HMSO.
32.
Osborn RN, Hunt JG and Jauch LR( 2002) Toward a contextual theory of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly13: 797-837.
33.
Portes A. ( 1998) Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology24: 1-24.
34.
Powell WW ( 1990) Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization . Research in Organizational Behaviour12: 295-336.
35.
Powell WW, Koput KW and Smith-Doerr L. ( 1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly41: 116-145.
36.
Provan KG and Milward HB ( 2001) Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review61(4): 414-423.
37.
Rcuk (2003) Synthesis of Strategies . Swindon: Research Councils UK .
38.
Sainsbury Review ( 2007) The Race to the Top: A review of Government’s Science and Innovation Policies. Norwich: HMSO.
39.
Simkins T. ( 2005) Leadership in education: what works or what makes sense ? Educational Management Administration & Leadership33(1): 9-26.
40.
Smith D. and Adams J. ( 2008) Academics or executives? Continuity and change in the roles of pro-vice-chancellors. Higher Education Quarterly62(4): 340-357.
41.
Smith D., Adams J. and Mount D. ( 2007) UK Universities and Executive Officers: The Changing Role of Pro-Vice-Chancellors. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.
42.
Smith D., Bargh C., Bocock J. and Scott P. ( 1999) New leaders at the top? The educational and career paths of UK university vice-chancellors (1960-1996). Higher Education Management11(2): 113-135.
43.
Spendlove M. ( 2007) Competencies for effective leadership in higher education . International Journal of Educational Management21(5): 407-417.
44.
Stewart R. ( 1989) Studies of managerial jobs and behaviour: the ways forward . Journal of Management Studies26(1): 1-10.
45.
Thompson JD ( 1967) Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw Hill.
46.
Tushman ML and Scanlan TJ ( 1981a) Boundary spanning individuals: their role in information transfer. Academy of Management Journal24: 289-305.
47.
Tushman ML and Scanlan TJ ( 1981b) Characteristics and external orientations of boundary spanning individuals. Academy of Management Journal24: 83-98.
48.
Whitley R. ( 1989) On the nature of managerial tasks and skills: their distinguishing characteristics and organization. Journal of Management Studies26(3): 209-224.
49.
Yukl G. ( 1999) An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly10(2): 285-306.
