Extra-vascular findings in patients undergoing magnetic resonance angiography of the abdomen,pelvis and lower extremities: A retrospective study of 352 patients

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and clinical significance of extra-vascular findings in patients undergoing magnetic resonance angiography of the abdomen, pelvis and lower extremities.

Materials and methods

Three hundred fifty-two patients underwent abdominal, pelvic and lower extremity 1.5 T magnetic resonance angiography. Clinically relevant vascular and extra-vascular findings were identified. Relevant vascular findings were classified as stenosis, occlusion, aneurysm, sclerosis, dissection or vasculitis. Relevant extra-vascular findings were categorized as ‘safe’ (Group A), intermediate – requiring additional investigation – (Group B) and malignant/endangering – requiring change of therapy (Group C).

Results

A total of 2152 clinically relevant vascular findings was identified (6.1/patient). The most frequent vascular finding was femoral artery stenosis (10.6%). Four hundred fifty-one extra-vascular findings were observed (1.3/patient) and classified into Group A (78%), Group B (19.5%) and Group C findings (2.4%). The most frequent malignant findings were lung cancer, lymphoma, osteosarcoma, hepatocellular carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma (7/352 patients).

Conclusions

Extravascular findings are frequently encountered in magnetic resonance angiography performed for vascular indications. Clinically relevant findings are seen in a substantial part of patients and should prompt further diagnostic work-up.

Keywords

Magnetic resonance angiography MRA vascular findings extra-vascular findings angiography

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ruehm

Hany

Pfammatter

et al.

Pelvic and lower extremity arterial imaging: diagnostic performance of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174: 1127–1135.

Vavrik

Rohrmoser

Madani

et al.

Comparison of MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography as a basis for planning treatment of lower limb occlusive disease. J Endovasc Ther 2004; 11: 294–301.

Lapeyre

Kobeiter

Desgranges

et al.

Assessment of critical limb ischemia in patients with diabetes: comparison of MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185: 1641–1650.

Drescher

Haller

Köster

et al.

Standardprotocol moving-table magnetic resonance angiography for planning of interventional procedures in patients with peripheral vascular occlusive disease. Clin Imaging 2006; 30: 382–387.

Koelemay

Lijmer

Stoker

et al.

Magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2001; 285: 1338–1345.

Shammas

. Epidemiology, classification and modifiable risk factors of peripheral arterial disease. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2007; 3: 229–234.

Tatli

Lipton

Davison

et al.

From the RSNA refresher courses MR imaging of aortic and peripheral vascular disease. RadioGraphics 2003; 23: 59–78.

Lumbreras

Donat

Hernández-Aguado

. Incidental findings in imaging diagnostic tests: a systematic review. Br J Radiol 2010; 83: 276–289.

Sohns

Staab

Menke

et al.

Vascular and extravascular findings on magnetic resonance angiography of the thoracic aorta and the origin of the great vessels. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014; 40: 988–995.

10.

Rutherford

Baker

Ernst

et al.

Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg 1997; 26: 517–538.

11.

Hermanns PM, Filler G and Roscher B (Hrsg.) GOÄ 2012. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2012.

12.

Vogt

Herborn

Parsons

et al.

Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries with the blood pool agent Vasovist: initial results in comparison to intra-arterial DSA. Rofo 2007; 179: 412–420.

13.

Ersoy

Rybicki

. MR angiography of the lower extremities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190: 1675–1684.

14.

Hartung

Grist

François

. Magnetic resonance angiography: current status and future directions. Source Department of Radiology. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011; 13: 19–19.

15.

Goyen

Ruehm

Debatin

. MR angiography for assessment of peripheral vascular disease. Radiol Clin North Am 2002; 40: 835–846.

16.

Vosshenrich

Fischer

. Contrast enhanced MR angiography of abdominal vessels: Is there still a role of angiography. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 218–230.

17.

Leiner

de Haan

et al.

Peripheral MR angiography. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 1765–1774.

18.

Schmitt

Coblenz

Cherevatyy

et al.

Comprehensive MR angiography of the lower limbs: a hybrid dual-bolus approach including the pedal arteries. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 2513–2524.

19.

