To summarize the current research progress of machine learning and venous thromboembolism.
Methods
The literature on risk factors, diagnosis, prevention and prognosis of machine learning and venous thromboembolism in recent years was reviewed.
Results
Machine learning is the future of biomedical research, personalized medicine, and computer-aided diagnosis, and will significantly promote the development of biomedical research and healthcare. However, many medical professionals are not familiar with it. In this review, we will introduce several commonly used machine learning algorithms in medicine, discuss the application of machine learning in venous thromboembolism, and reveal the challenges and opportunities of machine learning in medicine.
Conclusion
The incidence of venous thromboembolism is high, the diagnostic measures are diverse, and it is necessary to classify and treat machine learning, and machine learning as a research tool, it is more necessary to strengthen the special research of venous thromboembolism and machine learning.
WeiZLiuXD.Chen dominant-current deep learning scheme for electrical impedance tomography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng2019; 66(9): 2546–2555.
2.
BiWLHosnyASchabathMB, et al.Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: clinical challenges and applications. CA Cancer J Clin2019; 69(2): 127–157.
3.
HosnyAAertsHJWL.Artificial intelligence for global health. Science2019; 366(6468): 955–956.
4.
SchwalbeBWahlN.Artificial intelligence and the future of global health. Lancet2020; 395(10236): 1579–1586.
5.
The Lancet Haematology. Thromboembolism: an under appreciated cause of death. Lancet Haematol2015; 2(10): e393.
6.
DentaliFDouketisJDGianniM, et al.Meta-analysis: anticoagulant prophylaxis to prevent symptomatic venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients. Ann Intern Med2007; 146(4): 278–288.
7.
KonstantinidesSVMeyerGBecattiniC, et al.2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European respiratory society (ERS): the task force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European society of cardiology (ESC). Eur Respir J2019; 54(3): 1901647.
8.
KhanZFAlotaibiSR. Applications of artificial intelligence and big data analytics in m-health: a healthcare system perspective. J Healthc Eng2020; 2020: 8894694.
9.
SchmidhuberJ.Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw2015; 61: 85–117.
10.
BiQGoodmanKEKaminskyJ, et al.What is machine learning? a primer for the epidemiologist. Am J Epidemiol2019; 188(12): 2222–2239.
11.
FeiYHuJGaoK, et al.Predicting risk for portal vein thrombosis in acute pancreatitis patients: a comparison of radical basis function artificial neural network and logistic regression models. J Crit Care2017; 39: 115–123.
12.
WillanJKatzHKeelingD.The use of artificial neural network analysis can improve the risk-stratification of patients presenting with suspected deep vein thrombosis. Br J Haematol2019; 185(2): 289–296.
13.
MartinsTDAnnichino-BizzacchiJMRomanoAVC, et al.Artificial neural networks for prediction of recurrent venous thromboembolism. Int J Med Inform2020; 141: 104221.
14.
HandelmanGSKokHKChandraRV, et al.eDoctor: machine learning and the future of medicine. J Intern Med2018; 284(6): 603–619.
15.
DeGregoryKWKuiperPDeSilvioT, et al.A review of machine learning in obesity. Obes Rev2018; 19(5): 668–685.
16.
AbbasiAKarasuY.LiC, et al.Machine learning to predict hemorrhage and thrombosis during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care2020; 24(1): 689.
17.
NguyenJMJezequelPGilloisP, et al.Random forest of perfect trees: concept, performance, applications, and perspectives. Bioinformatics2021; 37(15): 2165–2174.
18.
PatelLShuklaTHuangX, et al.Machine learning methods in drug discovery. machine learning methods in drug discovery. Molecules2020; 25(22): 5277.
19.
WangXYangYQLiuSH, et al.Comparing different venous thromboembolism risk assessment machine learning models in Chinese patients. J Eval Clin Pract2020; 26(1): 26–34.
20.
RuskinKJ. Deep vein thrombosis and venous thromboembolism in trauma. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol2018; 31(2): 215–218.
21.
BrownJMCampbellJPBeersA, et al.Automated diagnosis of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity using deep convolutional neural networks. JAMA Ophthalmol2018; 136: 803–810.
22.
CoynerASSwanRCampbellJP, et al.Automated fundus image quality assessment in retinopathy of prematurity using deep convolutional neural networks. Ophthalmol Retina2019; 3: 444–450.
23.
El-NaqaIYangYWernickMN, et al.A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications. IEEE Trans Med Imaging2002; 21(12): 1552–1563.
24.
LiuHYuanHWangY, et al.Prediction of venous thromboembolism with machine learning techniques in young-middle-aged inpatients. Sci Rep2021; 11(1): 12868.
25.
LuntMIntroduction to statistical modelling: linear regression. Rheumatology (Oxford)2015; 54(7): 1137–1140.
26.
UddinSKhanAHossainME, et al.Comparing different supervised machine learning algorithms for disease prediction. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak2019; 19(1): 281.
27.
WangPWangYYuanZ, et al.Venous thromboembolism risk assessment of surgical patients in Southwest China using real-world data: establishment and evaluation of an improved venous thromboembolism risk model. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak2022; 22(1): 59.
28.
ParkJIKimDLeeJA, et al.Personalized risk prediction for 30-day readmissions with venous thromboembolism using machine learning. J Nurs Scholarsh2021; 53(3): 278–287.
29.
ChoiRYCoynerASKalpathy-CramerJ, et al.Introduction to machine learning, neural networks, and deep learning. Transl Vis Sci Technol2020; 9(2): 14.
30.
AliMMPaulBKAhmedK, et al.Heart disease prediction using supervised machine learning algorithms: performance analysis and comparison. Comput Biol Med2021; 136: 104672.
31.
WuCLiaqatSHelvaciH, et al.Machine learning based autism spectrum disorder detection from videos. Healthcom2021; 2020: 10–1109.
32.
PearceJFerrierDS.Scotts an evaluation of the predictive performance of distributional models for flora and fauna in North-East New South Wales. J Environ Manage2001; 62(2): 171–184.
33.
FresardMEEricesRBravoML, et al.Multi-objective optimization for personalized prediction of venous thromboembolism in ovarian cancer patients. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform2020; 24(5): 1500–1508.
34.
HayatAKhanM.MemHyb: predicting membrane protein types by hybridizing SAAC and PSSM. J Theor Biol2012; 292: 93–102.
35.
LiDCLiuCShuWC. A learning method for the class imbalance problem with medical data sets. Comput Biol Med2010; 40(5): 509–518.
36.
XueBLiDLuC, et al.Use of machine learning to develop and evaluate models using preoperative and intraoperative data to identify risks of postoperative complications. JAMA Netw Open2021; 4(3): e212240.