Gerretsen

le Maire

Miller

et al.

Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for MR angiography of peripheral arteries. Radiology 2010; 255: 988–1000.

20.

Hunold

Schmermund

Seibel

et al.

Prevalence and clinical significance of accidental findings in electron-beam tomographic scans for coronary artery calcification. Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 1748–1758.

21.

Sohns

Sossalla

Vollmann

. Extra cardiac findings by 64-multidetector computed tomography in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation prior to pulmonal vein isolation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 27: 127–134.

22.

Glockner

. Incidental findings on renal MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189: 693–700.

23.

Krishnam

Tomasian

Malik

et al.

Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced SSFP MR angiography compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR angiography for the assessment of thoracic aortic diseases. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 1311–1320.

24.

Hadizadeh

Kukuk

Fahlenkamp

et al.

Simultaneous MR arteriography and venography with blood pool contrast agent detects deep venous thrombosis in suspected arterial disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198: 1188–1195.

25.

Gebker

Gomaa

Schnackenburgg

et al.

Comparison of different MRI techniques for the assessment of thoracic aortic pathology: 3D contrast enhanced MR angiography, turbo spinecho and balanced steady state free precession. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2007; 23: 747–756.

26.

Groves

Bireley

Dill

et al.

Quantitative analysis of ECG-gated high-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the thoracic aorta. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 522–528.

27.

Prince

Narasimham

Jacoby

et al.

Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the thoracic aorta. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 1387–1397.

28.

Krinsky

Reuss

Lee

et al.

Thoracic aorta: comparison of single-dose breath-hold and doubledose non-breath-hold gadoliniumenhanced three-dimensional MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 145–150.

29.

Horton

Post

Blumenthal

et al.

Prevalence of significant noncardiac findings on electron-beam computed tomography coronary artery calcium screening examinations. Circulation 2002; 106: 532–534.

30.

MacMahon

Austin

Gamsu

et al.

Guidelines for management for small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2005; 237: 395–400.

31.

Onuma

Tanabe

Nakazawa

et al.

Noncardiac findings in cardiac imaging with multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 402–406.

32.

Haller

Kaiser

Buser

et al.

Coronary artery imaging with contrast-enhanced MDCT: extracardiac findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 105–110.

33.

Schietlinger

Bozlar

Hagspiel

et al.

The prevalence of extracardiac findings by multidetector computed tomography before atrial fibrillation ablation. Am Heart J 2008; 155: 254–259.

34.

Gufler

Schulze

Wagner

. Incidental findings in computed tomographic angiography for planning percutaneous aortic valve replacement: advanced age, increased cancer prevalence? Acta Radiol 2014; 55: 420–426.

35.

Booth

Waldman

Wardlaw

et al.

Management of incidental findings during imaging research in “healthy” volunteers: current UK practice. Br J Radiol 2012; 85: 11–21.

36.

Swensen

Jett

Hartman

et al.

Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience. Radiology 2003; 226: 756–761.

37.

Henschke

McCauley

Yankelevitz

et al.

Early lung cancer action project: a summary of the findings on baseline screening. Oncologist 2001; 6: 147–152.

38.

Budoff

Fischer

Gopal

. Incidental findings with cardiac CT evaluation: should we read beyond the heart? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 68: 965–973.

39.

Meaney

Prince

Nostrant

et al.

Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of visceral arteries in patients with suspected chronic mesenteric ischemia. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7: 171–176.

40.

Earls

. The pros and cons of searching for extracardiac findings at cardiac CT: studies should be reconstructed in the maximum field of view and adequately reviewed to detect pathologic findings. Radiology 2011; 261: 342–346.

41.

Uecker

Zhang

Voit

et al.

Real-time MRI at a resolution of 20 ms. NMR Biomed 2010; 23: 986–994.

42.

Joseph

Merboldt

Voit

et al.

Real-time phase-contrast MRI of cardiovascular blood flow using undersampled radial fast low-angle shot and nonlinear inverse reconstruction. NMR Biomed 2012; 25: 917–924.

43.

Zhang

Uecker

Voit

et al.

Real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance at high temporal resolution: radial FLASH with nonlinear inverse reconstruction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2010; 12: 39–39.